perfect timing for btc to shit the bed
just opened a massive short
>projectalways a qualifier with linkcucks
>literally who country
>>59251778Chainlink could literally announce it will be the antichrists choice to connect everything to the mark of the beast and it would be down 5%Sergey really fucked linkies.
>>59251809>8th largest economy in the world
>>59251778Piece of shit!
>Lulala Land
I swear if linkies starting pumping and ruin this BTC run to $100k I will lose it
>>59251815Lol sad but true
>>59251826cala a boca macaco
Who's next to announce? Hong Kong? Who else is in this CDBC sandbox? Thailand?
Everyone itt owns link
>>59252678You own link
>>59251778>project>pilot>demoLolLmaoPretty safe to say this garbage haszno revenue potential after nearly 10 years.
>>59253010Tell us which coin has revenue potential and I’ll let you fuck my mom
ok, price?>muh suppression!
>>59253108Ethereums revenue MOGS Chainlinks $1000 daily CCIP fees
>>59251815Based. Linkmarines are Christian.
>>59254354>Ethereum >revenuePlebbitors don't understand the significance of things like revenue
>>59254438Ethereum 30d revenue: $129.99mChainlink 30d revenue: $40.43kMogged kid. Get fucked.
>>59252568zanzabar according to mustafa but dont tell anyone
>>59254476Where are you getting this from? I am seeing $500M+ 30 day rev for Chainlink. Is ETH really only $130M? That doesn't sound right.
>>59252568.
>>59254476What do you think will happen to that Chainlink revenue once Swift, Brazil, ... go live?
>>59254556>$500M+ 30 day rev for ChainlinkSource?
>>59255047it's not that high but remembers that the chainlink team are sociopaths that can long outlast this scam marketthey get paid millions for every mainnet integrationthen you have all their bank work which will be bringing them in a lot of moneyon-chain, they are known for being ruthless with fee extraction for their price feeds but they obscure all thisthere is no benefit for them to have a higher priceemployees get paid partially in link, they don't want it mooning and employees retiringthey don't want attention, they don't want their bank partners seeing the token making headlinesthey make enough money from integrations both defi and insitutionaland lastly, and certainly not least, they have a massive warchest of link to dump on retail continuously, 400m LINK to go.not quite sure how that's legal but guess they'll get facts on the ground first by making themselves indispensable and then deal with any issues down the roadthis all leads to a suppressed price and bad price actionthe biggest rule is crypto isprice goes up = project is goodprice goes down or sideways = project is badchainlink is the biggest and most important project but you will suffer for years more. they are also helped along by highly traumatized bagholders who fud non-stop. these useful idiots are the icing on top and help suppress any vestige of retail positivity that remains or may emerge
>>59255348Brother, Chainlink knows very well that the news they're putting out with Swift, Brazil, DTCC, ... is the absolute biggest news in the history of crypto.They fully expect this news to pump Link sky high, and they're not holding back at all.
>>59255348>they get paid millions for every mainnet integration >then you have all their bank work which will be bringing them in a lot of money >on-chain, they are known for being ruthless with fee extraction for their price feeds but they obscure all this So why isn't this value going to the token? What the fuck is this obscure shit I'm starting to get what the fudders are saying. Looks like the company is making tons of money and hiding it all from the network.
>>59251778all I see is two banks trying to interact and a middleman getting in the way.
>>59255398Because the "millions" they're getting paid is not paid in Link nor is it being converted to Link. This is expected to change when the payment abstraction system is deployed likely next quarter.
