Is proper trading on this platform possible or do the high fees make it unviable outside of being lucky and betting on a moonshot early?
>>59255647there are no high fees retard
>>592557900.5% + networking fee is high, you retarded newfag.
>>59255647>high feeslmao
I know stories like le trader who made 1M with $20 it's just insidoorsbut would it be possible to pull a 1000x throwing $20 at 5 or 10 shitters every week on there or by making your own shitters?T. Retardexplain please
>>59255810You have to remember that most of the poor newniggers posting only think about the absolute and not the relative cost since they don't have a large enough positions where >0.1% fees matter
>>59256164It's a crapshoot. The single best trade on the platform ever was a 16000x, if you had bought the highest market cap coin on launch and sold the peak. Most coins seem to do 2x-7x before they rug and never recover. Holder information is practically worthless, because despite the biggest holders being ~2% at the time I've seen 99% rugs occur, so either people are botting or collaborating to orchestrate rugs. Creating the coin gives you no real advantages because you can only start buying when it goes live and you have to front the minting fee. I think the real way to gamble on this shit is to open small positions on lots of coins and aggressively take profit to break even asap and then just to let it sit in hopes of it going viral on the platform. But like I said, if you're planning to make predictable gains 0.5% + the transaction fee are an issue. Slippage is also obviously insane, so even if you have the perfect position it's not a guarantee that you can properly close it.
>>59256337>Most coins seem to do 2x-7x before they rug and never recover. Holder information is practically worthless,All i need to know.basically it should be called "jeet.fun".I pray for ETH/alt season now because I hate so-ylana but I also don't want zoomers to make it before me
