The time has come
What does Stellar have for us?
The time is now.
Time for all the boomers to fomo in. Time for us to finally decouple from Bitcoin once and for all
>>59563769Ripple:>has to pay to attend presidential dinner and have a photo opChainlink:>Trump's crypto project adopts Chainlink and buys Link tokens of its own accord
>chainlink... I have some bad news...>...>You're adopted
>>59563769>Green candles in the background Stinky pamp coming sars. I can feed my children for a week
>>59564065Military grade copium
>>59564127But that's quite literally what happened.
>>59564131Bagholding link really did a number on you guys.
>>59564353This photo was literally taken at a paid event, anon.
The time came, and I just bought a bongo to make my bongo cat have a little pump
>>59564382So what is it, did they pay or was he made from wax?
>>59564382>Thedailybeast>7min ago>Not shown on x>Doesn't understand the concept of PACs>Doesn't understand the concept of time managementHello, Canadian Liberal!
>>59564065this unironically
>>59564426or you can google it
>>59564448The fact that you link baggies try to even make this comparison >>59564065 is a new low. Probably the tax cuts that will send my bags to double digits were discussed. KEK FUDDIES clap with me X R P RENT FREE
>>59564382>typicallyso we don't know>>59564394both, they didn't dump on baggies enough to afford a photo op with the "real" one
>>59564486Ripple:>no adoption>no banks coming>have to pay to get Trump's attentionChainlink:>half a decade of massive adoption>Swift coming this year (not to mention DTCC, Brazil, etc.)>Trump's crypto project adopts Chainlink and buys the tokenThe day of reckoning is coming, and then everyone will say how obvious it was.
>>59564523good thing I'm not a tribalist retard and hold both
>>59564532Only human here. Good work.
>>59564532>>59564523Same, imagine making your portfolio your personality and having your mind broken in the process where you have resort into fudposting a bunch of schizophrenics every single day of the week.
>>59564532Sane anon, would you recommend dipping into LINK? I want to do this too but am kind of poor and XRP is so cheap compared to LINK, do you think there is much play left in LINK buying in now? I don't care about whatever rivalries wise just trying to make the best choices for my wallet. I also have some other stuff like XLM too which is even cheaper but having something in each tier sounds nice.
>>59564556idk honestly I don't like link as much after reading the whitepaper 2.0 and I also don't trust ethereumthat being said I can easily see link going to $200-500 even if it ends up failing ultimatelyif you want to dip in go for it, I guess it depends on how diversified you are
>>59564576>Ripple has no adoption and no banks coming>"I sleep">Chainlink significantly ramps up adoption with whitepaper 2.0>"THIS IS BAD GUYS"You are God's most retarded schizoid
>>59564618>He STILL thinks fundamental mumbo jumbo and aspietalk matter over price action. Inb4 ''silent google tactics''
>>59564556people are saying marketcap doesn't matter but link def has more upwards potentialThere is one strong use case that no one can deny and it's oracle services, price feeds are basically what defi is built on and what everyone needs, so if you believe defi is gonna be bigger in the future, then yes, link is a good optionThere will come a point where any new dev will build on chain ABC and it natively as a standard will just default to chainlink price feeds since thats what everyone already uses
>>59564631I didn't bring up whitepaper 2.0 retard
>>595637695 million dollar dinner
>>59564636 >There will come a point where any new dev will build on chain ABC and it natively as a standard will just default to chainlink price feeds since thats what everyone already usesWhat I mean with that: Imagine you develop an app on python, java, rust etc. and you want to have some kind of network capability. It doesn't matter which coding language you choose, there is 99.9% chance the network protocol will use TCP/UDP and you don't conciously choose that.Pricefeeds might only be one thing, but if you look at the documentation and their expansion of services, chainlink could be substancial in the future.
>>59564058>Time for us to finally decouple from BitcoinThis and this...>I'll repeat: XRP is gonna shove BTC's shit back in.
>>59564641Good business decision if it works out for them.
>>59564638But you quote him bringing it up you lying little fudfreak.
>>59564690Are you drunk or something?
>>59564687Yeah >if
>>59564775That's how political donations normally work. Donate money and get something in return.
>>59564687if what works out? They need chainlink to connect to swift. Theyre fucked. Theres no more paths for them other than to adopt CCIP and bend over.
>>59564556>XRP is so cheap compared to LINKXRP is 10x more expensive than Chainlink. Compare market cap, not price.
>>59564803It’s telling for ripple that in order to stay relevant they need to pay someone to help them instead of developing a good product
>>59564532Based
Now that we own your offices we demand you to share your boomer retail magic and pump our bags, or else
>>59564532That’s called the halfwit tribe
>>59564814The financial system is changing, XRP will be part of the new system in some way, so will link and many others. Swift won't be as big as what it is now when the new system comes out. >>59564850So does apply to oil, guns and big pharma as well or just to ripple?
>>59564828Last time link was at this mcap it was around its ATH of 40 dollarinos
>>59564863What does ripple have to offer that is similar to oil, guns and medicine? As far as I know these are essential life maintaining commodities
>>59564863Also>comparing few million donations to billions worth of lobbyist moneyLmao
>>59564871XRP FDV is 11x higher than Chainlink's FDV
>>59564874Its sole purpose is to make link maxies shit and piss themselves by just existing.
>>59564877So as I said if it works out for them it's good business, spend a shit load less than the lobbyists to get a non essential company into the new system.
>>59564636>so if you believe defi is gonna be bigger in the future, then yes, link is a good optionDid we teleport back to 2021? DeFi is the probably the least important part of Chainlink's future
>>59564065
>>59565029>Swift won't be as big as what it is now when the new system comes out.I'm sure that "new system" will happen any day now....In reality the "new system" is literally just going to be SWIFT but brought into the 21st century by Chainlink
>>59565051Meant for >>59564863
>>59564066kek
>>59564863>The financial system is changing, XRP will be part of the new system in some way>Even though Ripple failed at every aspect to on board banks, XRP still has to be a part of it some how....b-b-because of chainlink!!This is their new narrative.
>>59565058Yeah im sure the whole world will be happy to use Swift. There will be many options, almost like a level playing field. >>59565136>Their newNo I have had this opinion for a while.
>>59564656Thank you! It sounds like if it is adopted in that way it would be in a good spot, and probably gives people a reason to hold as well so it doesn't drop too much. Thanks for your response, I will pick some up just in case.
>>59565154Well then youre fucking stupid. No one builds on XRPL, its a dead chain, proven with on chain metrics.Dont forget to buy more XRP, brad needs to pay for chainlink services now faggot.
>>59565154>Yeah im sure the whole world will be happy to use SwiftAlmost half the banks in the world are using SWIFT, and they seem pretty happy at the moment. Once Chainlink is integrated and they can access digital assets natively they will be even happier.
>>59565154>Yeah im sure the whole world will be happy to use Swift.You don't seem to understand what Swift is.It's literally most of the world's banks coming together to agree on how to talk to each other.
>>59565230>>59565235I know what Swift is, I also know what the brics nations are. Are they happy using Swift?
>>59565136Their delusion is comical. They are now claiming that because Ripple is now "partnered" with Chainlink, it must mean Ripple is involved in Chainlink's work with SWIFT
>>59565253>BrazilDid you see the central bank of Brazil is using Chainlink CCIP in their CBDC trials?https://thefintechtimes.com/brazil-central-bank-microsoft-chainlink-and-7comm-pilot-cbdc-trade-finance-solution/
>>59565253>Swift fudfucking kek
>>59565283Yeah I did, it's hard to miss link news really.
>>59565292Yeah, let's be honest here, there's more chance avoiding porn in /gif/ than there is of missing ShitLink news in /biz/
>>59565283Link news is the same as something remotely positive with XRP, the catalog gets spammed for days.
>>59565292>>59565308>>59565311Link news:>Brazilian central bank>Swift going live>DTCC>Trump adopting and buying>...Ripple news:>Palau >a stablecoin>err...Absolute galaxies apart.
>>59565327>Ripple news:>Palau >a stablecoin>err...Don't forget Brad Garlinghouse getting a tattoo
>>59565344epic Macafee move
>>59565283what is microsoft doing in this scenario? are they just the cloud provider for that specific bank or is there something more that they do here
>>59565445>Microsoft, an active early participant in DREX, is providing cloud services for the project
>>59565267Yikes. At least theyre acknowledging that Chainlink works with swift
>link this, link that>xrp bad, xrp irrelevantI hope that all Chainlink advocates have an anti-suicide XRP bag of at least 1000 coins, because the regrets and reality check will be beyond recovery if they don't.
>>59565621Why would chainlink let ripple make more money when they hold the key to the swift network?
>>59565621Do you have a just in case link bag?
>>59565745Its bigger than his XRP one.
>>59564556>I want to do this too but am kind of poor and XRP is so cheap compared to LINKFUCKING RETARDPic rel is what Chainlink would be valued at the SAME MARKETCAP AS XRP
>>59564862I'm up at least 4-5x on every bagnot complaining>>59564618did you... read... the copepaper 2.0? It didn't sound like>significantly ramps up adoptionit sounded like carrot on a stick copestill holding though but I will for sure unload 25-50% somewhere in triple digits>>59565046I guess you can add (wax?) trump to the picture now kek
>>59566192>Chainlink is carrot on stick copeYou definitely don't hold any crypto other than Link.
wagmi
>>59564353Loading up EOS has been juicy, 30% APY feels so sweet
>>59564523I'm holding XRP LTC EOS, Dino coins is giving me opium
>>59566192ShitLink isn't up 4-5x in this cycle, jeet.
Comfy :)
>>59563769This man is really good for nothing ever happens.
>>59566306lol link is my second smallest bag behind mETH
>>59566674kek who says I bought it this cycle? my dca is like $3 from idk 5 years agoyall are some angry bots
>>59563769Did Brad really paid Trump for a photo op wtf
>>59568160Brad donated 5 million xrp to trump recently.Bullish.
>>59563774>IOTAReally?
>>59568212>giving away tokens for free is bullish
>>59563769Name my band thread?
>>59566674True, but UAFC has that 100x potential unlike LINK. MemeAI + cult vibes = next level gains.
>>59563769>ships>headwinds to tailwinds>green candles>Brad and Trump wearing coordinated patriotic tiesUnfathomably bullish for XRP.
>>59567569Ripple still has no adoption after 12 years.ADA still has no working smart contracts (or adoption) after 10 years.ETH still has no sharding after 10 years (and no EEA follow-up after 8 years)etc. etc. etc.There's your carrots and sticks.
>>59569187>Ripple still has no adoption after 12 yearsSo? believing the past determines the future is a mid-wit fallacy called "normalcy bias". You're in for a rude awakening, stinkie.
>>59569206>JUST WAIT UNTIL [future event]That's how carrots and sticks work, yes.Thanks for proving my point.
>>59569215>carrots and stickschildishly reductive. Implementing a new financial system was never going to be a weekend project.
>>59569263>childishly reductivekek yeah, tell it to this faggot who brought it up >>59566192
>>59568160That's a wax sculpture of Trump
