Nano thread?Nano thread.
Why NANO and not IOTA? Isn't IOTA an ISO20022 compliant coin?
>>59576372Whos gonna post the stfucopypasta before jannies delete?
>>59576480DESU I'm not sure what's up with IOTA these days. They always seem to have some drama. I think nano is superior in the sense that it's simple, it does payments, that's it. If you can't explain an investment then you shouldn't be invested (I believe that's a Warren Buffet quote)
>>59576497I think we have caught the jannies in a bit of a bind here. If they delete the thread again (and leave the spammer untouched) they'll have overplayed their hand. I'm not sure why exactly they have such a hater boner for nano but people are starting to catch on. Hopefully that means we get to keep our meagre thread up.
You Must find the portalNo, it is not nano, kekthe clues are out there for you to findHurry up there is not much time left
>>59576522>they'll have overplayed their handtop kek, you are so ignorant>>59576522>I'm not sure why exactly they have such a hater boner for nanodon't you understand that Jannies are a business and all threads that remain are:1) common topics (btc, eth, stocks, etc)2) WHAT YOU PAID THEM FOR3) shitposts
>>59576602Well nano is the lowest latency, lowest fee coin out there. Seems like a safe bet.>>59576611Wait, the jannies get PAID?!
>>59576672as far as dead projects go, nano is solidhowever it is not the portal.
>>59576672Btw <3s latency is all the same<0.001$ fee is all the sameNow where is the security, ledger integrity, quantum resistance, ledger state proofs? Where are the DEXs, stablecoins, tokens? Where are the contracts David?
>>59576694It's 100% the portal.>>59576699That's what I thought at first, but from a gaming perspective, would you rather play on LAN or with 3-5 ping? Why leave any room for improvement?
>>59576372I sold at $32 and haven't checked the price since. Should I check the price now?
>>59576785You should check the btc/xno pairing and salivate.
>>59576480Chainlink makes every coin ISO20022
>>59576742>perspective, would you rather play on LAN or with 3-5 ping? Why leave any room for improvement?It depends, is the connection stable? How about bandwidth? Does the connections crashes if the traffic increases suddenly? Does it resist attacks?Meanwhile, 1ms vs 10ms is not perceptible. However, the crash is very perceptible lmao
>>59576846If you are a high volume trader (or a bot) then 10ms is definitely noticeable. As for crashes, I agree but nano actually has anti spam prevention measures now, whereas I don't think any other chain has due to fees, so they've yet to overcome that hurdle. A wealthy bad actor could just bring bitcoin to its knees via spam
>>59576810Holy fuck I literally sold the top. I made $10k only though. I guess better than bag holding to where it is now, I think I had got in at like $3 or $4.
>>59576857No it's not noticeable, get real. For high freq trading, you use a 5 meter cable in a specific data center or you don't. 100ms is when things starts to feel.The spam thing: well you are wrong Bitcoin can never be halted because it's always at max tps. People tries several times. Also that's far from the only real issues with Nano. The real problem is the network really cant scale for long, nodes topology is mid tier. The entire thing is an experiment. 5 out of 10. You feel me?Not that this fixed supply "fast with no fees" unoriginal token cant pump. Expect violent pumps and dumps. But stop considering the tech as serious
>>59576694Dead project? It has outperformed ETH on the 1y.
>>59576934For multiplayer gaming I assure you it is at the top level. I assume the same would be true for traders.>bitcoin can never be spammed because it's always slowTrue>The real problem is the network really cant scale for long, nodes topology is mid tierIt scales with hardware, no?
>>59576742it's not.The answer is obvious, when you find itlook for the portaltime is running out
>>59576992>The answer is obvious, when you find itYeah it is... the fastest coin with the best distribution and the lowest fees. People are going to be smacking themselves for missing this
>>59576962yes, good project, very much alive, saar
It is the beginning of eternity the end of time and spacethe beginning of the end and the end of every space.Find the portal, saars, or you will be left out of the race
I have four legs to walk around, My milk is white and never brown.I chew my cud and moo all day, Grazing in the fields where I lay. Saar, What am I? Answer: A big tiddy goth
>>59576965>It scales with hardware, no?Yes. Hardware paid by no one, only volunteers. Understand now, or still no?
>>59576372i got scammed by an italian scammer during the raiblocks era
>>59577004You are insane to think it's the best distribution. Also FEES ARE IRRELEVANT KEK. If not BTC and ETH would not be the most used chains ever
>>59577186So... same as XRP, XLM, etc?>>59577194did you pursue the legal action? Some people got money back>>59577206>You are insane to think it's the best distributionName a better method of distribution... there aren't any
>>59577219Honestly good point on XLM XRP. I have no response to this. I also think they are dogshit technologies. It's all about which cartel backs you up.Seems like XNO got none.
>>59577320All it takes is one tweet...
>>59577333Checked and trips of truth. Now you are real. Tech sucks ASS (litecoin/Stellar tier). Maybe a pump and dump. Good luck, this is just gambling
Interesting, no "good grief" spammer tonight. The tides are changing.
>>59577333>one tweet"saar, xno berry gud, we rebwand, no redeem, yes? saar? we partner with amazon gift card, you buy? bloody benchod saar? do the needful saar"
also partner with steam gift car and apple gift car
>>59577713Elon will be doing the needful my dearhttps://x.com/DocumentingNano/status/1418372394050260995
Bumparino
Hmm, I just noticed that a lot of BG123's riddles involve a brick wall and a sun. That got me thinking about nano's old name, "raiblocks". Turns out, it's actually pronounced "ray-blocks". What's also quite interesting is if you say "rayb" backwards, it kinda sounds like "bear". Might be worth looking into.
>>59576372The deranged Nano spammers are plaguing /biz/ again, pic related.
>>59576372Nano is a scam.>Team NANO - Sex, Fraud, Corruption and Satanistshttps://warosu.org/biz/thread/16596049Here are some links:>Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrailhttp://archive.is/GGWIG>Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrailhttp://archive.is/zAtyl>Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nanohttp://archive.is/diUnZ>Worst anti-White, anti-European globohomos in cryptohttps://warosu.org/biz/thread/S24148427Pic. Desperate Nano scammer boiz keep whining that pic is not Bikini Blogger George Coxon, COO of Nano, later Director of now bankrupt Nano Foundation, with zero experience, connections, or tech knowledge, is a rabid hard left open borders feminist.It is. Pic is directly from her instagram account that got shut down for months. Scrubbed and re-emerged. Every one of her followers from that time can confirm that the pic was on her instagram. Photo is taken by London based photographer Sarah Bahbah using London based George Coxon as her model. George later posted the photo on her instagram.https://archive.vn/SpKB5
>>59576372Nano is not free, can't scale, and is wide open to spam attacks. Nano's claim in their whitepaper about unlimited scaling is absolutely rubbish. It's just as crazy as me stating that I will go the moon using my bicycle, proudly claiming that my speed is unlimited, only restricted by my muscle strength and I am getting stronger and stronger for each day, and very soon I will be strong enough to get such a high speed that I will jump to the moon. Ridiculous. Do they have any written plan for 100 000 TPS? Any cost analysis? ETH and other competitors will roll out 100K to 1 million TPS in a matter of months/year.Nano has done zero cost analysis for 100 000 TPS bandwidth, CPU, and IO. Random volunteers are supposed to take costs involving millions of USD each year, working on the network 24/ with no downtime, holidays, Christmas etc. Nano has done nothing to provide how it is feasible for Nano to reach 100 000 TPS within the next years. However, imagining it's possible, Nanoids admits that Amazon and large operators like them will take all the costs and burdens of operating the system. That's a clear and open single point of failure (SPOF) and is the very reason why people choose crypto currencies over banks and centralized payment systems. That Nano is not able to identify a clear and basic SPOF in their system is worrisome on multiple levels.Pic Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018 by the Nano Devs, Italian scammers, and the market, buying some more, while screaming:"2 da moooOooooooOooon!!!"
>>59576372Bitgrail trustees have 3 million Nano ready to be dumped on the market, that's why the Nano scammers, pic, are so desperate to provide exit liquidity, before the Nano price will totally crash and dumped into oblivion. They had to scam threads yesterday simultainously, many before that and two today. They never respond to anything or even try to defend their bankrupt scammer team or crashed tech. All they do is spam and scam. Nano is probably the most pathetic project in crypto, and one of the most unethical and involved in multiple lawsuits from former investors.
>>59579663Worst globohomo project in crypto
>>59579655>>59579659>>59579661>>59579663>>59579667Hi! We had an arrangement where we wouldn't post in XSG if we were allowed to have our thread uninterrupted. I'm not sure why you feel the need to attack our thread - people have different opinions and that's OK!
>>59579661> Nano falsely claim theoretical unlimited scalability, only constrained by hardware and bandwidth limitationit's true that it's the most ridiculous claim ever. If Nano claim this, why isn't every other chain claiming this? This should be a red flag for anyone with >90IQ desu
>>59579669I have nothing to do with XSG, and why would Nano redditors spam XSG threads? Go back, faggots.
>>59579671Everyone in crypto space knew it, except for the plebbit midwits of course. Even Vitalik tweeted about it.
>>59579684>hurr durr what about 10kWhat a midwit lmaooo
>>59576672>Well nano is the lowest latencyYeah, with a handful of nodes, controlled by Colin through a backdoor or exploit, and no load on the network.
>>59577004>the best distributionMore crazy lies from the spamming Nano scammers. Nano has some of the worst distribution in crypto. For many, Nano Foundation dumping Nano worth 300 000 USD on Nano bagholders each month sounds insane. Well, not so much when Colin is using funds from Nano Foundation to fight private messy divorce and slander accusations in court.https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752.1.0.pdfAfter dumping like a madman, Colin claims to have only 5-6 million Nano left.Colin is angry that confidential information was leaked from this lawsuit and confidential settlement agreement:https://decrypt.co/6396/nano-cryptocurrency-seeks-dismissal-170-million-rescue-fork-lawsuitFrom Nano Foundations/Colins lawsuit:>They tell their customers 'if you really believe in Nano ..... go to this small exchange in Italy that we don't know anybody and we have nothing to do but we completely vouch for him and he's running a legitimate exchange', we're gonna [sic] give him the Nano, he's gonna [sic] give us money every time he sells a Nano, he's gonna [sic] take half and we're gonna take half, we're gonna [sic] get rich and then one day there's gonna [sic] be an exit scam and then you're gonna [sic] be out $150 million."> Mr. LeMahieu and the other Nano developers face the prospect of a jail sentence in a current Federal action
>>59577004>>59579719George lied in autumn 2020 that it would be a hell of a Christmas for Nano and that they would reach "industrial scale" with their new TPS, aaaaand of course she lied as Nano has always done. Later they lied about Nano funding and did not tell the community that they had been bankrupt for months. Had huge loans, so people looking into their Nano Foundation wallets did not know they were bankrupt despite having assets there.Colin also lied for years about auditing the initial distribution of Nano, until he finally called it off for good, after having been lying for years to the Nano community that Nano had the best and fairest distribution in crypto. In court documents, he admitted to have been dumping tens of millions of Nano for years, but now, at that time, claimed to only have 5-6 million Nano left. Nobody believed him, as he had all the time operated with a network of hidden wallets, so nobody could ever really know how much Nano he had. Something he always hid from the community.
>>59579676OK. So what coin(s) do you hold?
>>59579752just give up, time to move on, nothing forces to you to think about, and hope for Nano. This is a failed project that's going nowhere, v22 .. v27 v30 even at v120 it won't change the fact that the fundamentals (technically & token distribution wise) sucks ass beyond belief
find the portal, saarsthis is now a BitBean threadBitBean is feeless, BitBean is fearlessBitBean is scaleable, Bitbean has been adopted by reputable mexican banksBitbean is fastest
Based, I agree BitBean is superior tech to dinosaur nano
>>59580022>>59580025based bitbean haversnobeaners will rope
>>59580022>>59580033All these gets, from different beaners must mean bean is about to go parabolic
>>59579973You can ignore the question but I'm going to just keep asking it.>OK. So what coin(s) do you hold?
>>59580025
>>59580022waiT WAIT I FOUND THE NEW PORTALGET ONBOARD THE ARK BEFORE THE FLOODARKKKKIIIEEESSSSSS
>>59577333>>59577555>>59579222>>59580111
LOL I btfo'd the bots into submission againtotal raiblocks victory
Hey hey heyyyHeyy heyyy heyyeeyyyyHey hey heyyeeyyWasswassawssawwaaaaupppppppPortal threeeeeaadWuowowowow xrp no no noPooooortaaaaaaalThreeaaaaaaaadPorrrtaaaaaaaaaaal threeeeeeeeaaaaaaadWe are coming and we are coming in waves
Can you hear that?The silence before the mini moon.
>>59580111Banano and Doge and Algo, of course
>>59581011XD
>$1.33>3.3T marketcapso it begins
>>59581113Schizo?
>>59581125YES???>you were warned for this postJanny... I...janny I...
>>59581142Man the first time you gonna have sex, you'll implode
>>59581153mmm yes sar much sexy inside the pusy !
