So what does xrp even do, other than some schizophrenic rambling?
>>59583052Yes
>>59583059Fpbp/thread
>>59583052I genuinely don't see why people care about link providing data feeds. Like seriously, who cares? They don't move value and are basically a company with a digital services offering for pricing data. Why would you buy link because of this? It makes no sense. I don't even hold much more than a little bit of XRP but genuinely seems like the LINK maxi culture is predicated on not understanding the technology and thinking a broadness of use translates to definite value.
>>59583052spoonfeeding season is over. genuinely if you're not intelligent to figure it out by yourself you don't deserve it.
>>59583129Ok the why buy xrp then?
>>59583137Why are you posting in this thread then? Fuck off faggot
>>59583138-Real world asset tokenization (like they are partnering with Standard Chartered and HSBC in the Hong Kong CBDC pilot to do with real estate). Cheap NFT capabilities which work with this but also in addition it could really be considered its own use case (but will not include it as one because I do not need to to make the list).-"Rippling" and escrow enabled repo market for tokenized assets-Hooks enabled smart contracts, Evernode, Codius in works to be reinitiated and very probable to be relatively soon. EVM compatible sidechain to port all of the development done on Ethereum, which is like the prototype test net but has projects worth bringing over before abandoning because it is a CCP/JPM centralized piece of shit that needs to centralize even more to be even remotely useful or to scale-Atomic settlement micro-capable payments/self-directed remittances with on demand liquidity (which Ripple hold an international patent on) which outperform correspondent banking both in terms of speed and price with their superior automated market maker and built in orderbook and auto-bridging etc., particularly between stablecoins which Ripple is branching into in a big way. The developers of XRP are the developers of the Interledger Protocol (if you don't know what this is you need to) which is optimized using Ripplenet which is optimized using XRP, which with it can literally scale to millions of transactions per second on the XRPL without sacrificing security or integrity or risking spam on the network. All on a gateless L1 that individuals can transact on and exchange on the dex built into the ledger and send unlimited amounts of money in three seconds for less than a penny.-Offline transactions-XRPL can literally work on blutooth or radio transmission in event of blackout, spotty network access etc. basically anything less than a Carrington Event-etc. (reaching character limit) There are lots of XRP use cases you don't know because you choose repression
>>59583173Copied from an earlier thread which made the case effectively imo
>>59583173Then how come none of the banks are using it?
>>59583144Also shared and relevant:https://youtu.be/5urrOWO0KDI https://pastebin.com/Bb4GNJrG
>>59583173This.Link was only ever a scam to distract you from buying profitable high performance crypto with actual futures, like xrp or ada. Xrp will replace swift and there's no way in hell link survives vs flare, which is just superior in every way.
>>59583183Multiple are. Ripple are on multiple central banks and BIS steering committees and XRP is objecrtively used to move billions of dollars yearly. Why are you pretending you don't know this?
>>59583190Billions of dollars of specifically institutional money through banks and payment companies*
>>59583193>>59583190I don’t know it cuz no one is using that worthless trash lolChainlink is 100x more useful than faggor xrp
>>59583197Strong argument
>>59583200I know it’s a strong one and you’re a fucking retard
>>59583052It facilitates the belief in an eth killer, even if it never happens.
>>59583204Pic related from a few generals ago, which seems more appropriate every thread I see.
>>59583200>>59583193Btw why did xrp donate $15 mil to comrade Kamala and $5 mil to Donald Trump? Why did Donald Trump not buy any xrp? Why did founder of ripple pay money to eat dinner with trump and pretended he was invited there?
>>59583207FLR is probably the Eth killer. XRP is definitely the CCP/JP Morgan Ethgate exposer though.
>>59583210Cope
>>59583211They didn't. Chris Larsen did. Trump accepted donations in XRP for his entire campaign and was donated $5M by Ripple proper and posed with them after having a dinner. He met with Ripple multiple times since last summer and while president met with them in the morning with nothing else slated for the whole day on his presidential calendar. Ripple are on the IMF's high level advisory board, the Federal Reserve's Faster payments committee, the BIS' cross-border payments board, the Digital Pound Project, the Digital Euro Foundation, the Digital Dollar Project, are a founding member of the INATBA which governs tokenized standards for ISO 20022 messaging, and on and on and on. Why isn't chainlink on any of these and their claim to fame is being included providing a price feed service to legacy financial messaging as a subscription service the company makes revenue from?
>>59583224In what world does replying this seem like biting contribution and not desperate, panicked posting? Your argument in >>59583211is self-contradictory and literally incoherent. Trump met with them multiple times before they even donated (which their CLO thanked him for listening to their story during) and invited them to the White House in 2017.
>>59583234Why would chainlink be on those rink dink school projects?
>>59583224
>>59583237Yeah and Trump decided to market buy xrp. Oh wait he didn’t
>>59583243Right, but again, they literally just provide price data to these for a subscription fee. This doesn't make link worth buying or value transferring whatsoever and they don't offer special technical advise or serve on the board of the central bank of central banks' (BIS) or IMF's committees. Why did 19 of the BIS' 37 or so core Basel group of banks that set policy for all other central banks buy XRP and not link? How does a company generating revenues through subscription pricing data that basically translates to being like a next gen relay service on par with Adobe or a music streamer like Spotify translate to "invest in link!?"
>>59583267>it’s just price dataLmao fuck off
>>59583254He literally solicited donations in XRP. Why didn't he accept donations in link? Trump didn't market buy link, a crypto company he is associated with did which uses Eth and needs certain assets in reserves to function within the current makeup of lending and other services probably uses Link for pricing, which again, who cares? It is noteworthy they own some but not really when it is basically a piggyback off of the Eth/AAVE reality of defi. I don't even hate link in any real way, I just don't understand why people buy it instead of taking a private equity stake in the company or something and don't understand why the fans of it as so UNBELIEVABLY salty to xrp specifically when they aren't even competitors
>>59583281It literally is
>>59583294>It literally isI guess that one more use case over xrp
>>59583243It is worth noting many of these organizations are on the same committees with Ripple, which no other crypto companies usually are and which I have never seen Chainlink on a single one of.
>>59583287>He literally solicited donations in XRPFor $5 mil? Kek you’re a fucking retard>Trump didn't market buy link, a crypto company he is associated with did which uses Eth and needs certain assets in reserves to function within the current makeup of lending and other services probably uses Link for pricing, which again, who cares?You’re coping lmao>I don't even hate link in any real wayYeah, you do not hate chainlink
>>59583304Another strong argument. lel I will leave it here, is becoming even more unproductive. Food for thought: Why choose to knowingly stick with an investment thesis you realize makes no sense literally just because you joined a group identity and hopium wave associated with it? Upon hearing the truth, would you really rather miss the whole just to stick to your consensus idea? Why, how is this more valuable than making it? How is any crypto that isn't principle driven (Chainlink isn't exactly the free and clear own your own future Satoshi legacy rider. Principle is more important than money but you aren't even choosing principle, you are just choosing..culture? Good luck.
>>59583306Probably because they are too busy using chainlink instead of wasting their time on some retarded “board” to talk about nothing
>>59583313Last post: No, he accepted XRP donations and advertised doing so for months prior to Ripple donating to him.
>>59583318Are you going back to your general now? Kek
>>59583325You got absolutely owned. Holy shit
>>59583330Are you going to buy xrp now?
>>59583318Based and XRP knowledge pilled.But you didn't have to murder the guy.
>>59583351I’m still never touching xrp you retarded faggots
>>59583339i own a little bit but already own more link. No joke am reading more and considering switching the ratios to more xrp and less link now leaning heavily toward doing so
>>59583359Kek good luck you dumb retard
>>59583361hopefully you will realize in time
>>59583356No one cares.You should be embarrassed by this thread.
>>59583367Nah I’ve lurked long enough.
>>59583368Nah I’m good
>>59583369length is not guarantor of success or insight-sometimes it is training into retardation that prevents you from seeing or being willing to see
>>59583052XRP links all other chains together.
>>59583173Yeah fucking right none of this is happening. is this copypasta from some schizo discord server or reddit?
>>59583129>LINK doesn't move valueCCIP does, why are you lying and gish galloping like a kike?LINK also secures value, most of defi is secured by chainlink infrastructure. But it's nice that ripple is paying banks to take their token so they can sell it instantly and not do swaps with it rofl
>>59583190>Multiple are.Your pic says literally nothing about banks.Pretty much zero banks are using it. And nobody in crypto uses it either.
>>59583287>He literally solicited donations in XRP. Why didn't he accept donations in link?He does accept donations in Link.Trump "solicted donations" in any crypto that can fit in a Coinbase, Gemini, ... wallet. Yet here you are pretending this is bullish for XRP specifically.You're clinically insane.
>>59583052G thing stfu and buy and get iced like a retard, tired of you bullshit
>>59583417Yup Right answerYou get to play another round with me>>59583549*or get icedOops little error
>>59583137Fiverr indians :)
>>5958318314 more days!
saars plshttps://x.com/joedirt501/status/1872230845114929438
>>59583619>https://x.com/joedirt501/status/1872230845114929438Needs more arm pit and toe jam.
XRP: >offices aroun the world, thousands of employees>hq in silicon valley high tech financial districts>deals, agreements, institutions, governments, national banks>soon SEC green light Chainlink:>"offices" in a known tax haven>ceo is a ruzzian known former con artists (NXT coin)>whole tech built on slow an expensive eth dino tech>no connections with the elite, sec status unknown.
>>59583052now ask Grok if "World Liberty Financial" holds XRP.
>>59583633Linkies are going to seethe so hard
>>59583210Lmao i love how this meme makes the linkies seethe
>>59583633How many offices and employees does Btc have?
>>59583677They already seethe every single day since XRP shot up from ~$0.50 to $2.00+.
>>59583512Ripple are a platinum American Banker's Association member since June 2024. They are an ISDA member and that graphic specifically talks about institutions and banks using Ripplenet's XRP using product. Commercial banks have ramped up purchases of XRP and so have central banks, specifically ones on the Basel central committee. Ripple sales account for less than 1% of total volume, has no material impact on price, and fundraise for the biggest institutional advocate XRP has-well worth it.>>59583540No one in this thread ever said they were accepting only XRP and forcing that interpretation is you being bad faith. He did accept link donations or at least the potential for him but in defense of the post, someone may not have known he accepted it without switching to the gemini wallet and scrolling the hundreds large list of ERC coins, none of which except USDC and Eth appeared on the marketed materials, where the same 8 or so appeared consistently like in 2 expressions in pic related, on the phone by app and name printed below and at the top of the page with the segment of icons with XRP and USDC in the center.>>59583670World Libertyfi is a fintech that services demand that said they would offer certain services based on market demand and did not endorse any tokens. They did however in their public launch X space say that "obviously a token with the largest throughput and transactions per second which is also secure will win." They mentioned using AAVE for yield and are an attempt to cutout banks as rent seekers for certain services and legitimize crypto as a venue for it. They bought link and probably like was said earlier in thread, may subscribe to their service for as long as eth has a market but them owning some is no more or less significant than them owning some AAVE or other assets they bought for operational reserve to payout yield on products of pledged principle and describing this as anything else than that is pretty dishonest.
>>59584002Ripple has no users whatsoever right now. And according to Schwartz they're not interested in using it in the future either.>No one in this thread ever said they were accepting only XRPI replied to the guy saying Trump didn't accept donations in Link.And that Trump specifically "solicited" donations in XRP.
>>59583052At least Sui's building with real tech and not just banking on courtroom drama.
>>59584009>this same old tired fudYou forgot the Wax Trump fud.
>>59583481For some reason 4chan will not let me post pic related. Included the link for easy clickability. This was the trial they did for their settlement coordination aspirations which they built:https://www.ledgerinsights.com/swift-blockchain-interoperability-trial-bnp-paribas-citi-dtcc/
>>59583481>>59584034This is the second time in as many days my post mentioning CCIP in a true way was flagged as spam no matter how I changed it if I broke the link, which itself posted. Pretty weird.
>>59584040>>59584034So what is your argument? You do realise using Chainlink services like CCIP has costs? Currently they are taking payment in whatever form the clients are paying in, with payment abstraction (which just finished the audit) they will be turned into LINK.
>>59584009You started by replying to a Finextra screenshot saying they use XRP to settle billions of dollars of transactions. He did say that and was wrong about it, which I addressed. Pretty reasonable to interpret from marketing on website that they didn't given to know they did you would have to open and navigate to halfway down a list of hundreds of other ERC tokens to find it was included in the general ETH package as accepted assets. You were right about this, which I already said and addressed but it definitely deserves a qualifying case made and he definitely never said they exclusively took XRP. Trump really notoriously took huge amounts of BTC donations. I don't think he was disputing this an
>>59584057>Finextra screenshot saying they use XRP to settle billions of dollars of transactions."They"?That screenshot only talks about the volume of ODL, none of which is coming from banks, or even crypto users.It's literally all ripple itself wash trading.
>>59584051Yeah, which is why it really makes a lot of sense earlier in thread how it was qualified as a digital services subscription which generates revenues for the company and its private investors which in no way reflect or map onto a value prospect for the token itself, and if you wanted to invest at all you should buy private equity in the company. If they do take payment in Link this will change (depending on how the flows are directed buying it to pay and whether they are settled on exchanges or over the counter) proportionate to the revenues they earn but currently there is no real value prospect for the token.
>>59584021See>>59583224
>>59584068Ripple ODL exclusively uses XRP and is exclusively an institutional product. They aren't wash trading. If they are, post proof. Banks are inarguably increasing purchases of XRP. As mentioned Ripple is inarguably a platinum American Bankers Association and ISDA member.
>>59583173meanwhile, the portal:yeah we do payments
>>59584076>Ripple ODL exclusively uses XRP and is exclusively an institutional product.And virtually zero institutions are using it.>post proofSee pic.Like I said, nobody is using Ripple/XRPL/ODL right now. No banks, and no crypto. I can't be anyone but Ripple itself.
>>59584076>Ripple ODL exclusively uses XRP and is exclusively an institutional productRipple is using its own product therefore institutions are using it?
>>59584084200+ institutions inarguably are.The document you. shared a screenshot of is a memorandum in law opposing Ripple's Motion for Summary Judgment, not a court decision or ruling written by a judge: You are literally citing the adversarial agency making accusations in a relatively inconsequential court document out of hundreds of others from the case (see doc number at top of page) as though it is court ruling or demonstrated fact. If this were true, they would be defrauding investors and the DOJ would pounce on it in a second. Why no charges related to it? Where is the proof? Realistically this is probably just qualifying specifically how their old ODL product was structured which made use basically impossible in the US due to Operation Chokepoint 2.0 which they have since changed the structure of how they source it and have seen literal several hundred percent increase in use of since the window of time cited in the lawsuit, which they got favorable outcome from ultimately. Here is the full doc you have the screenshot from incase you want to read it:https://www.crypto-law.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/SEC-Memo.pdf
>>59584125>200+ institutions inarguably are.Holy shit, proof plsEven Schwartz himself confirms banks aren't using it.
>>59583052>itt: 2 shizo bagholder camps arguing why their respective unregistered security thats being dumped by the CEO and entourage of their "decentralised" cryptocurrency is better than the other
>>59584134Ripple is the unregistered security you retard chainlink never got hit by sec
>>59583188>or adasomeone post the pic of the tranny dev posting on twitter about wanting to take cocks up the ass and also wanting more trannies to work on ada
>>59584091Institutions use Ripple to use its product. For a show of how much use is increasing, contrast pic related with pic related from:>>59583190 which is from January 2023:https://www.finextra.com/pressarticle/95578/ripple-names-monica-long-as-presidentBrad says they've signed more US deals in the last 6 months than they did prior in the last 12 months. For more see:Institutions are also buying it up. Cope:https://coingape.com/xrp-institutional-buying-soars-266-ripple-vs-sec-lawsuit-appeal/SBI:https://www.crypto-news-flash.com/ripples-grand-plan-unveiled-xrpl-nfts-to-steal-the-show-with-millions-of-users-set-to-join-initiative/XRP has additionally been used in billions of dollars worth of tradfi payments.Roughly 50% of their payments are already carried out using ODL:https://www.scb10x.com/en/blog/crypto-enabled-infrastructurehttps://archax.com/insights/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of-tokenized-real-world-assets-to-the-xrp-ledgerArchax is the first ever digital securities exchange regulated by the FCA in London:https://archax.com/insights/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of-tokenized-real-world-assets-to-the-xrp-ledgerSee also:https://archax.com/insights/archax-adds-state-street-fidelity-international-lgim-offerings-to-regulated-digital-platformInteresting connection:https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/09/16/bitstamp-and-ripple-to-launch-derivatives-exchange-on-xrp-ledger/
>>59584155>>59584091Forgot pic related.
>>59583052XRP is helping in the creation of CBDCs, anyone who supports it, is a terrorist, sociopath, contributing to a dystopic society, with no privacy, where people have no control over their money, over their property, and over themselves, and they deserve castration.
>>59584155>XRP has additionally been used in billions of dollars worth of tradfi payments.source?
>>59584134XRP was ruled in court to be a non-security. It is literally the only crypto to have this legal distinction besides bitcoin and the SEC is not and cannot appeal this. You believe and invest how you do because you are low information and emotional.
>>59583052In cross-border payments yes, but if you’re looking to understand the future of blockchain tech, Peaq is the one to watch.
>>59584163By the way, Link will partnership with XRP and bring the beast financial system. Yes, if you buy Link, you'll earn some money in a few months or years, but what's the point? The world will be destroyed, and controlled by Trump, the antichrist.
>>59584127No he doesn't and if you spam the quote you always spam which he specifically said when asked that he meant exactly the opposite to what you qualify it as or if you share a quote of him talking about Ripple's pre-ILP mid-2010s success you are an idiot. Here is a clip of a webinar given by Ripple's VP Head of Sales APAC in October 2023. I was actually mistaken and not up-to-date. They have over 500 partners, several specific banks mentioned which use them. Remark that they have increased US based deals by hundreds of percent since then:https://x.com/rohitku24694375/status/1729874659280384340?s=46&t=TK9_lqM8k5hIDbfrqdglmgHere is the webinar event link:https://register.gotowebinar.com/register/7809390621632158553
>>59583318>Principle is more important than moneyYou should try thinking about how XRP isn't actually decentralized or trustless like a cryptocurrency is supposed to be. It uses "trusted authorizers" instead of PoW/PoS/any other system. All have to be approved by Ripple.
>>59584169>>59584193The only thing to add is that MFS Africa changed its name to Onafriq (still uses Ripplenet). They are a massive, mostly pan-african but transcontinental payment provider spanning dozens of countries with corridors to some european countries as well. This is just an update on the data of the webinar.
>>59584193>No he doesn'tHe literally said the banks don't want to move billions with ripple. Literally.>https://x.com/rohitku24694375/status/1729874659280384340?s=46&t=TK9_lqM8k5hIDbfrqdglmgSo your source for "billions worth of tradfi payments" is a Ripple exec talking vaguely about "working with" the most literal who banks in third world shitholes.You're insane.
>>59584169Again, see pic related in:>>59583190>>59584127>>59584193>>59584201See pic related.
>>59584211>Again, see pic related in:>>>59583190That pic holds ZERO confirmation of banks using anything Ripple related.>See pic related.
>>59584209jeet cant read
>>59583052I'm gonna kill myself if it don't go up by 1000 this year.
It’s really interesting to see Ada and Xrp holders waking up to what’s happening and has been happening outside of their echo chambers.I wish them the best but what is coming is inevitable.Without link you become a small dessert island with no port or internet
>>59584209No, it is the Finextra article linked to you twice stating it explicitly. The wevinar link is showing that they are inarguably used by banks and payment providers that majority use XRP (ODL) for transactions per the Finextra quote. She doesn't "vaguely talk about working with them" she explicitly states their use of Ripplenet and so do those partners she cited talk about it btw:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20231107602363/en/Ripple-partners-with-Onafriq-to-power-digital-asset-enabled-cross-border-payments-between-Africa-and-the-rest-of-the-world(pic related)Post the quote you are mentioning with citation and timeframe of quote or admit you are lying or deliberately framing it in a lying way out of 2025 context and know it, because you are.
>>59584209>>59584238Pic related 2/2 from just one article naming just a few
>>59584173>Ripple ODL exclusively uses XRP and is exclusively an institutional productOnly for retail. It’s still a security for institutions, which is the only thing that matters
>>59584238>No, it is the Finextra articleThat article only talks about ODL volume, none of which is coming from banks or crypto.And best of all, the source for that "Finextra article" is Ripple itself, see pic.>>59584238>>59584245Those screenshots don't say anything use either, let alone "billions of dollars" worth.It's all "aims to", "is set to", "look at", ...Also, >Onafriq>Zazi>PayAngel>PyyplLMAO
>>59584238Is the CEO of Onafriq lying about their business or the citation he is giving about the broad market Ripple is already operating actively in? Does he know less than you do about his business partner in global payments' existing operations? How about the other CEO's listed in the 2/2 pic which were already partners and are secondary partners with Onafriq who all reiterate Ripple's operational presence and success? Lol
>>59583052It’s The Standard.
>>59584264Again, ODL is an exclusively institutional product. It says that the majority of their billions settled are done so using ODL which uses XRP. 10 minutes ago you were arguing they weren't even facilitating real payments based on a dishonest portrayal of an SEC filed minor court document you pretended was judicial ruling. Onafriq is the largest panAfrican payment provider. How do you feel like you are remotely not looking like a deliberately repressed, lying faggot and retard here?
>>59584286>Again, ODL is an exclusively institutional productSo are pretty much all the products Chainlink offers. So in your logic the institutions are using Chainlink as well?
>What does XRP do?It makes l9eA1cZv seethe extremely hard.
>>59584195>Transactions are validated by a network of independent validators who reach consensus every 3 to 5 seconds, enabling rapid transaction settlement.[8] Users rely on a trusted list of validators known as the Unique Node List (UNL).how do xrp bagholders cope?
>>59584255Once more 4chan is flagging my pro-XRP reply as spam. Will post it as a pic in followup. See pic related for what I will refer to in the reply (you are inarguably wrong).
>>59584255>>59584327Mentioned flagged reply
>>59584311Yes but not in any value meaningful way to the link token, just to private investors. Large institutions are building out tokenized assets and launching products on XRPL and building out its use to settle payments and bridge ledgers for value.
>>59584337>the headlines are wrong!!!Keep coping you retard>>59584346You literally need link token to use the products you absolute amoeba
>>59584363when link line go up?
>>59584286>ODL is an exclusively institutional product.And yet no institutions are using it.Those numbers are Ripple itself wash trading it. And best of all, the source for those numbers is ripple itself.
>>59584346>Large institutions are launching products on XRPLAbsolutely not lol
>>59584269was directed at >>59584264by the way.
>>59584408They inarguably are. You desperate spamming cope has never been more transparent/weird. See:>>59584155
>>59584269>OnafriqLMAOalso>aiming to>>59584418Literally zero source for institutions moving any money at all through ripple.In fact, the Ripple cto confirmed that banks don't want to.
>>59584424>Literally zero source for institutions moving any money at all through ripple.Would you believe if they did?
>>59584390Seething desperation. Unbelievably cringe attempt to revive an already executed attempt at actual propaganda.>>59584363No you don't and even if you choose to use it it is as a low input digital service, not a value transmission high volume instrument. Why be like this? Going to bed now but holy shit are you perma butthurt and dishonest for really gay reasons
59584424is this bait?
>>59584430The Ripple cto is personally saying banks don't want to use ripple.Combine that with the zero sources to the contrary, and there you have it.
>>59584430>>59584286>>59583190why do you keep switching IDs btw?
>>59584429Ripple publish their ODL volumes and you claim they are not proof. A Ripple VO cites their partners and you say she is being vague insinuating she is lying. The CEOs of those same companies put out a press release claiming to use it, who are literally some of the largest payment providers in the world, and you say it is not proof of use by institutions. The repression is so deep and desperate it is almost literally unbelievable. There is no way you aren't a paid poster. Going to bed now. Good luck changing or refinding your integrity!
>>59584430>No you don'tYou’re right they are letting you use their product for free>>59584411>onafriqLolwut
>>59584446Not switching between ids. I quoted the poster from earlier? Not even clear what you're suggesting. What would benefit from posting from multiple IDs if you don't dogpile between them whatsoever?
>>59584451>some of the largest payment providers in the worldYeah, like Onafriq fucking lol
>>59584453They are the largest digital payments gateway in Africa. You not knowing and then when finding it out in the most embarrassing way possible pretending it is not true doesn't change reality.https://onafriq.com/
>>59584471>They are the largest digital payments gateway in Africa.That's like saying "the least smelly jeet in the hole village"
>>59584471>They are the largest digital payments gateway>in AfricaDid this sound more impressive in your head when you typed it out?Also charge your phone your faggot
>>59584466You used court docs wrong to prove claims that are false and you cannot substantiate and when proven wrong are trying to diminish the extent of it by pretending one of the most important payment companies in the world which you had never heard of is a small fry by hoping people will not click and see you are lying. Your mom should be ashamed of you and I am sure she is. See:>>59584466
>>59584474No it is like saying "the company most deeply poised to bank hundreds of billions of unbanked people."
>>59584481millions*
>>59584474Yes, you're clearly one of the more insightful SHITlinkers.
>>59584446>>59584459Just noticed the w...and the P+...IDs are both me. Not sure why it switched, have been on the same connection the whole time, and didn't even notice it but those two are me.
Hey look its that same link bagholder using the same shit rhetoric in the same shit arguments. Do not engage with this "individual". He refuses to read the proof/links you provide and when he does, he cherry picks lines and sentences and reformats them to fit his narrative. He gets more unhinged as we are nearing ath and he might take his own life if this continues. Inb4 they paid a wax Trump with money they got from dumping on retail who bought because of fake partnerships that ripple themselves paid for.
>>59584363Wait holy shit are you actually claiming XRP is a security if sold to institutions? Lol Nowhere in the court docs is this claimed. Hilarious you portrayed SEC filing as court ruling earlier and still don't know the core result of the actual ruling. Unreal The judge ruled the way they sold a specific portion during a specific period constituted a packaging into a security, not that the token itself was. They no longer offer the type of sales and rebuilt their product to make it clearly not a security when sourcing XRP to sell to institutions. You have no business telling people to cope. This is insane
>>59583052loads of projects literally add nothing to to the industry, and that's next level messed up. only a couple projects provide real utility, including UAFC meme, which allows users train AIs how to fight and have them compete in street fight games.
>>59584386Maybe in 10 years, but with PEAQ, the future’s already happening. Building and earning through connected machines
>>59583052nothing.and WLF is not Trump's they just use he's name
99% reads like corporate+schizo babble1% reads like bankman snakes trying to weasel their way into crypto to take it overlink same too
>>59584481>>59584515>are you actually claiming XRP is a security if sold to institutions?>Lol Nowhere in the court docs is this claimedLMAONow I know you're just trolling.
>>59584771Kek
>>59584515It is thoroughly entertaining watching you dismantle 3 stupid arguments at once hahaha chad!It’s got to the point where you provide a paragraph of reasons while rebutting their points and tgey will either repeat what has already been disproven or say ‘cope’Checkmate.
>>59586592lmao okay samefag
>>59584771Also literally no one cares if it’s de-centrally centralised with verifiers or if it’s a security. It doesn’t detract from anything it just doesn’t cl form to the rest of the shitcoins. You lot act like it doesn’t have advantages
>>59586618Kys Rope is 5 buckYour dad is a cuck
>>59583138Payment processing racket is coming to an end.If you do any amount of business you would know this well. 3% of all tx value is being dragged from people when it costs nothing to do.So someone (a few someones) will scoop up the 66 billion cc tax at 3% and do it for .1-.5% and take over the entire market and everyone will love it from plebs to bankers.If you take in a million in cc payments, you pay 30-40k to process the payments a year.That's the difference between a shit year and a good year for some people and cumulatively enough to make you a millionaire just in saved fees over a lifetime.t. 1.8million in internet sales yearly
>>59586618That was genuinely not me. Samefagging is for retards who can't make the argument themselves and need to pretend they convinced people. Where in this thread has it looked like I've been unwilling to argue points or seemed even remotely unsure of them? You not liking my investment choices but having zero argument against what I say doesn't translate to a conspiracy of argumentz. Lol It translates to you being an emotional literal NPC who refuses ro surrender a fixated narrative even when given really good reason. This is not a valuable trait and literally means you choosing to miss out on the big crypto utility plays to play narrative with those like you. Cope/change.
>>59584771Retard. I already said this. She ruled on a specific sale during a specific period in time which they totally restructured their product to not be like anymore. Again, this can literally be true for orange groves being packaged in products that equal securities. This does not mean that the token itself is inherently a security when sold to institutions and she gave specific in dicta comment saying it explicitly itself was not a security regardless of context. This is not complicated and literally no one disagrees. You just saw this screenshot somewhere and downloaded it and believed whatever twitter poster shared it with zero minutes of double checking. Ripple paid a fine for the original time specific offering and always said they would even settle with the SEC and do so if they got what they ended up getting (legal clarity that XRP is not a security). They spent well over $100M fighting it and were happy with the result, which again, contrary to what you probably believe, the SEC is not appealing and cannot appeal (that XRP is a non-security). They no shit established a judicial framework for tokens to be considered non-securities which is a HUGE boon for the whole industry but specific advantage to them at this time. It is UNREAL you would rather misinterpret the ruling to force a narrative than be thankful they did this and that you would think this is a bad thing from an investment standpoint when they litigated and got exactly what they wanted and need for their business to operate using XRP in the US.
>>59586678w7... and P+... and this are me. Am on a different network connection now.
>>59586624>>59586678why are you losers raging so hard over your banker meme coin. just get over it, people have every right to laugh at it. it didnt replace swift, it wont be taking over world finance, it cant even onboard Japanese banks, its just an L1 among L1s riding stablecoin hype and paying for trump pictures. whats not to laugh at?
>>59584683Best and truest meme I have seen in a long time.
>>59586702You are literally having a meltdown over your shitcoin being a security
>>59587482Once more see:>>59584327Why was I not allowed to post pic related. Why are posts defending XRP against Spammy being flagged multiple times with no reasonable trigger words?
>>59586713This is not news. You are repeating something literally everyone has known for years. The challenge was not about ODL demand influence it was about usage of Ripplenet and then of XRP within Ripplenet. Both points have been proven and he still pretends they aren't and repeats the same lie he knows is a lie over and over in every XRP thread 24 hours a day. For a hint at demand, see:>>59584238>>59584155
>>59586702and another new id>>59588280and another new id
Cant believe it's 2025 and people are still trying to fud XRP lol
>>59588394XRP literally fuds itself
>>59583138good point. neither LINK or XRP actually provide valuable, unique services. it's all just bullshit. Probably a top signal
>>59583052>So what does xrp even do, other than some schizophrenic rambling?Sorry if you weren't paying attention. Not my problem.
>>59588393This thread has lasted literal days and I am phonefagging. I haven't piled on from an old id and have replied directly to replies as a continuance clearly being me every time and haven't reset a router or done anything to seek new ID once. Not sure what to tell you or why this matters? If I were pretending to be another person or like affirming points as a new ID and not replying as myself, that would be completely different but I never once even pretended to not be the next network connection of myself. None of this is relevant to you being wrong on every single point or excuse for you being unable to defend it or less gay that you try to double down points you are proven inarguably wrong on over and over.
>>59588477Not reading all that.You need to go outside. You're not well.
>>59588403There's the mentioned quote which he specifically said he meant the exact opposite of what you are insinuating he did which you have been corrected on in 20 threads but still spam because you literally don't care what's true and are cultishly obsessed with link the way only a paid poster can be.
>>59588485>he specifically said he meant the exact oppositeThat's about the "success story" thing.He never denied the "banks don't want to move billions with us" part.
>>59588485>>59588403
both xrp and link are memecoins, whose value is nearly entirely determined by memetics and not whatever utility you think they provide or will provideneither ever needs to deliver on anything, simply repeating "$1000 per xrp/link" is enough
>>59588489Again, Ripple already move billions with XRP for banks.You've already been proven to wrong on this. Pretending it never happened won't make it not have
>>59588520FUCKING POST THE PROOF U RETARDSTOP REPEATING WHAT ANOTHER RETARDED POSTED WITH NO PROOFGODAMN WHY IS IT SO HARD WITH U
>>59588520And another new idAnd you haven't proven a single dollar moved by banks.Your proof is:1) Ripple self-reporting the volume of ODL (which zero banks are using)2) fucking Onafriq "aiming to" look at using Ripple
>>59588484You have posted at least a dozen threads in the last week alone, attending to all of them, spending collective days spamming the same 4 low hanging fud things you get owned on every single time despite trying hard and then repeat in the next threads you make pretending you didn't already get owned on it, 24/7 at a level only paid posters can, and you are SERIOUSLY trying to play the "actually I'm the low effort one and you are cringe for spending time replying and me being wrong and beaten down on every single point despite trying very hard is less meaningful to the core subject and reality because I am now posturing as cooly detached and too cool to engage to spin the lost argument" card? You post dozens of threads but are trying to zoomer culture "not reading allat" instagram comment cringe over a fucking paragraph? >inb4 not reading allat
>>59588542His ID is Biepum1V ffs. That already says enough. >>59588525Fuck off biepum, go read a book you little sperg.
>>59588525The VP specifically mentions banks by name which use it in themselves not even mentioning the literal largest payment gateway in Africa (and the largest financial institution in the MENA region (QNB) using it, starting the program in one of their branches). Ripple report their service and CEOs of relevant companies issue press releases the same way Chainlinink do and the same way revenues are reported for services in quarterly shareholder reports for any company. Why is Ripple the only company this is insufficient proof for? Why aren't the DOJ and SEC alleging accounting fraud? Your argument is literally so retarded.
>>59588525Another non-reply, with me literally obviously being myself and not trying to present as anyone else and gaining no advantage whatsoever by my phone shifting network connections. I am not pretending to be anyone else literally once, you faggot.
>>59588551It's either fishy or zach rhynes, you're literally wasting your time arguing with paid shills
>>59588524I already did. Their president said 60% of transactions are ODL, up dramatically from just a year ago, which I also posted. ODL is exclusively institutional product. Their VP cited banks in the same video she mentioned Onafriq (formerly MFS Africa). You are so dishonest and integrity stripped it is unreal
>>59588542see >>59588484>>59588556>The VP specifically mentions banks by nameAll those banks are third world shithole nobodies that are "aiming to", "set to", "looking at", ...>>59588573>Their president said 60% of transactions are ODLThe president of ripple is saying that.But banks aren't using ODL
>>59588561Im no longer arguing I just check in once in a while to check if he is still sane/has roped. Once we are near ATH or 1 link = zerp I will dump my screened fudfolder from all the seething Biepum has done. He bought around 2017 below 1 dollar so the emotional damage is severe. You can sniff him out by his reasoning/cherry picking and the no context screenshots he posts where you need background to even know what the fud is about.
>>59588888lmao
>>59588578So just to be clear, you are after dozens of threads claiming that banks aren't even using Ripple let alone XRP, conceding that they do (but just aren't big enough for you! lol) and so do some of the literal largest payment providers in the world who link banks together for payments, and then saying again at the end that banks don't use it? What? Lol Already addressed your "vague" accusation. She is specifically talking about established product using partners, describing what Ripple are looking to do through partnership with them using the product with them being specific cases portraying their strategy. You saying "I'm not reading allat" through reference doesn't make it any more potent when you are almost definitely, no exaggeration, the most time spent effort poster in the history of biz while simultaneously having won literally zero points ever and never convinced a single person despite getting very emotional often and trying very hard until you lose and then repeat the same arguments in the next thread you make.
>>59588927And another new id.>conceding that they doEven the shithole subsaharan African banks aren't using it, since they're all "aiming to", "set to", "looking at", ... use it.
>>59588978None of this matters, Biepum
>>59588927>>59589527I pop in here to see if our little lolcow is still going and he is! Still as impervious to fact as before. Oh and ODL is up 60 percent from what number exactly? And with who?https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/04/23/ripple-president-says-ripple-itself-has-no-odl-partners/
>>59583052Well, you know... It helps... with payments and... uh.. banks? And Uh... So there.
>>59589642Dont really care about ODL being up. Price is stable while market dumps. You know what that means, Biepum?
>>59583052glowniggers dont want you to buy XPR, it'll interupt their plans. BUY MORE XPR NOW. THEY ARE TRYING TO CONFUSE US. BITCOIN IS A SCAM, IT WAS INTIALLY AN EXPERIMENT, THE REAL COIN IS XPR
trump is down over a mil on his link position
>>59591388If he actually cared, he would just pump the price.
3 weeks ago>dude trump is buying link hand over fist, moon imminentnow>dude it was le heckin pocket change!!!The Cuckolds of crypto
>>59589642The Finextra screenshot says it. There is no world where you successfully project me as being the cringe, truth defiant one
>>59588978Faggot. I told you I am phonefagging. I never respond acting like I am anyone other than myself. Unbelievably starved for valid argument material.
>>59593173>The Finextra screenshot says it.See >>59588525Your proof is:1) Ripple self-reporting the volume of ODL (which zero banks are using) on Finextra2) fucking Onafriq "aiming to" look at using Ripple>>59593181And another new id.
>>59583052Has 10x the market cap of LINK is all.
>>59594207looks like fishy's shift just started
>>59594266He just ran to a fresh thread.>>59594305
>>59583204You need to go dialate
>>59594207I am phonefagging. You have not replied to jack shit of any argument. I have never presented myself as anyone but myself. Documenting every time my phone network shifts is not a meaningful reply. Extremely low IQ
>>59594656>You have not replied to jack shit of any argument.Of course I have.You keep saying the Finextra quote proves that institutions are using ODL, but it literally does not.For some reason I have to keep pointing this out to your samefagging ass.
>>59594266Fishy = chainlinkgod = biepum1V = Terminally online fudcuck
>>59594752i dont get why you even care enough to shit on these subhumansit makes absolutely no difference in realitytrump buys link, and cripple has to buy his timelink gives an awkward thumbs up to cripple as they get added to the mountain of crypto integrations that link already has (while they cater to the needs of live products being released with swift, dtcc, etc,) while cripple announces that they're using link and even calls it the chainlink standardsibos and smartcon last year featured the kind of people that cripplefags dream of having anywhere near cripple leadership - all dedicated to the endorsement and discussion of link and their agreed upon plans going forward, meanwhile katz himself has said the banks they did approach aren't interested in using cripple, because there's no functional difference or justification to change in their eyeseven cripple isn't interested in using cripple for anything besides dumping on people's heads as per the court casei could go on, but i don't even need to because even the xrp chimpouts in response to this post will just vindicate everything i'm sayingthese are people that rotted their brains by circlejerking with twitter niggers and karens for the last 7 years, while convincing themselves that they were "clever schizos" for solving childish riddles and puzzles, written for them by unironic qanon boomers like a classroom of special kids being given paper and crayons to distract them - so just let them draw, who gives a fuck
it's a ponzi alright, and somehow it refuses to die. it's bitconnect with better marketing & connections, but fundamentally, in the end it's just another bitconnect.>hurrr durr banks are using itnope and they will never use it, they just don't need it.>they just met trumpSBF met lots of politicians as well, he's in prison now.>banks purchased xrpthey can't. anyone with more than 2 digit iqs knows that it's a pyramid scheme, no bank would take the risk, no institutions balance sheets has xrp on them>offices around the world, thousands of employeessame as bitconnect, plus why not a stock>top 500 holders owns %99.9 of itso basically it's market cap is a bubble, it's a lie, that's also shows how much of a scam it isThe whole scheme is just a ponzi just as amway or herbalife are. These are legal business models that are still defined by not producing any signigicant value even close to their valuations or profit but build their business on attracting new members. And xrp does the same they make their money by having new people coming in and giving them dollars and then sell more of their premined xrp to benefit from that.
>>59594964>>59595052>REEEEE XRP BAD BAD CHAINLANK THE BEST BUY MY BAGS REEEEEEthe absolute state of seething linkoids
>>59595081not a link faggot, faggot.i have FARTCOIN, Butthole, Virtuals. I've made around 20x in last 30 days, how much you've made? let me tell you ZERO, you've made ZERO. You are on - on your bags. so maybe you should listen smarter people like me. because if you genuinely believe XRP will make you rich, you are either an ESL shill jeet, or 70 iq retard (in the end it's the same thing), so you should listen to your superiors, like me.I buy real ponzis, no phony ones acts like they are saving the world. keep paying salaries of HR roasties with your xrp buys.
>>59595081>obsession with crypto twitterfag personalities and 0 actual argumentoh and here's Ademdoes someone need to message Bram or Edem again to stage another intervention regarding your suicidal porn addiction? lmfao
Trump is down $700k on his Link purchaseWallet here: https://etherscan.io/address/0x5be9a4959308a0d0c7bc0870e319314d8d957dbb
>lots of linkjeets seething over xrpI wonder what the play might be here
>>59583052Just fucking lol at the baggies arguing over the best way to miss out on the bullrun
>>59595113>not a linkie I swear guise!sure buddy
>>59583052Makes shitlinkies, seethe, alot.This is a use case that I can invest in, Rakesh.
>>59583190then how come xrp is not 1000 dollars then?
>>59595303EOS will always be >>>>
>>59584232>It’s really interesting to see Ada and Xrp holders waking up to what’s happening and has been happening outside of their echo chambers.Yeah it's funny these retards where saying 2 months ago that Ripple didn't need Chainlink, guess what happened next kek.
>>59584683Nostro Vostro is not needed when using CCIP.
So on the one hand we have a dedicated LINK baggie saying Ripple is used by zero banks and on the other hand we have a dedicated XRP baggie samefaggint with 10 IDs or so saying that Ripple is used bt 200+ banks. Funny thread.
Fellow 4.32% earners, CCIP v1.5 on mainnet. The countdown to v1.6 (aka the payment abstraction patch) begins.https://x.com/chainlink/status/1879272363319341107
>>59597604Nothingburger.
>>59583052It makes me money, faggot.
>>59583052Liberty Financial isn't owned by drumpf fucking retard
>>59583052>chainlinkjust a decoy
>>59583052Imagine being in the year of our blockchain 2025 and still asking to be spoon fed.
>>59583188>Xrp will replace swiftWill never happen. Banks own swift. Why would they surrender that? Chainlink working in tandem with swift seems much more plausible. It’s like adding modern avionics to a warthog. It’s tried and true, trusted, and already paid for.
>>59598695You sound like you have 95 IQ and took your boosters
>>59598695palvin is a giga stacy.
>>59594752No, you haven't. You have been avoidant and evasive and disingenuous this whole time. You said that institutional clients of Ripple using Ripplenet were not using XRP, the Finextra quote from Ripple's president says the majority of an increasing amount of billions of dollars in transactions are (doesn't say that their transaction volume is increasing, but their shareholder reports does every quarter and the earlier Finextra quote shows they have in the last few years increased the percentage of transactions which use XRP (billions of dollars per year) by double digit percent, with some examples of clients using it being those banks and payment providers that connect banks listed by the VP) exactly what I said.
>>59597582Settlement is. CCIP builds out a layer for public blockchain settlement which ACTUALLY moves value (doesn't just provide price feeds for the value moving instrument) and banks and institutions have a MASSIVE incentive to have a neutral trustless liquidity token that they can interchange any pair between and totally eliminate volatility in low volume trading pairs, counterparty risk, prevent conversion frictions or the need to hold another country's currency you have NO use for and probably don't want your treasury in, and solving Triffin's Dilemma. Banks may have their own stablecoins but thy still need to transact between each other in a trustless way. David Schwartz has talked extensively on the walled garden and how it actually increases XRP's use case, particularly when big banks are already using a huge Ripple subsidiary for token custody (Metaco) or tokenization (Standard Custody). They are NOT gonna use Link to settle value. Lol Why would they? It would be more expensive and more risky and slower at a lower throughput. Banks have interledger protocol which is built to be optimized using Ripplenet optimally using XRP. Why would they choose to transact more expensive and slower on a network not built to move value in high transactions? Ripple literally built ILP for this exactly at banks' request, and gifted it to the Mojaloop foundation.
>>59583052that's not the pointthe main thing is that you can verify the integrity of the cripple ledgerit's essentially worthless
hOW IS THIS THREAD STILL UP
>>59598934me:>pretty much zero banks are using Ripple>Ripple has no users whatsoever>none of which (ODL volume) is coming from banks>nobody is using Ripple/XRP/ODL>virtually zero institutions are using it (ODL)>banks don't want to move billions with ripple>ZERO confirmation of banks using anything Ripple related>etc. etc. etc.you:>"so you're saying banks are using Ripplenet...."You are a joke of a person.Also, yet another new id.>>59598963Any tokenized RWA on any chain can do all of that without the need for a middleman liquidity token.That's the whole point of the tokenization trend.
>>59598963This still is not right. At every example XRP is inserted unnecessarily.> trustless liquidity token that they can interchange any pair betweenccip lock and mint>totally eliminate volatility in low volume trading pairsoracles watching liquidity pools, staked rewards will help here too. XRP not needed> counterparty riskccip is trustless.>prevent conversion frictions or the need to hold another country's currency you have NO use for and probably don't want your treasury inccip + oracles> They are NOT gonna use Link to settle value.ccip + oraclesXRP is not going to the next world reserve currency. Save your money. Closest thing might be a basket that a global RWA dex pairs RWA tokens with. (Which won't be XRP).
>>59598934>>59598963>>59599152>>59600218The walls of cope. Just hopping in to say high as we break ATH.
