[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20250114_143452.jpg (186 KB, 1179x1086)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
What causes people to marry their shitcoin bag?
>>
If link is a model its dev interviews and partnerships
>>
>>59597051
You see some people marry their bags and become stupidly wealthy. Ontop all crypto holders preach this mantra.
>>
I dont care i dont read.
I sell at 500$ in next month
>>
>>59597051
the lily dog was cute
I am financially ruined.
>>
>>59597051
people like to be right. or at the very least like to feel they're right. pretty much every LTC maxi read a pros / cons list against BTC and decided that the market must see things their way eventually. and when they do oh man i'm going to be so FUCKING rich. and if i sold and it mooned i'd probably kys myself.

(yes, i hold chainlink)
>>
secondarily, certain political figures and their handlers have been aggressively anti crypto. why would you let a revolutionary technology controlled by no one spring up and threaten your stranglehold on the banking system. as evidenced by the avalanche of regulations when people started getting rich off btc tax free during the 18k peak. they clipped the wings of every us based crypto start up ever since
>>
File: plebbit.gif (2.38 MB, 300x250)
2.38 MB
2.38 MB GIF
>>59598686
cope. plebbit still exists.
>>
>>59598699
i can't even tell what you're arguing. are you even in the right thread?
>>
>>59597051
if you hold anything past +10% without foreknowledge of an incoming pump you're a fucking retard
>>
>>59598709
in a sea of volatile assets regularly seeing 3000% gains why on earth would you sell at 10%? you can make 10% with an index fund in 6 months with virtually zero risk
>>
>>59597128
You shouldn't marry old bags. You marry young bags and divorce for lots of money down the line
>>
>>59598707
you said:
>they clipped the wings of every us based crypto start up ever since
i am refuting that with plebbit (forum protocol on IPFS/IPNS with no HTTPS endpoints or SSL certificates making it actually centralized unlike federated social media). this means its actually scalable and resistant to censorship.
flexible front end (4chan and reddt styled front end).
no VCs waiting to dump bc it was airdropped to /biz/ 3 years ago.
literally one of the only /biz/ projects that did not rug (went from 100k to 16m and now bottoming at 2.5m mc).
>>
>>59597051
Sunk cost fallacy
>>
>>59597183
Thats what you said 2,4,6,8,12... months ago too nigger. This shitcoins going nowhere freakshow.
>>
>>59598737
>volatile assets seeing 3000% gains
these are usually predictable, hence the second part of my post
retards holding their bags through a cumulative 100% gain to end up at a loss deserve every bit of what they're getting and more
>you can make 10% with an index fund in 6 months with virtually zero risk
you can do that in 8 to 20 hours swinging shitcoins with the same amount of risk
>>
>>59597051
You simply cant reason with litecoin tards
They actually believe some secret entity has been suppressing the price for a decade and that it will moon one day
>>
>>59597051
>buying LTC in 2025
>>
>>59598759
>muh social media shitcoin didn't get debanked
>you said every
>i win
ok, every startup that actually had a chance to threaten their stranglehold on the banking system
>moving the goalposts
no, your reading comprehension is garbage and so is your shitcoin
>>
>>59598784
>you can do that in 8 to 20 hours swinging shitcoins with the same amount of risk
If it were that easy everyone would be doing it and we'd all be rich
>>
>>59598820
it is that easy but it's basically a full time job if you want it to work and most people can't afford or don't have the discipline to check their assets every 30 seconds
>>
File: 1674996730592624.jpg (44 KB, 750x725)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>inb4 seethe moar / post count
>>
File: 1729911146658245.png (14 KB, 640x590)
14 KB
14 KB PNG
>>59597051
>PLEBBIT SCREENSHOT THREAD
WOWZORS!!!!!!!!
>>
File: saint pepe baggies.jpg (227 KB, 1096x1970)
227 KB
227 KB JPG
>>59597051
>What causes people to marry their shitcoin bag?
Autism
>>
>>59598855
You have to go back.
>>
>>59598784
>you can do that in 8 to 20 hours swinging shitcoins with the same amount of risk
lmao no you can't
>>
>>59597051
This isn't great, but it's nowhere near the worst. Go on Bitcointalk and you will see people still posting daily for projects that have been abandoned since 2017 and are at 0.001% of their 2017 height with volume below $1000 daily. And it's not bots. It's "I'm still hopeful guys. I believe the Dev" referring to shit said in like 2018. There are some seriously sad, old, lonely people on that site.
>>
>>59597051
XRP making it of course. Did you see the maxis getting validated after 7 years of marrying their bags?
>>
>>59598904
>google image found a version with a reddit watermark
>got em
nah, eat shit nigger
>>
>>59598930
ok faggot go check the charts for any active shitcoin and tell me how long it takes for a full down and then up to occur
>>
>>59598980
yeah and good luck getting a 10% return on $100M swing trading shitcoins lmao
>>
>>59599041
why the fuck would you be doing anything with crypto if you have $100M
>>
>>59597051
Marrying your bags is the best thing you can do as long as you choose the best small caps in crypto. Btw it’s Kenshi.
>>
File: Esteban whitepaper.jpg (206 KB, 648x1161)
206 KB
206 KB JPG
>>59598810
>purely p2p free speech platform with no centralized DNS, HTTPS or SSL doesnt that is scalable and resistant (never been done) doesnt threaten corporate monopolies.
you are an idiot.
>>
>>59599431
buy an ad
>>
>>59597051
The same thing is happening with linkies on biz. They keep buying link and expect the singularity (massive price increase) to happen at some point. I used to laugh at linkcels, but now it's just sad.
>>
>>59597051
>why doesn't Charlie buy back in if he believes in it?!
Well, because he doesn't.

Remember back in 2017 when there were "rumors" about Facebook using Litecoin for its payment system, and then suddenly Charlie Lee announced he had to sell 100% of his LTC "because of conflict of interest" and then nothing happened (other than LTC getting flushed down the toilet)?

Who do you think was pushing those "rumors"?
>>
>>59598743
Old bags are paying off, bag some XRP EOS ADA chad.
>>
>>59597051
bottom signal
>>
Ltc may moon in the upcoming envirement where Trump allows a crypto-bull-run. LTC may get an etf
>>
>>59600821
All the bagholders can dump their shitcoins on new bagholders, yay!

There's already a closed-end trust for it through Grayscale. Its ticker is LTCN. Looks like there are bagholders for that, too.
>>
>>59597051
>Btc was $10,000 8years ago and he wasted his time and money on shitcoin
This is future of all altcoiners
>>
>>59597051
>litecoin
I can't imagine marrying a bag of this absolute shit when there are a bunch of other actual projects to marry into. You gotta be a God damn idiot to think this piece of garbage is going anywhere.
>>
File: 1736962518104658.png (545 KB, 547x680)
545 KB
545 KB PNG
>>59602132
Same with all the other "projects" people shill here.

Bitcoin isn't a "project", though, Bitcoin is just money.

(Verification not required.)
>>
>>59597051
The HODL meme
>>
>>59598788
Kek, it truly is like digital silver.
>>
>>59603421
they used to be men
>>
>>59603686
No. STFU you tranny shill.
>>
2k is programmed for litecoin nextweek
>>
>>59604287
Called it
$200 within the next hour



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.