[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: oopgrade.jpg (75 KB, 603x780)
75 KB
75 KB JPG
Why is no one talking about this? its starting, two more weeks.
>>
File: 1733187405610483.gif (185 KB, 640x512)
185 KB
185 KB GIF
Chainlink is inevitable. wagmi bros.
>>
Trust the plan!
>>
>>59597597
So this is the update where chains can self onboard into CCIP or what? I'm out of the loop help me out.
>>
>>59597597
BTW BTC crash incoming, you heard it here first!
>>
>>59597618
No, not the chains themselves. Token devs will be able to deploy CCTs
>>
>"5m"
>Why is nobody talking about this?
It literally just happened. This is nice btw. This also helps the timeline people were talking about in a thread the other day. The audit for this I believe ended during smartcon (halloween) and its live january 14th. That's 106 days. The audit for the payment abstraction layer ended January 3rd and 106 days from that is April 18th. Also note that usdc being added to more chains, since usdc will be one of the whitelisted fee tokens that will be converted in the PAL. I'd really like to see the full list of whitelisted fee tokens.
>>
>>59597618
End users can make their own cross chain tokens here. It will basically be a memecoin casino that will overtake "that" site you can't say here anymore once solana gets on ccip.
>3:10 for video demo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNXz5mbfxWg
>>
>>59597649
>whitelisted
You mean the allowlist?
>>
>>59597661
Yea. Has that list of approved tokens for the PAL been posted? Obviously it will include usdc and eth but I haven't seen a full list
>>
>>59597635
>>59597660
Ok thanks, I just thought this was already the case with shib and pepe going crosschain. I guess those were big projects so not self onboarded like what """devs""" will be able to do know.
>>
>>59597673
>I guess those were big projects so not self onboarded
yup
>>
tokenmanager.chain.link
>>
File: 1736436593065310.jpg (239 KB, 1125x2300)
239 KB
239 KB JPG
>>59597671
Just saw this
https://docs.chain.link/ccip/directory/mainnet

If you expand each network it tells you which "Fee tokens" are allowed for each.

Pic related are the fee tokens allowed for Base Mainnet
>>
>>59597762
WTF my wallet got drained.
>>
>>59597597
The only thing worth to note starting now is Trump presidency. Auradex meme’s will be mooning hard
>>
>>59597597
So they just killed bridges on supported blockchain?
>>
>>59597597
Bros please don't tell me they're still going for flat fees over percentage based fees?
>>
>>59597597
The second post is an absolute joke. Look how fucking slow they are.

No name bridges plug in CCTP garbage as soon as it's released and Chainlink takes months to do it.
>>
>>59597820
Flat fees are better since it costs less for the users and allows for more adoption. How much more money does Sergey need to fill his greedy pockets?
>>
>>59597597
Bearish for chainlink
Bullish for xrp and xlm
>>
>>59597889
>No name bridges
the ones that get hacked all the time?
>>
>>59597905
No one's that are part of BUILD dumbfuck.
>>
>>59597597
Boinkers is about to blow up, and everyone’s sleeping on it. Two weeks? That’s just the calm before the storm. Once it pops, it’s gonna be all over. You better get in now while it’s still under the radar; once the hype hits, it’s gonna be too late.
>>
>>59597736
Thank you. Interesting that GHO is the only token on any of the chains here that isn't.
>a chains native token
>a chains wrapped native token
>LINK
Also interesting that it's only on arb and eth, considering how many eth L2's are on this chain list you would think it would be on there too.
>>
it's a subtle change in marketing. in the past, you had stacks of things getting bigger or charts going up. now they throw a bunch of projects against the wall and see which ones get interest from token buyers. then they make the version number go up, to great praise. doesn't matter if there are any changes, just the number going up soothes the token buyer
>>
>>59597899
>Bearish for chainlink
>Bullish for xrp and xlm
Bearish for xrp
Bullish for sui
>>
>>59597660
>"that" site
?
>>
>>59598083
meatspin
>>
>>59598083
That solana memecoin site, you know which one I'm talking about. Saying it used to give you a 3 day for advertising and I don't want to find out if it still does.
>>
>>59598113
Rhymes with jump dot gun?
>>
>>59597660
Solana is never going to get on CCIP you dumb fuck.
>>
>>59597985
Reminds me on how Tribally is evolving into gaming and AI now.
>>
It will be another disappointment. No one will use this.
VCs will prefer using VC shit.
>>
>>59597611
>>59597613
>>59597618
>>59597622
>>59597635
>>59597649
>>59597660
There are 0 plans for Solana to integrate CCIP. Give it up. So sick of LINKchuds.
>>
>>59598178
>>59598175
>>59598152
>seething so hard he switched id back and forth
You ok anon?
>>
>>59598189
Maybe offer a rebuttal you fucking Chainlink Telegram chud. I know you fuck heads from that unofficial Telegram frequent here and try to shill your LINK bags. All of you are fucking annoying and your Telegram status has no power here.
>>
>>59598137
yep
>>59598178
Are you stupid? You know the github is public right? You can just look with your own eyeballs and see that they are working on it.
>>
>>59598200
>bro they are working on it
>doesn't link source if its so easy to find

kek
>>
>>59598093
>chainlink is going to overtake meatspin
gonna be rich, bros
>>
>>59598200
If you had a gf, I could steal her so fast your head would spin. Go stop being skinny fat chud
>>
>>59598207
REEEEEEEEEEE HERE YOU IDIOT. NO MORE SPOONFEEDING. YOU HAD 8 YEARS.

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink-ccip/tree/main/chains/solana
>>
>>59598178
Didn't they just hire a rust dev for Sol shit? Anyway CCIP will just plug in the CCTP Circle attestation for SOL and act like it's their tech kek.
>>
>>59598218
This just means that CCIP providing the tooling. Solana still needs to integrate this, so balls in their court and they aren't interested.

LINK price target: $10
>>
>>59598222
Wow 1 whole Jeet dev to onboard Solana (who isn't even interested in integrating CCIP).

Find 1 source that shows that Solana is actually interested and in the process of integrating CCIP.

A lot of you have overdosed on X hopium CLG and fishy and it shows. kek
>>
>>59598222
>>59598218
>>59598200
You should have just bought XRP.
>>
>>59598237
I'm agreeing with you dipshit.
>>
>>59598242
desperate faggot KEK
>>
>>59598250
Desperate for what exactly? Jump off a cliff.
>>
>>59598265
>>59598242
>>59598237
>>59598227
>>59598212
>>59598207
>>59598200
>>59598197
>>59598197
>>59598178
This nigga so mad he mad 10 posts in 10 minutes
>>
>>59598273
Consider adding a rebuttal to what I'm saying otherwise sit the fuck down.
>>
>>59598237
who gives a shit about solana
chainlink is swift scale
>>
>>59598535
>who gives a shit
>coin went from 12 dollars to 240

Just hold Chainlink maweeens!

Wait until 2026, I mean 2027 for Swift. Actually maybe 2030, for real dis time.
>>
>>59598535
We understand the swift product is most important but swift is not the intended end user of the token manager portal. Why would these banks need to create their own cross chain token on a frequent basis? They will just use a stablecoin and pay for their cross chain fees in link.
>>
>>59598535
>who gives a shit about solana

imagine being this retarded. Solana is literally the star of the show this bullrun.
>>
>>59597597
Bump
>>
>>59597597
Check the chart, no one cares
>>
File: the chart lolzor2000.png (67 KB, 1105x580)
67 KB
67 KB PNG
>>59599879
Here I added for visibility
>>
>>59597597
>he does it for free
https://chain.link/community/advocates
>>
>>59600350
Jesus, that's some jeet-tier multi level marketing shit
I always kinda thought chainlink might be a scam, this shreds all doubt
>>
>>59598273
wait 3 of those posts are to a single 1 line reply, kek
>>59598554
It was the star but now I think it will be the sidekick because of institutional adoption
>>
January 2021:
BTC: $29,000
ETH: $730
SOL: $1.50
BNB: $37
LINK: $21

January 2025
BTC: $98,000
ETH: $3,300
SOL: $194
BNB: $698
LINK: $21


Nobody...and I mean NOBODY, gets absolutely c-u-c-k-h-o-l-d-e-d harder, for longer... and then comes back absolutely BEGGING for more

THE Cuckolds of crypto



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.