Why?
New standard
>>59598471Why did they call Chainlink the Standard then?
Standard oil tried to be the standard and look what happened to that. Nobody uses standard oil.
>>59598601linkies are delulu
>>59598663I asked you a questionThis is not about Link its about eth and xrp
>>59598663but why didnt xrp just make their own system why do they have to use the standard chainlink?
>>59598750Other coins use chainlink, why are you tryna act like it’s a bad thing? It’s like paying for a service
>>59598802Yeah everyone used Chainlink, it's the standard of course
>>59598802So like standard infrastructure used by everyone? Kinda sounds like….
>>59597892because retards who don't understand WHY blcokchains exist have put their money in solana, thinking that it's fine to run a project with no self validation it will, of course, blow up in their facessame shit with cripple
A pro-crypto congressman that was on video two years ago stating XRP is absolutely not a security was appointed as Vice Chairman of the Subcommittee on Digital Assets a couple hours ago. Probably as good a reason for bullish sentiment as there ever was for crypto in general, but he specifically has come to XRP's defense in the past.>>59598922
>>59598995Well not a security....and?It doesnt make a useless token worth 100s of billions
Now that XRP and Chainlink are friends now. We are going to double team etheraum and bring blockchain to the next level. Satoshi would have wanted this. We can't have a pony draped skeleton troon run these crypto streets. We need real men who go to court rooms and fight for the common man.
>>59597892is prolly nothing, disregard
