Why didn't they pick The Standard?
It is the standard. They chose the solution that can give them access to any chain, not just one.
Because they're going extinct once Ripple goes live.
>>59603327Why did Kodiak refuse to launch a digital camera when the competition was?
>>59603353But how fast is Chainlink? How many TPS? XRP is the fastest, baby.
>>59603356Swift is not a random third party, they are the banks themselves. How are they going extinct? kek
XRP just did a x6 in a crab market, with no signs of stopping as it approaches its old ATH. Chainlink couldn't even hold a x3 without retracing -33%, and is nowhere near its ATH.This is not FUD, these are indisputable facts about the current situation.
>>59603376Kodiak was the largest camera company with no second best. Now no one knows their name. Companies fall from the #1 spot all the time.
>>59603376When a faster, cheaper, alternative gets released.Buy XRP before it's too late.
>>59603379Should I buy Chainlink before it pumps? Buy low sell high u know.
>>59603373https://x.com/chainlink/status/1878154916826665303>>59603376Its XRPs only argument now and it makes no sense, unless youre a gullible rube
>>59603409Can you explain if XRP is faster than Swift how is Swift gonna avoid getting replaced and the banks using something faster?
>>59603427>Swift gonna avoid getting replaced and the banks using something faster?Because Swift is run by the banks, retard fucking dipshit.
>>59603435No need to get angry just trying to undertand this Chainlink stuff
>>59603409the coin they are going to drop is xrp btw
>>59603504How are the banks going to replace themselves? Do you even understand what Swift is? Understanding swift is not "chainlink stuff"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWIFT>and owned by the banks and other member firms that use its service. Swift can now use any chain they want (except XRPL because they haven't integrated CCIP yet).
>>59603536>Swift can now use any chain they want (except XRPL because they haven't integrated CCIP yet).If CCIP is only integrated for a bunch or slow and expensive EVM chains, how are you so sure banks won't just switch and use XRP instead which is fast and cheap?
>>59603568>how are you so sure banks won't just switch and use XRP instead which is fast and cheap?Because thats why theyre using CCIP. It can give them access to any chain thats connectedThe simpler solution would be to tell ripple to integrate CCIP and well see how fast banks flock to the XRPL. (they wont)
>>59603568>IfEventually XRP will be considered slow. Why should the market lock themselves in? Btw hedera (which is just as fast but has more throughput than XRP) has or will have ccipBridge currency not needed
>>59603657Exactly. Would you rather have 1 car or 100 cars you can drive? Each car has a different purpose and each car shares the same gas tank
>>59603399sure why not? digits says soI wouldn't though
There is more than 1 standard.
>>59603721Lets hear your reasoning?
>>59603615>Because thats why theyre using CCIP. It can give them access to any chain thats connectedBut you don't need CCIP to use the XRPL. It's a not needed middle-man.>>59603657I don't think Hedera is integrated with CCIP but I get your point.>>59603721>There is more than 1 standardWDYM?
>>59603327I have a better one, why is LINK stuck at $20?
>>59603759>But you don't need CCIP to use the XRPL. It's a not needed middle-man.Banks do.
>>59603791Lol
>>59603806>If this is the case
>>59603753https://www.iso.org/standards.htmlNotice the s on the end of standards, that means there is more than one.
>>59603806>written by: Dishita>reviewed by: DharaBrownoids
>>59603759> But you don't need CCIP to use the XRPL. It's a not needed middle-man.If you want xyz-memecoin on xrpl (for god knows what reason) you need ccip. >“Okay but why would you want that?”If a corp mints 100 bond tokens on a RWA permissioned consortium dex, there needs to be a mechanism to move and track to the destination wallet/chain(chainlink ccip). XRPL requires the world to be on their platform which just wont happen. Sure some banks might be suckered into their sales pitch, maybe ripple net will have a shiny client for bankers. But that will be small potatoes. Totally not spam thanks 4chinz
>>59603833Well of course, Swift defined ISO 20022 and such. And XRP is the premier ISO 20022 coin.>>59603835Ok that's pretty funny.
>>59603843shut the fuck up faggot. Youve been wrong about everything youve said.
>>59603843All the projects in your picture will play a part in the new system, they will all have their own standard.
>>59603859Your pic has nothing to do with all this. Is Chainlink ISO 20022?>>59603837>XRPL requires the world to be on their platform which just wont happen.Why are you so sure of this, while on the other hand believe that the entire world will be on Chainlink's platform? Seems like double standards. We all believe our chain will win.
Swift invited a handful of teams to solve some problems that they had about ten years ago.One of those teams became known as Chainlink, the other teams dont exist anymore.
>>59603859BIS proposes to connect national systems internationally to improve speed, cost, and transparency of cross-border payments, which basically sums up the mission of blockchain firms such as XRP-powered Ripple, ex-Ripple founder Jed McCaleb’s Stellar (XLM), and newly launched Algorand-powered Six Clovers.SWIFT has just announced cross-border payments in a matter of seconds with its new messaging product SWIFT Go, which is complementary to cross-border settlement services such as BIS’ Project Nexus and Ripple’s On-Demand Liquidity.https://financefeeds.com/ripples-xrp-losing-competitive-advantage-bis-and-swift-going-real-time/
>>59603887Source?
>>59603878>Your pic has nothing to do with all this. Is Chainlink ISO 20022?That picture makes any coin iso20022 compliant. >>59603889shut the fuck up faggot.
and recently Swift had to change iso20022 so that it is up to the Chainlink standard.
>>59603899>That picture makes any coin iso20022 compliant.I don't get it. Is ETH ISO 20022 compliant for example?
>>59603878>believe that the entire world will be on Chainlink's platform? Seems like double standards. We all believe our chain will win.Because swift has published reports with chainlink. Chainlink also speaks at SIBOS. Xrp has none.Show me any report from swift that mentions Ripple.
>>59603894spoon feeding days are over. DYOR
>>59603920How do you think they tested Ethereum with swift? You dont get much.
>>59603934Every shill says this. Go into XSG and ask any questions about Ripple hype. "Spoonfeeding season is over" is a non answer so I'll believe you made that up.>>59603933>Because swift has published reports with chainlink.But even if Swift picks Chainlink over XRP, Swift is not the entire world, see BRICS. Also Central Banks will transact with each other without using CCIP. The 'Swift connector' for CBDCs doesn't use Chainlink.
>>59603919Yes i posted it here>>59603859
>>59603959>Swift is not the entire worldIts 11,000 banks. >BRICSlmao>central Banks will transact with each other without using CCIPcool story>The 'Swift connector' for CBDCs doesn't use Chainlink.Yes it does.
>>59603984>lmaoNot an argument.>Yes it does.No it doesn't, look it up.
>>59603379I would sooner accept defeat as a wrong-picker than buy XRP (ticker: XRP) I made that decision long ago and stand by my beliefs.I think my decision will be winning, however.
>>59603997>Not an argument.Dont worry bro, you can have BRICS. >No it doesn't, look it up.yes it does. you look it up. Also>But even if Swift picks Chainlink over XRPThey already did. It goes live in 25/26. where have you been for the last 5 years?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vce745hO4jg
>>59603899>shut the fuck up faggot.I accept your concession
>>59604037Not clicking your scam link.
>>59603373Imagine a road where you're allowed to drive at 200mphif you like, but it goes to DetroitNow imagine a road with a normal speed limit, but it goes anywhere you want (including Detroit)You need to pick one to use moving forward
>>59604015The Swift CDBC connector solution does not use Chainlink.
>>59604055Prove it.
Sergey Nazorov says he's very excited about the upcoming adoption of payments with swift.https://www.swift.com/news-events/press-releases/swift-ubs-asset-management-and-chainlink-successfully-complete-innovative-pilot-bridge-tokenized-assets-existing-payment-systems
>>59604056One Swift guy was asked about this months ago and he said that the CBDC in particular did not use CCIP, while the rest of Swift SR 2025 thing yes it would use CCIP as showcased by Sergey at Sibos.
>>59604067>One Swift guy was asked about this months agook post your source now. >while the rest of Swift SR 2025 thing yes it would use CCIP as showcased by Sergey at Sibos.youre still a faggot even if you think im right.
>>59604086I made it up.
>>59604094Did I also mention that the DTCC, Euroclear and clear stream will also be using CCIP too, not just Swift?
>>59604094Respect, but fuck you
>>59604048So what website satisfy your confirmation bias?
>>59604113Directly from the source not your fake scam websites with fucking 3rd worlders as the source.
Friendly reminder that chainlink is just a road and generates no extra value no matter how many oil tankers drive on it
'digital assets are going to become mainstream very, very rapidly'- Swifts head of securities strategy Jonathon Ehrenfeld., featuring at Sibos with Sergey Nazarov.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzolWJVwbi4
>>59604148That guy looks creepy, I don't trust his word.
>>59604161You have no choice.kek
>>59604161So do you understand why Swift chose chainlink and not a single chain?
>>59604172Not really, you didn't make a single valid argument IMO. If XRPL is the best chain what's the point of banks using CCIP?
XRP is eating Links lunch again
>>59604188Institutions dont want to bet on a single chain. They have put all their eggs into chainlink which will give them access to ANY chain including XRPL, if they dare. >If XRPL is the best chain what's the point of banks using CCIP?because it not. No one uses it.
Swift confirming they have with with Chainlink for over ten years.
>>59604196>Institutions dont want to bet on a single chain. They have put all their eggs into chainlinkThis doesn't make any sense. If banks don't want to take on excesive "single project risk" then only betting on Chainlink would also be contraindicated.
>>59604209It makes perfect sense. Swift is chainlink. Dont you see it yet? >>59604208
>>59604217>Swift is chainlink.Nah, working together for a long time does not make Swift and Chainlink the same.
>>59603568its only fast and cheap because its a ghost chain
>>59604235Well Ripple has never worked with Swift so what does that make them? FUCKING NOTHING.Go back to making Link threads, larping as a XRP holder aint doing anything.
>>59604243>Everyone is a LINK holderTake your meds.
>>59604010>I would sooner accept defeat as a wrong-picker than [capitulate my position]Never stop being you anon.
Here's Ari's thoughts on the matter.
>>59604252Someone who mentions the "swift CBDC connector" is.
>>59603959> believe you made that up.kek go ahead then how fucking new are you if you dont know this. I literally cannot believe its 2025 and people are still trying to figure this out
>>59603894https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2016/09/26/swift-kicks-off-sibos-by-unveiling-blockchain-contest-winners
OMG CHECK TWITTER ALL YOURE FAVORITE INCEL ACCOUNTS ARE SEETHING!!! LITERALLY. EVERY. SINGLE. WON.
>>59604190*checks price*bump
