[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: intcintc.png (338 KB, 768x432)
338 KB
338 KB PNG
Strongly considering going all in INTC right now. I can tolerate some risk and the upside seems incredible, I don't see why they shouldn't be able to deliver on 18A. Thoughts?
>>
>>59607388
INTC right now is a dying company being devoured from the inside and being outcompeted by TSMC and Samsung on the semiconductor side and AMD and NVDA on the chip side. Yes, they can recover (like AMD did), but their outlook is pretty grim and they look like they'll be the second Big Blue at this rate.
>>
>>59607388
buy amd and intel then you cannot lose
>>
>>59607388
That bullish divergence on the weekly is interesting, but I would want to see some evidence that price is ready to trend back up.
>>
>>59607400
Was also strongly considering this since AMD is also a bit down atm
>>59607391
How is it being devoured from the inside? I've tried to read articles on it but most of the articles read like ads for Intel
>>
>>59607400
both look awful. x86 is dead. buy ARM.
>>
>>59607388
Do they have alot of jews in company? If so imma buy. Good point to take into consideration which alot of people miss/forget
>>
>>59607565
they built a new factory in israel, so yeah
>>
>>59607388
Dead company
>>
>>59607388
They're retarded.
Also Intel's all time high was in the 2000s.
>>
>>59607705
>fading intel in the age of AI
ngmi
>>
>>59607388
it took them 5 years to get 10nm working
>>
OP
>>
File: 1706203719244325.png (161 KB, 483x470)
161 KB
161 KB PNG
>>59607388
One of the best stocks to be buying right now at these levels. Buy in this range and sell a couple years later for a 5-10x
>>
>>59608412
How much did you buy?
>>
Intel will never die. Current prices are a steal but it could go even lower before getting bailed out so DCA is the play here.
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (8 KB, 480x360)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
>>59608412
I'm not against buying Intel. But right now it looks really dire and are there even any positives in the future?
>Apple stopped using Intel
>pretty much lost to AMD
>not part of the AI gold digging craze

opinions?
>>
>>59607420
buy amd and intel and arm then you cannot lose
>>
>>59607715
>AI
Nvidia's already supplying Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet, what's Intel gonna do?
>>
>>59609248
They could get bought out for a huge sum of money
>>
>>59609586
>Nvidia's already supplying Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet,
not if their orders get cancelled amid delays and overheating issues
>>
>>59609600
>if
good luck with that prediction
>>
File: 1711134086590110.png (220 KB, 1000x1151)
220 KB
220 KB PNG
>>59609248
Trump administration is going to push Intel as the main US chip manufacturer over his term. Watch this one closely.
>>
solid play.
MAGA narrative.
fundamentally USA needs chip manufacture independence.
also, yall niggas forget Intel's responsible for pushing entire computer industry for the past three decades - it's not going away.
>>
>>59607391
>outcompeted by TSMC and Samsung on the semiconductor side and AMD and NVDA on the chip side.
Wtf are you even trying to say? Semiconductors and chips are the same thing.

Intel designs and manufacturers their own microchips for CPUs, which makes them a unique company. AMD sold their fabs a long time ago. Nvidia designs their GPUs and gets other companies to manufacture them. TSMC doesn't design, they just manufacture designs for companies like AMD and Nvidia.
>>
File: Rec card.jpg (1.12 MB, 3606x1142)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB JPG
>>59607411
>How is it being devoured from the inside?
Intel as a company drank from the fountains of DEI and ESG a long time ago. They are filled to the gills with the most incompetent H1-Bs and yass queen female engineers. They consistently internally push back the release dates for new architecture. They still can't create 7nm but keep promising 5nm and 3nm are just around the corner.
>>
>>59607388
Its a trash company.
There is a reason they tanked.
That reason has not been resolved, it is still ongoing.
Geopolitics are against them

Whats your bull case for Intel?
>>
>>59607400
Almost certainly Beijing funds their own Chip fabs. This is a major national security issue for them.
>>59607411
Propaganda articles shilling the stock is a bad sign.
>>
>>59610065
>they've survived this long! they have to stay alive because I say so!
Gee I wonder how well that worked out for Sears, Blockbuster, Kodak and Chrysler. Want to know what all those and Intel have in common? They failed to capitalize on market trends and stuck to their old playbook while their competitors outplayed them.
>>
>>59610648
It's the premier American chip designer and manufacturer, and a hardcore nationalist and protectionist is about to take office. You are a fool if you are not at least DCAing in.
>>
>>59610972
Except Intel chips are fucking everywhere, x86 is homogenous across the board and will be for the foreseeable future despite memes like ARM.

Hell, IBM is still around because the modern banking system is still running on old IBM mainframes and someone has to maintain that shit.
>>
>>59611251
IBM is a shell of it's former self and has been stagnant in stock price since 2012, the only reason you'd invest in this is for safe and stable stock that returns dividends. Investing in Intel right now is a risk game.
>x86 is homogenous across the board
And they're not alone in the x86 game. Their only serious competitor has taken 20% of their market share in the last 5 years.
I'm not saying Intel is going under tomorrow but it needs some serious rework to stay competitive in the computing industry for the long-term.
>>
>>59607388
This is either like investing in Nokia in 2010 or investing in Nvidia in 2019. I'm not sure which.
>>
>>59607388
Im currently holding 502 shares with a DCA of a little over 27/share. I’ve used it to sell options against for years. Both as outs and covered calls. Right now I’ve stopped because its either set to tank like a mother fucker or course correct and go back to being the main chip maker it used to be. That really depends on if they get rid of all the DEI/ESG shit and actually hire competent people. I’m about 50/50 either way. Seems the only companies still clinging to pozzed politics are those with enough market cap to afford to. INTC already showed they are getting rid of unprofitable sectors like that stupid capital division. I’ll probably hold for a bit longer depending on this their earning report at the end of the month and what the revised guidance is. If it dumps to 50% of my cost basis I’ll most likely sell it.
>>
File: Imagine.jpg (1.26 MB, 2252x2787)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB JPG
>>59611232
>It's the premier American chip designer and manufacturer
And it's been ran into the ground by incompetency over the last 10 years. Mothballed fabs, failure to compete with ARM on mobile, little interest in making their chips more efficient so they're losing to competitors on data centers now. I work at Intel, you have literally no idea.
>>
>>59607388
the only thing that is going to save Intel and Boeing is the war economy.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.