Why is every single iso20022 coin pumping hard
>>59608164they are sucking cheeto dick hard
i dont fucking know but i hate it so much, none of them have any users or whatsoever
No such thing as a ISO20022 coin retard
>>59608164Orange man said a reserve for the big US based coins is a possibility. Also there is no real thing as an "iso20022 compliant" coin. All chains are compliant if they use the God protocol.
idk, it's prolly something to do with the homosexual mafia
>>59608164This is the utility run.All non-ISO20022s (BTC, ETH, LINK) will fall by the wayside.Tokens will be compliant with govt/industry regulations or they will fizzle out of existence.
>>59608203>non-ISO20022>LINKopinion disregarded
>>59608164I'm battling some serious fomo right now with HBAR, in the end I will have to sit this one out. No way I'm buying in the green.
>>59608264didn't you hear? not only is link not iso 20022, sirgay agreed to downgrade link to an erc-14 token in exchange for 1 years supply of filet-o-fish
>>59608296I love opposite day! Chainlink actually makes any coin ISO compliant.
It seems like the BIS system is happening before the swift system.
>>59608264>opinionIt's a fact anon.https://coincodex.com/article/27964/iso-20022-crypto/LINK isn't in the club.