ICP cycle burn rate is primed to explode. We've been telling you to accumulate for the last 3 years. Well, now you can see what's happening. 2025 will be your last chance to accumulate. By the way, ICP goes deflationary at > 4T cycles per second.
>>59612302Still a ghost chain, still irrelevant. Only hope is that lame AI dapp “Caffeine AI”. Whatever happened to Dragginz also? Wasn’t that suppose to be huge
>>59612337my bags are packed. just don't cry when you get left behind.
>>59612355I am stuck in 8 year neuron.
>>59612600Good, would prevent your dumbass from selling too early. You'll thank yourself in a decade when ICP is 4 digits or more.
>>59612600how many ICP?
>>59612302How high do you think ICP will go this cycle?
>>59612806ICP is going to $5000 by 2030. Screencap this post.
>>59612302>i bought this piece of shit when it was $50
>>59612302Burn rate up 10% since I made this thread. FUDders in shambles
Bought some and will try to buy more soon! Thanks anon
>>596127186500
>>59613696>REEEE it doesn't workdude, come on literally 90% of them don't work. that doesn't stop the pump though, might as well grab a few and sell at 25 on some normies lol
>>59612302your dogshit can't verify from genesisyou don't have fraud proofsyou have no light nodeicp is only above 0 because of VC grift and tech illiterates who don't understand how blockchains work and why they exist ripple, sonic, solana, dfinityyou don't have blockchains
>>59613712this is warput your money on the cypherpunks or die
>>59613714Light nodes output can be spoofed since you're relying on 3rd party so it doesn't matter anyway you need to run a full node if you want to truly verify, you can run a full node on any blockchain retard. Your blogchain is centralized anyway it runs on AWS or centralized staking protocols or big mining farms.
>>59613587You'll be yielding $10,000 a day before the end of this decade
2k eoy
>>59612302What does this even mean, and how high can it realistically go before we enter the real actual bear market sometime at the latter half of the year?
is 420 icp enough?
>>59615024yeah
>>59615024How does $2M sound?
Got my bags ready, this is heading to $1k+ no less.
>>59616428When
>>59612302>2025 will be your last chance to accumulateIsn't 2025 supposed to be the peak in this bullrun?
can any of you cope fags debunk the FUD that ICP has no developer adoption?
>>59616635Andy do you hear about this one?
>>59616665The last chance to accumulate was 2024. Now we are about to pump the shit up.
>>59612302I can't believe retards still fall for the fud that it's a ghost chain kek
>>59616662Dfinity is a team of highly skilled cryptographers from FANG companies, coinbase, and others that will ensure this reaches 4 digits a coin MINIMUM. The Warburg family is invested (hint: they don't lose).
>>59612337as a developer, ICP is THE most legitimate project. active discussions, daily live voice calls, you can get technical help from an asian qt (she still hasn't caught on that I ask obscure motoko questions just to hear her voice).staff is in shifts there's always calls happening.you can build things on IC that you just CANNOT on other chains.
>>59617363Jennifer can fucking get it.
>>59613587I'll buy your neuron for 4000 ICP right now. Hmu on OpenChat and we'll set it up on ID Geek. You think I'm kidding
>>59612302
>>59612302What's the suicide stack? I barely have 5000.
>>59617363Developer too and I confirm this. Just had to study ICP for a company project. No other chain combines coin, smart contracts and web2(interactive sites) hosting together.
>>59616419nice
>>59617871>What's the suicide stack? I barely have 5000.Nigga, you're holding a make-it stack
>>59612302Dumbfucks are still shilling this shitcoin? $400 to $3 at the bottom. Only reason it's moving up is because shitcoiners trade it against Bitcoin, pricing it in satoshis, and Bitcoin has been on a tear for the last year.
>>59617871100/1000. Always has been.ICP is going to $5,000 within 5 years.
>>59617923I can't see it ever going above $30. It's impossible. >>59617928This chart is really out of date. I think it's more like 10k/100k
>>59617924Retard, it's literally the only blockchain that can run an LLM 100% on chain. I just tested their proof of concept a few minutes ago.
>>59617939>I think it's more like 10k/100kNot reasonable You are pricing a makeit stack at over a $1M USD. That kind of money by itself lets you retire and live a king in most countries. ICP is going to a multi trillion dollar market cap once the AI wars kick off and destroy Web 2. ICP will be $5,000 by 2030. I am sticking to this point.
>>59617952How much time left to get a stack. Before it reaches singularity
>>59618003Wanting to rope that I missed out on $3/ICP but looking at everything now, anything around $10 is your last chance for cheapies.
>>59618003~4T cycles burned per second is the critical inflection point causing the token to go deflationary. I would say you have about a year until that will happen, maybe less.
>>59617811I love sending her scurrying for information. She assigns her subordinates tasks then reports back the findings. So cute and helpful. Ugh.
>>59618108Ok I think I can manage to get 5k Icp granted it stays under $20. Is 5k enough?
Here is some exclusive, leaked content from Dominic Williams' private office of him "demoing" Caffeine.AI: https://vocaroo.com/1iPPRLzVMsrF
>>59618191based
>>59618166Yes. My advice is to DCA what you can (not a cent more or less) until you wake up one day, and you've made it.
How come there's no wikipedia article for ICP? All the other coins get one. Reeeeeeeeeeeee. No I will not write one myself.
>>59618108Deflation rate is dependent on token price as cycle mint rate is tied to xdr, if u want 1 xdr worth of cycles its 1 divided by current price of icp. you spend less icp converting to cycles the higher the price of icp. the cycle burn rate is only for already converted stockpiled cycles. A measurement im interested in is how much icp is being converted to cycles on a given day.
>>59618587Not entirely true. Only node rewards are tied to XDR. Most inflation comes from voting rewards which are priced in ICP.
>>59618629for the inflation mechanisms sure, im speaking of the deflationary mechanisms
>>59612302Genuine questionWhat are the best reasons we need the internet on the block chain?
>>59619067You want to have a site to talk agaisnt your local politician. He cant censor it. The reasons are vert apparent when u live under a dictatorship. Imagine social media without being censored because ur post was labelled as "hate speech"
>>59617177>The Warburg family is invested (hint: they don't lose).Sauce? And, checked.
>>59617811>simping for THISBig Yikes
>>59619067_Theoretically_ it'd be the same reason as why we have crypto money. Can't really be messed with or stopped by anyone. It also simplifies things: imagine any human or AI system connected to the internet being able to launch most any app or webpage as a smart contract without having to give a name and fork over goy fiat and accept ToS for various web services where one suffers platform risk. Literally just connect to ICP, fork over the cycles and the code and boom, you have your thing running that creates value, either just for you as a private app that you can always control to from anywhere in the world even from a brand new phone as long as you have your seed/yubikey, or as a product for others.The main bearish thing about ICP imo is you still have to contact Dfinity to get a node up and running, and afaik Dfinity still has control over key parts of the network. As long as the network can't accept new nodes in a sovereign manner and push any kind of new code via the NNS without Dfinity involvement, it's a serious problem. I wish Dominic would speak on this in 2025 (incl Badlands). Shit like entire NNS votes to kill canisters serving super mario wasms is retarded and I sure hope Dfinity realizes this. Because what happens when competitors and state actors start flooding the network with millions of CP sites etc and post links everywhere with AI bots? That day will come if there's a gain in doing such an attack and right now I don't know how ICP would cope. As it works now, Dfinity is too important imo
>>59619288Checked. I always assumed the plan was to decentralize at some point when the network is more mature and development further along, but I also have no idea what their targets are in that respect.
>>59613714>>59613717Based
>>59619308based on what?
>>59619148You say that but the second anyone tries to set up a virulently racist or terrorist glorification dapp they are getting yeeted.
>>59619288re: network survivability - isn't it up to the nodes to censor- it JUST SO HAPPENS that dfinity has the most neuron ICP therefore they have controlling stake?so anytime they can introduce a vote to exile a node.I would like to understand more about the node diversity. Being on multiple continents is great, but if it's just 1 guy running a node in say, Brazil, and that's 1/4 of the south american nodes - then it's easy to shut down. Compared to tens of thousands (or more?) btc nodes.
>>59612302I wish it were actually decentralized. It had some potential.
