From a pure standpoint of speculative value proposition vs. the rest of the market we could easily make the case Chainlink should be a $60-100B+ mcap token, if not based on XRP a $180B+ mcap token (since LINK does way more than XRP currently, stands to capture way more value, has more important partnerships, and a shitload more revenue, for example). What will it take for LINK to actually see the 4-10x+ it's due?At this point Reddit and Twitter always say LINK is an essential hold, so the wheel seems to be in motion but what will the catalyst be and will it come soon?
>>59617201we need more official announcements from big boy companies saying they're using chainlink. eventually one of them will be known by enough normies to cause a FOMO spark.
i feel like if any of the bullish announcements we had in the last few years were made now we would pump since the overall sentiment for crypto is insanely bullish
>>59617271Agreed. If that DTCC proof of concept released today instead of a year ago we would be at $40 right now.
Always remember, we can remain delusional longer than market can remain irrational
>>59617201is it even worth buying if I can only afford a 3 digit stack?
>>59617364a 10x is a 10x
>>59617364you have until the end of the year.
>>59617201XRP is an outlier, an abnormality, you can't mesure anything against it.
>>59617364>>59617377checked - 7's anon is right. Don't be a retard with the mentality "A bitcoin is $105,000 I can't afford that." Focus on the multiplier. How much can you MULTIPLY your investment by? The chief argument against buying BTC vs. an alt shouldn't be the PRICE of Bitcoin but rather the market cap as it takes a LOT more money to come into Bitcoin at this point to 2x it than it would to even 50x Chainlink.LINK easily has a 10x in it in the near (think 2-3 years) future, and probably honestly a 100-1000x within the next decade.Will it be the BEST performing asset over the next 3 years? Unlikely, though I honestly wouldn't put it past it. But it's pretty much a guaranteed very good investment, which is a smarter choice to make 9/10 times than a YOLO play for a higher multiple where you likely lose your money instead, or an alternative safe play where the multiple will likely be lower.
>>59617400LINK has been underperforming for last cycle, its probably the most likely 10x this year
>>59617262It's not about announcement it's about putting the tokenomics into place. We need high usage + payment abstraction + staking, if we get that we will be super high, no matter if retails buy or not (they will, making us higher) >>59617364It's a dumb way of looking at things. If you believe it will rise a lot, you should invest in it even if you're just buying a cute 5 LINK stack (aka retirement in 2050 if all goes well). Think about it like assets are competing for your purchasing power. What other asset beside LINK have a more solid potential upside? I don't know any, be it long or short term.
>>59617201Your premise is based on the market being sane.I suggest you rethink your position.
>anon gets forcibly removed by VCs for bullposting about LINK
