Reminder: LINK going on an XRP-like run would put it at $150/token in 2 months time and even then it would only be half XRP's mcap. This shit has room to run, and it's going to. Don't say we didn't warn you.
THAT'S ALL WELL AND GOODI GO BACK TO WORK ON WEDNESDAY MORNINGWHEN CAN I CEASE THE WAGERY?!
Sell it and buy Trump.
>>59645296SOLANA IS A PIECE OF SHIT AND I REFUSE TO USE IT
>>59645281US Strategic Bitcoin ReserveChainlink Proof of Reserve Rub some braincells together and see what's coming anonshttps://www.salon.com/2025/01/13/inauguration-committee-sells-candlelight-dinner-access-for-1-million/
>>59645281>its been like 10 years but this time its actually seriously going to pump for real trust the plan!!!!
>>59645296i only buy Eth like Trump
>>59645331a chainlink reserve doesn't make sense at all. like not giving any comment about how important link will or won't be, it just is not the sort of thing you'd reserve. only really BTC and XRP make sense for the US to reserve, maybe ETH, although i'm sure they'd prefer to just let ETH die since its chinese.
>>59645294lmao SEETHE
>>59645431Sorry let me break it down for you retard.The meme lately is the dictator wants to make a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve.Chainlink has a solution for providing real-time updates to consumers about the balances in reserves. It is called Chainlink Proof of Reserve (POR)https://chain.link/proof-of-reserveI am implying in my post not that Trump will make a Chainlink reserve, as your dumb fuck monkey skull conjured up, but instead would be selected as the technology to secure and enable the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve to be used as a sort of collateral in the world markets.The second effect this would have is making Chainlink an instant household name.Hope that all makes sense! Goodnight dip shit!
>>59645634Yeah, they are derived from 3rd party companies. So much for "proof".Also PoR does nothing for price.
>>59645660oh but the price? and even the chart???
>>59645281>weWhos we?
>>59645634you seem unconfident and paranoid.
>>59645331that's one fat mother fucker right there. absolute piece of shit fatass. im all in.
>>59645827Yeah exactly
>>59645634How does this benefit token holders?Payments abstraction layer when?
>>59648104It doesn't. It just makes LINK look more useful than it is, when it's just pulling PoR data from some shitty companies API.PA won't do shit, Sergey still has 9 billion left to dump, no amount LINK payments will offset that.
>>59645827>>59648104PoR is done by DONs and the node operators need to get paid(with the LINK token)
>>59645331Is this guy 5'1"?
>>596484715'9
>>59648397Lmao no one is paying for this shit.
>>59645281In 5 years owning a full link token will be seen as impossible.
>>59648942Indeed, because it will be delisted from everywhere
>>59645320Buy it on kraken pro with usd or euro
>>59645281Not buying you bags, stupid Linkie
>>59650232That's ok, the President will.
>>59645354oh anoooonWakey wakey champ, time to come downstairs and check out Trump's buys today!
>>59648397How much has the PoR regenerated so far? How much will this increase?How does this translate into value to the token? Is there currently a way to circumvent using the link token? When is the payment abstraction layer coming?
>>59650424>How does this translate into value to the token?How did $Trump translate into value to the token?Or XRP?You're missing the forest for the trees you sperg.
>>59650435Answer the question you shilling tetris nigger
>>59650464kek you're clearly not interested in price performance.
>>59650281Wtf it's real. They boughted 180k extra link??
>>59650479Im am , reread the question. you are not interested in giving info, you just want to sperg out about other coins doing something price wise.
>>59650514You are the sperg here, sperg. >"Explain precisely how improving your product and ecosystem benefits the token holders! No I don't care for anything that isn't exactly quantifiable even though we all know crypto gains are still coming from hype and speculation alone, and not utility! Trump coin?? Yes it pumped 1000% overnight on nothing but hype b-but that's different ok!" Sperg.
>>59650571The product you mention, PoR, have been around for some time. It did nothing for price, am I wrong to ask how more of that will do something for price?Why are link holders so sensitive to basic questions about price action and the newest, shiniest gold shit plated carrot dangled in front of their eyes?Sperg
>>59650642what language do you speak at home?
>>59650677The product you mentioned, PoR (Proof of Reserves), has been around for a while. It didn't seem to affect the price, so I'm wondering how implementing more of it would impact the price differently this time.I'm curious why Link token holders seem so sensitive to straightforward questions about price movements and the latest attractive features being promoted to them.Better?Will you now answer the question instead of switching IPs?Man's dodging quesitons like ukros dodging the draft.
>>59650642You're asking dumb questions that you know are unanswerable as a way of coping. Terminal disease, shitty life in general, or just a small stack, I don't know. But you are coping with something. >>59650424Even if the geniuses here are able to figure out for you what revenue a certain Chainlink product brings in (without having access to any inside information mind you), it's still next to impossible to calculate how exactly that translates to increase in token price. You know that, I know that, everyone knows that. Your question is non-sensical and the angle is obvious. That's why you ALWAYS get the same answer: it doesn't matter until it does, and while it still doesn't; look at coin xyz pumping without caring about your arbitrary conditions" >>59650791>muh ip switchMultiple anons think you are dumb, does it hurt that much?
>>59650899Copewall and projection, what a surprise.
>>59650928Very quick concession, I'm impressed.
JD VANCE shaking hands with ripple Brad Garlinghouse last night. https://twitter.com/digitalassetbuy/status/1881298237857906828
>>59650959Complete nothingburger, but thanks for chiming in lad
>>59650899he really got to you eh
>>59650514This guy already gave your microtechnical answer: >>59648397And I gave you your macroeconomic answer: >>59650435And you're interested in neither.
>>59650791>The product you mentionedholy shit you type like an absolutely riled up faggot
>>59651014No doubt about it. I'm seething uncontrollably after realizing how his masterfully crafted question immediately exposed the glaring problems with Chainlink we've been blind to all these years. I kneel.
>>59650281Imagine buying LINK or any other Trump-coin immediately after he rugpulls you idiots. Some people just never learn.
>>59651050Its reformatted by an AI, kek. You want to see more? I asked it to describe >>59650899 by his ad hominem answer: This individual can be described as a defensive and emotionally charged investor who reacts dismissively to critical questions about their investment choices. Their confrontational tone suggests insecurity and frustration, leading them to prioritize asserting dominance in discussions over constructive dialogue. This behavior reflects a strong emotional attachment to their beliefs, often influenced by groupthink within their community.Kek, emotionally charged investors>>59651038Node operators get paid in link, that they proceed to dump? As I said, POR has been one of the previous carrots and did 0 for price. So big nothingburger.
>>59651533Kek, fuddies and AI, name a more pathetic duo. Remember when Adem thought it was damning that he got some bs AI assistant to say that Sergey doing an interview with Bankless meant they had a deeply rooted partnership? Anyway, based on your last few posts: >Based on the provided text, the user’s posting style can be characterized as follows:>Confrontational and Provocative:The user employs an aggressive tone, including direct accusations, mockery, and offensive language.Their approach often includes dismissive remarks ("copewall and projection"), inflammatory phrases, and baiting ("answer the question you shilling tetris...").>Critical and Skeptical:They express skepticism towards the topic discussed, particularly about the perceived value and effectiveness of PoR (Proof of Reserves) and related developments.Their questions highlight dissatisfaction with previous promises or expectations regarding price impact.>Persistent and Demanding:The user repeatedly asks for direct answers to their questions, indicating a desire for clarity or accountability.They criticize evasiveness or perceived unwillingness to engage with their queries.>Informal and Erratic:The writing lacks formality and often includes grammatical errors or typos ("quesitons," "Im am").There’s a mix of coherent arguments and emotionally charged outbursts.
