I rippled up right after I de-linked
How does a new mansion sound?
Why is trump buying LINK and not XRP?
>>59653935Why did Trump have dinner with Brad and not Sergey?
>>59653863>I altedup right after I de-ALTed?
We cant see everything Trump and JD Vance buys.
I sold xrp when the ceo said he didn't know why the price was up, bought link for its little pump then realized it's run by a Russian so I sold and bought doge for its pump. Took those profits and dumped it in btc for its dump that wiped out all that hard work. Been trading for three months, zero gain.
>XRP's only bull case is to ban all other crypto and be the only one allowed>so their plan is to manipulate politics to make that happen
>>59654490>CEOHe's CTO
>>59653935Buying XRP would be insider trading
>>59653949You mean how they donated 5 million and had dinner with other people? Ya I member.
>>59654847You know that JD Vance went straight up to one of the XRP guys and shook hands long while talking with him today, right?
>>59654866Sure he did. Is this what the XRP community told you? Show proof.
>>59654907He really did. Vance literally sprinted across the room to meet the XRP guy, shook his hand, and congratulated him at becoming the new Finance Minister.
>>59654912Cringe. Xrp faggots would believe this too.
Yeah JD went right for fucking Brad Garlinghouse immediately. We all saw it.
>>59654924How could you possibly see it in your moms basement?
There you go, JD singles him out.https://twitter.com/RowenExchange/status/1881364398687609045
>>59654956link sissies, our response?
>>59654956Theyre literally waiting there like a bunch of NSync fans hoping to get a picture.
>>59654974>Theyre literally waiting there like a bunch of NSync fans hoping to get a picture.JD didn't go around the room... And do a handshake with everyone... Did he now? Oh wait he didn't. Seethe more.
there's video of JD talking about XRP from like 4 or 5 years agoyou know he's rippled up
I just wanted to say that i can post without the 15min captcha. I suspect its the glowies messing with my phone again - sometimes i get banned for posts i did not post. Thats all
>>59654993He literally spoke to the other 2 guys longer.
Hahhaahahahahhahahahhahahahahah
>>59655070How does it feel?
>>59654920>>59654955>>59654974>>59655060cry cry cryAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA
>>59654974>NSyncTop kek and yes, I'm a boomer.
>>59655106congratulations on the 1 second handshake. Trump bought more LINK btw
>>59655260LINK 64% on 1YXRP 500% on 1YAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHLINK ABSOLUTELY SUCKS
>>59655292>you know he's rippled upProve it? Why did they publicly buy link again?
>>59655303LINK ABSOLUTELY SUCKSAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHITS UNDERPERFORMINGAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHXRP IS EATING LINKS LUNCHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAHA
>>59655318Holy cope. Nobody needs XRP kek. Thats why their only buyers and sellers are ripple.
Get in you fuckin losers, we're gonna make America great again
>>59655341XRP IS EATING LINKS LUNCH!!!!!!!!!
>>59655471at what? Fake value being injected into the token?
>>59655523COPEchart/price, baggieLINK LOSESXRP WINS
>>59655536Ranked 55 in Defi TVL lmao kek. nice adoption=. The musical chairs eventually stops though
>>59655523Hello madam I am calling from microsoft sappart Do not be of alarm butBy Vishnu, there is FAKE VALUE hiding in the blockchain, do not redeem saar, i mean madam
>>59655823>there is FAKE VALUE hiding in the blockchainKEK BAHAHAHA. Its not even value on chain, no one uses XRPL Do I need to repeat: ranked 55 in Devi TVL @ 70m.
>>59655740At it again biepum?
>>59657480What’s a biepum?
fuck all linkies
>>59653863Truth be told, y'all need meme in your life
>>59655366Your'e god damn right.>589 fee btw.
CHAINLINK to $1000!
>>59653949
Extremely based
>>59653949>>59662271
>>59653935He didn't. World Liberty Fi did because it is a defi yield service. Why did the CEO and CLO of Ripple shake the Vance's hand at the inauguration and not Sergei?https://x.com/_Crypto_Barbie/status/1881459471307993339
>>59655303To use in for price feed data on the eth version of their stablecoin. Not a big deal literally whatsoever and anyone who thinks it is doesn't understand blockchain fundamentals, which is probably why you invested how you did
>>59662356holy shit that’s crazy how they shook the vance’s handTHE vance hand shakers of crypto
>>59662356World Liberty also adopted Chainlink.And Donald J. and his sons are all co-founders.
>>59662271Lol Those are just (some of) their payment company partners. Ripple are partnered with a majority of core service Fednow providers (Finastra, Accenture, Volante, etc.). Big players using link for data feeds is a HILARIOUS cope and boon for Chainlink private company investors but in no way meaningful to LINK token investors.
>>59662271>>59662351It is always funny to see your memes that always look the same, an ms paint edit you couldn't even figure out how to size well with plain white background. Same ol thirdworld spammy.
>>59662433>Finastra, Accenture, Volante, etcThose aren't banks.>your memesanon's first day on an image board
>>59662433>boon for Chainlink private company investors but in no way meaningful to LINK token investorsfunny how you brought that up
>>59662467The difference is everyone who invested in XRP knows this about ODL and I never used it to make an argument for why you should invest or based my decision on the demand volume from it. Your whole argument hangs on the analog for link and so does your whole investment thesis. Pretty hilariously ironic self-own.
>>59662501>I never used it to make an argument for why you should invest You used it as an argument for why you shouldn't invest in Link lolAlso, you got your IDs mixed up. Oops
>>59662448Your memes are objectively poorly made (not really that relevant but who cares). The listed service providers weren't presented as banks. What do you even mean? They were presented as core service providers for the Fednow payment system (as well as many other hundreds of banks). Finastra is actually higher up the pike than individual banks and provides the core software they use for payments, lending, and otherwise. Check them out:https://www.finastra.com/solutions/us-mid-market/digital-retail-commercial-bankinghttps://www.accenture.com/us-en/about/company-indexhttps://www.volantetech.com/about/about-volante/
>>59662537Retard. I said that ODL demand is not why we invest in XRP and that all of us know this. I then said that you invest in link for the link equivalent of ODL. It literally is a good reason to not invest in link if that's all there is to it. This is intro logic stuff. I made an analogy and said the version of it in terms of XRP is not a good reason to buy XRP in itself. Then said same for link. This is so low level and irrefutable of an argument it is really hard to imagine what you are misunderstanding, except for the fact that you post literally all day about link here to such an extent that you are in every single thread that mentions XRP or link and seemingly don't even break for sleep. It is actually crazy. If you aren't a paid poster (which you almost definitely are), you are almost definitely the most terminally online and active 4chan user in history on any board. Pretty crazy when you think about it.
>>59662448your memes are bad and you should feel badseethe and cope, linktranny
>>59662537I don't have my IDs "mixed up". What does that even mean?
>>59662429They use link for price data. This is such an extreme nothingburger in terms of price impact for token holders it is like driving by a lemon grove and smelling it as you go by at 55 mph and considering it a deep process of consuming lemons and vitamin c.>>59662387At the fucking inauguration after meeting with Trump the week before and several times before while president and not, once seemingly for an entire day per his presidential calendar.
>>59662543>>59662574>>59662576>>59662577>>59662595>Finastra/Accenture/Volante VS. Swift/DTCC/Euroclear/Brazilian CB, etc.lol>having no value capture bad for Link, but NOT bad for Ripple!lol>back-to-back seethepostinglol
>>59662610Cope
>>59662610forgot>samefagginglol
>>59662610It is impossible to spell out your failure understanding argument more simply than was done in >>59662574. Maybe separating the premises will help.ODL is basically demand neutralTherefore ODL is not sufficient reason to buy Link price feeds are basically demand non-existentTherefore buying link for its price feed service alone is not sufficient reasoning.No one (especially not me) is making an argument that you should buy XRP due to demand volume.You are making the argument that you should buy link based on price feed data deals.You are making the bad investment/argument. I am not saying the same principle doesn't apply to XRP, you are strawmanning me as saying that because you are both too low IQ to understand a really not complicated argument and too intent to post (for wage probably or just extremely unparalleled obsession) to not reply despite not knowing or caring how objectively retarded you sound
>>59662618How am I samefagging? I have the same ID every time I reply to you. Lol What is wrong with you?
>>59662615>>59662635>double replyinglolBy the way, when was the last major point of contact between Ripple and Finastra for instance?And why can't I find them on Finastra's partner page?https://www.finastra.com/partners/find-a-partner>>59662641You replied to me here >>59662501with the wrong ID.
>>59662650People double reply all the fucking time when they are replying to multiple posts. That is not samefagging. How the fuck do you spend THIS much time here and still not know basic newfag terminology? I didn't reply with the wrong ID. How the fuck do you even do that? I clicked the post number and the window autogenerate to reply to you. Ripple and Finastra are ongoing partners. The petulant cope is absolutely unreal.
>>59662650Another double reply for ya. https://www.finastra.com/sites/default/files/file/2021-12/resource-ripplenet-via-fusion-total-messaging.pdf
>>59662650Here is from the announcement of their partnership: https://www.fstech.co.uk/fst/Ripple_Partners_Finastra_Blockchain_Tech.php
>>59662687>2021>>59662703>2019lol>no longer listed as partnerlol
>>59662356>He didn't. World Liberty Fi did because it is a defi yield service.your attempts at obfuscation are so pathetic. Do you really think that anyone in this thread will read your nonsense, see that it doesn't make sense, and then just accept it to be true? That might work on room temp IQ brownoids but it will not work on us. By the way, go tell your boss the same thing. He tried the same exact thing in pic rel and it just became a meme and a screenshot to share and laugh at, because anyone with an IQ over 110 sees straight through this shit. It's actually insulting that you faggots think that you can fool us. Fun fact, I already know how you will respond to this. You will completely ignore the fact that I just BTFO you, instead you will try to redirect the conversation in an inflammatory way by insulting me, or by talking about the price, or by saying chainlink bad.
>>59662772You’re talking to a guy that thinks price feeds are demand non-existent and doesn’t understand that chainlink is a suite of products
>>59662710Here is from their own current product video. Lol. Pic related pops up at 1:30:https://pages.finastra.com/Payments-Connectivity-Marketplace.html#video
>>59662610>>59662650>>59662710Volante-https://www.volantetech.com/about/partners/
>>59662809>>59662812>IDslol
>>59662783he isn't a guy who thinks that, he is a paid shill who has a large spreadsheet of dishonest arguments that he posts from all day long. He knows he is wrong but he doesn't care because he needs the 25 cent paycheck per post. He could even be a carefully instructed GPT bot, who knows.Anons need to learn to stop arguing with these guys and letting them derail our threads. Read what they post and realize that they are not arguing in good faith, they are operating off a carefully scripted set of lines and arguments that are designed to disrupt, frustrate, and distract. Pilpul 101.
>>59662356>they shook hands!HahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>59662772You posting the "very fine people" equivalent of David's tweets here while accusing me of obfuscation to try to dig out of being called out for being a low IQ literal paid poster is hilarious. He literally states he is saying the exact opposite of what you are claiming in the tweet you are citing. He is saying banks which benefit from Ripplenet don't benefit to the same extent because they are not the ones benefitted by the level playingground. They still benefit from Ripple's service, but they are not as transformative as those who priorly could not compete at that level. Poorly worded but insane cope to try to spin the same quote you try to spin this way and get absolutely wrecked on in every single thread this way and then rinse repeat in the next thread pretending it never happened while accusing me of obfuscating. Lol>>59662783I do understand it-that doesn't mean the suite is being used as such. CCIP doesn't settle value in LINK and never will because that is not even a use case for link. Even Vitalik said it is insane to imagine the "internet of value" costing even 5 cents per transaction. CCIP uses link for price data and opens up potential to settle using a public blockchain. Even in the Ripple-adversarial camp there are 5-6 better top chains to move actual value than link. Interledger protocol on the otherhand can process literally limitless (limited only by hardware capability not software) as a higher layer build on the XRP tech, using payment channels. It can settle using multiple chains (so far XRP, Eth, and Btc) but is most efficient and cost effective using XRP and can literally make XRP interoperate between all even non-blockchain (but also all blockchain) networks as a liquidity threading everything and causing no low liquidity/counterparty risk to an ecosystem of private stablecoins etc. And XRPL has the programmability for rippling, auto-bridging/pathfinding with a built in order book and cut-above-the-rest automated market maker.
>>59662898"We asked banks to transfer billions of dollars with us and they said they don't want to."t. David Schwartz
>>59662828Multiple people posting multiple things is not samefagging nor is me posting twice to you in reply consecutively. I would say lurk moar but holy shit it impossible. You are at the technical limit you cognitively possess the capability to achieve.
>>59653863
>>59662877Sergei wasn't even invited to the inauguration. Not only was the CEO of Ripple invited, but the CLO was, and he took the time greeting them, both of which just had dinner with Trump (pretty weird for a CLO to attend if there isn't a technical aspect to the meet. 2 days ago you guys started 5 fucking threads about how Sergei was invited to the crypto ball literally a thousand people were at and most major crypto heads were invited to (Ripple literally had more even just media/influencers in attendance than Link did employees).
>>59662933Forget about all that, HE SHOOK HANDS WITH VANCE. THATS CRAZY
>>59662907Post context and timing of quote. Is this from 2014 when he was talking about how they did not want to use XRP because it could not scale to sufficient tps (which consequently led to them developing interledger protocol and gifting it to W3C and Mojaloop and which he described then following this they returned and banks were very happy with it)? You do this every day in every thread. Ripple already move billions of dollars a year in XRP objectively. Whenever this quote was from it is already not the case. Lol
>>59662922Almost every point on this meme is no longer (or not even originally) true. Lol
>>59662960>Post context He was talking about how Ripple had a bunch of press releases with banks, but they don't actually want to transfer billions with them.>and timing of quoteA few months ago.
>>59662898can process literally limitless tps* (as in, trillions, at technical limit that current hardware specs can process6)
>>59662960>Is this from 2014 when he was talking about how they did not want to use XRP because it could not scale to sufficient tpsLiterally from oct 2024. Everything else you said is shit now.
>>59654428Clearly it fake. AI. Matter off time before the Chainlink well be billionaires for alls saars.
>>59662972Post the quote or admit you have no idea where it is from or are deliberately misrepresenting it and don't want to have it be shown. In what world is you butthurtedly describing how he said it "posting the quote in context?" And again, either way, it is already objectively not true. Ripple process billions of dollars in institutional payments yearly using XRP for payment companies that connect banks and banks themselves.
>>59662983Post the quote or admit you can't/are being deliberately misrepresentative
>>59662996>Post the quotehttps://youtu.be/bbBWXlfaxNw?t=218336:23
>>59653863This guy really look alike nft from galaxis
>>59662983Also they literally already do use XRP to settle billions of dollars of transactions via payment companies that connect them as said multiple times.
>>59662933>Sergei wasn't even invited
>>59663014kek source?
>>59663009>...In the beginningHe literally said "in the beginning," referring to the time period exactly I was saying and conveniently clipped before the quote you are citing, he mentioned how the thirdparty payment providers that connect banks are much quicker to move and that banks are slower and more reluctant to disruptive technologies relative to them. None of this is news. Lol The video you shared is literally posted BY BankXRP, a youtube channel and X profile that is easily a top 10 XRP influencer. We all know the history of Ripple and its products and the state of banks wrt using actual blockchain tokens (especially in the US wrt Operation Chokepoint 2.0 and that we are in the AOL 1000 hours online period of crypto development esp wrt banks specifically). Still Ripple uses XRP to settle billions of dollars a year and still a majority of Basel policy setting central banks are buying XRP 3rd only to BTC and Eth (even when it was not 3rd in marketcap). It is hard to see what your argument is? That David citing the slowmovingness of banks and their early reluctance particularly in 2014ish is somehow proof against the current multibillion dollar use of them by payment companies? I don't think I ever even claimed bank partnership as part of my argument here, did I (they are partnered with a number of banks though btw, to say nothing of their wholly owned subsidiary Metaco, which handles custody for a majority of top banks, Standard Custody their other play, or (Finastra also, forgot to mention, provides services for 45/50 top banks at a much deeper actually core level as opposed to SWIFT messaging, which is not even necessary to rely on anymore in the ISO 20022 network era lol))? How is what you wrote responsive to or meaningful to anything I said whatsoever?
>>59663107>He literally said "in the beginning,Yes, referring to the press releases.But NOW the banks don't actually want to follow through on those press releases.Also, holy chatgpt
>>59663024This is the ball after the fact, not the actual inauguration, which was MASSIVELY limited due to space from moving inside. Senators' spouses couldn't even attend if I remember correctly-But Stuart and Brad were still invited. Lol
When payment abstraction layer?How long till the 8 % per year of link tokens runs out? How come chainlink claims to run half the industry but is the token underperforming for years? Why do linkies act cocky while their ''moment'' will be in 1,5 years when ''muh banks'' go live? >>59662863This is indeed the vocal link advocates like clg, fishy and biepum. They argue in bad faith and use strawmans, cherry picking and information from 3 years ago to ''win'' their arguments. When confronted with basic questions as above they act like emotionally invested bagholders that immediatly start ad-hominem arguing. You can put their writeups and blogposts in any text interpreter and it will tell you how cringe they are. When they feel like they are losing the argument they make up shit like ''wax trump'' or ''paid for dinner'', even if those 2 contradict eachother. They truly are mindbroken from holding link.
>>59663121>This is the ball after the fact, not the actual inaugurationThis wasn't at the actual inauguration either >>59654428
>>59663116What? He literally said in the beginning it was good for business (probably while raising especially) to sign banks and that they did so for marketability of service and no longer do that. They objectively are already used by banks for this service, though not sweepingly because, as stated, it is still very early days in crypto in general, especially to move actual movement. It is one thing to test and to use data services but another to settle actual assets on your balance sheet in it, especially in the literally up until yesterday regulatory environment. Once more, it still feels extremely desperate (you have nothing to reply to the things I actually said and asserted) that you continue to extraneously insist the whole conversation hangs on Ripple's specifically banking agreements literally just because you spam that in every thread despite getting continually owned without a single exception. You are literally having an entire different argument just because you have literally pre-scripted talking points you don't know how to argue outside of.
>>59663146He said they liked press releases with banks in the beginning, but apparently banks don't want to move beyond press releases.
>>59662356>BROOOO THEY SHOOK HAAAAANDS>>59662933>OH YEAH WELL SERGEY WASN'T EVEN THERE (he was)I hope you realize what is inevitably coming for all coins based purely on speculation with zero fundamentals
>>59662863How am I derailing a conversation. The only one avoiding argument and coping loudly are you guys? Ignoring everything I say, pretending I didn't prove points wrong or that the stack of points don't matter when demonstrated, hiding once I refute the claims you make despite you having never even read the technical details from the pilot you are citing and for literally not reason at all think link will be used to settle value because of, etc. You are projecting and hiding from actual substantiveness because your arguments are weak because your investment thesis is ignorant and wrong.
>>59663161He wasn't. Sergei attended a gala event after with everyone else in polite society DC. Are you seriously arguing that people being invited to a MASSIVELY capacity limited inauguration is not significant? Because if you are, you are retarded. You are emotionally ejaculating loud all capped strawmans of what I say to cope with not having anything to say. You are literally operating on the same level of argument/rhretoric as a black lady in a grocery store who got caught stealing and pivots into shouting the same annoying shit over and over because you have no good argument but refuse to just stfu or admit wrongness.
>>596631539th post about banks only. No mention of anything else? Why? Banks already use their service. He said banks are slow adopters and that early on it made a name for them if they could sign a bank. Really unclear why you think this is significant. Again, the interview you shared is literally hosted on the youtube channel of a top 10 XRP influencer. Lol
>>59663014Have posted it in a dozen previous threads to you. Brad himself said that over half of their billions a year Ripple Payments products is settled using ODL (XRP). https://www.scb10x.com/en/blog/crypto-enabled-infrastructure
>>59663220>Banks already use their serviceBro, he LITERALLY said they do not.
>>59663248https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/80-japanese-banks-set-embrace-xrp-global-payments-2025???
>>59663248No, "bro," he LITERALLY didn't. He said banks in general, not all banks. There are already banks in early stages of using it. Fednow already processes ODL payments and so do banks via payment companies they deal through. The largest bank or even financial institution in the MENA region (QNB) is already using it, starting with their division in Turkey. Digital banks like Brazil's Travelex bank already use it. There are others and multiple others that use Ripple Payments without XRP currently. Ripple Payments is like 40% more cost effective using low volatility condition XRP than not. The belief that partner banks will maintain the choice for their transactions to be deliberately more expensive and slower than they could be once regulatory clarity is here is ridiculous, but even if they don't, your argument is already wrong.
>>59663272>according to The Crypto Times.nice troll. Now kindly shut the fuck up.
>>59653863OP just wait until Thursday. That's when we will find out
>>59663272what the fuck that is huge
>>59663284source is nasdaq.
>>59663272Lmao, linkcels in shambles
>>59663272Please do not get him started on SBI again. Lol He shit his pants hyping that up for a week when literally no one expected what he strawmanned us as expecting (le overnight switch on January 1st of 4/5 of Japanese banks lol).
>>59663295No, thats where it was posted. >according to The Crypto Times.is the source.
>>596632721) that's about the future, I'm arguing banks aren't using it NOW2) fucking lol@urlyfe if you believe that shit3) won't do anything for the price of XRP, see >>59662467>>59663281>He said banks in general, not all banksSo who are the exceptions then?
>moving the goalposts (again)dial 8 linkies, it's ogre
>>59663319>The Crypto Times.kek
>>59663311I literally named two (one of which is the largest in the MENA region) in the post you replied to.
>>59663349>The largest bank or even financial institution in the MENA region (QNB) is already using it, starting with their division in Turkey. Digital banks like Brazil's Travelex bank already use itJust kill yourself please.
>>59663349>it WILL be possiblefuture tensealso,>QNBlol
>>59663349>>59663361>it will be possible
>>59663365When?>soonHow soon?>Coming soon
>>59663272Also:https://coingape.com/xrp-institutional-buying-soars-266-ripple-vs-sec-lawsuit-appeal/SBI:https://www.crypto-news-flash.com/ripples-grand-plan-unveiled-xrpl-nfts-to-steal-the-show-with-millions-of-users-set-to-join-initiative/https://archax.com/insights/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of-tokenized-real-world-assets-to-the-xrp-ledgerArchax is the first ever digital securities exchange regulated by the FCA in London:https://archax.com/insights/ripple-collaborates-with-archax-to-bring-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-of-tokenized-real-world-assets-to-the-xrp-ledgerSee also:https://archax.com/insights/archax-adds-state-street-fidelity-international-lgim-offerings-to-regulated-digital-platformInteresting connection:https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/09/16/bitstamp-and-ripple-to-launch-derivatives-exchange-on-xrp-ledger/Ripple are a platinum American Banker's Association and ISDA member. And a majority of the supervision policy setting Basel central banks bought XRP:https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/368263558842
>>59663376>zero actual use by bankskeklooks like Schwartz wasn't lying after all huh?
>>59663376>coingape>crypto news flash>Ripple Collaborates with Archax to Bring Hundreds of Millions of Dollars of Tokenized Real-World Assets to the XRP LedgerBut their defi TVL is only 70m?
>>59663371>>59663387Schrödinger's adoption: it already exists but is coming soon.
dear god the link boyscouts are getting absolutely slaughtered in this threadalso this The year is 2030 ->link staking 1.0 has been released, although build rewards are still "coming soon", "we are still recovering from Gary Gensler's operation chokepoint in 2022">rory's update on discord: hey guys, thanks for your patience, we're finalizing a few final items and then hoping to release preliminary build for select users by q1 '2031 at the latest>a marine asks if the build rewards have been accruing for stakers this whole time...he's immediately kicked and banned>rory then reposts the website faq reminding community members they will be sued by chainlink labs for negative comments>linkdrake chimes in on how it's ridiculous people expect a return in under 15 years of holding something>link price: $9, market cap at all time high
>>59663396>dear god the link boyscouts are getting absolutely slaughtered in this threadYour fake news articles are not sources nor proof XRP is used by banks retard. >>59663391XRP will go down as one of the biggest grifts.
>>59663396But its clear youre just another link holder who fuds link by shilling xrp lol
>>59663396optimistic, link will be abandoned long before then
>>59663377>>59663391>>59663365>>59663371https://www.gulf-times.com/pdf/2024/06/20/business-20240620-1.pdf?ts=002828
>>59663361>>59663365>>59663371>>59663377>>59663391
>>59663435>>59663448>QNB>"it will be possible"Also, >QNBlol
>>59663435https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE1koW8aRGo [Embed]11:40>moderator: recently XRP became the the third largest cryptocurrency by market shares or market capitalization sorry so what led to that specifically?>david: You know it's really hard to know. I would like to think that people realized how awesome the technology was as a technologist but the technology was awesome a month ago. You know and we were still singing its praises to everybody who had listened.>So I I have to think that a primary factor is the change in the regulatory environment in the United States but that's just a guess, I would be stunned if that had nothing to do with it but whether that's the direct cause whether that's a trigger and there were other factors, pent up demand, I really I don't know.So not bank adoption? Surely he would ahve mentioned 80% of japan banks adopting xrp?
>>59653863Got rugged on $Melania? perhaps $Trump on auradex doesn't rug
>>59663302>>59663335It is literally citing a quote from the SBI CEO.>>59663359Why do you always use the same charley murphy picture? Warosu has like 2 pages just of link shilling xrp fudding posts of you using the charlie murphy picture. Isn't is a bit weird after like the 30th time? Isn't it a bit pathetic to not have an answer to what I say and just cope by trying to play sophistical rhetorical games like this?>>59663387Why do you always make the same arguments you know fall flat? The XRPL was deliberately programmed to not have L1 smart contracts. You mention TVL talking about a currency that was deliberately designed to not have native smart contracts like it is meaningful. It makes no sense whatsoeover, has nothing to do with even success of the Ripple bull case and is a completely arbitrary metric you chose because it sounds good to people who have no idea what you are claiming. You mention this in every thread and have never once won the argument. How do you think it is possible people don't think you are paid to post here? Lol
>>59663526>It is literally citing a quote from the SBI CEO.Cringe. Where and when did he say that?>Why do you always use the same charley murphy picture? Warosu has like 2 pages just of link shilling xrp fudding posts of you using the charlie murphy picture. Isn't is a bit weird after like the 30th time? Isn't it a bit pathetic to not have an answer to what I say and just cope by trying to play sophistical rhetorical games like this?>Why do you always make the same arguments you know fall flat? The XRPL was deliberately programmed to not have L1 smart contracts. You mention TVL talking about a currency that was deliberately designed to not have native smart contracts like it is meaningful. It makes no sense whatsoeover, has nothing to do with even success of the Ripple bull case and is a completely arbitrary metric you chose because it sounds good to people who have no idea what you are claiming. You mention this in every thread and have never once won the argument. How do you think it is possible people don't think you are paid to post here? LolBro look at you coping. You have zero arguments and need to resort to the "paid to post here" and "omg youre using pictures that other people use">The XRPL was deliberately programmed to not have L1 smart contracts.How is this a good thing? It just means theyre 5 years behind everyone?
>>59663459Also said it was early days, just that they had already agreed to use XRP in general and specifically at banks (as opposed to the connecting third-party payments companies). SBI has already been using XRP in multiple intercontinental multi-country corridors:https://www.kapronasia.com/asia-payments-research-category/sbi-holdings-and-ripple-step-up-their-cooperation.htmlAlso see SBI NFT link in:>>59663376QNB are the largest financial institution in the MENA region. Posting "lol" is another of the sophistical rhetoric gushes mentioned meant to make up for not having anything to say but refusing to admit you are wrong. Cope.
>>59663585jesus you are such a faggot lmao
>>59663594Cope and deflection to avoid answering an easy question. >The XRPL was deliberately programmed to not have L1 smart contracts.How is this a good thing?
>>59663587I advise you to stop arguing, there is no point. The only dopamine these ghouls get is F5ing the page and seeing you(s)
>>59663587>XRP is going to be used a bridge currency bros!You guys are stuck in 2017.
>>59663587>I just said that they had already agreed to use XRPNo, you said they were ALREADY using it.See >>59663281>(QNB) is already using itoopsie!>>59663526>TVL doesn't matter because XRPL doesn't have smart contracts!You posted a link saying there was "Hundreds of Millions of Dollars of Tokenized Real-World Assets" (aka TVL) coming to the XRP Ledger.double oopsie!
>>59663646kek
>>59663585Projecting and saying "no u" doesn't change the fact you are the one being what you are or make it less objectively knowable to anyone who reads this thread.https://www.linqto.com/unicorn-news/ripple-news-japanese-banks-to-embrace-ripples-xrp-by-2025/https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/672a46cd5d69102b6213ba89/
>>59663608Because it was literally built to be the internet of value that provides interoperable liquidity across every type of network. It now has hooks and L2 smart contract functionality with Evernode. This is not hard to understand. High programmability sacrifices payments viability, which hilarious to your own not getting given your investment thesis, is why link will never be used to settle payments for SWIFT. Lol
>>59663708How bout and hear me out, this may sound weir,. but.....an article directly from the banks themselves?>Yoshitaka Kitao, the CEO of SBI, recently indicated>(this is their link) https://x.com/Brett_Crypto_X/status/1849735923321217393LMAO MY SIDES!!!!
>>59663643Not an argument. >>59663646And I literally listed two that are with a screenshot highlighting the portion detailing how. What is wrong with you? I shared a link showing derivatives networks etc. being built out ON the XRPL. No joke you need to learn literally fundaments of what a blockchain and its layers are.
>>59663734>Not an argument.Yes it is. Stable coins and RWAs enable atomic DvP swaps and makes XRP obsolete. (as proven by banks testing blockchain)
>>59663734>And I literally listed twoYou said QNB was "already using it", but you had to admit it isn't.Not going to do the song and dance for every lie you utter.
>29 absolutely seething post by this terminally online linkbaggie
>>59664027>linkies got owned because I said they did!!You got blown the fuck out mate. >crypto timesKEK
>>59663961This isn't a song and dance. Lol I listed multiple banks already using it (one one of the largest in Japan and one of largest in the world) and the largest in the MENA region recently inking a deal for use of specifically ODL rolling it out in their Turkish division to test it before broadening use (in their own words).>>59663746No they don't and no it wasn't. If this is true, why are they testing even CCIP settlement using public blockchains? Lol You still need something highly liquid that interoperates between private networks which is public and doesn't require trust or counterparty/currency risk and doesn't leave businesses in China holding Sudanese currency and vice versa, which solves Triffin's dilemma, that is micropayment capable, and has sufficiently pooled liquidity (optimally that can operate from anything to anything, whether public or private onchain assets or traditional networks).>>59663725I think you are actually right about this. I am willing to admit when I was wrong, it does not seem like this quote came from Kitao. I swore I remembered listening to the shareholder meeting itself, but props on being right for on literally the first thing in several thousand hours of posting. Funny enough when looking for it I also found this interview with the Kitao though (pic related as well as pic to follow related):https://www.coinspeaker.com/sbi-bank-japan-ripples-xrp/
>>59663725>>59664055
>>59664055>You still need something highly liquid that interoperates between private networks which is public and doesn't require trust or counterparty/currency risk and doesn't leave businesses in China holding Sudanese currency and vice versa, which solves Triffin's dilemma, that is micropayment capable, and has sufficiently pooled liquidity (optimally that can operate from anything to anything, whether public or private onchain assets or traditional networks).CCIP shares liquidity across connected chains so literally any stablecoin you absolute imbecile>https://www.coinspeaker.com/sbi-bank-japan-ripples-xrp/still not a real source (again). You live and breathe stupid aye?
>>59664055>I listed multiple banks already using itYou said QNB (lol) was already using it. They aren't.And it's the same for every single bank, none of them use Ripple beyond maybe a test run here and there.
>>59662898hello "JoelKatz", have you considered getting a Nose Reduction Surgery?
>>59664027>2900000000000000000000000 fud postsand I'm still stakedLMAO
>throw pearls at swine>they choose to roll around in their own shitLet them be left behind to cope and seethe forevermore.
>>59663608This is the first time I've ever participated in any of these threads you stupid nigger. You are compelling enough for me to quit lurking and to call a faggot. Congrats.
>>59664236>This is the first time I've ever participated in any of these threads you stupid niggerKEK cool? and you got blown the fuck out. You got caught between your web of lies. Answer this one simple question. If XRP is in fact a bridge currency, why did they create RLUSD?
>>59664077They are already using Ripplenet (see pic related, from 2022, they were so confident in Ripple they mentioned them by name and offered them as a service that could be used in their World Cup (like the Super Bowl but 100x larger and global) promotion) and are beginning the rollout of what I said bank partners would into the XRP direct use service. I then listed several banks already using the XRP Service. Again, this is like the 12th post out from mentioning the entire bank aspect is not something I even made as part of my argument and is something extraneous to the whole which you have chosen to only address exclusively ignoring the rest to disingenuously keep the conversation funneled in a way that only minimally BTFOs you.https://www.qnb.com/sites/qnb/qnbqatar/document/en/enBankandWin>>59664066Yes, and it as mentioned, is piloting using a public blockchain (not link) to settle actual value. And this is all just for SWIFT, which is a major messaging player but ironically not really necessary in the ISO 20022 payments messaging era. That is LITERALLY an interview with direct quotes conducted by the person who wrote the article. Cope.
>>59664089I hate the synagogue of Satan, OT name of the nation of God commodifying literally Rothschild founded (through Balfour Declaration) fake state more than you do. Talmudic judaism and islam are both social cancers.
>>59664294shut the fuck up with your fake new sources and twitter posts. Jesus Christ youre like a broken record player>not really necessary in the ISO 20022 payments messaging era.Youve latched onto some xrp schizo narrative and continue to push your bullshit with no proof other than fake articles and cherry picked cropped pictures.
>>59664186True. I have to get my day started anyways. Have a good one anons. Inb4 the surefire incoming wall of spam nothing replies and repeats of old claims dressed as substantive BTFOing material that I couldn't reply to despite knowing I could and that they are objectively wrong and trying to cope/posture victory by getting the last word in name only.
>>59664323Pathetic.
>>59664366>Pathetic.Good one. Now explain the purpose of RLUSD.
>>59664378No.Don’t feel like arguing with you like anon did.
>>59664323Last post because I just saw yours while posting. It isn't a schizo narrative. Enriched messaging, real-time payments, in context of online banking and broadened fintech really doesn't require the same centralization of payment messaging networks. I am not saying it will disappear overnight but its attrition is certainly built-in. SWIFT was never really THAT big of a deal in terms of the eurodollar market and settlement. It was and is a messaging network with technology literally from the fax machine era. This is why when Russian sanctions were announced, gold surged and bitcoin (risk assets) dumped not knowing what it would be. When it was announced that it was SWIFT cutoff the trend reversed immediately and it was portrayed as a big deal to lamen retards but Russia could technically still operate just the same even on western systems if they intended to by just making a bunch of phone calls. Lol It is also why the Russian economy thrived under sanctions selling oil through intermediary countries back to Europe (good analogy for the general picture) for 3x the value they usually would. Its new product is better but not really necessary and well past the point of security itself early enough to be taken as such. Sorry. Have a good day!
>New Trump filed crypto ETF>Included BONK and DOGE but not LINKStinkies will never recover.
>>59664463Post-Trump*
>>59664388Yet you can post no problem, but cant actually discuss the topic. Fucking retard.>>59664402>It isn't a schizo narrative.It literally is and your swift schizoid theory isnt helping either. Youre living in 2017 still. XRP as a bridge currency is a bygone idea. Its obsolete, that why you cant provide sources showing theyre actually using it. The future is tokenized assets like stable coins and RWAs being the intermediary for sending value not shit coins.
>>59654955>>59662877>>59662955>>59662387
>>59664504Garlichouse wanted pictures will all the important people.
>>59654955>>59662387>>59662877>>59662955>>59664504In totally separate exchange, Vance posed with the Chief Legal Officer of Ripple. He went directly to them at the inauguration which they attended despite being very limited attendance with family members of politicians cut out and posed with them for pictures at the Vice President's dinner which they were also invited to, were also invited to the President's dinner. Sergei wasn't even invited. Stinkies were blasting biz with threads of Sergei attending the crypto ball everyone was at and Ripple had more influencers at than Chainlink did employees and Sergei was invited to none of the other events, but somehow this is not significant.
>>59664583Nice fiction story but this isnt proof of anything retard.
>>59664319yet you spend your day making 46 posts defending the most Jewish coin on the market (XRP) and fighting against the White Man's coin, Chainlink?
>>59664510That isn't how skeletons/posture works, faggot. You are possibly spatially retarded. His center is not through his shoulder blade. He is leaning back to fit in the photo because he is taking it. Note that Sergei was the one who posted it along with others. Who is desperate to be seen as connected to who?
>>59664510>>59664697And remember, this is for an after the fact event everyone in Washington is invited to. Sergei was not invited to the inauguration. Why?
>>59664634based on what he said and what you do I would bank on you just being wrong and not prompting a revelation by stating something he has obviously considered
>>59664599How is it fiction? What about it is untrue? You are entitled to your own opinions but you are not entitled to leave aspects of reality on the cutting room floor because they prove you wrong.
>>59664707Actually looks like this is from the Vice President's Dinner. Which means in the collection of pictures Sergei posted, he didn't even get one with the Vice President. Fucking kek.
notice how the same fag misspells sergey the same way on both ids
>>59664707Sergai betray former best fren, linkbaggies New best fren, ripplecoin
>>59664799i'd never knew how to spell it until I read this thread and never went into a link thread that didn't also mention muh xerpies. I guess I learned it wrong even here through? Is it Sergey?
>>59664707>fat serg walks away from Kennedy>Kennedy: who the fuck was that January 15, 2021BTC: $39kETH: $1kLINK: $21XRP: $0.30DOGE: $0.009January 21, 2025BTC: $103kETH: $3.2kLINK: $25XRP: $3DOGE: $0.37
How big do you think sergays xrp stack is?I think it's a lot...
>>59664916What is xrp needed for?
>>59653863I sold all my ETH in 2020 for LINK, and had I gone the other way, I would currently be down instead of 75% up.
>>59664983I heard i rubs linkbaggies asses raw
>>59664402>claims this is his last post after racking up 46 posts in some frantic manic episode>immediately returns 10 minutes later on different ID >>59664504Tb h I was just memeing about the handshake because it was kinda funny you thought it was such a huge deal, but come on man this is just pathetic.
>>59665238>75%>in 5yearsI mean great boomer gains but maybe you shouldve bought XRP instead
>>59665358Why are you tripling down on something like this? You say others are manic or uncritically considering something important that you are suggesting isn't but even the way you word it makes it very obvious you are the one that is. I can feel full of piss you are dripping from your words.
>>59665358>>59665464I also learned a fuck load in this thread. At no point was it ever "frantic" except for by people replying who tried to misrepresent what was said or weirdly push the whole talk into being about something else. It was really chickish and cringe desu particularly from the link spammer who always ruins every xsg
>>59665372Maybe I could have swung but I really don't care enough to fuck around because I spent the majority of my adult life watching gamblers lose their balls chasing losses.
JD went out of his way to shake Brad's hand.Stinkies like to omit this fact.
My dearest friend, 'tis with immense pleasure that I inform you that your letter has found safe travel to my destination and landed in my hands. However, this pleasure was fated to remain short lived and bittersweet, for I must also admit to you, regardless of what distress it may cause to you, knowing you went to great trouble to pen it and deliver it to me, that I in fact declined to open it and refused to read the message contained within. Surmising your intentions, there exists no doubt in my heart regarding your sincere worries for my financial well being, but alas your attempts to convince me to modify my investment strategies shall regretfully remain futile, as my stubbornness in this matter has indeed been sealed irrevocably and no other voice shall rock its imperturbable foundations. Allow me then to reiterate my will once more, and do your best to forever remember it for no change will follow: I shan't part ways with my beloved asset for it is my utmost belief that I have invested wisely and foresee infinite potential in its future, and therefore no other possession in this world shall change my decision, not even a mountain of gold! For my possessed asset is indeed fated to be worth more than any other riches in the world. We shan't speak of this no more. Sincerely yours, your beloved friend.
>>59653863Fat Sergay and some other crypto dorks linked up.Need it or keep it?
>>59665536The talking point of every xerpie for the next 5 months.
>>59665612Meanwhile chainlink niggers have been shitting up biz with seething, farting, cumming and endless coping.
>>59665642Cope. Cant wait until XRPL is exposed.
>>59665658quick, get coffeezilla on the case, rumor is they are hiding FAKE VALUE inside the blockchain
>>59666042Where are they hiding the value? Definitely not on defi kek
