[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 635.jpg (164 KB, 750x1000)
164 KB
164 KB JPG
>BTC creator has Wikipedia page
>ETH creator has Wikipedia page
>Chainlink creator: doesn't have Wikipedia page
OH NO NO NO NO
linkies, we are the laughing stock of the crypto world
>>
sounds like we're still early then wow, thanks OP
>>
>>59667159
Zoom
Out
>>
>>59667101
You can make one instead of making these shitty threads.
>>
>>59667255
OK
1. I don't know how
2. He definitely doesn't deserve to have one
>>
>>59667270
That’s fine. SN=SN
I’ll just consider Satoshi’s Wikipedia page Sergey’s.
>>
>>59667101
>BTC creator has Wikipedia page
>ETH creator has Wikipedia page
>Chainlink creator: doesn't have Wikipedia page
>OH NO NO NO NO
>linkies, we are the laughing stock of the crypto world
I checked ripple.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brad_Garlinghouse

Someone needs to talk to Wikipedia...
>>
seriously though, i've been holding this shit for 7 years now. I've gone beyond losing my patience. We're like the fucking rippletards now, holding on to something in the hope that one day it actually meets it potential but looking more and more like we bought shit.
>>
jews that fund Wikipedia keep reverting the Chainlink page to an early version from like 2021 to prevent people from finding robust information about the project; when i noticed this was happening I realized the value of LINK
>>
>>59667101
even my shitty band from 2006-2012 (RIP) has a robust wikipedia page because some crazy Brazilian fan made one. It's not a hard thing to get, anon. I wouldn't be too concerned.
>>
>>59667101
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto
what do you mean?
>>
>>59667101
woah just checked and ari doesn't have one either
the wiki editors are retarded
>>
File: 1736387624717400.jpg (46 KB, 480x480)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
its Q2 of this decade and this pos is still -60% .. its never gonna make it
>>
>>59667101
>wikipedia
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/
>UPDATE “Philip Cross” has not had one single day off from editing Wikipedia in almost five years. “He” has edited every single day from 29 August 2013 to 14 May 2018. Including five Christmas Days. That’s 1,721 consecutive days of editing.
>133,612 edits to Wikpedia have been made in the name of “Philip Cross” over 14 years. That’s over 30 edits per day, seven days a week. And I do not use that figuratively: Wikipedia edits are timed, and if you plot them, the timecard for “Philip Cross’s” Wikipedia activity is astonishing is astonishing if it is one individual.

Tell us more about your propaganda platform. I bet you use facebook.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.