XMR is what normalfaggots think BTC is and XMR possesses the features everyone always wanted BTC to have. If you're anti-Monero, you're either a glownigger or freedom-hating normalfaggot of the authority-bootlicking type who's anti private ownership of firearms etc. Or both. And probably a faggot.
>>60135595>inflationary shitcoin mined by any jeet with a 10,000 node botnet>hasn't seen a new ATH in fucking agesLol no.
Didn't Chainalysis pwn Monero? Isn't the dark web going back to BTC? I looked pretty closely into it and basically Chainalysis is labeling parts of the chain which then reveal other parts of the chain as nauseum
>>60135595>didn't achieved ASICs>infinite (never ending) emission>lacks lightning network - can't do millions of secure transactions per minute globally>was up in your face with gubirments - got banned (harder onramps)>I... I am the REAL bitcoin!!!!!11
im all in BAT it will pump like OM soon
>>60135608It's not a game of musical chairs like bitcoin where ten lose it all for one to get 10x, it's a tool to transfer value. Scam somewhere else.>>60135621Doesn't look like it. But the real problem is still using that acquired value.So you will still have to pay a markup to the local mafia for your villa in South America.But at least you can get the value into the country without problems.
>>60135637If BTC aka glowniggercoin was as good as Monero then it would've been "banned" just as much. That BTC hasn't been "banned" proves it's the safe/allowed – (((kosher))) – coin you're meant to use; the coin they want you to use. I wrote "banned" because obviously Monero can't actually be banned; nobody and nothing can prevent people from using it. It's the absolute least bannable crypto, as all XMR is fungible unlike with Bitshit. Tainted coins is something that's impossible with Monero.
>>60135608>inflationary>rate of supply never increases or decreases over time>crypto usage continues to increase exponentiallyWhat did he mean by this
>>60135608>inflationary shitcoinmonero isn't a shitcoin and its tail emission is meaningless for price>>60135637>infinite (never ending) emissionnot what tail emission is>>60135595>Monero is the real Bitcoinnot quite, monero can't do the volume of transactions that bitcoin achievesboth chains are still evolving >If you're anti-Moneroyes, but if you're anti-Bitcoin, chances are that you're just a ex-bcasher trying to throw shade because you were wrong>>60135849>glowniggercoinagain, probably some bcasher anyone that says that shit doesn't understand blockchain at all
TL;DR: both chains are good and if you instead try to shill for one over the other, you're the fed
>>60136072>monero can't do the volume of transactions that bitcoin achievesWhy not?>muh block sizePlease. Hard drives are dirt cheap.
>>60135849>That BTC hasn't been "banned" proves it's the safe/allowed – (((kosher))) – coinfucking BASED!seethe and cope, altcoiner.
>>60135637>didn't achieved ASICsIt did achieve ASICS and then it BTFOd them.
Stop shilling it you're going to ruin it.
>>60135595Reminder to never spend your BTC if you want to make it, XMR is for all that economic stuff.
Monero enables judaism
>>60135595What features?CPU mining lets botnets fuck up the economics.L1 privacy adds complexity, bloat, and vulnerabilitiesNo max block size adds even more bloatNode size and sync time is ridiculous, would be unusable at Bitcoin's tx count with no decentralization Tail emission just means botnets dump into shrinking liquidity Bitcoin is exactly what I want and expect it to be. And it's not your shitcoin
>>60136072BTC was created by the NSA and other agencies. It was a government project.NSA paper from 1996: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm>even talks about the "double spend" problemNote there's a "Tatsuaki Okamoto" there. Not only does Okamoto sound similar to Nakamoto, but if you rearrange the letters you get close to Satoshi Nakamoto.TATSUAKI OKAMOTOSATO__I _AKAMOTO (discarded: T, U and K)The extra needed letters are S, H and N.The NSA created SHA 256, which Bitcoin uses.S and H can be found in "SHA 256".Remove S and H from "SHA 256" and left is "A 256".A is the 1st letter of the alphabet.So "A 256" equals "1 256".1+2+5+6 equals 14.The 14th letter of the alphabet is N.So "1 256" equals N.So, "SHA 256" = SHN <--- the extra needed letters missing in "SATO__I _AKAMOTO".
>>60138313Very nice. Why do you think they discarded T U K? Also do Nicolas van Saberhagen.
>>60135595Reminder: Monero is the pedocoin
>>60135849Bitcoin can't be banned retard, that's the point. China tried very hard to ban bitcoin mining and transactions and it had basically no effect on it. It's way way too decentralised at this point for any government to stop. Monero is less decentralised and it is only getting worse over time with the bloat acceleration. There are big problems in trying to do everything on a L1 also. I think monero is kinda useful but I don't think it has any long term future honestly compared to what is being built on bitcoin.
>>60138313>BTC was created by the NSA and other agencies. It was a government project.thanks, government <3
>>60137670>L1 privacy adds complexity, bloat, and vulnerabilitiesWhy? Lightning is a dumpster fire, coinjoins are less private and less secure, so it's really weird to compare the complexity of btc l2 to monero.>No max block size adds even more bloatEnjoy your 10-minute long transactions, kek.>Node size and sync time is ridiculous, would be unusable at Bitcoin's tx count with no decentralizationWrong. Do the math, at the same tx count monero would require only ~20TB of storage. It's literally just ~200$ in storage, nigger.>muh botnetsHow's that a problem?
>>60138659reminder: BTC is government controlledwhenever someone says "its for the children" what they mean is they want all your personal information so that they can put you in jail whenever they feel like it.
>>60138932>Lightning is a dumpster fire,they work fine>coinjoins are less private and less secureno
>>60138932Lightning works fine for small payments, which is the majority of day to day spending. If I want to move $10k I'll take the 40 cent hit in fees, confident that unlike Monero, Bitcoin is actually secure. Also coinjoin is amazing. You'd know if you ever used it. But most important, none of that stuff is weighing down the L1>Enjoy your 10-minute long transactionsDoesn't Monero have a 10 minute lockout as well. Plus security is so low you have to wait days for any significant amount of cash to securely settle>only ~20TB of storageLmao, only 20TB. 20TB of SSDs no less since Monero can't function on a HDD. I'll just get all my friends to whip out their storage servers so your network stays decentralized >how are botnets a problem?If gold mining was suddenly dominated by a company that could mine gold for free, the value of gold would crater. For PoW security comes from the economic resources being used up to create new blocks.
>>60139599>>60139672>tell me you know nothing about how lightning works without telling meYeah, sure, great tech. Try hosting a node sometime.>coinjoin is amazing secure and privateNuh uh. Chainalysis doesn't complain about coinjoin - makes you wonder, doesn't it?Also, contrary to monero, there are multiple coinjoin providers - pick the wrong one, and you risk getting fucked. It is centralized by design.>>60139672>If I want to move $10k I'll take the 40 cent hit in fees, confident that unlike Monero, Bitcoin is actually secureThis is just your own bias.>Doesn't Monero have a 10 minute lockout as well2 minutes per block.>Plus security is so low you have to wait days for any significant amount of cash to securely settleWhat? Nonsense.>Lmao, only 20TB. 20TB of SSDs no less since Monero can't function on a HDD. I'll just get all my friends to whip out their storage servers so your network stays decentralizedAre you really going to complain about storage requirements in 2025? This is just a stupid argument. But yeah, okay, I guess your friends all have asic-based mining farms for btc - these are much easier and cheaper to get, right.>If gold mining was suddenly dominated by a company that could mine gold for free, the value of gold would crater. For PoW security comes from the economic resources being used up to create new blocks.You have machines doing computation anyway. How's that free? By that logic, anyone who participates in a btc mining pool might be seen as a bot in a botnet, and therefore btc is not secure.
>>60139672>Lightning works fine for small payments, which is the majority of day to day spending.Nigga plz, even Bitcoiners don't want to use LN when its an option.
>>60140269>Nigga plz, even Bitcoiners don't want to use LN when its an option.show now break down comparing paying with CC versus Bitcoin, on Amazonretard.
>>60140265>coinjoin providers - pick the wrong one, and you risk getting fucked.you can use it more than 1 timealso, add LN into the mix
>>60140289>picrelEvery. Fucking. Time. These discussions always go the same route.
>>60140284Nice deflection but the point still stands: most bitcoiners prefer on-chain payments due to the principle of least effort.
>>60140300Except coinjoins are extremely low effort. Install wasabi, select a provider, then do nothing. The entire process is automatic
>>60140487True on that, monero is more difficult to get into. This will change with the upcoming serai dex which will allow to swap btc, eth, and dai into monero via AMM - think jupiter or uniswap but for monero.
>>60140300
>>60135637good bait, great larping as a retard
Theres nothing wrong with monero. It's users are pretty firm on the idea of anonymityThe majority of btc owners have abandoned the ideology of anonymity in exchange for institutional and government adoption.
>>60138313Grim.
>>60142073All the time you hear Monero maxis telling Bitcoiners what they think or what they care about. You people sure love to straw man.
>>60135849by that logic Monero is shit because it's not been banned compared to Tornado Cash which was banned.
>>60135608>inflationaryIt has a hard limit of 0.6 XMR per block.
>>60138750>Bitcoin can't be banned retardThe mining factories are sitting ducks.
>>60137670>CPU mining lets botnetsMonero's RandomX requires 2GB ram. Botnets eliminated.
>>60140719Monero's full chain membership proofs will make the XMR critique in this meme moot.
>>60143114>Monero's full chain membership proofs will make the XMR critique in this meme moot.Bitcoins bullet proofs will be the final solution.Monero will be token total not needed.
>>60142285I'm not a monero maxiI watched john wick and you know how the underground criminal network exchanges in these gold tokens? I imagine that to be monero.And its fun to think of monero as the john wick coin because the m on the monero coin could be turned upside down for w (for wick lol)
>>60143394As if bitcoin chuds ever update their code, lol. You'll unironically have to wait until an existential threat comes knocking on the door for them to think about forking bitcoin.
>>60140719Not only is the information completely wrong on this for Monero and BC, but the concept of "perfect privacy" is retarded. Just avoid KYC exchanges if you are concerned about privacy. Monero has extremely strong baselayer privacy for mouthbreathers and that is why it is being used so much relative to its market cap.
>>60143394>Bitcoins bullet proofsNever gonna happen. Confidential transactions was developed by btc devs back in 2015. Why haven't you added that to bitshit since then?
>>60135595THREAD THEME: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIcISf3kZ7A
>>60144067>As if bitcoin chuds ever update their code, lol.updates happen each few years. the fewer the better! UPDOOOOOOOTERS like you can seethe cope and dilate.
>>60145164>Confidential transactions was developed by btc devs back in 2015. Why haven't you added that to bitshit since then?very based!because it was not needed.perhaps join pay and LN are solving it enough as is.this is the money of entire world, not you shitty token toy, we don't need to UPDOOOOT it every month with newest craze.
>>60145536Ah yes, the "updates" no one actually cares about because no actual UX improvements get introduced. Cope harder, retarded maxi.
>>60145554>bitshit bp blah blah>it was not needed!!Holy shit you are far too gone
>>60145593>no one actually cares about because no actual UX improvements get introduced.LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL>my money needs an user interface update!!!fucking lamaoooooooooooo
>>60145597>>Bitcoin could do final solution of bullet proofs in future,>>but also it already seems pretty solved with the things we have right now.yes. and?>noooo! you need to switch to my altcoin, ok?! you muuuust!!!!! I can't even...! where is my dillator?? brb
>>60145765>user interface updateKek, you've literally confirmed you're a room temperature IQ nigger. You don't even understand the term User Experience.
>>60145815>I can not explain my pointok
>>60145828>please please spoonfeed me, I can't even google up what UX is!Lmao, the absolute state of bitcoin maxis.
>>60145859>noooooooooooooo I refuse to detail what UX means in context on an internet protocol! do I mean Bitcoin Core? one of 30+ wallets? the RPC Api? The built in script OPcodes? Who knows???k
>>60145897Yes, you've already shown that you're dumb as a rock. No need to double down on that.
>>60145942>3 posts, 0 attempts to ask honest questionk, you can log off now
>>60145942>Yes, you've already shown that you're dumb as a rock. No need to double down on that.Don't bother, they will claim anything in their desperate attempts to keep bitcoin tech relevant in 2025.
