this market volatility happening. Say... what's the revenue so far?
wait... does it even exist?
>>60173701Looking like $500k from 3 price feeds, wonder what it would have been from whole aave
sorry but chainlink is only dealing with liquidations on obscure coins that do not actually get liquidations please buy more funding tokens errr i mean, super important really useful chainlink network tokens
>duuuuuude you just have to IMAGINE it existinggrim
Oh fuddies will be in for a rude awakening on wednesday
>>60173870>muh wednesdaycan't wait for this nothing burger to come and goand let me guess, you will be absent from all my threads laughing at you stupid stinkiesthis is why everyone loathes you shitheadsyou can't even stand by your words
>>60173946Are you the retard that said LINK would be sub $9 in 24h, 24h ago?Kek
>>60173870doubtful can anyone show an onchain link for marc's numbers? i went to that tweet and in true chainlink fashion, the devil is in the details>svr is part of itwtf there's always a small lie in everything link related they are one of the most insidious companies ive ever seen
>>60173996Its aave employee and he says $0.5m is SVR profits, $1m is total
but let's say 500k was the number, so across 1B link tokens each holder receives $0.0005that's as nice money printer there. keep going and you'll have enough money to buy a drink from a soda machine in 1990
>>60174036Now lets see XRP revenue
>>60174056nice whataboutism, stinkiexrp doesn't need fake and gay revenueit has this thing called "panache"you wouldn't understand
>>60174036the whole sell was the token was supposed to be locked in staking contracts but fat ass bait and switched and did different versions of staking.