Two more weeks bros
>>60189177Register now!
YAWNNNNN ANOTHER NOTHINGBURGER2 MORE WEEKS, MARINES!!
>>60189177>77 and green IDone more fortnight my brothers
any price predictions after this nothingburger?i'll say>-4.28%
>>60189177based
This has literally nothing to do with Chainlink.
>>60189177Opening a x25 short on link
>>60189177>2025>still just doing experiments
>>60189399https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2023/september/21/bringing-capital-markets-onchain-with-dtcc-and-chainlinkcope fuddie
>>60189298The dam finally breaks and we go to 200-300 dollars within a couple of months. Either after this one or the live trials with swift. It’s gonna happen at some point
>>60189611let me guess, you are a post-mainnet topbuyer. let me give you a tip, nothing, absolutely nothing pumps this coin anymore. i'm not talking about a 20-25% pump that retraces after a few days
>>60189644Eventually it will pump
>>60189461That’s from 2023 and no longer elegant. Since then DTCC has moved on to better solutions and no longer is considering chainlink
>>60189677>elegantlol, baited
>>60189673just like afterocrpordecoccipstakingarbitrumpalsvrwhat other goofy acronym carrot dangles am I missing?
>>60189644I’m a post mainnet couple o bucks buyer actually and I bought it through my own research like a big boy. I only discovered 4chan after I bought link and was searching for info about it on Google. We are not the same
>>60189177Checked and I'll be watching live.
>>60189177Checked
>>60189177can I just fill this out by making stuff up?will I still get a stream link?
>>60189677https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxAgrSbwXZQAre you mentally ill anon?
>>60189721>I’m a post mainnet couple o bucks buyeryou're right, we aren't the same. go back to r eddit
>>60189764Sorry friend, you seem to have misunderstood. What I actually meant was that we are not the same in the sense that I discovered chainlink on my own while independently researching different tokens. I didn’t have to be spoon fed like a baby and badgered into buying it and then coddled by a support group telling me to hold it every day.
>>60189880how down are you in your investment?
>>60189908I’m up shitloads. I have already cashed out waaay more than I ever put in and I still have fat bags left. Wasn’t all skill mind you I caught a lot of good airdrops over the years
what do i do when this doesn't do anything to the price
>>60190496It won't do much as it's already priced in. Link is talking about it forever.. what it needs to go up is it then actually being used creating link demand by utility not speculation
>>60190597kek everything in the top 10 got there purely on speculation.What Link needs is exactly that: speculation.
>>60190597LINK can and will pump on speculation like it has before, current crypto space is just fucking retarded
>>60189715build rewardscre
>>60189177slowly but surely the chainlink world is being builtwe may be losers now, but one day we'll be the biggest winners crypto has ever seen
>>60190638that was our biggest mistakewe overestimated the intelligence of the average crypto investor by a lot
>>60189908Haha you only bought because you were spoonfed. The real elite are the mid-buyers who discovered on their own.
>>60190626this is the reddest redpill of cryptountil utility is powerful enough to pump a coin on its own speculation is the only thing that matters, and sadly all the speculation these days has devolved into which meme coin is the best meme and easiest to buy
>>60191394
>>60189177JUST 2 MORE WEEKS THEN MY LIFE CAN BEGIN
>>60189908Most of us bought under 50 cents anon.
>>60193664LiesThe vast majority of holders still hanging around here are post-2020 buyersIf you bought under 50 cents, go back to your 2018 self and imagine if someone from 2025 told you that chainlink was trading at less than 12 bucks. Would you believe that person?
>>60193729Yes why not? I had just seen eth go from 12 dollars to a few hundred not too long before that
>>60194152>Yes why not?eth did that in it's 2nd year of existencelink is going on year 8you can't tell me with a straight face that if someone in 2018 said "link would be 11 something in 2025" that you would believe them. that would be unfathomable. and to disagree would be revisionist history. you can check warosu for old price predictions.
What's amazing is that Chainlink went for the highest-value, highest-volume use cases first. So if this shit actually does go into production and it actually does fulfill its promises then it's just going to grow and grow until it eats the world.
>>60194490>highest-value, highest-volume use cases firstit's been 8 years anon. if that's first to you, you need to go back to preschool
>>60194598Gensler delayed everything by 4 years basically, as soon as it was possible Sergey went and took control of policy
>>60194627>sergey worshipcringe
>>60194263Go look for it
i'm really trying to remain patient bros but it's so fucking hard. how much longer do i need to wage for?
>>60194688Where is the untrue information?
>>60190626That's what you need to sell it before other speculators sell. If you want it to keep going and selling whenever you need funds, then it needs more than speculation.. well that's me. You are wasting your time if you invested into it to sell it fast with a win. Then you could've actually gone to meme coins in first place.Link needs utility to keep going and form an upwards trajectory. Speculation is then on top
>>60193729At the time, anything above it's previous ath of $1.40 sounded fantastic.
>>60189461Stephen Prosperi who wrote that article left the DTCC last year. Why would he leave when they are on the verge of implementing this with Chainlink?Or was he pushed out when his pet project failed?
Sergey needs to get off his fatass for this one because I’m about 5 seconds away from quitting my gay job for faggots
>>60196426why would kemal and ben chan leave as well?really makes you thinkunfortunately, bagholders don't use their noggins too well
>>60194263I am an under 50c buyer, and no, I would not believe it. We were 100% right about what chainlink was and is, underestimating even its true scope and potential. And 100% wrong about the kind of timeline it would take to play out. I can admit that. And it's frustrating as hell. But I hold because there's simply nothing else to do. It's all there, it's just we don't know when.
>>60197036here, here. amen
>>60189177they are now literally creating the 2008 gfc 2.0 just to suppress the impacttruly something isnt it, nobody will care about what is said at this event because it will probably coincide with a powell emergency address so the entire thing will be hidden in the background for years while the revenue keeps ticking upwardsthe premine dumps run out in q1 2030, so presumably mid 2029 is when it is no longer possible to contain
>>60198624This whole time we were either right about everything, or nothing. And considering we’ve been right about 95% so far, I’m not backing down.
>>60197036So you must be one of those based LPL chuddie kiddos then right? Made it from thre LPL Bancor Celsius holy trinity? Retired from your NFT gains?
are we seriously going back to single digits?
>>60200624NO REFUNDS FOR YOUR GENEROUS DONATIONS, MARINE!!CHRIS NEEDS A NEW PAIR OF COWBOY BOOTS AND SUNGLASSES
>>60200603YOU ARE COMPLETELY UNHINGED SPAMMING THIS SHIT FOR YEARS ANON YEARS YOU MUST BE ON THE SPECTRUM AND NEED TO BE MEDICATED THIS INSTANT FFS ANON SERIOUSLY SEEK HELP
Thank you for supporting Lil‘Sergs addiction
>>60189461>news from 2023sad baggie lmao
>>60189445lol.
>>60202129That's AI
>>60196061at the time, all of us thought it would have an ETH like run, stop spreading lies
>>60202925thisthat guy is being incredibly disingenuous and trying to revise historylink was for everyone that missed out on btc and eth. eth went on its huge run after 2 years and everyone thought link would do the same. after 8 years, its a shitcoin just like everything else. we were so wrong
>The vast majority of holders still hanging around here are post-2020 buyersPsychic Steve strikes again. Gasp at his power. Wonder at his made-up factoids. Awe on his beauty.
>>60202973Are you aware that you have a loser attitude? Do you wake up in the morning and look in the mirror and say “yep, that’s me, what a fucking loser I am”? I’m actually curious, you must know you have a defeatist, whiny attitude of a loser and you’ve just decided that you’re content with that?
>>60203146Do you wake up in the morning and enjoy licking the boots of the team that is financially crippling you?
>>60203195Yes. I think they do an incredible job and I’m very happy with my investment. If there was another project that I thought had a brighter future I would invest in them rather than whining like a miserable little bitch every day about how unhappy I am with my own choices.
>>60203336You're beyond salvation. Seek professional help
>>60203336sounds like you're extremely insecure about your investment, and you're looking for some reassurance from anonymous shitposters, otherwise, why would you persist on engaging with pessimistic losers?very grim
>>60203379he sounds like a guy who has a couple hundred link at the most. they're usually the ones still kissing the team's ass day and night and refusing to hold them accountable
>>60203379Why does anyone post anything on an anonymous message board? I simply enjoy arguing. It’s 6 am in the morning I’m about to get up and make breakfast, telling some pathetic losers off on 4chan gives me a boost of energy to get the day started. Why are you here?
>>60203491to vent about LINKs atrocious performance over the span of 7 years on the designated /link/ shitposting board
>>60203534WELL WHY DONT YOU JUST SELL ALREADY?!?!?!
>>60203534I had a friend who constantly complained about his life while doing absolutely nothing to change anything. One day his girlfriend said to him: You are the gayest man I have ever met in my life, you are gay gay GAY Ross. Then she left him. That was the love of his life. Your attitude could make a woman who loves you more than anything in the world walk away
>>60203637cool story bro, meanwhile you're free to ignore the losers and focus on all of your amazing gains, yet you can't help it
>>60203655Funny you should say that. I just had an amazing bowl of grains for breakfast. Now I’m gonna go get an amazing latte from Starbucks (about half the price of a chainlink token)
>>60203708don't forget to engage with toxic losers while you're at itthe sheer irony of a late post mainnet buyer lecturing oldfags about patience and positivity and shityou do realize that LINK has been making multi year lows against BTC from the moment you got in, right? kek
>>60203750Yes I’m familiar with the price action however I’m still up a lot more than I would’ve been if I’d just bought bitcoin (various airdrops). No need to thank me for engaging with you toxic losers tho, I want to help you get better- a lot of people don’t actually realise that complaining about your situation while doing nothing about it is what makes you a loser. Identifying the problem is half the battle
>>60203803>I'm still up >various airdrops kek, imagine admitting that the only reason you're not underwater on your 5 year investment is other shit the absolute state
>>60203803also>I care about your wellbeing anon, so please, STOP FUDDING MY BAGS REEEElmao you literally cannot make this shit up
>>60203858Well between airdrops and buying link at 2 dollars.. guess you wouldn’t know about airdrops cos they’re something you need to have agency to be able to hunt for lol
>>60196946I can help with that. They left because they contributed what they could to the tech, which has been ready for years now, and the company was stuck in regulatory limbo.
>>60197036>We were 100% right about what chainlink was and is, underestimating even its true scope and potentialI will never, ever live down not buying nvidia. I didn't have any money but I could have taken loans. I knew where things where going because I was researching neural networks back in 2016 and the obama lip sync video blew my mind. I extremely firmly believe in the world chainlink is building towards to, but you're absolutely right that it's very hard to estimate timelines of when. I will not miss this train this time
>>60202925>>60202973>>60194263Chainlink did things beyond our wildest pre-mainnet dreams.Back then we could only dream of getting adopted by the likes of Compound and Maker, being in bed with DTCC, at the white house directly talking to the president in front of the press, let alone being on the brink of Swift adoption. Yet here we are. Honestly Chainlink couldn't have done things any better, all things considered.
>>60204979the wildest pre mainnet dream I had was ETH valuations, which has obviously failed to materialise none of the pre mainnet marines could give two shits about more PoCs after 7 years
>>60204999Market valuation is the one thing Chainlink itself has no control over.And witnessed.
>>60205019market valuation is the one thing that mattersappreciate the checking
>>60205284Doesn't change what I said.The reason you bought and held Chainlink is because you felt that it was promising in terms of future adoption. And these promises have been far exceeded.However the market valuation does not reflect it, which is beyond Chainlink's control.
>>60205329the reason I bought Chainlink was the promise of an ETH runthat has not materialised, and it is quite literally the only thing that mattersI don't care about tech, or partnerships, or endorsementsI missed BTC and ETH and I believed LINK would be nextI was terribly wrong
>>60205417Why did you think Chainlink specifically was going on an ETH run?
>>60205465Sandro Salsano as an angel investor, Steve massaging Blythe Masters feetI fell for the psyop
>>60205497Jokes aside, the reason ETH went on its run was because of institutional partnerships.At a February 2017 event, ETH announced the formation of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance with a list of semi-big institutional players, and ETH skyrocketed from there.And on top of that, Ethereum also had major in-crypto adoption.So if you wanted an ETH-style run, you actively looked for partnerships and endorsements.Which is why you bought Chainlink.
>>60205524ok, none of those things you just said change the fact that LINK did not have an ETH like run, I don't even understand what point you're trying to make here
>>60205545ETH had a big run based on partnerships and endorsements, and you wanted an ETH run.So when you said "I don't care about tech, or partnerships, or endorsements" you were lying to yourself.
>>60205417>those pesky banking institutions just can't keep up with my greedy lambo aspirations. this means the Chainlink project has failed and is best abandoned right away. amirite?
>>60205593>no no no let ME tell YOU why YOU bought this thingwhat kind of mental illness is this
>>60205545the point is; all developments thus far have exceeded our biggest dreams from 2017. the ONLY thing which has not caught up yet is the price. execution wise, the project has been more or less flawless (especially compared to the broader market).Knowing this, LINK is much easier to hold now than it was in 2017-2018 when we had no information at all. on a pure fundamentals basis, there is no easier crypto to hold long term (except for bitcoin)
>>60205632I'm not telling you, you're telling me.You wanted an ETH run, and the ETH run was based on partnerships and endorsements.You also bought Chainlink, which was always notable for its partnerships and endorsements.Stop lying to yourself.
>>60205638>the ONLY thing which has not caught up yet is the pricetoo bad that's the ONLY thing that actually matters then>>60205652>you wanted an ETH run>stop lying to yourself anon, you're genuinely not well
>>60205671What makes a coin go up, anon?
isn't it amazing how the shills flock to correct the narrative as soon as someone is expressing genuine dissatisfaction with this project? >noooo you cannot think like this, let me tell you what to believe and think
>>60205675not the tech that's for certain
>>60205691Indeed. What makes a coin go up is mostly partnerships and endorsements.Because that's what tickles speculators most.
>>60205704indeed, but that does not change the fact that despite the numerous partnerships and endorsements, it just won't pumptherefore, I don't carewhy is this concept so hard for you to accept anon?
If there's no money to invest price doesn't go up. The good news and tech of chaninlink bleeps it only in a good place compared to other cryptos. It's childish to think good news = automatic price increase.
>>60205730>indeedSo you do care about partnerships and endorsements.
>>60205752not really, no, I'd prefer ETH gains and I would happily trade all of those partnerships for a triple digit valuation
>>60205780>coins go up mostly because of partnerships and endorsements>I don't care about partnerships and endorsementsAnon, I...
>>60205794yes, you're very obviously mentally illI've been telling you for hours that the only thing that matters to me is price, and you're hellbent on making me believe that ackssually I care about some stupid partnerships that have demonstrably done nothing for the price literal insanity
>>60205835>the only thing that matters to me is priceAnd what makes price go up is overwhelmingly partnerships and endorsements.See ETH and XRP.
>>60205842>and XRP.and here your larp goes to shit
>>60205842ok, I'm done bye bye
>>60205849what?>>60205855Do you know what the primary thesis of investing is?
>>60205849>>60205855Also I'm pretty sure I just witnessed the old samefag ID handoff here lmaoThis is where our resident Link fudder transitions into full XRP defense mode.
>>60205860Not much point arguing with that guy he’s just having a fit about how gay and retarded he is. He thinks the only thing that matters is retail fomo so he spends his days telling anyone who’ll listen about what a shit investment it is. This is a buck broken nigga
>>60205855Bye faggot
They had to crash the world economy as a last resort for keeping the link price down on positive news. Not surprised at all.
>>60205671You’re a consequentialist. You judge not on actions and intentions but outcomes. If someone shoved you out of the way of a speeding train and you sprained your ankle you would sue the guy and call him a son of a bitch. This is a common belief system for people who have no agency and see themselves as helpless feathers floating on the whims of others
>>60206148>judge not on actions and intentions but outcomesthe best way to judge things, agreed
>>60206188It’s an extremely useful tool for avoiding responsibility for your own life I’ll give you that
>>60206381>expressing dissatisfaction with LINK means you're avoiding responsibility of your own lifekek, the mental gymnastics you're required to perform just so you can avoid the most valid criticism regarding LINK are hilarious
>>60206427>"Sergey didn't manually pump the price">valid criticismkeeeekI also love how you keep using the exact same buzzwords year in year out, like "valid criticism", "value capture", "carrot dangle", etc.You're one guy but you're responsible for like 75% of all fud ever on here.
>>60206952>keeeeekcringe I'm not whoever you think I am, you terminally online autist
>nooooo it's a samefag all of the negativity comes from a single person reeeee manually pump price reeeeeethe absolute state of unhinged bagholders
>>60207153Okay Adem
>>60207206ok Zach???
>>60207153How many hours a week do you spend raging about an internet currency you don't own?
>>60207153I’m genuinely interested in your well-being. Did you take any of my advice from the thread the other weekend about getting a shower and putting on clean clothes and setting a body weight target and learning to count calories etc. You DO have the power to change anon
>>60205497>Steve massaging Blythe Mastersthat picture wasnt ellis was it, or you mean some other steve
>>60205638>the project has been more or less flawlessone point against the team which as things look might end of really important is their poor handling of premine token distributioni forget exactly when but they had a blog post about btc tokenomics and the impact of the halving on development and then went and did the opposite and increased token emissions per yearnot enough to truly impact the price at the moment, but enough to deplete their entire premine way too fast, they were probably looking at their adoption metrics behind the scenes and figured the network would be in profit long before thenbut look now and we have another financial disaster on our hands that will slow tradfi adoption considerably, so it would have been a lot more convenient if they still had a large section of the premine available to continue node operations for a good whileif they had any sense they would move to limit their emissions as soon as possible in order to max out their runway right nowno reason for a landgrab when the whole world is melting down and literally every one of their present competitors will be forgotten in 3 years
>>60208111>will slow tradfi adoption considerablyChecked but disagree.DTCC pilot in 2 weeks, Swift this year, Fidelity is literally making it so you can buy crypto through them for your retirement. It's happening at pace.
>>60207969It was Dan Kochis.
>>60208205>Dan Kochisyep thats the one, he looked way too buff in the picture to be steve, i found it after a while of digging through my bizfolder>>60208172anon we are on the verge of a crisis worse than 2008 in financial markets right when there is a global trade war to the death being foughtadoption of new tech is going to be slowed considerably as some of the institutions that are suppose to be adopting here are about to go bankrupt, several of them criminally soremember who cefi and ftx rekt the cryptospace in 2022, but at least it being crypto it was an orderly liquidations as one cant fake corns onchainwell that same thing is going to happen to real dollars and peoples custodial everythingit is going to be fun to watch tho
>>60189177Checked mein nibbas
>>60208172>It's happening at paceSHUT THE FUCK UP. ITS BEEN 8 FUCKING YEARS AND WE'RE STILL IN PILOTS, EXPERIMENTS, AND TRIALS>It's happening at pace.JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU DUPLICITOUS LITTLE SHITHEAD
>>60207253The anon probably has 10x the amount of link than you do
>>60202925some of us hunkered down and prepared for the 2026 timeline
>>60209478>ITS BEEN 8 FUCKING YEARS AND WE'RE STILL IN PILOTS, EXPERIMENTS, AND TRIALSUnlike all those other cryptos that are already at full-scale institutional adoption, right?
>>60209608Who cares? The only thing that matters is price
>>60209645Then why did you try to argue adoption?And why did you change your ID from GSuom2Kb?
>143 posts this thread is buzzing omg organic LINK conversations!?cFyovmi2 responds to every shitpost itt with the same tiring arguments, so he can bump the thread in a desperate attempt to create interest in the most inorganic wayfuck your astroturfed shitcoin you kike shill
>>60209730>if you respond to fud spam, you're the one spamming!The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you
>>60202925it did a 100x from 2018 to 2020and what lie am i spreading? to 2018 me, mid six figures earning 4.32% interest sounded fantastic
>>60209678Is it that hard to believe that after 5 years of languishing futile that more than one poster would be frustrated with link?
>>60209678also, where did I argue about adoption? I don't give a shit about adoption or utility or anything that any topbuying bagholders who 'only care about the tech' think about. All I care about is the price
>>60189177So they vet who signs up right? I want to sign up but working as a mech eng. in oilfield manufacturing probably won't make the cut. Then my name is tied to the token and they'll disappear me in 5 years, right?
>>60209899Im passing on this one personally, Youll know if LINK is involved without attending the stream
>>60209848If you only care about price, then why are you holding an asset that has had shit price action for nearly five years now?If you only care about price, then why did you spend alllll those hours itt arguing about fundamentals, adoption, features releases, ....?Literally nothing about you makes any sense.>>60209890>where did I argue about adoption?Right here: >>60209478
>>60209899If you are a long-time holder, you are likely already being watched.Remember the Ambrosus eye airdrop?
>>60204999i'm a pre mainnet marine and i give a shit
>>60209949That's not arguing about adoption.Jesus Christ, kid, you're still at it? Discontinue the lithium and take a nap
>>60209959no don't you see you don't care and if you do care you're an astroturf shill because those words mean something because obviously this shithole board that is dominated by left wing political shills really matters in the grand scheme of things
>>60209987>That's not arguing about adoption.Of course it is.You're whining that Chainlink is still in pilots, experiments, and trials instead of adoption.
>>60209795>wow, muh ETH run!!1and OMG pulled a 110x in 6 monthsand NANO pulled a 180x in the same spannigga pull your shit together, ETH did a 1000x from 2015-2017, that's what anons mean when talking about "ETH-like run"are you retarded?
>>60210071>niggause the er you stupid fucking nigger
>>60210071these topbuyers weren't around to see the discussions in 2018, 2019. If only you could bump year-old threads...everyone, I mean everyone expected link to be 3-4 digits by now. hell, even earlier than 2025. the fact that its struggled to stay in double digits is an abject failure
>>60210071>uncle rico talks about how his '80s trans am won a street raceTHE Cuckolds of crypto
>>60210150>WAAAAH 4CHAN ANONS PROOOMIIIIIIIISED!!!If you only care about price, why the fuck are you still holding an asset whose price has been shit for the past half decade?Explain yourself.
>>60210071oh no, i only 100x'd my investmentyou sound upset btw
>>60209645>The only thing that matters is priceand yet at the same time you have disregarded every possible avenue that could be explored to divine forward price action in a somewhat deterministic wayif you want to base your investment thesis on i buy things only because they go up you either need to possess a time machine or you are forced to chase pumps which is one of the fastest ways to destitutionat this point even casinos exceed your mental framework, i would recommend going to your local corner shop and buy all the scratch its you can, since that is the only thing that corresponds to your understanding of the world
>>60208111valid point, but desu they could easily just reduce the staking yield and emissions and still be able to survive for another 10 years. if the network isnt sustainable by then it was never going to be. I also dont buy that we are at an end of the world scenario, eventually there will be an agreement and we are going to rebound like crazy. If anything, the current drop is incredibly bullish for LINK since it extends the bullrun, and we are probably going to see the juice bits being live in Q1 2026
>>60210150i also actually agree with this. I remember thinking in 2019-2020 that low 3 figures was going to be inevitable for the 2021-2022 run and then 1k EOY by 2026. But honestly, this is more a testament to the market being retarded (see XRP valuation) rather than the team not executing correctly. What is most exciting now is that we are actually seeing production implementations and not just PoC/Trials.DTCC and SWIFT in production this year is huge/amazing
>>60210489Honestly feels like this whole China thing is a way out for Trump. They will make a deal and people forget whole thing in a week
>>60210578that is my base case aswell. You could argue that the AI bubble needed to be popped, but in all honesty it feels like we are just replaying 2017 except on steroids. The longer we chop around these levels, the higher and longer we are going to fucking blast once it resolves and everyone realizes they have to start printing. i have never been more bullish, so many factors converging.If anything else, the relative strength of the token should inspire some hope for the rest of the year (maintaining market share in #11-#20)
>>60210489>>60210661yes they will be forced to print but no it really is the end of the world, trump was retarded after allthe damage to the western financial system might not be fixable at this point, the basis trade is in the process of blowing up no matter what happens with the tariffsafter that it will be a wasteland in the economy for a good long while, dont underestimate the impact of what is happening right now
>>60210773so either they cuck on tariffs and we moon, or its the end of capitalism. i dont really think you can hedge that properly so id rather just hold (ofc you should have cash and gold as well)
>>60210773it was never fixablethis is what we've been saying for decadesthe chickens are coming home to roost
>>60211294dont get me wrong this isnt a call to panic dump your stack right this minutevery much quite the opposite, you certainly want a good part of your folio to be in an asset that has no counterparty riskwhat i said was that this clusterfuck will slow the adoption of tradfi of new link driven tech considerably because those tradfi institutions are fighting for survival right nowand yes this cant be hedged properly except to have cash on hand to buy the dip when it happens
>>60211482it depends on the level of damage, honestly. a full burn of the current system is better for linkies than a partial because a full burn means theres no power to push against a total redevelopment which is ultimately what chainlink and a blockchain based system is
>>60211578Theres also the absolute girfter nightmare scenario where they destroy the current order and unironically adopt xrp. Thats why i bagged a 5k xrp suicide bag when it was shooting over $1, you never know how big the grift is gonna get
>>60208399>custodial babies are going to learn a basic lesson resulting in giving me more time to accumulate assets directly involved in the fundamental shift of the financial systemOkay?
>>60189461lolI bet you believed Arbitrum would run on Link too
>>60211975>custodial babies are going to learn a basic lessoni wasnt talking about crypto holdings here anon, in these you have no excuse everyone can self hold and remove all counter party riskno i am talking about all most all global equities and commodity contracts, as retail its impossible not to have a custodial, it just isnt so you are on the hook in some way and thats the entire boomer and gen x retirement right therebut yes if that bridge is crossed rwa tokenization will happen just assume a 2 year sifting through the ruble hiatus between now and there
I feel nothingI am completely empty insideI know that this is bullish beyond belief, but I still expect nothing to come out of it and do not have the slightest amount of hope inside meAnyone else?
>>60212248I wish i still was just empty, trust me there are worse fates
>>60212248Completely buckbrokenMany such casesThat's what happens after 7 years of nothingburgersYou thought you'd be retired by nowInstead you are dead inside Watching link bleed outWhile chainlink labs' employees are rubbing it in your faceGrim
>>60212248chin up, stinkie :/
>>60205497You missed where right before our eyes, Sergey sent 8M Link to dump on us and kill a price pump just last month. They're deliberately suppressing the price to keep it out of the top 10.
>>60212830its unreal how much disdain he has for this communitywithout the original chainlink holders this would have been another nxt
>>60213363The Link community wrote the playbook for crypto communities, have been spreading info to developers on why oracles are important since we had high level developers up 2022 who were pointing out industry problems that were already solved by Chainlink.I guess the current staking pool is them throwing us a bone but sheesh, I wish we could be treated nicer. They really don't want us in their club and won't let this take off till it's ready to go from 0-1000.
>>60211482looks like he cucked
>>60212830>>60213363>>60213711Sergey was already working with Swift before /biz/ ever heard of Chainlink.Get over yourself, you're on an image board with virtually zero traction.
>>60215218A whole list of countries offered things like zero for zero tariff rates, Trump is responding positively to that.
>>60215218doesnt matter the basis trade blow up isnt a function of tariffspowell has to cuck out and lower rates so the real rates go down at least 100 bpthe spx can moon back to jan levels still doesnt change the losses in treasuries these retards managed to accrue
>>60216115Anon, crypto twitter stole all our memes. WTF are you talking about?
>>60216115go backyou're out of your depth here and have no idea what you're talking about
>>60216756sergey was already inner circle before he launched the token and before anyone has thus ever heard of him, despite that biz was indeed the first public place to learn of it
>>60216756>>60217033Most of "our memes" were stolen themselves retard.Even Linkmarines was stolen from Digimarines.On the whole this place has been a net detriment to Chainlink. Remember Zeus Capital for instance? That entire report was just a collection of fud from /biz/
>>60211578Thats why Sergey always said a collapse was necessary for Link to become used. God you’re all retarded ITT the entire world is a theatre play and they’re gonna crash it so we go to $81,000 by 2026.>inb4 medsIf you hold this Coin you’re automatically more special than 99% of humanity.
