>>60191285Good day Mr. Rekt.
>>60191285Good Day Mr Rekt what price of btc is ur invalidation ?
>>60191285I admire your tenacity in the face of all empirical evidence contrary to your thesis.
>>60191285I'm not sure this is what actually makes the line go up but if it makes you happy then it makes me happy too.
>>60191285
>>60191285how it goes so far:
>>60191285Imagine this faggot OP actually reported Mumu Rekt In Anus' post earlier.
>>60196040>oilPUTare you trying to tell me something?
>>60191931Good day, Mr. Europoor!>>60191997There is no specific number. I am a statistician. I made my own statistics based indicator, under 0 is sell/short and over 0 is buy/long. It crossed over 0 at 22k and has not gone under since. I will consider the bull run over once it has done so. However the values of the indicator are crabbing. This thing is more accurate than 99.999% of people>>60192016I am indeed tenacious, and will continue no matter what, if I was not, I would still be posting, because see above.>>60196040I would never do such a thing. I appreciate some good competition. I even appreciate his posts, both for humoristic reasons and for ego reasons (he does not realize, despite the hate, he is paying a hommage to me)
>>60196486What do you think the bottom is amidst all this tariff nonsense?
>>60196500I estimated the bottom to be 80K a few days ago. However it has gone against my guess 10% or so. I still think this is the bottom. 10% is not that far off
>>60196599You really think btc can hit 180k this cycle? It's just so hard to see how btc will pump that high with all this tariff nonsense going on...especially since btc is so correlated with stocks now.
>>60196633Too many times people over the years hurped and durped for many different reasons about why it cant pump but it did. I do not look at it much because mostly BTC just does its own thing. There were an immense amount of negative conditions on the way from 1k to 100k+ high yet here we are at 77K. Regardless the indicator I speak of with about 20% drawdown would take weeks more or negative downturn to go under 0. And yes, I still think that BTC will to to 180K, because historically the market price to production price ratio peaked at at least 3X. A few days ago despite the downturn hash rate reached a new high. At current hash rate progression by October 180K would be under 2X production price. Market price is now cheaper than production price, by the way.
>>60196775>I do not look at it much because mostly BTC just does its own thingYou really think this is still the case? It seems that btc is very correlated with stocks now>Market price is now cheaper than production price, by the way.Hmm...what is the significance of this? Has this happened before?
>>60196817There are times when it correlates and there are times when it does not. If you look at historic ratios of BTC to the stonks market it heavily underperforms. Why would it stop now? How many people thought like you are 10 years ago and we still went so much higher? BTC is special, it is not comparable to stonks where prices are psychological. Either the price dances around production price or production price dances around the price, but they are certainly correlated. And yes, it is significant, the price eventually always has gone up above production price. If you believe the bull run is still on, buying at under production price is a bargain
>>60196926Do you consider 5 btc to be a respectable stack if one is planning to hold for 4-8 years or so.
Even 1 BTC is a significant stack. I don’t see why one would sell BTC, unless he needs the money. It could be generational wealth for your children one day. My policy is stack when its low and never sell. It has been quite lucrative. As insane as this ride is, there is no signs it is stopping. There is no amount that counts as a significant stack. It is all relative to what you can afford to buy. If you are poor 1 is amazing. If you are really rich 5 is terribly little.KHLAV KHALASH
