It’s going to be illegal not to use Chainlink
if this PROOF act makes scamming with crypto harder, it'll never pass
Glad I have a make it stack of 52.
>>60248232
>>60248232Delete this RIGHT now.
FUCK NOO I DIDN'T STACK UP ENOUGH LINKIES
okay, but... price? and uh, chart?
>>60248232Ok I'm back. Fuck it. $1000 end of year. God damn it there is just no way this is a coincidence.
Imagine not buying LINK at $12. I’m so much better at investing than most folks
>>60248232>>60248789Hmm I like it but the ICO was Sep 18th 2017, not Sep 16th. Is there something i'm missing?
Where in the bill does it mention Chainlink?I'll waitI already know what the bagholders are going to response with...>they're not going to explicitly mention Chainlink in the bill, it's going to be a white label solution!Wake up, morons. This is another one of Chainlink's grifts. Whatever the hot button item is of the day, they try to latch onto it and say, "Chainlink solves this!"Going on 8 years of this nonsense
>>60248203they are going to shut down global trade again but this time for good and usher in 10,000 years of balkanization and an age of warlord kingdoms administered by regional blockchains united throughout the realms into some type of Golden Recordand LINK will be like only 3 silver coins
>>60248232holy kek>>60248203They doubted the Goldman Serg
>>60248221It just makes the scammers pay tribute to the ultimate scammer, sergay, for his proof blessing
>>60249061Retard ofc they dont say YOU NEED TO USE CHAINLINKYou are only required to have proof of reserves and other things only Chainlink does :^)
>>60249036then it was 2777 days away which is still 777
>>60248232there are no coincidences in my frame of reference
>>60249125The bagholders are incapable of thinking rationally. They'll lick up everything Chainlink Labs tells them. Sad really.
>>60248484
>>6024903616th was the day the tokens were created on chain
>>60248789I would bust, squirt and quite possibly ejaculate
>>60248232Everytime I’m about to give up hope I see something like this
I actually predicted this years ago when taking heavy amounts of mushrooms. Centralized exchanges will have to adopt the PROOF act if they want to operate within the US. This means you're either going to see loose regulations/enforcement like the STOCK act or youre going to see less established centralized exchanges around.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STOCK_Acthttps://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/senate-bill/2038
>Why is consumer confidence so low?>I think there is a great optimism.
i believe
>I can confirm the president is in very good shape UwU
>is the president eating less mcdonaldsbitch the ECONOMY
>>60249125They will use chainlink regardless of their "choices"Companies are not going to senselessly waste money on experiments they dont care about. Nobody cares about blockchain they only want it done.Google how big Ford's model T was in market dominance at the height of it's innovation. Between 1915 to 1925 it owned 60% of the entire auto industry, leaving competitors like GM and Dodge with 5% each.You're going to see Chainlink dominate 70% of the competition and leave competitors like wormhole and others fighting over the remaining 30%."The Automobile Industry, 1920–1980" by George S. May"Ford: The Times, the Man, the Company" by Allan Nevins (1954):Economic History Association (eh.net)
Once again asking:>consumer sentiment down>yields up>dollar down>China raising tariffs>indices pumpingCAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN WTF IS HAPPENING?
>>60249637I can explain that you're in the wrong thread. This isn't /smg/.
US CUSTOMS ANNOUNCEDSystem for tariff exemptions on freight ships is glitching the fuck out https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/11/customs-reports-glitch-in-system-used-by-freight-for-tariff-exemptions.html
>>60249637THAT NIGGER TRICKED ME
>>60249615>There's no trade war in the United States
I made a funny
>no tarriff news>market pumpWATI WAS ABOUT TO FINALLY BUY IN
>Why is consumer sentiment so low?>The american people have a high confidence in this administtration they overwhelmingly voted for president trumpOk then
>>60249637>>60249652>>60249657>>60249665>>60249721intentional misdirection. Good luck boys see you at 1000 USD
oOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>60248203kek so this was the "proof of" bill that Sergey was talking about two weeks ago
>>60249061>Where in the bill does it mention Chainlink?it doesn't and fyi to all the retards here, US bills don't mandate a fucking vendor lmao holy shit people here are so dumb and inexperiencedalso, proof of reserves have nothing to do with the funding token
>>60249125>Retard ofc they dont say YOU NEED TO USE CHAINLINKthis doesn't work anymore last cycle was the last time the breadcrumb thing worked poor guy, you're a one trick pony
>>60249779proof of reserves is a feature that requires the token, dumbass
>>60249437>Everytime I’m about to give up hope I see something like thisthey (CL) have it down to a sciencethey probably have a calculation of the exact minmum fluff they need to post to keep loyal c u c k h o l d s like yourself chomping at the bit
Alright, I'm new to crypto and just want to know, can you use chainlink without using etherium?
>>60249635>Companies are not going to senselessly waste money on experiments they dont care aboutHahahahahahaha i can't tell if this guy is trolling or just that dumbevery single major tech company has wasted money on experiments... a few quick onesgoogle glassfacebooks metaversetheranos' entire company was a failed experiment (just like chainlink) amazon fire phone>Google how big Ford's model Tthe main difference here: the cars existed (the entire company wasn't powerpoint slides about IMAGINING the future) > market dominanceand yet the largest asset manager in the world (blackrock) is using a competitor...i have to at least give you props for trying out a new analogy i guess you got tired of saying link was amazon? that one can get a little cliche
>>60249807>proof of reserves is a feature that requires the token, dumbassdoes it say that in the bill?what page? also how is chainlink providing these services now and getting paid offchain?
>>60249837Here's a better question to ask them because they cant answer>how do you exchange tokens from different blockchains without the use of smart contracts, and why are sushiswap and pancakeswap proof of concepts>If I had Token A and wanted to pay for a service that only accepts token B, how does this happen without the use of a centralized exchange?they can't directly answer it without skirting around it
>>60249910you can read the documentation here:https://chain.link/proof-of-reserve
>>60249628in what
>>60249933that's not a link to the proposed regulations you're getting mixed up with a bunch of buzzwords your cult posted kidmy question was, where in the government bill does it say you need a token? fyi to all -- this is not a new bill... they are essentially retrying the one from '23 which is here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3087/textit basically says an accounting firm needs to sign off on your assets
>>60250055a government bill is not going to specifically dictate the use of a private company's token. that's not how it works.
>>60248232WE ARE SO FUCKING BACK!
>>60250055Token sneeded sorry
>>60249884It's easier to just sift through the bullshit and get down to the facts
>>60248389>gas ID>tpPraise KEK
>>60250173(1/2)Who Would Likely Use What with the PROOF ActThe PROOF Act’s PoR requirements favor oracles with robust security, real-time auditing, and TradFi credibility. Here’s how services might align with Chainlink or competitors:Chainlink:Likely Users: Major custodians (Coinbase, Kraken), stablecoin issuers (Tether, Circle), and tokenized asset platforms (BlackRock’s BUIDL, Franklin Templeton). Banks entering crypto (JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs) also fit, given Chainlink’s SWIFT and DTCC pilots.Why: Chainlink’s PoR secures $8.5 billion in assets (e.g., Paxos, TrueUSD), supports 20+ chains, and offers AML/KYC data. Its 70% oracle market share and $50 trillion in enabled value scream reliability. For BUIDL ($1.87 billion AUM), Chainlink’s NAV feeds and CCIP handle cross-chain needs, making it a no-brainer for regulated entities.PROOF Act Fit: Perfect for real-time, on-chain PoR across public/private chains, meeting strict compliance needs.Pyth Network:Likely Users: DeFi-heavy exchanges (OKX, Bybit), perps platforms (dYdX), and Solana-based custodians (e.g., Serum-adjacent projects).Why: Pyth’s 400ms feeds suit high-frequency trading and DeFi, securing $1 trillion in volume. Its speed and 84-chain reach appeal to crypto-native firms, but it lacks Chainlink’s TradFi heft.PROOF Act Fit: Good for DeFi-focused custodians needing fast PoR, but less ideal for banks or multichain funds due to limited non-financial data.Band Protocol:
>>60250196(2/2)Likely Users: Smaller exchanges (KuCoin), regional DeFi platforms (Cronos), and gaming dApps needing basic PoR.Why: Band’s low-cost feeds work for budget-conscious projects, but its 5% market share and weaker security (fewer nodes) limit it to niche players.PROOF Act Fit: Viable for lightweight PoR on non-EVM chains, but risky for high-value custodians due to scale constraints.RedStone:Likely Users: Tokenization platforms (Securitize clients), layer-2 DeFi (Morpho, Pendle), and emerging asset custodians (e.g., Bitcoin staking protocols).Why: RedStone’s tie to Securitize (BUIDL’s partner) and $6 billion TVL make it a dark horse. Its modular feeds suit new assets, but it’s less mature than Chainlink.PROOF Act Fit: Strong for layer-2 PoR or niche RWAs, but not yet a go-to for major custodians or banks.Tellor, API3, DIA, WINKlink:Likely Users: Tellor for DIY DeFi (small lending protocols); API3 for insurance DeFi (Nexus Mutual); DIA for community-driven dApps; WINKlink for TRON-only custodians (e.g., JustLend).Why: These are fringe players with specific niches—Tellor’s flexibility, API3’s direct feeds, DIA’s transparency, or WINKlink’s TRON focus. None match Chainlink’s scale or TradFi ties.PROOF Act Fit: Marginal. Tellor’s latency, API3’s low adoption, DIA’s limited enterprise use, and WINKlink’s TRON lock-in make them unlikely for major PoR compliance.Broad Takeaway: The PROOF Act pushes custodians toward oracles with scale, security, and regulatory alignment. Chainlink dominates for TradFi (banks, BlackRock) and large custodians, capturing 60%–70% of use cases. Pyth and RedStone split DeFi and layer-2 niches (20%–30%), while Band, Tellor, API3, DIA, and WINKlink scrap for 5%–10% among smaller or specialized players. In-house PoR (e.g., Binance’s Merkle trees) could compete, but the act’s on-chain bias favors oracles like Chainlink.
>>60250210>Tellor, API3, DIA, WINKlinki figured these were all vapor ware at this pointand pyth isnt gaining too much traction on its own scam chainthere really is only redstone as a link competitor right now and that one is quite unknown to the wider public just like link
>>60249697>I WAS ABOUT TO FINALLY BUY INsure you were
>>60250210Overall: Blockchain will likely grow 25% annually through 2030, hitting $1 trillion in economic impact (PwC). Oracles will be the glue, with Chainlink’s 70% share giving it a head start, though Pyth, RedStone, and others will chip away at DeFi edges.
>>60250287Long-Term (2030+):If blockchain hits $1 trillion impact and Chainlink keeps 50% oracle share, LINK could reach $150–$200 in a hyper-adoption scenario (1 billion users, tokenized everything). But $1,000 is unrealistic—$213 by 2030 (Stealthex) needs a 20x market cap jump ($150 billion), unlikely without global crypto dominance. Downside risk: regulatory clampdowns or tech disruption (e.g., quantum oracles) could peg LINK at $10–$20.Speculative Take: LINK’s price will likely climb to $30–$50 by 2030, driven by PoR mandates and RWA growth, assuming Chainlink fends off Pyth and RedStone. Blockchain’s rise will amplify oracles, but LINK won’t moon to $1,000 without unprecedented adoption. Volatility (6%–10% daily swings) and macro risks cap short-term upside.Final ThoughtsThe PROOF Act makes Chainlink the top pick for major custodians and TradFi due to its scale, security, and partnerships, covering 60%–70% of PoR use cases. Pyth and RedStone will grab DeFi and layer-2 niches (20%–30%), while Band and others limp along (5%–10%). Blockchain’s future—$10 trillion RWAs, mature DeFi, AI contracts—will lean on oracles, boosting Chainlink’s utility. LINK’s price could hit $30–$50 by 2030, but competition and regulation temper moonshot hopes.
>>60250187Woah
>>60250173>>60250196>>60250210>>60250287>>60250322nobody wants to read your stupid chatgpt output bro
>>60250364See people can't directly address it >>60249926
>>60250322>LINK’s price will likely climb to $30–$50 by 2030HOLD FOR ANOTHER HALF DECADE FOR A 3X MARINES (IF YOURE LUCKY)!!!
>>60250486It really does hinge on if the globohomo society can successfully force this shit down our throats
>>60250114>a government bill is not going to specifically dictate the use of a private company's token. that's not how it works.i already said that aboveno where in the 2023 bill is there anything about having to use a token >>60250173>factswhat facts did you post? you got some ai put together buzzwords from twitter, congratseveryone is so pathetic these days, can't even take 10 minutes a read a billspeaking of... is it even released yet? i can't find the '25 bill
>>60250588Okay so whats your argument other than baiting and dodging. Do you see the future not being so blockchain dependent? Wait, is this peter schiff?
>>60250287>Chainlink’s 70% shareshare of what? are you saying they already have 70% of proof of reserves business?if so, that's a concession it does nothing for the funding token right? >>60250287>Oracles will be the glueclassic empty metaphor the shovels too right? >LINK could reach $150–$200 in a hyper-adoption scenariowhy would price go up if market share goes down? >The PROOF Act makes Chainlink the top pickwhat??? again, the bill will not name a companyalso you'll want to factor in acccounting firms creating their own solutions if cl gets too expensive for them they do this with other auditing type products >>60250402>See people can't directly address iti've undressed it where does your bot pull from by the way?
>>60249926It's a real problem, but it's a built in problem with decentralization. Standardization is key to easy access. Cross chain swaping is a necessity if you are diversified and holding many different interesting coins in different chains. Smart contracts can only do so much, and then they're is the problem of having two contracts void parts of other contracts out. Which smart contract is correct if you're swapping cross chain?
>>60250699>Smart contracts can only do so much, and then they're is the problem of having two contracts void parts of other contracts out. Which smart contract is correct if you're swapping cross chain?there's only 1 smart contract dude, lolit's pointless to talk about link on biz today, the board is full of morons
>>60250671>https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3087/text>https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1664
>>60250647>Okay so whats your argument other than baiting and dodginggoing back to the topic of this post, i find it ridiculous that the cult is trying insinuate an act requiring transparency will somehow benefit the link funding tokenit's really sick how they lead people on like and if i can wake up even one person it's worth itthey're fleecing people chainlink latches onto whatever is in the news that week.... ai, banks crashing, tariffs, inflation, whatever >Do you see the future not being so blockchain dependent?that's a good question, i'm undecided and every year becoming more skeptical as most of the space is solving problems that dont existthe underlying tech will change some things, give us some marginal efficiency over today's systems but most altcoin cults will get rugged hard hopefully the cl team does some prison time utility altcoins were a way to raise free capital for startups without giving away equityi find it intellectually lazy when people say "xyz is the future" and leave it at thati think a lot of idealists went into crypto and they think this technology is going to change everything and create some bullshit utopia state
>>60250811that's the 2023 bill ctrl f oracles ctrl f token ctrl f coinctrl f nigger
>>60250838>chainlink latches onto whatever is in the news that week.... ai, banks crashing, tariffs, inflation, whateverTHINKING BACK ON THE LAST 5 YEARS, THIS IS SO TRUE. I THINK IT REALLY KICKED INTO HIGH GEAR WITH THE SVB DEBACLE
>>60250838I'm not in favor of blockchain solving everything, but it would be naive to assume that this stuff isnt being pushed down our throats.>https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/blockchain-technology-market>https://www.precedenceresearch.com/blockchain-technology-market>The global blockchain technology market size was valued at USD 27.85 billion in 2024. The market is projected to grow from USD 44.29 billion in 2025 to USD 746.41 billion by 2032, exhibiting a CAGR of 49.7% during the forecast period.Source: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/blockchain-market-100072
fuddies in shambles lmao
thats it, im selling my xrpoo for link fucking paid indians posting in XRP generals really got me
>>60248389>that IDno fucking way
Last screenshot
>>60251427please
>>60251460stay mad for being wrong
>>60248232This is POWERFULL
>>60251627DONT YOU RUBES GET TIRED OF BEING DUPED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN?
>>60248203Its fine its literally not needed on kaspa which will be the default currency, DYOR
>linktards have resorted to ai slop for hopiumthe absolute state
>>60249792>last cycle was the last time the breadcrumb thing worked>poor guy, you're a one trick ponythis. year of the snake. expecto betrayal
Imagine being Donkey Kong in that scene and having to be all like "damn, Candy Kong, you fuckin' fine, all sexy with your tight body and gorgeous face. I would totally have sex with you, both my character and the real me." Like seriously imagine having to be Donkey Kong and not only she stands in there while she winks at you and tells you to come and fuck her, the favorable lighting exposing her beautiful brown fur and smooth skin, and just stand there, take after take, hour after hour, while she perfected that scene as a reward for buying Bonjo Blast from her. Not only having to tolerate her monstrous mommy milkers but her naughty attitude as everyone on set tells her she's STILL GOT IT!! and DAMN, CANDY KONG LOOKS LIKE THAT??!! because they're not the ones who have to sit there and watch her irresistible fucking angel face contort into types of hotness you didn't even know existed before that day. That big gorilla bastard have been fucking nothing but a healthy diet of blondes and supermodels and later alleged rape victims for your ENTIRE CAREER coming straight out of the boonies in DK Island. You've never even seen anything this fucking sexy before, and now you swear you can taste the sweat that's breaking out of her pits as she standing there suggestively at you, smugly assured that you are enjoying the opportunity to get paid to stand there and revel in her "statuesque (for that is what she calls herself)" beauty, the beauty she worked so hard for with personal trainers in the previous months. And then the director calls for another take, and you know you could give a raise to every single person in this room before the studio secretly could put her down. You really want to have sex with that tight blonde monkey pussy, but you stand there and resist the urge to fuck her, because you're fucking DONKEY KONG and you're starting in a video game made for kids. You're going to lose your future career over this. Just bear it. Hide your face and bear it.
>>60253181Yeah but have you ever tried Captain Kutchie's Key Lime Pies?
>>60248389LMAO
Chainlinks PoR are a scam anyway. They use third party services (Harris & Trotter). Why would they pay in a LINK token when they can get it directly from the 3rd party kek. Token definitely not needed.Its also hilarious that over CLL entire PoR revenue since its inception has only made 12k LINK in revenue over 3 years. Don't believe me? Do the calculation yourself.
>>60255529who's harris and trotter
>>60255529>Why would they pay in a LINK token when they can get it directly from the 3rd party"just make your own oracle bro"
>>60248789too much of a hopium. let's see it hit $100 first. holding both SUPRA and LINK. let's see which brings the highest ROI.
>>60255888Checked.Some 3rd party company that does proof of reserves. They give CLL the data, then they charge a fee for it.>>60256033>Oracle hacks from 2020Its been 5 years bro, its very telling that Linkies still pull up events that happened so long ago. Its the equivalent of AVAX baggies or something pulling up the ETH DAO hack. Its also completely devoid of context because DeFi was bleeding edge back then so there were hacks every few week, to do with oracles or notIt just shows you haven't developed mentally at all and your awareness of whats happening in the space is extremely limited. A very bearish signal.
>>60256502Bro the wormhole hack is barely 3y old and the orbit hack was literally last year, 5 months ago, stargate halted over 30k transactions. its you who has been living under a rock or just shutting his ears to cope
>>60256701Crypto moves fast, i'm not keeping tabs every time some literal who bridge gets cooked. 3 years is a long time in crypto, if it was such a colossal hit to Wormholes reputation, why would Securitize partner with them? Also Ondo. All the RWA's are moved via Wormhole, over 2bn in value, CLL has zero assets under its management.Another massive thing you retards don't seem to understand is this. Wormhole or any bridge that has been operational, the longer it has TVL and has no mishaps the more robust it is. CCIP has been operational since July 2023 and has ZERO, yes ZERO TVL other than some no name garbage shitcoins. Which means two things, there's no liquidity to bootstrap it, and secondly THERE'S NO MONEY TO HACK. So if there's no money to hack, how can you even prove the robustness of your protocol. They hav ea bunch of paper audits, but we all know what the value of those are. Wormhole has 2.5b Tether sitting there waiting to get stolen, but nothing has happened since 3 years ago. I also doubt anything of that magnitude will ever happen again, because contextually, bridges were incredibly new at the time. If CLL released CCIP then they would have probably got fucked too, but alas they get to learn from those that push the boundaries.One last thing that is extremely telling is that if there's 2.5b Tether on Wormhole, it shows that the market TRUSTS it more than CCIP. You can then say the market is retarded, but the reality here is people are voting with their dollars and its demonstrably and objectively without question that Wormhole is better.
>>60256701tbf 3 years is a long time. The question is: did they fix up their infrastructure since then to prevent further exploits?>>60256768why would Securitize partner with them?Securitize and Wormhole are both backed by the same VCs. I can't remember who, maybe another anon can share. The info was shown on X when the Securitize/Wormhole partnership was first introduced.
>>60255529Because said 3rd party services don't have infrastructure to deliver the data reliably to the smartcontracts on blockchains.
>>60248232>link shills found another magic numberPlease, stop giving me hopium
>>60249628Which ai is this and how do you get it so close to sergey? Is it one you can feed an image.
>>60249767>proof of crab
>>60250055>where in the government bill does it say you need a token?It's a goverment bill. Why would they name the tech that will be used in the backend? It's irrelevant to the document.
>>60257263and the tokin is irrelevant to the use of the tech
>>60248232wtf
>>60248389screencap this>it was all true, all of it
>>60256840Why would they partner with CCIP?There's 2.5b of real money (tether) on Wormhole, there's NO money on CCIP, it actually would make no sense to partner with CCIP. The only persuasive argument you can make is they got hacked 3 years ago. Sure they are backed by the same VCs which probably influenced the outcome, but the bridge works and has a shitload of liquidity compared to competitors. Also I misspoke above about Ondo, they actually use LayerZero. I meant Centrifuge bringing 2b RWA onchain and Wormhole being the bridge.https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/67f84c1fc11064762f4c06c7/
>>60257757Its over i sold
>>60257757Price and chart
