Previous: >> 61803438
>>61889178Previous: >>61803438
>>61889178Shorts were closed when the stock was canceled.
>>61889178they need to make a sequel to dumb money where it's just retards blowing their life savings on a towel stock
>>61889178
>>61889815
>>61889815>>61889818
>>61889178Your money and shares are gone and they are never coming back. Should have bought GME instead.
>>61889815>>61889818>>61889820For everyone wondering about the CUSIP-6 conundrum and how partially incorrect (stale) information in consistently posted every thread, here are official SEC, OCC, and BBBY investor relation links so you can see the CUSIP conundrum for yourself:Bed Bath in June 30th 2020 before name change(now known as BBBYQ or DK-Butterfly-1), 13Ghttps://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/886158/000110465920082648/tv0003-bedbathbeyondinc.htmCUSIP: 075896100OverStock(now BBBY), December 31, 2019, 13Ghttps://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1130713/000119312520035091/d885642dsc13ga.htmCUSIP: 690370101BBBY(now OverStock) September 30th 2025, "Bed Bath & Beyond Inc", 13Ghttps://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1130713/000010290925000032/xslSCHEDULE_13G_X01/primary_doc.xmlCUSIP: 690370101BBBYW (BBBY warrants) Options Clearing Corporation filing:https://infomemo.theocc.com/infomemos?number=57365theocc.com is the official Options Clearing Corporation website.CUSIP (BBBY): 690370101CUSIP (BBBYW): 075896159BBBYW (BBBY warrants) official BBBY investor relations website:https://investors.beyond.com/resources/Warrants/default.aspxscroll down and you will see Form 8937 Tax Information, here is a direct link from the official BBBY investor relations website:https://s203.q4cdn.com/409549452/files/doc_downloads/2025/Form-8937-Warrant-and-Attachment.pdfWarrant CUSIP: 075896159Common Stock CUSIP: 690370101OFFICIAL filings that show the:BBBYQ(DK-Butterfly-1) CUSIP-6: 075896BBBY(OverStock) CUSIP-6: 690370BBBYW(BBBY Warrants) CUSIP-6: 075896
>>61892353A bigger conundrum is how anyone thinks they will get paid for shares canceled over 2 years ago. These numbers are meaningless for canceled shareholders, you are not getting shit for BBBYQ.
>>61892820dont your problem.or not?
>>61892820Happened with hertz, and the bbbyq chapter 11 judge said himself it’s possible for shareholders to get cash and or equity
As far as I'm concerned, as long as the shares remain canceled the hypefags are WRONG and we LOST. Only if the shares are ever uncanceled can you say you are right. Until then, you are WRONG.>But the secret planShares are still canceled>But the cusip cunnilingusMy shares have been gone for years>But RC is a creditorStill no sharesTry not to seethe at the truth that I speak.
>>61893617>Happened with hertz>load muh_hertz.txtThe problem here is that you just do not understand how BK works. We will use Hertz as an. example as it was one of the very few occasions when the original stockholders got SOMETHING, although very little.First, when a company declares BK the stock is DELISTED FROM ALL EXCHANGES. The exchanges don't trade BK stock. Shorts are excused from closing the transaction, as the stock is by definition worthless. THERE IS NO SQUEEZE BECAUSE THE SHORT SELLERS DON'T HAVE TO RETURN WORTHLESS STOCK. Sooner or later, the broker will release all funds to the short seller.Then, the stock ticker symbol is changed. Hertz was changed from HTZ to HTZGQ. Now all old stockholders own shares in HTZGQ. THEN A NEW COMPANY IS FORMED. With Hertz, it was HTZ. All the old stockholders own NO SHARES OF HTZ. HTZGQ (old HTZ) will never again trade on an exchange although it can trade on pink sheets (that's what the "Q" means). HTZ can be (and was) listed with an exchange and traded.Then, HTZGQ does a Section 363 bankruptcy sale of the assets to HTZ. This transfers the assets free of any liens to HTZ. HTZ pays for these assets by selling stock. The money generated in HTZGQ from selling stock in HTZ is distributed to the creditors of HTZGQ. Remember, that HTZGQ was once HTZ and was the original Hertz. (New) HTZ then discovers that it owns thousands of slightly used cars in the hottest used car market ever and the price then soars. This doesn't affect the original stockholders in Hertz because HTZGQ sold those cars to HTZ for 10 cents on the dollar. HTZ soars but the original stockholders own HTZGQ not HTZ. HTZGQ of course is worth pennies.As a matter of fact, the holders of HTZGQ got $1.46 plus 1/20 share of HTZ for every share of HTZGQ for the best BK result of the century.
>>61893694>Shorts are excused from closing the transaction, as the stock is by definition worthless. >As a matter of fact, the holders of HTZGQ got $1.46 plus 1/20 share of HTZ for every share of HTZGQ for the best BK result of the century.Who paid the holders who bought the shares that were sold short?
>>61893729No one, because you pay the short seller, not the buyer of the share, in case of cancellation.
>>61893740You're saying that some people who bought HTZ before it became HTZGQ got absolutely nothing while other people who bought HTZ before it became HTZGQ got a payout? Where is the evidence for this claim?What determines whether or not a share you buy through your broker is a real share or a short share? What mechanism exists to arbitrate any disputes in the event of a HTZ situation?
>>61893765HTZGQ holders got money per the approved Bankruptcy Planhttps://infomemo.theocc.com/infomemos?number=48928The plan determines what holders get.>now lets see the BBBY plan
>>61893821>HTZGQ holders got money All the holders? Even the holders who bought shares that were sold short? So HTZ paid out for more shares than they issued because speculators decided to sell something that they didn't own? Is that what you're saying?
>>61893861No, you're putting words into my mouth, and are reading beyond the plan. You can speculate if Hertz had naked shorts. You can't even speculate the same for BBBYQ, since analysis stops at the lack of a similar provision of payment from BBBYQ's own bankruptcy plan.
>>61893897The plan can still legally change, and given what RC, Icahn and Larry Cheng and Overstock appear to be planning it looks like shareholder recovery is in the horizon
>>61893897Naked shorts? We're just talking about regular old shorts. Borrowing a share from somebody to sell it to somebody else creates 2 shares out of 1. The person you borrowed from owns a share and the person you sold it to owns a share. If that share is entitled to a distribution as it was with HTZ, then who pays the second holder? If the second holder doesn't get paid then how is it determined who owns a real share? Did HTZ pay out for more shares than they issued just because some speculators decided to sell shares they didn't own? Did some HTZ shareholders get nothing because they didn't buy a real share? Or did the speculators (i.e. shorts) have to pay the distribution? Or are you saying that when HTZ went bankrupt the short interest was 0.0000000%?
>>61893931>Cope>>61893932>Did HTZ pay out for more shares than they issued just because some speculators decided to sell shares they didn't own? Did some HTZ shareholders get nothing because they didn't buy a real share? Or did the speculators (i.e. shorts) have to pay the distribution? Or are you saying that when HTZ went bankrupt the short interest was 0.0000000%?You can go dig it up. Regardless, it won't matter for BBBYQ holders, given there's no provision in the approved plan.
Well that's one way of admitting that you lied earlier. Shorts are responsible for paying any distribution for shares they sold. Whether or not there is a distribution is another matter. Now why would a person just go into a thread and lie about shorts being closed because shares were cancelled, and then cite HTZ knowing full well that HTZ shorts had to pay that distribution for the shares they short sold?You wouldn't happen to be here posting on behalf of a party that short sold BBBYQ shares now would you? I think that's a crime there Jimbo.
>>61893946Stating a fact isn’t coping. The judge himself said the plan can change and previous shareholders can receive new equity.
>>61894001Actually it is cope.>Appear to beAppears to whomsdve?
>>61893998>Shorts are responsible for paying any distribution for shares they soldNot for a cancelled stock.https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/maintain-short-position-delisted-stock/
>>61894061>Not for a cancelled stock.So who paid HTZ holders for the distribution after HTZ shares were cancelled?https://seekingalpha.com/article/4410692-hertz-just-filed-ch-11-reorganization-plan-which-will-wipe-out-shareholdersIt was the shorts. They paid. Not HTZ. Not the brokers. The liability remains open even if shares are cancelled. Now why would you just go into a thread and lie about something so easily verifiable, Jimbo?
>>61894090>So who paid HTZ holders for the distribution after HTZ shares were cancelled?The (old) Hertz entity. Old Hertz sold its fleet of cars to New Hertz, and New Hertz paid Old Hertz cash+shares in New Hertz.
>>61894181But that was distributed to Old Hertz shareholders at a 1:20 ratio as you said. But what about Old Hertz shareholders who bought shares that were sold by short sellers? The shorts who sold those shares were liable for distributions owed to those who bought those shares, even after the shares were cancelled.
>>61894207Short sellers do not "sell shares.">The shorts who sold those shares were liable for distributions owed to those who bought those shares, even after the shares were cancelled.Source?
>>61894232>Short sellers do not "sell shares."Oh? Then what do they do?
>>61894258they borrow AND sell. They don't need to return the shares after the shares are cancelled. A simple google search would have answered this (but you knew that)
The gassy retard doth protest too much
>>61894299And if the shares they borrowed and sold are owed a distribution as was the case with HTZ, they are responsible for delivering that distribution. Even after the shares are cancelled (as was the case with HTZ). But you knew that.
>>61894417There will never be any distribution to former BBBYQ holders, the bankruptcy plan clearly states this.
>>61894530The plan can legally still be changed in arbitrary ways
>>61893998No, because they aren't "short" in the new distribution. If you were to follow that logic, the distribution would go to the shorts, which could then decide to sell or return this distribution
>>61894807>they aren't "short" in the new distributionYes they are>the distribution would go to the shortsThe distribution goes to the longs>which could then decide to sell or return this distributionIncorrect. They owe the distribution to the share they sold and the share they borrowed. It works the same way it does for dividends. >Borrow share of $AAPL>Sell borrowed share of $AAPL>$AAPL dividend>Short pays $AAPL dividend to the long he borrowed from and the long he sold to>Alternatively, short buys back share he sold and returns the share he borrowed to avoid dividend liability
>RK's brother is butterflyposting>RC's brother is butterfly and teddy posting>shills shifting the narrative from "you're not getting anything" to "shorts will NOT be on the hook for your payout!!" (of course they will be lmao)>little Dougies bff has a full blown meltdown on twitter, and, for sooooome reason (we know why) HATES Teddyyeah i'm thinking we're in the blessed timeline, comfy aff :))
sK6S62j/ is trying to act so retarded he may usurp dogshit anon as the greatest long signal (he still has a long way to go.)
>>61895488Link for RC’s brother butterfly posting?
>>61895828https://x.com/mtlbrad/status/2026005517873582211>do you like butterflies?>I’d go back in time just to give my dad one last hug!so he's associating a butterfly with his dad (Teddy)if any shill could explain this in any way other then the (to us) obvious one, please feel free to do so
>>61889178Will you fucking niggers wake the fuck up one day, what the fuck are these threads holy fuck.
>>61896785>what the fuck are these threadsBig dick business. You wouldn't understand.
We are fren.Dont be afraid.You dont care
>>61897008THERE YOU HAVE IT FELLAS
>>61897008lmaooooThere will be ZERO response to this. They will simply goalpost move and probably go back to belt buckle "dd"Start deleting those begging tweets sal LMFAO!!!!
>>61896937how much money have you made?
>>61897075I haven't decided yet
>>61897008UMMM SHILLIES? YOUR RESPONSE?
Looks like this means the cusip thing is now meaningless. If RC isn't interested in new bbby at all, that means the cusip has zero relevance. Which is it? You can't have your cake and eat it too.
>Literal who
>>61897724do you deny the cusip conundrum?
>>61897739There was a CUSIP conundrum alright LMFAO
>the cusip proves new bbby will save us>erm actually we don't need new bbbywhich is it?
>>61897796lmfao
>>61897692The CUSIP connects to the DK-Butterfly shell. That's a separate legal entity with $3-4B in NOLs and a 1145 relisting provision. Nothing to do with the operating business.Burry himself praised the shell's NOL structure on Substack and called it 'Instant Berkshire.'Cusip conundrum remains unrefuted
>group of the most insufferable people that act like obnoxious smart asses for years claiming they've won despite seeing zero results>"wow why does everyone hate us they must be shills"
>>61897941Couch Status?
>>61897941You know its bad when this faggot pipes up
>>61897008How can RC have GME buy bbbyq tho? How is that even an option? Thread natives have been insisting this is impossible for years?Bbby will buy bbbyq, not gme, then teddy will absorb bbby and gme.
>>61898056>Bbby will buy bbbyqLemonis has said multiple times this is not happening. Any time this was pointed out before, you guys would say "yeah because gamestop is buying bbbyq"
>>61898081He is correct. BBBYQ reverse merged with BBBY. The CUSIP Conundrums explains this exactly.
>>61898081So you’re implying lemonis would divulge non public M&A activity on social media? Do you hear yourself?
>>61898144Lemonis isn't obligated to respond to anyone on twitter, especially if he is at risk of breaching an NDA. The fact that he did respond at all means he had nothing to hide. So you're implying that it's fine for a CEO to openly lie to protect himself despite not needing to respond at all. Do YOU hear yourself?
Welp
it's been quite amusing to see laymen go through the details of a standard bankruptcy process and somehow manage to spin a pizzagate tier conspiracy out of itmaybe investing / gambling should be regulated after allthese people have mothers and wives and daughtersjust buy an index fund next timewhat a great waste of mental effort
>>61898220HELLO DARKNESS MY OLD FRIEND
>>61898220Hey >>61898144, is this good enough for you? Straight from the horse's mouth.
>>61898166>>61898475Gme will never buy bbby or bbbyq. It appears that bbbyq will merge into bbby.
>>61898491AMC will merge with BBBYQ (AMC needs to go backrupt first)
Thank goodness this BBBYQ nonsense is finally over...
shares canceledcreditors stiffedbaggies coping ad infinitumkekon my way to go buy bingus token instead
DK-Butterfuck these haters
The shills are lashing out today. One of the shills may have outted themselves today. Gary Gasparino was posting from his main account about RC's "dead daddy, Sad, Ha!" which is exactly the same sort of wording a twitter shills constantly uses. The shorts are shitting their pants so hard. They don't think they got away with BBBYQ's murder. Not at all. In fact, they appear to be completely ass blasted about BBBY. We literally caught a live one today. Gary Gasparino MALDING in such a fashion that he almost undoubtedly thought he was anonymous. Sad, Ha!
>>61898979>Sad, Ha!Is this a common saying or exclusive to gasparino? The shills use it a bunch. Don't tell me gasparino is too stupid to change his words while using an alt
If I bashed bbbyq for 3 years, (regardless if it was a paid gig) And it actually returned I wouldn't hesitate to kill myself
Are the new shares in the room yet?
>>61899113Either Gasparino is having a meltdown and decided to use his actual account to post that or he forgot he was not logged in as a different shill account and posted that on accident. Make no mistake about it, probably every development in the CH11 BK Virtu Financial finds out about it that same day. The real question is why did he suddenly have a drunken meltdown? What does he know that made him so upset?
>>618978173-4?i think 10B
>>61899706nope
Does Bed Bath and Beyond still exist as a store?
>>61900324Yes. The CUSIP is still being used too.
>>61900324owned by BBBY (former BYON, Buyed by OVSTK)
kek baggies
>>61896785Schizo shit I read for amusement. Think of the time wasted and opportunities misses with all this madness. They’re like angry ex jilted boyfriends who can’t let go. It’s the same mental illness. Funny though
>>61900328>>>>>>>>61889818
>>61901172I think it's hilarious how, after GameStop distributed warrants, BBBY bagholders decided they had warrants too. BBBY warrants weren't an idea before then.It's just really obvious at this point that BBBY has only ever been a GME parody, pushed to cast doubt on the credibility of the GME board and their investors.
>>61901824Warrants aren't a common dividend to give to shareholders in the retail sector. The timing is impeccable and the CUSIP Conundrum basically proves what the 3 year long thesis was pointing towards.BBBYQ is walking like a duck It's quacking like a duck. It's probably a duck. Lots of people whine and cry about this but they really don't have a good reason why all of this is happening when it has been suspected that we would be seeing these kinds of clues. We have them. We have the CUSIP Confirmation. It's over. Towelkings were right this whole time.
>>61901824I find it hilarious how much people can’t shut the fuck up about this bankrupt cancelled towel stock. Mods from the cringe mines, Micheal Burry, d word niggers on a Syrian sandwich forum, and even Hedge fund market makers won’t shut the hell up about it. Awkward.
>>61901851It's funny how you are invested in GME and know that whole lore but you have to pretend to not know anything about the massive short scandal in BBBY that RC is integral to the events that unfolded the last few years.You're not fooling anyone which is why you're such silly shilly.
>>61901894That post is literally agreeing with you you autist.
>>61901851>he can't even spell disingenuous
>>61901901Sneed
>>61901901BBBY baggies have shit reading comprehension. If they didn't, they wouldn't have become BBBY baggies in the first place lol
>61901824We've gone from>It's not real stop talking about itTo>Okay, it LOOKS real, and everybody is taking about it, but they're just jokingHow heavy are those goalposts?
We are ALL going to wagmi.
>>61904229No PP you and your dozens of viewers Will All Going to Have To Find Employment
>>61897067burry is overrated as fuck because of the movie. he made a degen bet and got lucky once. he's had a terrible track record since then.
burry thinks GME MOASS is extremely unlikely and that RC is just grifting retail investors. either something happens with BBBYQ/DK-butterfly or none of it happens as far as i'm concerned. you didn't have to be a genius to take the hint from pulte if you were just paying attention. the formation of gameshire bathaway would be the ultimate proof that RC is the real deal.
I need all of you BBBaggies to listen carefully: stay the fuck out of my /gme/ thread you pajeety larpers. GME is a profitable vertically positioned DFV stock and i do NOT need you shit-skin coloured nigs larping about the revival of a failed, forgotten Q-list stock. Failure to comply and I shall personally BLAST you with my Global Obliteration Yield Beam or G.O.Y Beam for short, but I’m sure many of you curry munchers would actually prefer that.
Boooom
if towelfags win, i get money (because i am also a towelfag)if towelfags lose, the crash out from pp and his squad of hypefags will be gloriouswin win
>>61905166grok talking like an absolute faggot outs you as asking a very VERY leading question only to crop it out and post here you should kill yourself
>this thread
>>61905912Oof, this is awkward...
>>61905912This is a spicy development.
>>61905912I voted for this>>61905917Of course the parasite, without missing a beat, springs to action to retain some semblance of relevance.
>>61905917AI wrote that. kek.
Remember when there was a tendie offer then it was never discussed again? One of about 20 curious things related to BBBYQ.
>>61907080I legitimately forgot about this.
>>61907080
>>61907080what you mean?
>>61905917This is ai slop, or at least the numbers should be. It would be especially awkward if jane street claimed a 3% stake after Papalia disclosed that retail had 98% ownership at the time of bankruptcy.
twitterfags are now speculating $15 per shareholy shit I would take that in a heartbeatdeal, I agree to $15 per share deal deal dealGIVE IT TO ME NOW I ACCEPT THESE TERMS DO IT NOW GIVE IT TO ME
>>61908589Link, I don't have an account
>>61908589sauce
>>61908589$15 is below rcs options price. its at least 60 dumb fag
>>61908739it better be an 1:1 equity+cash deal because $15 per share after three plus years is insulting.
>>61908764I had a cost basis below $1. $15 per share would be a gift from god and I would be more than happy with it considering right now it's 0. The towelfags are some real greedy motherfuckers.
>>61908902Towelfags aren't greedy, though. Markets are supposed to use buying and selling to find a price that clears the most number of trades. If I want a share of a stock and I hand over my money for it, then I expect to receive it. If short sellers are counterfeiting shares to dilute the shareprice and end up selling me shares for pennies when it is actually worth more then that is on them. They have no right to try and inject themselves as providers of liquidity if it means they can illegally counterfeit with impunity.
>>61908902I’d say $15 per share is letting them off the hook easy compared to the triple digit gamma squeeze we could have seen back in 2023 if it weren’t for SEC allowing rampant corruption in broad day light. >>61908939This
>>61908589Why are they talking about $15 per share again? The Charles Schwab leak a long time ago was $25 dollars per share.
https://x.com/xMarketNews/status/2027028346379346271?s=20
>>61893665>>61897692>>61897941>>61905236>>61908589>>61908902LMFAO
>>61910758Greedy towelfags don't get to speak on behalf of me, especially not grifters like pp and his group of idiots. It's not my problem if most of you had small stacks and a shitty cost basis. I had 25000 shares at about 70 cents per share. If they want to give me $15 per share, I say GIVE IT TO ME. I want my money NOW.
>>61911092
>>61911140I'm allowed to want money while simultaneously showing disdain for all of you grifting hypefags. Sal, pp, and michael can all go fuck themselves. I know at least one of them posts here.
>>61911092>Grifters like PPI only trust Sonichu these days. He has never steered me wrong
>>61911151And your boss is allowed to hope I take a bottom of the barrel payout. This reeks of bad faith, and there will be multipliers for that sort of thing on my payout.
>>61911388It's not up to me and it's not up to you. I don't care what you think. If they said "you get $15 per share and that's final" I will be very happy. We don't get to negotiate and at this point I will be happy with anything more than zero. Because right now, zero is what we got. Go ahead and cry because I'm the only one with decent expectations. Go ahead and demand 1000 per share or whatever fantasy you have.
>>61911416>you'll get what I say you get, goyimShalom
>>619110927october 2026>>61889818
>>61911465Hey buddy, if $15 per share makes you uneasy or disappointed, that's a YOU problem.
>>61911506You're the only one acting uneasy. Now pretend you haven't been shitting up the thread with your bitching. I command it.
The shills are malding over the CUSIP Conundrum. They can't even muster a single utterance in its refutation. BBBYQ was officially solved by Sonichu. He;s literally BBBYQ's DFV.
>>61911092>I want my money NOW.None of you is getting any money
>>61912669
Can you spare some change?
Won't somebody think of the baggies?
>>61912992>BTFO so hard he had to switch IDs.I like this image, because bbbyq never actually went to zero before delisting. It never even went under a penny. Very interesting indeed. Keep trying shillfren.
>>61913116Nope, I came straight from the GME thread! You mad canceled stock baggie?
>>61913136Thanks for keeping the thread bumped.
>>61913141>implying anything discussed here actually matters or has any effect on anything
>>61913153It seems to have an effect on you sissyshillies.
Saar!
Please to be taking notice saar!
Sar, please to be taking the notice.
holy fuck shills are on demoralization duty today, too bad doug cifus behavior and the CUSIP-6 is the smoking gun.
>>61913183>>61913197>>61913210You should feed PP and Buttfarm's face to the prompt.
>>61913153The fact that you’re even here proves it has an effect on at least you.
>>61913223you guys are the board lolcows. Maybe even sitewide lolcows. At any given moment some percentage of 4chan is going to stop in and laugh at you and feel thankful they're not as retarded as you are. you take this as proof that you're right and people are being paid to make fun of you. But in real life you're just stupid and people make fun of you for free.
>>61913250
>How did he know what I look like...
A new level of shill tactics lmfaoooooooooooo
do you recognize this man?
>tfw you're king of the canceled stock baggies
>>61913362Fascinating how much effort they are going just to stifle the CUSIP Conundrum. This is all they have left since they can't actually refute it.
GME vs. BBBYQ baggie war is the ultimate loser showdownWho's going to be the one to win the title of biggest loser?(both of the faggot fandoms)
>>61913395CUSIP Conundrum and $15 will get you a large 2 topping at dominosyou see it doesn't matter if you win an argument on 4chan, you still didn't get any money. And you never will.
It is so incredibly difficult to enter an AI prompt bros, so much effort going in
>>61913385>>61913392>>61913403top fucking notchCan you have PP be a fast food wagie where he puts the fries in the bag?
>>61913413How's this anon?
>>61913413This one might be better
>>61913433Zased. Make it sadder for great justice.
>>61913447ahahaha holy shit
He wasn't putting the fries in the bag fast enough
>>61913402The reverse merger means I have a massive stake in BBBY and whatever corporate structures that are apart of the transaction. We have restructured and my interests have been preserved. We know this to be true because the BBBYQ CUSIP is on BBBY's warrants. The same warrants which were released on the same day as RC. RC is the CEO of GME whose company has expressed their intent to engage in M&A. I'm just gonna be a comdy womfy boy and wait for CH11 BK to conclude. I made like $14,000 on my silver stack today alone so I can care less about the eternal-crab.
>>61913433>>61913447>>6191345710/10 meme for those familiar with the matter
>>61913486Actually lmfao as a long time watcher of the pp show. It was always lambos or food stamps
>>61913625how much did you donate?
Baggie had to get a new job. Nothing is happening with the canceled shares and not enough people bought the shitcoin.
Baggie can only dream of gains, as the stock he likes is canceled
I love seeing the shills this fucking assblasted:>>61911574>>61911593Why would doug cifu be so outraged at his market making firm selling "worthless" shares which makes them millions, while BBBY was going under 10 cents that he would beg gensler to shut it down?More importantly, why was doug cifu so balls deep in the BBBYQ "scitzo" recovery theories on twitter that he followed a page, which he only could have followed if he knew theppshow podcast hosts' real name?>pic relatedpic inside this post:>>61892353Doug Cifu knew theppshow podcasts hosts' real name and followed a disparaging page, why such rage over twitter "scitzos" theorizing on BBBYQ recovery theories? Why would Larry Cheng go onto such a show?
>>61913233Checked! The AI still shows the stock mooning when the prompt says it's cancelled. Absolutely based.
>It's so telling that people are annoyed by us spamming a canceled baggy stock all the time
I wonder what rS6+inp9 tells people when they ask him what he does on a Friday night.
>>61913755Can you do this nigga next?
>>61913868
>>61913821I bet there are more people shit flinging about canceled baggy stock in the GME thread tonight!
>>61913898real king hours. Please do couchman next >>61897962
>>61913903
>>61913931kek
>>61913935He was evicted from the trailer
>>61913931>>61913940Baaahahaah. This is great.
>>61909296https://x.com/gamestop/status/2027087120754680261it's retarded but this is what it is
This is the real investment vehicle of infinite wealth. And you can't buy it anymore.
>>61914041You can buy and DRS warrants (which use the CUSIP-6 for BBBYQ) which is why these queers are still infesting the GME thread. 6 million warrants at ~80 cents each is a paltry $4.8 million.
>>61913447This image is what triggered (GME only) MOASS
>>61913656Zero donations, I bought into the hype and acoomulated 22k shares of BBBYQ though.
>>61914041hey ftwbiz take control of your destinykys before I do it immediately following moass
>>61913475>We know this to be true becauseall the rationalization and apophenia in the world doesn't put a dime in your bank account.call me when you get paid. I've been saying it for YEARS now. You get nothing.
hey guys, gotta borrow a post
>>61914494
>>61914285>I've been saying it for YEARS now.Yes, we all know the zero-sum nature of BBBY. Your opinion that you have been expressing for years is meaningless in the face of the CUSIP Conundrum. BBBY's warrants should not have BBBYQ's CUSIP. It does, however. This proves that a reverse merger took place. >Took>Past tenseYes. That is correct. It has ALREADY happened.
