yes./thread
>>10937928>sneakersNo
>>10937994Anon loskhrglehgolhqweo I'm weak
why aren't these girls showing their bare legs?
>>10938013Because it's not very common to leave most of your leg uncovered in lolita fashion.
>>10937994it's still lolita, die mad
>>10938022typical newfag. it's called "ero" lolita
>>10938032they didn't say it was impossible or that you couldn't do it, just that it wasn't common. "ero" is not common at all, and 90% of western ero is just bad/ita
>>10938032Ayrt, I was thinking about hot weather coordinates with ankle length socks. Those outfits usually leave most of the lower leg bare. I also did not say bare legs does not happen, just that it is not very common. Most outfits have UTKs, OTKs or tights.But considering the way you wrote your comment I'm going to assume it was a joke or satire.
>>10938079i was the original anon who asked the question about the bare legs, and I was genuinely curious btw
>>10938088We know why you asked don't worry
is this lolita??
>>10939632>animal earsnope, everyone out
>>10941024anyone know the name of the JSK on the left?
>>10941025The best guess I have is that it's either an undocumented Cornet piece or home made. Couldn't find it on lolibrary.
