yes.

/thread

>>10937928
>sneakers
No

>>10937994
Anon loskhrglehgolhqweo I'm weak

why aren't these girls showing their bare legs?

>>10938013
Because it's not very common to leave most of your leg uncovered in lolita fashion.

>>10937994
it's still lolita, die mad

>>10938022
typical newfag. it's called "ero" lolita

>>10938032
they didn't say it was impossible or that you couldn't do it, just that it wasn't common. "ero" is not common at all, and 90% of western ero is just bad/ita

>>10938032
Ayrt, I was thinking about hot weather coordinates with ankle length socks. Those outfits usually leave most of the lower leg bare. I also did not say bare legs does not happen, just that it is not very common. Most outfits have UTKs, OTKs or tights.

But considering the way you wrote your comment I'm going to assume it was a joke or satire.

>>10938079
i was the original anon who asked the question about the bare legs, and I was genuinely curious btw

>>10938088
We know why you asked don't worry

File: Kawaii-Fashion-Get-Kawaii(...).jpg (199 KB, 1024x680)

199 KB JPG

is this lolita??