last threads about to hit the bump limit. merry christmas /cgl/
>>10942831the average lolita sewing group member.
>>10942832what's wrong with it. it looks so nice for a hot summer coord. Feels like vendetta
>>10942852she's fat
>>10942855Calm down anachan she’s not fat
failing to see the "full white lolita outfit" here
>>10942832vendettapost
>>10942852>>10942870i just dont think it looks right. the blouse, shoes and socks don't really look good with such a bright colour. maybe im nitpicking>>10942855definitely not fat
>>10942831
>>10942858>>10942900just how obese are you people
>>10942915>official skirt measurement is 64 to 72cmJust say you’re delusional and go >>10942913I thought doing brows like this got left in 2014. The makeup is indeed terrible, but I’d like to see more of the outfit. I can’t imagine it’s great either.
>>10942917why do people go to r/lolita to post their face anyway? she looks like she's being strangled by her outfit
>>10942915stop bone rattling
>>10942924you sound hungry
>>10942832this is cute except for the shoes being much more modern than the rest of the pieces, but that's a nitpick. she's not chubby enough that it ruins the coord either.
>>10942928Tea Party shoes were first released in 2005Camisole released in 2006Skirt released in 2010Tea party shoes are technically the oldest piece she's wearing.
>>10942932sure, but thematically, tea parties look out of place in oldschool styling and especially tartan. again this is a nitpick and largely personal preference, she doesn't belong in the ita thread.
>>10942949How can they look out of place when they were first released before the cami and the skirt? I am just asking to have a discussion about it, and to hear what you have to say.
>>10942954this coord has tartan, built-in bloomers, very saturated pink, and a bold, almost y2k bag, so regardless of how old the pieces are i'd call it "oldschool styling". imo, something chunkier like heart buckle shoes or RHs would suit it better.tea parties on the other hand best suit the delicate and elegant pieces found in modern AP/BTSSB imo. when i see tea parties, i expect pastel pink, border prints, mesh lace, etc. people will disagree but 2005 is when brands started transitioning from what looks like oldschool to what looks "modern" to me.
>>10942961I guess I'm just getting thrown off because you're calling the oldest item "too new" and the newest item (the vw purse) "y2k"
>>10942964I don’t have much more opinion to offer other than sometimes things look like things from a different time period ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>10942832My main quip is the socks! I hate those cheap ankle socks that have the thin ruffle of tulle lace that has no gathering. It just looks like a floppy tube of cheap lace. Fucks sake gather the damn lace! At least meta has the balls to actually gather the fuck out of the lace on their raschel socks!
>>10942910What is with this new bread of tiktok "lolitas" that all dress like this
>>10943207She always looks ita and ugly it’s crazy
>>10943230Wear whatever you want, but don’t call it lolita when it doesn’t hit any of the marks of the fashion. Fucks sake. >>10943279What the fuck is going on with the girl on the left? Her dress is too tightly laced, or possibly just too small in general? I’m thinking too small in general due to the tightness of the detachable sleeves even that low on her arm.
Look, all uggos overexpose pictures to hide things they hate - nose, acne, bad makeup - but using it to try to hide your gut is a new low I think.
>>10943330looks like they just used flash
>>10943295>hit any of the marks of the fashionhave you heard of roomwear
>>10943335Nta but are you seeing the coord? That’s not roomwear she’s in the fucking street
>>10943335Nayrt. -she's outside -roomwear is a legitimate part of lolita fashion, no matter how hard the occasional beginner screams it's not lolita because "it's not in the guide" -room wear can look very nice -this outfit is absolutely terrible -it's not even an example of room wear.
>>10943295She laced it too tightly, there seems to be a generous amount of shirring in the front panel. The only thing I can be sure of doesn't fit is her upper arms are too big, so she can't wear the detachable sleeves high up enough to connect with the short sleeves.I don't think it's good, but it's also not bad enough to be ita level bad.
Cringe
>>10943436Extremely cringe, would be even worse if she was wearing trousers under the dress.>>10943411The absence of petticoat is not the problem here.
>>10943440
>>10943436She might want to reconsider wearing Lolita fashion or remove her hijab, as the combination doesn’t seem to suit her capacities. It appears that her fashion choices don’t quite come together.
>>10943411Can't stand this guy, everything he does is the worst and all he gets are asspats.>>10943426If she "knows the rules," wouldn't she know that it's okay to wear anything as long as you just don't call it lolita?
>>10943444ayrt, and ugh.So far I've only seen one (yes, 1!) lolita with a hijab who didn't want to show the outline of her legs who seemed to understand how to wear lolita without looking absolutely terrible.They want to avoid showing the outline of their legs because it's their culture, but then they decide to wear trousers under a knee length dress and it doesn't occur to them to look for a solution that works within their culture's limitations without looking ridiculous. There are floor length dresses within lolita and EGA. If they're even stricter about hiding the outline of their body there are even floor length sack dresses.But they probably want to wear the knee length dress so much that they don't care that it looks stupid with trousers. Weird mindset, to want to wear a specific style but not care about wearing an outfit that actually looks good.
>>10943426Wearing the fashion for that long and still having no idea how to put together a good looking coord isn't the flex these bitches think it is, but we all know what she actually means is she saw a lolita once on Tumblr 6 years ago.
>>10943512Also, a standard JSK still shows the silhouette of a body and defines the bust/waist. Isn't that not allowed?
>>10943230>wear my lolita cord without a skirt because it's too hot>wears a black blouse>with a camisole over itIs this... ita logic? I mean, you can technically wear lolita clothing items in a non lolita way, it's not a lolita coord anymore though.>>10943569People always find workarounds and loopholes with islamic rules. It's impossible to follow them all so they cherrypick which ones to follow in order to virtue signal as a good muslim and conveniently swipe under the rug the ones that don't suit them. Hence why 99,9% of muslims won't eat pork (it's easy) but only a small minority will do their prayers everyday because it's such a hassle to do even though it's more important (literally one of the 5 pillars of Islam lol). All of that to say that religion isn't an excuse to dress like shit, they're the ones choosing to wear these fugly large trousers under their dresses when lolita is already a modest enough fashion, especially with so much tea lenght dress releases.
>>10943605I also thought you weren't supposed to wear anything showy or flashy as that isn't modest, but then wear lolita which is extremely loud
>>10943610Nayrt, and yes you are correct that they're not supposed to wear anything showy or flashy. But >>10943605 is also right by saying that they cherry pick which rules they follow. There are some extremely flashy Muslims who care way too much about status and material things.
>>10943608Dang, 12 years and that's the first dress you choose, kek
>>10943444tf is this? shop towel kei?
>>10943444If they did SOMETHING to make the veil match, it'd look way better. Make it black, for one, and if it had a lace overlay to give it some texture and dimension, perhaps have that in a different color, a veil or hijab could look REALLY pretty in a coord so long as there was actual effort put into it. Here, it feels out of place, thoughtless, and like they just slapped a weird looking clip to it and called it "good enough."
Why is this tagged as lolita fashion
>>10943699lolita fashion is larping as an overgrown 5 year old, nonna. didn't you hear?
>>10943729
>>10943727>lolita fashion is larping as an overgrown 5 year oldcorrect, that's sweet and ott sweet lolita
>>10943180>my first lolita lookIt looks like her first time dressing herself, how do they do it?
>>10943952Yes, the coat doesn't match, but it's not like most lolitas have a matching coat for every single one of their coords, in fact, most lolitas don't even own a single lolita coat
>>10943953what exactly happebed with her face? She could legit evade bes surveilance systems with that tech.
>>10943952The dress under the coat is brown. What's THAT look like? I do find it interesting that she has a pink hair accessory and the brown bow is spilling out the front, so I'm wary, but I'm reserving judgement until I see the actual coord and not just a coat.
>>10943955She spent all her money on the coat, yet she doesn’t invest in making the rest of her outfit look presentable.
>>10943953demonias have no place in lolita
>>10943958you sound jealous she owns milky chan
>>10943968sorry you got posted. some of us were lolitas before we found out about it through tiktok, covidchan.
>>10943968As an old school-chan I don’t fucking care about milky-chan
>>10943955>>10943957>>10943958The only bad things I see about this outfit is her hair style, the hair accessory looks a bit too simple for the coat, and that she's wearing her coat open at the top probably because she can't close it due to being too big for it. Whilst wearing clothes you don't fit properly can make you an ita I don't think this outfit is bad enough to be called ita. This looks like it could be a vendetta post, or a self post looking for attention. >>10943968I don't find milky chan that appealing. Sure, milky chan is cute but way too sweet for me.
>>10943982Cmon the shoes are hideous
>>10943982AYRT I don't like milky either, I'm not a sweetfag. But this does look like a vendettapost, and "someone you hate owns your dream item" is a common reason for that.
>>10943989No it’s just because I found her ugly and fat and without any style which is ita
>>10944010Fat? You can’t even see her body, okay ana-chan.
>>10944010ah, vendetta confirmed then.
>>10944027Are you fucking retarded I said she lacks any sense of style. she did not even bother to close her coat, her shoes are ugly, and she clearly doesn’t bother to brush her dry and ugly hair
>>10944036ok vendettachan
>>10944036I'm guessing she can't close her coat. It's smooth, no extra room there.
>>10944069why is she wearing a wedding dress for christmas? more importantly, why is this thread more full of vendetta posting than ever?
>>10944076Is the vendetta in the room with us now? All of these itas are newcomers to the threads. Get over yourself.
>>10944069This seems fine? idgi>>10943952Can't really see enough of the actual outfit to tell if it's bad or not but the chocolate socks and shoes seem cute? Like I guess that doesn't match the coat but not everyone has an array of lolita coats to match every coordinate
>>10944077Kind of sounds like you're a newfag who just discovered cgl and decided to vendettapost random girls you don't like. Integrate.
Maybe we need a nitpick thread again
>>10943952I don't know if it's ita as much as ugly/incomplete? She needs a larger headpiece to balance out the fullness of the coat, and perhaps a brown handbag and lace wristcuffs would make it look better. The shoes are just hideous.
>>10944085Yeah, a lot of these are just "coords I don't like" and not actual itas
>>10943730Same, mr gingerbread man. Same...
>>10943610>>10943664I've always side eyed this stuff. Full hijab with a full beat on the faceHijab but bright colors and patternsTight fitting blouse but wearing a hijabWhy bother? Just wear secular clothing, pray to your God, and call it a day.
Average melanie martinez Fan
>>10943959Why do people keep saying this? Sure, not every Demonia design is suitable for lolita fashion, but Demonia is the parent company of Pleaser which has been around since 1993. You can literally see Demonias being worn by Japanese lolitas in late 90s and early 00s street snaps. Demonias are particularly popular with old schoolers, including gothic and punk lolitas and this is unlikely to change. You don't have to like them but please at least acknowledge their presence in lolita fashion history.
So lolita
>>10944366Nayrt, some people complaining about Demonias in lolita only have a limited amount of designs in mind, often the boots with the buckles on the front and sometimes the fur ones. They're probably not aware of the variety of designs demonia has made over the years.
>>10944716
>>10944697>>10944698>the absolute state of her roomwhy do they upload pictures online that display their state of mental illness so shamelessly?
>>10943411>>10943488>guy>heobvious girl with special pronouns, if you have any doubts her voice is a dead giveaway
>>10944727Yeah, even as a teen I cleaned my room at least twice a week after I was done with whatever for the night. I would have been mortified if I had boxes, clothing, bags, shoes and my trash strewn everywhere for the internet to see. I would not even take a photo in there or opt to go outside. But yeah take 5 minutes to clear out what is in the sight of the mirror. You don't even have to get the whole room.
>>10945207Barbara smartcars twin
>>10943207I secretly love this. Of all the experimental looks going on these days, sporty lolita is up there.
>>10945329It's not even lolita
>>10945347she looks like an early 2000s girl who was emo but transitioned to lolita (happened a lot apparently)>>10945480repost, itd be fine if her chest actually fit the dress. also better tights>>10945728the coord isnt bad, but i have a suspicion that dress is a knockoff. also how do you get so fat with such skinny ankles
>>10945480w h e w
>>10945728>xxl serving of blood and body of christ please
>>10945730>how do you get so fat with such skinny anklesAre you dumb nonna? Fat cells aren't evenly distributed in the body. Ankles almost don't have them at all, they get puffy when one has bloodflow issues.
>>10945740it's also dependent on body type as well. I have large ankles because my actual body shape is linebacker stouty. It just means shes built like a apple/ fat old guy with all her weight in her boobs/stomach
>>10945728Ngl, i like this dress
>>10945730Wait, a knock off of what? There are a ton of dresses on the market that look like this afaik. It doesn’t appear to be a replica of anything immediately recognizable to me. >>10945769Seconded, it looks like a nice filler piece for daily wear.
>>10946034I know he's ita but he's just my type
>>10946059Anon he looks 12…
>>10945922She looks like a fat toddler who just discovered Sanrio. The shoes and socks are particularly grave offenders here.>>10946245The fucking jeans are sending me into orbit, holy smokes how did we get to this
>>10942932They're not even tea parties
>>10947071Idk if you are blind or what but they are definitely tea party style shoes, either real or fake
Hm.
>>10947344The outfit is bad but I kind of like the vibe of this. Very nostalgic kind of ita, don't really see that as much anymore, bonus points for being in a mall too
Katsucon was a mistake
>>10947380Is this even lolita? Looks like a cosplay or an idol outfit
>>10947384Nope. She wore it to a meet.
>>10947384>>10947389it looks like there was a considerable attempt though, help me here, is the lolita sin not wearing one of those lolita blouses under the dress? pardon my poor lolita clothing terminology
>>10947437Not wearing a blouse is part of it, but the actual main piece itself here looks too costumey. It looks like an idol outfit from love live more than a lolita coordinate.
Where's uncle fester and what are his socials I miss him
>>10943230She looks backwards and forwards at the same time.
>>24193101Future you here. You're going to think it's a cute light read.
>>10947363even early 00s ebay lace monsters had more skirt volume than that, what the fuck happened. The hem looks like it's the same circumference as the bodice
tagged as lolita. the fucking dog collar
>>10947552>>10947554>>10947555Genuinely what is the problem with these? Aside from garment quality or some interesting makeup choices I dont think any of these are ita enough to warrant being posted
>>10947649You're new. This is what ita is. Lurk more.
>>10944697>>10944698>I love hot dadsdo you guys think she's aware of the difference between the clothing style and the book?
>>10947649vendetta
>>10947717ita
>>10947649Ok newfag
>>10947718>>10947719ok samefag
>>10947955this is the newfag that was promoting stalking people’s purchase history on lacemarket and messaging them to sell her their dresses. too bad that method worked out for her just to make a mediocre coord
>>10947955>>10947977she has some kind of sense of taste, I think that maybe with one of those lolita blouses underneat she'd be set
>>10947999Are you fucking bling
I think Hime is the substyle for mebitch u don't even have a bed
>>10948174I like the outfit though, what I can see of it anyway. Although I can't tell exactly what's happening with the head, is it a bonnet and a crown? Crown should go inside the bonnet, not out, would look better.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io2yYmnX-OYName dropping AP and BTSSB in a song when all your coords consist of cheap shit from Devilinspired is truly ita behavior.
>>10948174>>10948177nta, honestly it saddens me, lolitas have very high standards when it comes to pics, how they look, and how the dress looks, it all probably inspired by the expensive brand photoshoots
this coord is killing me
>>10948850rofl
My comm is full of people who cannot coord for shit and just look downright like clowns. There's a reason I do not attend meet-ups anymore yuck.
>>10948867+1 ...
>>10948867i really hate shitty, bright, contrasting to the coord dyed hair in sweet coords like please get a wig at this point.. it’s sad cause this would be fine if she wore some better shoes and glasses and had normal hair
>>10948868might be fair game for ita, but I like her e-girl lolita mix style
>>10948867I see you’re from the Netherlands. It’s the same for the Belgian comm…
>>10948867>>10948868If these are considered ita then we're getting really nitpicky>>10948876Nothing about her coord is egirl, how are you still so bad at this after lurking here for so long? Start thinking with your head, not your dick
>>10948895k h e k, peak obese ita detected
>>10948895If this is nitpicky to you, your coords probably suck ass as well hahaha. The clashing of the skirt print with the sock print makes my eyes bleed u.u
>>10948885It is so sad honestly... You can notice the great divide between the people who look good and whatever rainbow puke this is. Lonelita it is.
>>10948921saying >>10948867 is ita is pretty nitpicky, all colors match, accessories are cute and match, yeah she's wearing tennis shoes but effort was made to match the coord's colors (maybe there was a lot of walking in this meet and lolita shoes suck for that)You probably just hate that she's fat, if this coord was on a thin girl you'd be saying "vendetta" >>10948868 is worse but still don't think it's outright ita either. it's weird because everything theoretically matches but it just looks off.
the results of the lack of gatekeeping in the west
>>10946068i know this is a 2 month old post but when the fuck have you ever seen a 12 year old like that
>>10948926sorry you got posted
>>10948975No actual continuation of a discussion, just a phrase that's been said 1000 times before. So clever.
>>10948923It doesn’t have to be rainbow puke, nona. Even the ones that stick to one color are… ita
>>10945239LMAO underrated comment>>10943411this new round of social media lolitas is really something
>>10948867>>10948873yeah I was just thinking that with a good wig and some non clashing glasses this would be totally ok.And glasses being expensive isn't a barrier anymore. Frames are cheap AF now and if you can save up money for a blouse, you can save up for lenses to go in a better frame for your coords. Shoes I can give a little of a pas to cause I don't know what the activities were that day but she needs better leg wear.
>>10948867Same issue with mine. It’s all taobao itas, why bother.
>>10949365This made me bust out laughing. Why the fuck is he crouched?
>>10949365OMG I saw his post and immediately blocked, I got real bad vibes from that post, lol.
Him saying he dresses good is actually insane. Also, maybe try taobao instead of Aliexpress? Barbara smartcar has never and will never be a real Lolita
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHX0mVXfxzQ
>>10949611
>>10949612
>>10949613
>>10949614
>>10949581https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFT9QE6kETU
wtf is this
>>10949616
>>10950308somehow the full coord is worse
>>10950309Selfpost? This is an average beginner coord
>>10950308Vendettapost
>>10950341not selfpost, just a wack coord someone else found.
>>10950552I kek'd hard, good stuff
>>10950575
>>10950576
>>10950577
>>10950578
>>10950579
>>10950580
>>10950578What are those shoes lmao they have the shape of lightning mcqueen
>>10942831Tagged as egl
>>10943207she looks like Mike Myer's Cat in the Hat
>>10947384This is an actual Lolita dress, but the problem is people on /cgl/ are oldschool lolita's they don't consider a lot of Chinese Lolita dresses to be lolita and usually prefer for people to wear mainly well known brand name dresses from Japan like AP/Baby/Moite ect. or to wear more well known taobao pieces from brands like Infanta ect. This dress is a Chinese dress, and in China they don't follow all the same standards and rules when it comes to design that Japanese lolita's do. American's are traditionalists and think that any stray from the standards of what they deem JP Lolita style automatically makes a coord ita, even if in some cases it isn't- that being said most of this thread is though imo, bad styling, matching shit that doesn't go together ect. Being blouseless in 101 F heat isn't "ita" it's called being sane, unless you find heat stroke to be a worthy experience all in the name of fashion. This person's coord is ita, socks and choker look ridiculous but if they were changed, this would be fine, unless you want to add the grave sin of her being chubby. As someone who's visited Japan and wore Lolita there and saw other Lolita's, it's not as "huge" of a fashion as there as these threads make it seem, and it's honestly bigger in China of all places where a lot of these "weird" more "costumey-lolita" dresses come from, these dresses can still be considered lolita as they can be coorded properly and have the right silhouette and calling them "ita" just from their designs is pretty subjective. The gulls in this thread may hate what they deem as "clo-lita" but it doesn't change the fact that the fashion is bigger in China than in Japan in recent years and the sub-styles are growing and changing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upupLcgShO0&t=1086s
>>10950595This thread hates this dress, it makes me want to buy it and coord it properly.
>>10950576Is the crime here having blue hair and piercings? Because that doesn't make this ita. This coord is honestly perfectly fine.
>>10949919Ai generated shironuri ?
>>10947380At least this dress wouldn't have been missed if it got sewage on it from the pipe burst incident at that con
>>10950822I was with you until I saw what coord you are defending lmaoBut yeah Americans and Europeans always seem to be about 5-10 years behind on lolita trends, it's quite odd
>>10950839nayrt,yes and no. Americans and Europeans aren't necessarily behind on lolita trends, we're not all dressing in releases from 2015~2020. It's more that some people are buying new releases of jp brands and some people prefer specific older styles. imo US/EU lolitas don't think it's important to follow trends for its own sake. They mostly just buy what they like.
>>10950822>>10950822Just because a lot of people in Asia wear something doesn’t make it any less ugly or that it needs to be included under the ever-expanding umbrella of Lolita. You seem young and/or new, so my advice is to develop higher standards and stop defending hideous dresses.
>>10950866No, that's your personal opinion and it's subjective. I personally don't find the OTT taobao dress in that picture to be ugly, it reminds me of mahou shojo characters from the early 2000s, very nostalgic. I'm not new or young, and I don't have to change what I like because a brandwhore cocksucker told me to. I've never liked the selection that JP brands have, the re-release a lot of old shit and I'm not into it, and I also don't like their pricing, and it's not even defendable considering a lot of their recent pieces don't have the best quality in the first place unless you just love being able to shove "I own the newest AP/BABY/Moite ect. release." in everyone's faces when quite frankly no one gives a fuck. And "just because a lot of people in Asia wear something doesn't make it any less ugly", excuse you? An entire group of people enjoying something on a mass scale means that someone other than your delusional ass finds it attractive, so shitting on and thinking you can talk down to people who do is absolutely fucking insane. Go stalk jp brand's twitter pages and websites for new releases and fuck off. Many of us in person would ignore someone like you at a meet for your outdated view of the fashion, you seem like the type to harass people for wearing taobao pieces just for your own entertainment.
>>10950822>>10950867sorry you got posted
>>10950839I was defending the dress not the entire coord.
>>10950869I don't post pictures of myself in the fashion online at all because I've been in the community since 2015. I'm glad that post isn't me, I'd hate to wear a coord that looks like it was just thrown together with similarly colored items.
>>10950869Btw, when someone makes good points in an argument, responding with "sorry you got posted" makes you look like an even bigger idiot :)
>>10950867Ayrt, I don’t buy most current JP brand releases either, because as you said the quality has gone down and is often indistinguishable from Taobao.It’s great that you want to wear cheap mass-produced clothing made of shiny, wrinkly fabric and covered in tacky decorations. You’re right, that’s “subjective taste”. You’re right, billions of people will agree with you that it’s cute or at least “good enough”.You will be to human beings what AI slop is to art.
>>10950875Funny how the new releases are perfectly fine for the Asian market and they have no problem looking good and having fun with them, but slovenly, poorly dressed westerners all have a problem with "muh quality" while they shove greasy fried foods into their mouth holes and struggle to look like they didn't roll out of bed a minute ago. Funny how they alone believe that it's far better to buy faded, musty old OPs that have graced a dozen sweaty armpits. They insist on this
>>10950870It's not a good dress. The plush hearts, the tuxedo theme front, the low neckline and short hem. It does not look like a lolita dress but it does look like idol anime.
>>10950882If imagining that everyone who disagrees with you is fat and stinky and can only afford pieces in poor condition makes you keep buying Taobao, then go for it. More for meee
>>10950867Who hurt you?
>>10949614This one made me so weirdly nostalgic
>>10952783this girl would benefit from a sticker on her face
>>10942831Went to HS with this emo coke addicted girl
>>10952872Exhibit B
>>10952873nice vendetta
>>10952872>>10952873Whats wrong with this? Looks like a nice gothic co-ord to me. Something you would probably see in Fruits back in the day. Well put together, neat hair and makeup. A personal distaste for a certain substyle does not make it ita.
>>10954313No clue. She has a little boobloaf going on but otherwise it seems fine.>>10952872You should learn to say how you feel to someones face instead of bothering us with your bullshit. At least vendettapost about a real ita next time, retard.
Someone else find adi hoseki so fucking ita? Also she has an ED, its so obvious But she act like we don't realize it. She looks like a funko pop
>>10954627Seems more visual kei that sometimes wears lolita pieces. Vkei as a whole is cringy but idk that its ita lolita, man.>Also she has an EDYes pretty obvious.Ita is shit more like this that makes you want to stab your eyes out:>>10943729>>10944716>>10946034>>10947344
>>10954627She looks healthier now than she used to tbf, but even if she is anorexic she's not obligated to disclose that personal health information on her fashion centric social media. Mentally ill women are allowed to partake in their hobbies online too.
>>10954670>Mentally ill women are allowed to partake in their hobbies online tooAre they? Even if it influences younger women? SHED is bad but I'm sick of people running defense for them saying it's just mental illness, that entire community just encourages and enables each otherThey are actively harming young women's minds
>>10954789>Are they?Yes. Sorry you dislike it, Karen!Unfortunately, anyone can make an account and upload videos or post online. If you dislike it, try blocking them. If you feel so strongly that you can't, go start an awareness campaign and do something about this thing you're so passionate about.Bitching to us about it while it lives rent free in your brain is just virtue signaling and enabling your own mental illness, while doing nothing but bothering random anons.
>>10954627she used to be a eugenia-tier skeleton so honestly i'm just glad to see her looking better
>>10954789Is your opinion the same for fat lolitas eating themselves to death and encouraging others to do it too or are you one of those body positivity tards? I see too many lardasses shitting on anorexics and claiming it’s out of concern for their health even though they do nothing to take care of their own.
>>10954802>Is your opinion the same for fat lolitas eating themselves to death and encouraging others to do it too or are you one of those body positivity tards?I thought about that too, does nonny only care and preach about thinfluencers effects on young women, or is it fat positivity too?If we are being fair here, then using their logic, both anorexics and fatties should be banned from dressing in lolita and posting online. Then young women can't be influenced towards either ED!
>>10954789It's really not some random woman on the internet's responsibility to keep people from feeling "triggered". If you know you know you're negatively impacted by seeing a person with a certain body type then you should just stay off social media. Do you want to deplatform women who are underweight for non ED reasons too? Should we start censoring cancer patients? What about skinny men, or is it only women who are the problem?
>>10955557Why are people so desperate to still call it lolita or egl. It doesnt even look like the aesthetic anymore.
>>10954797>>10954802>>10954817>encouraging self harm is good actuallyanything for male attention huh
>>10954627>>10954669>EDAs in an Encyclopedia Dramatica page? I couldn't find her there
>>10956824How is she encouraging self harm by simply existing and posting her coords? To my knowledge she doesn't post about her ED or any proana content. Binge eating disorder is a real thing too so I take it you're fine with censoring and deplatforming all the obese lolitas too? No one said anything about moids but there's probably more of them with feeder/bbw fetishes than anorexia fetishists so I'm not really sure what your point is other than some sort of projection based on your own insecurities. Seek help and stay off social media if you're that mentally fragile.
She just seems kinda ita to me. She tags her posts as lolita, but her styling feels off, and the ED vibes are impossible to ignore it’s giving Eugenia Cooney, even if she’s not posting anything pro-ana.Honestly, the same goes for fat lolitas. A lot of the ones people post here aren’t even ita by definition, but their weight makes their coords look off just like in Adi’s case, it’s not always the outfit itself, but how the body wearing it affects the overall impression.
>>10942832smash >>10942910smash
>>10943279smash x2>>10943426smash>>10943952smash holy>>10944476smash>>10948928nigga i aint gay
>>10949365some gay ass niggas in this thread >>10950576smash>>10950579smash>>10950595smash>>10952873smash holy moly
>>10957007Shut the fuck up disgusting gooner scrote. Go castrate yourself , your shriveled tiny dick is worthless anyway
>>10957013some girl in this thread is mad i passed on her lmao, didn't mean to put you in your feels ig
>>109>>10957044Kindly Castrate yourself
why does the "ita phase" look better
>>10957186smash>>10957271another gay nigga>>10957273smash Ita phase
post some more for me ladies? also, if i happened to see a lolita fashion girl in public, or wherever they hang out do you think i could rizz one up and take her back to my goon cave? lol
>>10957365Genuinely shut the fuck up nigger scrote, no one wants your faggot gooner ass. Go do us a favor and cut yourself
>>10957371mad asf lol
>>10957448I will strangle you, promiscuous moid
>>10957365an actual well dressed lolita? no chance. but if you mean the slobbish fat itas ITT then they might be desperate enough for some free validation from an ugly coomer such as yourself.
>>10957270>>10957271Everyone in this video looked so bad
>>10957005>>10957006>>10957007Fuck off scrote.
>>10957450keep seething sweetie >>10957464shhh sweetheart, maybe if you were hot i'd give you some attention too >>10957530not until i see your asses clapping out of those frilly shorts you girls always wear lol
>>10957371>>10957450>>10957530Lose weight, hole
>>10958978
>>10958979
>>10942861The sock to boot ratio is a little jarring.
>>10958980
>>10959137
>>10959138
>>10959139
>>10959140
>>10959141
>>10959142
>>10958978I can’t believe no one give them concrit on reddit that’s so messed up
>>10959142This comm reminds me of why I don't do comms.
>>10958000pass>>10958001smash left, pass right>>10958002pass >>10958003smash>>10959137pass i ain't gay nigga
>>10959140smash>>10959141smash>>10959142left to right top to bottompass, smash, smash, pass, smash, pass, pass, smash, smash, pass, smash >>10959143smash
everyone who regularly and actively posts in ita threads should kill themselves, or at minimum, get the fuck out of lolita and find a 3/10 opioid addicted white man with a make-work ICE job like the pickmes they are"sorry u got posted"sorry u got kicked out of every single lolita comm because you're unlikable bitches who thought the alt feminist japanese fashion full of autistic women was the place to play 2000s mean girl shit
>>10959335Lucky you, cgl is die. There’s not even any point in posting to this thread anymore because it gets invaded by moids.It’s fun to laugh at bad outfits. It’s not fun to see predatory moids talking about which naive itas they’d groom. Ita threads used to go fast due to infighting, bait, and vendetta posts, but even the summerfags have moved on. In essence, no1curr, cgl dead, yada yada.
>>10959335not a feminist fashion, such an ita conceptualization of fashion being political. kek at your cringe rant! these threads have been a thing since the beginning, ita-butthurt-chan. you sound so deranged.
>>10959392nayrt but holy shit the newfaggery in your postdon’t get into possibly the girliest alt fashion and expect there not to be feminist aspects to it retard. Kawaii culture originated from young girls rebelling. Are you seriously this dense?
>>10959396Kawaii culture originated from the cool japan movement of the 2000's, lolita fashion came before that. In no works of Japanese literature does anyone claim Lolita fashion to be a political statement. You can read countless dissertations by real Japanese women, or you can repeat the same retarded ameriburger take over and over again from Tiktok and hope it sticks. Try choosing the former.
>>10959403>you can read countless dissertations by real Japanese womenwhich you obviously haven’t or you wouldn’t be spouting bullshit. You don’t know enough about the subculture to be here. Thinking someone nearly 40 uses TikTok is insane behavior and so is falling for disinformation spread by moids, but I don’t expect more from the teenagers pretending to be adults on this website. Never change, cgl. Never change.
>>10959406>im 40 years old youre insane!!!you know youre anonymous right grandma lolalso cite any japanese source that it started in feminism?
imagine falling for this bait...
>>10959408Physical Drop's designer interview last year has a whole section on this
>>10959475nta but i searched the whole article and no mention of feminism at all
>>10943199recuperation of the genuine into the mere-appearance via mass media. i might get hate for this but i don’t even think she looks bad.it’s just not lolita. it’s something else entirely—something more hollow
>>10959250Lol you got rejected or smth?
>>10960604You're getting defensive in the ita thread. I assume you're in the picture?
>>10960667I know the "leader" and it's something, half of their comm is tired of her
>>10948645Lolita is wholly composed of aesthetics. If someone is taking a casual photo to share between friends, that's one thing, but taking the photo explicitly to share with the world and hopefully others with similar interests as you, why the fuck wouldn't you think to take your photo with a slightly more appealing background? No one cares to see your disheveled mattress on the floor. The chair next to the mirror looks nice, so perhaps set up your camera timer and take a photo there. Don't have a tripod? Prop your phone up. It's not that fucking hard. It has nothing to do with brand photoshoots and everything to do with carelessness. Show some dignity to your interests and yourself. This sentiment applies to all itas, even the naive newfags. Stop jumping the gun on shit you don't understand, have a passing care for, or don't give enough of a shit to accomplish successfully. By approaching your life with intention and care, you might find yourself far more fulfilled and happy than you were sloppily and rapidly chasing the next dopamine hit. In b4 lol its just clothing
“coord” and it’s just a shitty taobao dress with no blouse, petticoat, wristcuffs, or headwear. the bar is in hell.
