ITT: soulful restaurant architecture
>>20933026That's not it.
>>20933030It will be in 20 years.
>>20933036Lets brainstorm how it could get more colorless and corperate.I propose rusty brutalist concrete archetecture will be the new norm
I love the Ikea aesthetic that they use nowit's metal, but with enough wood and earthy tones to make it comfyI prefer it to the gaudy circus colors bozo bonkers shit
>>20933036Actually no, the brain requires complex patterns to be stimulated in order to properly function, that's why we produce tiles, wallpapers, wall detailing, gardening, to develop proper buildings. The Bauhaus approach fueled by industrial minimalism is a trauma for the people and the urban landscape.
>>20933072Sorry but the pyramids are kino
>>20933072the MIDWIT brain needs that, like a child or autist
>>20933072That has nothing to do with Bauhaus. Bauhaus has nothing to do with Industrialism at all. You seem to be confused.
>>20933026Last time I went in one of these it absolutely stank. No wonder everyone gets drive through
>>20933078This, Bauhaus was more gothic than industrial.
How do they decorate a building like this up for Christmas? Where is the garden/greenery?
>>20933157>ChristmasWhy would the Jews do that, anon? Corporate America celebrates "Le Holidays", starting on Satanic Commercial Friday, and all they need to decorate are a few lights and posters with independently meaningless words like "joy" and "smile". Now BUY SOMETHING, cattle, we showed you some red & green.
>>20933146I see what you did there
>>20933173They have stuff for the jews at some stores too but by far everywhere around here is Christian and malls and places decorate accordingly. I've never seen Jewish stuff at a McDonald's. Most mcdonalds at least have at least a Christmas display and a box to donate to Ronald Mcdonald House charity.
>>20933186Anon, when was the last time you saw a corporation like this display the word "Christmas"?
>>20933192Last year silly. As I said, even the smallest mcdonalds has a little corner with a tree, decorations, lights and info about the charity. My question was (which was stimulated by another active thread) I never see these types decorated up nice like the older designs and how would they do it? There are usually at least bushes/hedges and things outside the walkway they wrap in Christmas lights.
>>20933200>Last year silly.Doubt.
>>20933192When you hear "happy holidays", respond "BDS" and ask about infant genital mutilation.
>>20933203As I said, it's not a huge display but enough to know it's Christmas time. >>20933212I am hearing Happy holidays more. I think it's just they are trying to be more inclusive to the minorities who celebrate something else.
>>20933219>enough to knowSo when I asked >>20933192 and you answered "last year", that was a lie.
>>20933250No, I've seen text at McDonald's with the word Christmas on it just last year.
>>20933157Corporations and governments are not allowed to celebrate holidays publicly for fear of offending those that don't celebrate those holidays and causing a terrorist attack. Instead all they are allowed to do is celebrate pride month.
>>20933298Not corporations dummy. Governments it can be questionable because separation of church and state but it still happens everywhere. So stop making things up. Corporations and other private businesses celebrate a range of religious holidays, the most here in the US being Christmas obviously.
>>20933302Frankly I think public celebrations of Christmas should be banned, white supremacist dogwhistles like that are the reason people of color get radicalized
>>20933310You can't ban them unless they are on govt property. So... yeah, you have nothing. Corporations, mom and pop shops and other private property can display whatever they want. Free speech.
>>20933331Hate speech is not free speech you fascist
>>20933367No, but hate speech IS free speech.
>>20933310Lmao SIR this bait is ridiculous.
>>20933374well it's working
>>20933377It is also incorrect as I have stated.
>>20933380lol
>>20933026Mcdonalds??more likePoopdonalds@W#
>>20933141I'm old enough to remember when mcdonald's was heavily assosciated with actual clowns. It was horrific.
>>20933414I'm old enough to remember when child porn was legal in the early 70s and sold at magazine stands and mcdonalds is where photographers looked for girls to model.
>>20933078>Bauhaus has nothing to do with Industrialism at all>The school became famous for its approach to design, which attempted to unify individual artistic vision with the principles of mass production and emphasis on function>which attempted to unify individual artistic vision with the principles of mass production
>>20933441So when and what exactly caused the current hysteria over cheese pizza?
>>20933460You're not really getting your views on child sex trafficking from mad magazine, are you?
>>20933051instead of the brick facade, plain concrete blocks with undressed lime-plaster
>>20933479https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/genetic>It's similar to an ad hominem fallacy in that it leverages existing negative perceptions to make someone's argument look bad, without actually presenting a case for why the argument itself lacks merit.
>>20933489I question that a simple straightforward question can even contain a logical fallacy, but fair enough. I see where you're coming from.I'll be more straightforward: Do you actually think that children do not get trafficked for the purposes of producing CSAM in the united states?I was not able to surmise your position from the post I replied to, hence the skewed question.
>>20933498I wasn't the person you were talking to.But reading the article:>none of the raids resulted in any seizures of cp>I question that a simple straightforward question can even contain a logical fallacyVery easily, yours is a fine example. Read the link for proof as to why.If you /really/ cannot fathom your fallibility, then you are not a great thinker. Dubito ergo cogito.
>>20933479MAD magazine is not up to the quality of Playboy obviously. Jesus you kids.
>>20933524Anon, referring to playboy as mad magazine in a tongue in cheek way is not a logical fallacy. It's just a joke. The underlying question is "Are you getting your views on human trafficking from magazine editorials?"But reading the article:>none of the raids resulted in any seizures of cp>in illinois>in 1977This is not relevant to anything. CSAM gets seized by the ton.
>>20933536>The underlying question is "Are you getting your views on human trafficking from magazine editorials?"https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/genetic>It's similar to an ad hominem fallacy in that it leverages existing negative perceptions to make someone's argument look bad, without actually presenting a case for why the argument itself lacks merit.
>>20933524>Mad magazine = Cracked magazine>Cracked = modern CNN>therefore Mad magazine = legitimate news organization
>>20933536>raids to gather cp>not relevant to the current cp discussionAgain, I wasn't the person you were responding to so my level to tolerate you is very low. Any more retarded stuff and I'm just going to leave it to the other guy, if he even cares about you.
>>20933543You're exhibiting the fallacy fallacy, anon. You might be able to cherrypick my words, but you have failed to address the substance of my question.I'll distill it again!The data presented in that playboy article has long since been made irrelevant. The evidence indicates that child rape is a highly lucrative industry. Cherrypicked data from 1977 Illinois doesn't have anything to do with anything except 1977 Illinois.Please feel free to engage in good faith at any time.>>20933553okay. Please don't respond to me again if you don't have anything to contribute.
>>20933543Do you really get your views on modern day 2024 child sex trafficking from a 1977 article in The Atlantic?>if you do, you might be retarded
If it feels good, do it. /discussion
>>20933590drugs are bad
>>20933157Do you not remember the Starbucks red cup fiasco?
>>20933627>coffeeNot a drug user.
>>20933452It was an arts and crafts movement leaning heavily on spirituality. The complete opposite of what you're trying to claim it was. Try to spout less vatnik propaganda.
>>20933638caffeine is a drug
>>20933146Forgot to add. You're actually correct. See: Kandinsky, "On the Spiritual in Art".
>>20933036>>20933051>implying we have 20 years
>>20933051Just having a bare concrete box would look better.
>>20933051melenial finds that soulful
>>20933583>>>/r/eddit
>>20933565>doesn't provide a single sourceInb4 you post data from 2023, which is irrelevant to 2024.
>>20933396omg lol
>>20935822LOL!
>>20933072>I saw a building and got TRAUMATIZEDYou have become the person you mocked 9 years ago
>>20933452You do know that detailed things can be mass-produced, right? Nothing about "mass production" necessitates being minimalist or low-detail.
>>20933642>It was an arts and crafts movement leaning heavily on spirituality. No, it was a movement to render design and architecture void of the human presence promoting an industrial aesthetic pretending it was functionality.
>>20936011I've only argued that industrialism and mass-production are the same thing.
>>20933645botpost?
>soul>corporate behemothAnon, I...
>>20933077If you find >>20933026 visually stimulating, I must assume you are a beetle or rat or some other lowly form of life.
>>20933078>>20933642>opens the floodgates for corporate minimalism>uh no, we didn't do that, we're spiritual or some shit
>>20933051No signs, colors, or windows. Buildings will be white (to reflect sunlight) rectangular insulation boxes of standardized size with solar panels on the roof. There will be no visual indicators of what the building is for - you'll have to use you internet-connected AR goggles to detect signals that show you the name and function of each structure.
>>20937104something doesn't need to be gonzo circus colors with shiny pieces and crazy patterns to be MENTALLY stimulating, dumbassbut I'm guessing your brain is fried from skibidi toilet and 15 second tiktocs, and you've never actually been to an art gallery
How do you know this is a restaurant?
>>20937788The nobility and royalty found 'crazy' patterns stimulating.
>>20935256What the fuck is wrong with you, you sperg? Answer the question or stfu with your "reddit says I win" bullshit. Nobody cares here.
>>20937792>How do you know this is a restaurant?Floor to ceiling windows on the side facing the front of the building.To me, it looks a bit like a Chipotle location. Inside they feature a bit of a stark industrial style, a mix of sheet metal and wood both. There may be some exposed pipes and air ducts for the industrial theme too.
Anyone else enjoyed pizza hut buffets? I don't remember if it ever tasted good but it was a valued experience when I was young.
>>20933026sign of the times. sterile, corporate, safe.we're now in the flip side of the 1970s.
>>20933026The corporations were the same kind of people then as they are now even when they had all the silly shit. Besides, who the fuck sits down inside of a fast food place?
>>20933441Never heard of this. I thought it was always illegal.
>>20933026>dreary corporate brutalism>soulfulKill yourself
I present you the humble Burger King in Nürnberg, Germany (Nuremberg)
>>20933141So many things use the late 80s and early 90s trend of bright fluorescent colours when depicting the 80s when 90% of it was this brown and orange colour scheme
Little chefs were so comfy, they basically stuck them in any building large enough with no real cohesiveness.
>>20939390
>>20933396more like McDOOnalds hehehe *defecates in my boxers at the wal-mart mcdolands*
>>20937801I don't think using historic royalty and nobility as an example has quite the effect you think it does.>yeah but these inbred freaks liked it hundreds of years ago, and they had money!
>>20939371kino
>>20939401All euros are inbred freaks, not just the """royalty""". Or brown, if we're talking more modern times.
>um, actually, minimalism is, like, BETTER!
>>20939390>>20939392VGH I miss these so much, I remember the joy of mum and dad agreeing to stop off at Little Chef. Now all we have is American slop outlets full of brown people and chavs.
>>20939518I look like that and I say this
>>20939520Bet you didn't realise you'd forgotten about these.
>>20939401Something a peasant would say.
>>20937094hes right, retard
>>20939584didn't say it wasn'tif you had an ounce of reading comprehenion you'd realize the post is nonsensical in the context of the post it was replying to, dipnuts
>>20939429You're all inbred freaks.
>>20939371And people say amerifats were/are the good guys..
Pictures you can smell and/or taste.
>>20933026
>>20933051Fewer windows
>>20939584botpost?
>>20933072You vill like ze grey rectangles and you vill be happy.
>>20933051A fortified concrete box with a RCID scanner. They decide what you have based on your biometrics and credit score.
>>20940893>walk in>lovely tone of the electronic bell loudly chimes>hear hustle and bustle of kitchen, drowned out by customer chatter>smells of warmth, spices, and cheese permeate through the air>never 100% lit, even with the windows open on a sunny day the lamps only provide a certain amount of light to set the moodI wanna go back. Haven't had a decent hut experience in a very long time.
>>20933060Growing up with your customers is something these people don't seem to understand
>>20941741Uh... just go register a pizza party for your sexy niece or something.
>>20939371looks like crema 2. well done krouts.
>>20933026>posts the most soulless thing imaginable
>>20941741>never 100% litthis was the best thing about the 90s for me right here, everywhere had appropriate mood lighting. now everything is bright as fuck, all walls are plain white, and you feel so cold walking into any place now
>>20941991>appropriate mood lightingCan't take selfies or make TikTok vids like that grampa. It's time to move over.
>>20940898>trans t-mobile
>>20942013I hope and pray your post is simply some godtier trolling. If not, then it may be time to start executing zoomers in bulk.
