Tell me a difference between these two characters
>>143347550Johnny Bravo is good and funny.
https://youtu.be/0ttgTWxW138
>>143347550Johnny Bravo doesn't have a show where they cuck him out of screentime and gets replaced by a female as the MC
>>143347550One is muscular and the other is a twink
>>143347550Johnny Bravo is not a shit person
>>143347550Johnny Bravo is not an asshole
>>143347559i'm still mad about it. It was the perfect chance for a faithful adaptation and they completely blew it.
>>143347550Well for one Johnny boy is clearly culturally rooted in the 50's while Scott is a late 2000's/early 2010's teenager
>>143347550Johnny's antics are presented as a way to make him the target of ridicule.
>>143347592We already got the movie
>>143347550Johnny Bravo was made to be a joke of the masculine ideal and Scott is one person because ? I mean everything was consensual he didn't rape anyone or anything. Bitches be dumb
Everyone in Scott Pilgrim looks and acts like a child, I don't care if it's the art style, I don't care if that's how Canadian yuppies actually are.
>>143347674bad person*
>>143347674The whole point of SP is that Scott and Ramona are both shit people and that's why they deserve each other
>>143347550Luck with no charisma vs charisma with no luck
>>143347691>They're bad people because other people are bitchesWhat is this moralfaggotry? Not to mention that Scott is objectively better than every one of ramona's ex-boyfriends.
>>143347666the movie completely skips over the second half of the books, which are mainly about Scott's development.
>>143347708Just because Scott isn't a asshole doesn't stop him from being a retard