Was he right about garfield's influence?
>>144632397He was a paid actor by the juicefunny skit doe
>>144632446Death of the authorSo, was he right?
>>144632397Garfield, as an original idea born of an artist's own vision, has inherently more value than Lasagna cat, which is a derivative work that would be meaningless without the source material it mocks. You cannot change my mind.
>>144633147But anon, all creation is derivative!
>>144633147>parody and satire cannot exist in a vacuum!No shit! Also >>144633322
>>144632446the jews paid your father to abandon you
>>144633147I bet you feel real smart
>>144632397Yes
>>144633669No one on this website is
>>144633147Define value.
>>144634081Get filtered namefag.
>>144632397I think about this video often. The extent went. The sheer levels of irony and actual great delivery.
>>144632446That's Drew Barrymore's brother.
>>144632397> something something Garfield is unfunny and soullessI get the idea they were trying to convey but I just can't hate Garfield. Even with him being a cash-milking mascot character and his comics being unfunny (some of them actually are hilarious).He's a huge part of my childhood, Garfield & Friends show was good. Yes, I liked U.S. Acres segment too. Sometimes even more than Garfield segment.
>>144632397He was right about the rage room and cigarettes. The power in that...
it was not made to hate on garfield or jim davis. it's just humor and a demonstraion of their video editing skills
>>144632397Yes, he was.
>>144635307>it was not made to hate on garfield or jim davisYes it was.They've made a fucking 1-hour long skit about Jon being a sexless incel just to channel a message that Jim Davis is unfunny at the end. It's deleted for some reason but there are reuploads.
