DC All-In will carry the classic DC logo. Dare I say....SOUL?
>>144671785I thought they legally couldn't use it?
>>144671785You're too easy.
>>144671785If this is true... I'm okay with this? I guess?Can't really muster any anger right now, I spent it all on the last thing.
>>144671812That's the one that replaced this logo. They attempted to sue another company that used a similar logo, only to find out it wasn't properly copywritten and THEY had to pay the company they sued.
>>144671785Bullet bros, we finally back!
This may or may not be true, would be cool, but apparently they've filed the copyright to maintain it, as they've done in the past, and that's what Rich is going by? No indication they'll actually make the switch.
>>144671785I'd rather they publish better comics than try to please the boomers (most of whom don't even buy comics anymore) desu
>>144672254When has Modern DC tried to please boomers?All they publish is Gay BLM Woke Propaganda comics.
>>144672361>When has Modern DC tried to please boomers?During Rebirth?
>>144672403Hardly. Lee didn’t let them bring back the trunks on Batman or Superman until after the rebirth banner was gone and Warner told him to fuck off. The ONLY comic from rebirth made to please traditionalists of any age was Tomasi’s Superman and Super Sons (as a comic to share with their kids). Since Nelson used Lee to overrule Didio back in 2011 and force the New 52 it’s been almost all middle fingers to traditionalists. (Which includes boomers, Xoomers, millennials and the most based of zoomers)
>>144671785That doesn't really change anything. Just get better writers who understand the characters and the medium.
>>144671881This is the best logo imo
DC keeps winning
I think they're really trying on this one. They really want people to start reading DC again. I'm excited for a lot of the upcoming books.
>>144673341>DC>WinningLet's slow down for a bit.
>>144671881>and THEY had to pay the company they sued.Ok, this is hilarious.
>>144673352>everyone's hyped>got their best logo back>marvel is being fucking retarded>ultimatefags are seethingWe're back, bro.
>>144671785Does anyone give a shit? The story is still going to be pig shit.
>>144672403Rebirth was the last time they did it at all and even then it was barely more than lip service. It was also the last time their comics sold well.We keep hearing about how the comic audience is "aging rapidly" but the fact is they're still out there, alive and well, and they only quit buying comics because comics quit catering to them.
>>144673423>>everyone's hyped(citation needed)
>>144671785Well it’s the undeniable best logo they’ve ever had. This might be the best trade year they’ve ever had too. I dunno maybe good sign?
>>144673423Ultimate Universe is great, but I'm excited for Absolute too.
>>144671785>Pansexual Superman Pass
>>144671785I've been noticing a lot of brands are exploiting nostalgia and bringing back their old logos/artwork(Sadly to say, I first noticed this with breakfast cereals, when I saw them using 80s/90s designs for all the sugary ones like Lucky Charms and Cap'n Crunch)
>>144674006Nostalgiabait is fine when done well. But too often it's done clumsily, with indifference, by people who never lived through the era or have no actual fondness for it.
>>144674006Pizza Hut brought back their old logo. Burger King too. I don't know, I think it's kinda comfy.
>>144674006They are dying. This is the last attempt before the fall.
>>144671785>member when our comics weren't fucking horrible dogshit?just die already, dogshit company.
>>144672454>muh trunksGet a life
Yeah I'm thinkin' we're back
Creature Commandos looks promisinghttps://x.com/DCU_Updates/status/1816953731239542846
>>144671785Same goes for Marvel.I guess it's appropriate.The 90s Marvel logo has a degree of rebellious punk-rock feel to it. Modern Marvel logo is bland, safe and sterile. Just like their comics.
>>144676195I don't know if Gunn's DC franchise will be successful. I don't even know if it'll be good. But I do think it's a good thing that they're being led by someone who cares a lot about comics.
>>144676386agreed, same with beau demayo on X-Men 97, let people that care about this shit actually make it
>remember when our comics weren't god-awful?>yeah, well, they still are but here's an old logo!
>>144671785i dont like it
The DC bullet logo was designed by Milton Glaser, considered one of the greatest graphic designers of all time. And they've been trying to replace it with stuff made by their nameless in house designers for years. I can't stress how ugly most design elements are in modern comics. Text pages, ads, covers? All hideous. Good design would showcase the good stuff that contemporary comic artists are capable of but this is so far down the list of priorities.
>>144676319this logo can't come back. not in the state marvel is in the presentit would be disrespectful with stan the man
This entertainment is a huge distraction from the election
>>144676386>>144676424I just hope it's enough to steer DC in the right direction. Shazam 1 and Blue Beetle gave me hope that not all of DC's movies have to be bleak and dreary
>>144676386Agreed. Not a huge Gunn fan but at least he gives a shit.
>>144671785It doesn't go far enough.Superman DC or bust.
>>144676319I just realized why. It's like 'COMICS' is spray painted on the Marvel M. Yeah, my favorite brand mark too.
>>144676386>But I do think it's a good thing that they're being led by someone who cares a lot about comics.This, I loved Gunn’s faithful adaptation of GOTG.
>>144676195>they changed the logo for the entire company because of the movie guymore like "DC All-in on James Gunn or we're fucked"
Something is off.
I actually really liked the 2016 logo, but there's no denying this was always going to be THE DC logo. It lasted as long as it did for good reason.>>144674006It's not entirely nostalgia. Times are changing, there's been a rise in backlash against the minimalism and streamlining of the 2010's over the last couple years.
>>1446776952016 was best of bad situation (seriously fuck whoever came up with that page flip shit) I’m beyond stoked that the bullet logo is back. I understand Gunn isn’t the popular choice off the bat but to me this shows he gives a fuck.
>>144677099Hey look the Chojin association logo, does that mean that Superman is back at the leading chair?
>>144675991>>144676155>>144676195Finally.
>>144674006There are a lot of old logos that are superior to modern ones.
>>144673423>>144673341Did DC do something interesting in comics? I haven't been paying attention to them since Rebirth ended.
>>144671881SOVL
>>144673315>>144679882It looks kinda goofy, bullet was before my time but it's timeless.
>>144671881But since they lost the case they couldn't use stars in the logo anymore, hence the toilet logo and the current plain one
>>144680284Guess not then
>>144680284So how come they can use the stars now?
>>144676979The best thing would be if the movies had all different tones but still managed to feel cohesive and part of the same universe. That's something that was so awful about their first attempt. Dawn of Justice and Shazam and Wonder Woman don't even feel like they belong in the same universe.
It's the DC Studios logo now too
>>144676195It's obvious which era of comics Gunn loved. His Justice League will definitely be based on the JLI from the late 80s.
>>144680768Good
