>Creates Rorschach>Yo--you are not supposed to interpret him that way!It is astonishing how many good works have retards as authors, they create things beyond their comprehension
>>147120140the proper intentional reading was siding with the near omniscient Manhattan, who sympathized with Rorschach but knew that, no matter how powerful he was, there was no third option besides Ozy's shit or an armagedon. The story was meant to show it is better to give up on pursuit of truth and justice, and ore specifically to give up on opposing the Soviets even if you truly believed they were bad.But there was a third option and the history has shown that US was more competent and moral than Moore depicted it in his comics. But that does not stop him from keeping authoritatively weighting on politics and other subjects he's ignorant abut, like Conan the Barbarian
>>147120221you're a fucking moron if you think you were meant to 'side' with any character.
>>147120226>the character with ability to see the future didn't know what he was doingAnd Moore has killed the claim of Watchmen having multiple characters to possibly side with by shitting on Rorschach himself
>>147120221>>147120242If Osterman's so smart and all-knowing, how did Veidt frame him?
>>147120221Ozymandias' plan was already unraveling by the end. There was only one option after he did what he did.
>>147120266not reallyThey could use it to give themselves time to set up fall of Soviets and after that was done reveal Ozy's crimes and punish himit only required to remove plot armor from Soviets and idiot ball from US, which has prevented US Cold War victory with Manhattan on their side. But Manhattan knew that everyone was predetermined by Moore's script, so that was impossible to change
>>147120242>the character with ability to see the future didn't know what he was doingVeidt had deliberately impeded his ability to see the future. Manhattan was as uncertain about what would happen as everyone else.
>truth is less important than surviving Do atheists really?
