>calling a cartoon calarts or beanmouth in 2025
>t.
>>147129883Industry people don't look like this anymore. They all have shaggy Billie Eilish hair and septum piercings now
>>147129883Post a picture that starts with 17 boomer.
>>147129865Then what the fuck do you call current-day cartoons then.I use the more accurate term, "shit".
>>147130072CorporateTo distinguish from all those indie cartoons that think they're unique
>>147129865>liking disney slop in 2025
>>147129865It still applies
>>147129883FPBP, Calarts troons will seethe forever
>>147129865CalArts
>>>calling a cartoon calarts or beanmouth in 2025>literally a beanmouth in the OP pic
>>147129865It screams millennial.
>>147131896Kek
>>147129865Which one of you losers made this pathetic imitation of this classic?
>>147130072bauhaus
https://files.catbox.moe/01ov5c.jpegHow about artstyles like this edgy stuff?
>>147132548based vexus enjoyer
>>147132548What a fucking LAD
>>147132548Vexus feels incredibly out of place here.
>>147133134that's just his fuckin' harem man can't argue with the results.
>>147129865b-but california bad
>>147129865>>147133241Samefag
We seriously need to start banning zoomers
>>147129865I'll stop calling them that when they start looking different.The problem is that calling a cartoon anything in 2025 is a challenge because no original cartoons are being made.
>>147132548zased
>>147129865Or better yet - Grubhub. As if they invented that style of animation.
>>147134064This is repulsive
>>147129865Sorry Maggie but you are. Please accept your reality, you are calarts. Good calarts, but still calarts.
>>147129865maggie sexo
>>147129865she cutearts desu
>>1471301092025 and they still dragging Edd through the dirt
>>147134064Turning red is peak grubhubcore and I'm tired of pretending it isn't.
Amphibia is absolutely beanmouth, but I never had a problem with it.
