Stop using glossy paper for collected trades...
Both look like shit and is the reason I don't read comics pre 1993.
>>147157408Quality anchor-bait post.
>>147157408fpbp
>>147157408/thread
>>147157408
>>147157385The digital print is better IMO because I prefer clearer images and the coloring is mostly faithful. Only real difference I see is the removal of the title.
>>147157563The digital reprints, especially on glossy paper, completely fucks the coloring, because it was designed to be more subdued due to being absorbed by the porous newspaper quality paper. Glossy paper doesn't absorb as much so it makes it look way more saturated and brighter. It's literally not the intended look for it.
>>147157408retard
>>147157408>>147157439>>147157455Casual.
>>147157408Zoomer opinion. Even I, a millennial, can appreciate golden age and silver age comics.
>>147157606>>147157710>>147157755stop the larp
>>147157775Cope.
>>147157408Uhm...b-based?
>>147157755Plebian taste.
>>147157819Sorry, am I not turtly enough for the turtle club?
>>147157385Get 1984 paper quality in 2025 would be really expensive.
>>147157408The fuck do you even read
>>147158419You'd know if you read my comment.
>>147157601Can't they just use darker colors for the printing then?
>>147158516Recoloring always looks like shit, even with good intentions. They'll never get close to the original look; at least if they follow the original color guides they'll at least sort of look like an approximation of the original.The only way to really get close to the original colors is the way Taschen and some other ultra-expensive collections do it, which is to scan actual comic books in a really high-quality way, which I assume is expensive (just getting the best possible copies of old comics).
