How was he supposed to be seen as a threat in the Kang Dynasty movie if all his previous appearances led to him losing?
Poor planning.
Sheer Fucking Hubris
>>147160446should've just copied the EMH version of Kang, that actually could've worked given the snap, having that be the canon event that Kang's timeline is being erased.
It makes sense when you realize that Marvel got the idea to make Kang into the next event villain during the production of Ant-Man 3 because they really had no plan for their next saga
>>147160446He Who Remains wanted to lose and the Conqueror did a lot of damage despite losing (and would've returned as the Beyonder anyway). The idea was that if one Kang almost wrecked the universe, the Council of Kangs would be 100x worse.
