>>153676183never
>irrelevant, time wasting image>lust provoking question
>>153676183god i wish a woman taller and stronger than me would use me how she wants
>>153676183No>>153676510Faggot
>>153676183Outdated? No.Overdone and done poorly? Yes.People tire of the "strong independent woman" because it typically means a particular sort of poorly written one. Or rather, it's "a strong woman as written by weak women" which annoys them.There are plenty of strong women as written by strong women (or men) who are perfectly fine.
>>153676549Shut up
>>153676183whether or not they're outdated, they're ridiculous considering how unrealistic they are
>>153676183The post-2016 girlboss is dead. It never actually worked and there never was an audience for them. Strong female with insecurities seems to hit pretty well every time, though.
>>153676510Hit the weights, boy
>>153676183>stereotypearchetype*And no
>>153676183Only the human ones.
>>153677275Based literate anon >>153677283Wrong.
>>153678535Luisa is cute...CUTE
>>153676183The only thing preventing anons from becoming gay is a female sounding voice. These movies prove that you all lust after furries even if they have no feminine features.
>>153676183anything can work if given the proper writer. the exact same thing has been said about the boy scout protagonist or the edgelord. ooh there are going out of style until a half descent story is done with them and suddenly the times have changed
>>153679236No
They were never a stereotype, they were always exceptional outliers.
What makes you NOT want her to have hips? I don't get that part of the kink.Like even bara fetishes give their guys hips and asses.
>>153676183These two movies are highly satanic because of the implied lesbialanism
>>153678726yeah ikr
>>153676183No, they're just frequently poorly executed. Strong females shouldn't be macho men with boobs and a vagina, they should be firmly feminine.
>>153683764this is my fetish
>>153683764Everyone wants a dominant muscle mommy, I want a cute muscle girl who you can doll up
>>153684456Hot take: I feel the "make buff women look/dress more 'feminine'" discourse I see in threads like these is ultimately pointless, because women in general usually look good in whatever aesthetic they feel comfortable in. Yes, I know that these various aesthetics are used in porn/rule 34/etc. to get us horny, but I think a muscular woman can look as sexy in sensible clothing as she can in slutwear.I dunno, I'm probably not phrasing it in the best way. Granted, I'm not a huge fan of the phrase "muscle mommy" either, mainly because I hate the sexualization of the word "mommy" in general
>>153676183It's misused, Instead of fun sexy adventures we're stuck having them laying about stuffing themselves with food whining about their non-problems.
>>153685152I dunno, there are times it looks sexy when you see buff girls/women in say wedding dresses, classy dresses, or something a bit undersized/very tight for them but girly where the more muscle shaped female form shows itself subtly
>>153684456>Everyone wants a dominant muscle mommyThe men who specifically want a "muscle mommy" are fucking weak cowards because it's just another way for them to demand a woman take care of them while offering nothing in return. Strong, muscular women still deserve to feel like women from time to time, and they deserve to have partners that can keep up with them and be strong for them when they find themselves lacking.Fuck being a submissive little bitch boy, I want to naked wrestle with a strong gal to determine who gets to take the lead during sex.
>>153685152God, I WISH we had art of buff women in slutwear
>>153686142I agree that women in more traditionally feminine clothing can be very attractive, especially if they're muscular. My point is that such women look great in any kind of outfit, regardless of which gender it was meant for.>>153686201I will agree that far too many men want to be babied; a lot of women in the gentle femdom community say they're tired of being viewed as "kink dispensers". Honestly, I think toxic dependency is something a lot of men have these days, regardless of kinks. Good on you for wanting to express yourself in a healthy way.>>153686932It exists, but it's more niche than it should be.
>>153687741Why can't we get art like this? I'm so sick of Jennifer lookin' like a dude in a wig.
>>153679236Yeah, Jett even had to be drawn off-model here >>153676549 to look femalebecause her model in Goat is just a straight up man. You'd never know this was supposed to be a woman until you heard her speak. >>153686142>redditbuddy
>>153676183Furry "fandom" goes on >>>/trash/
>>153688031You know who else goes on >>>/trash/?
>>153687741I think I get what you're saying. You like seeing strong women dressed like women, or like dudes, because you like seeing strong women. I can get behind that - there's really no "wrong" way to be a woman, I guess.
>>153688621Exactly! Athletic tomboys are as valid as buff bimbos!
Is it ethical to use magic to make more strong female characters?
>>153685152>women in general usually look good in whatever aesthetic they feel comfortable inI don't get your point but i know for sure women do not look good in whatever they feel comfortable in. Some outfits make even the hottest ladies turn into an eyesore.
I think it would be very funny if a female bully's jeans fell down and she was wearing embarrassing underwear with unicorns and rainbows on 'em.I think it'd be hilarious if she tugged her shirt down at the front and squirmed while everybody pointed and laughed at the silly undies wrapping over her butt.A classic "bully gets their comeuppance" moment, haha. That'd certainly get a good laugh out of me.
I think it would be very funny if Kitty heisted my sperm.
