Lovely ladies that double as living bombs, preferably complete with ticking timers and/or hissing fuses! Let's get some literal bombshells here!
would like more of bombgirls that get more hot and bothered as they get closer to popping off
>>10893781Ideal is if they like, start smug and malicious when they reveal that they're bombs, and then lose control the closer they get to going off
>>10894041>Trying to walk home one day when all of the sudden the local bombgirl begins antagonizing you>Sick of her shit you pull out your lighter and begin moving to light her fuze >Chuckle to yourself as you watch her cower in fear from it
>>10894465I think I'd prefer a reaction more like this.
I have never heard of this fetish, what’s the appeal? not judging just wondering.
>>10894874The anticipation! The tick of a timer, the hiss of a fuse, the inevitable buildup to a massive orgasmic KA-BOOM!!
>>10894874Guys love explosions, guys also love girlsWhy not both?
>>10895023do they die? is this some form of snuff?
>>10895587Sometimes yes, sometimes no, aftermath is not super important to me.
OK, I'm curious about this. None of it's doing it for me, but I genuinely want to know what about bombgirls does it for the enthusiasts. Can you point out which image(s) of this got you into it, or why you got into it, or explain at all why you find it hot?I can see there's power dynamics at play, there's partial objectification and putting a time limit on someone's existence, there's room for a whole lot of fear/panic/desperation - a lot of emotional shit all wrapped up in a fuse, I guess.I'd love to hear it in your words though, since me guessing and stroking my cigar like freud could be way off the mark.>I bring an offering of a magic the gathering card that does this for you, since art of this kink is rare.
>>10897200>and it turns out I'm retarded and someone else already asked this ITT. Welp. This is why I at least brought a pic to share, sorry.
>>10897200I like the tension and desperation from it, while it's cartoony nature makes it easier to handwave the consequences. I like to imagine the explosion as something chaotic and bad, but not lethal and dangerous. It might destroy nearby objects and cover everything in soot, but anyone reasonably healthy nearby will make it out only a sore and achey. My ideal for how it effects the bomb girl herself is just is similarly light and slapstick. The loss of clothes and the shrinking of her bursting bust of course. Afterwords she should feel faint or dizzy, drunk could also work well. Those lovely posr orgasm lovey dovey feelings are good too. For characters that could survive it like robots, the complete destruction of their body can be fun. YoRHa was a gift.I also like it out of my general love of object girls and any inhuman partner. I like how it can create characters with unique dynamics and perspectives.The bodytype and big assets are also great.
>>10897455so it’s like cartoon/pokemon explosion. they appear in the blast crater unscathed except for a layer of soot that shakes off
>>10897571That's how I personally like it.
all I think of when I see this thread
SHIA KAZING!
>>10897571And VERY sexually satisfied, can’t forget that!I’m honestly cool with darker applications too, though. I’m not super picky when explodey gals are involved.
do minecraft girls count?
as usual, the only thing I have to contribute is something just closely enough related that it instakills the threadoh well, this is 4chan, we're all faggots here
>>10892559
hi sorry i've been busy here's another one
>>10900319honestly I'm surprised there's as much of this very niche thing as there is.It's not my kink but I'm happy for you lot, is it artists being into it, people commissioning it, or some mix?
>>10900648I may have commed enough to have a whole catbox folder of it, lol
>>10900699based coomissioner. I've only commed two bits of porn in my life, and that was to check it off my bucket list, but I'm glad I did.
>>10899487Creeper girls, you mean?Uhh, I guess in theory, then can-
>>10901955they*fuck
>>10899487Fine... But preferably less blocky and more curvy.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V7T4sUWoRcE
why does it seem like most of this thread is commissions all by one person
>>10908079how can you tell?
>>10908388Reoccurring ideas at a greater frequency than other fetishes. The same body types keep showing up. The same fuse tails. Little overlap with other fetishes or experimentation. It's always just a bomb girl. No transformation into a bomb girl, no pairs of bomb girls and no bomb futa. It all points to a single source, who if not uncreative, gives little guidance to the artists they commission, or has very steady tastes.
>>10908894Hurtful to be called uncreative, but fair.
>>10908971Hey, I gave you three options to choose from.Commission artists are lazy about composition. If you don't spell things out for them, they're content to draw the same thing over and over again.
>>10909247yeah, that's just good business sense
>>10909266If you need any ideas, I have plenty.>dullahan or robot bomb girl throwing you her head.>Bomb girl wincing as someone moves a match to her fuse>A lit bomb girl furiously chasing a boy down.>One bomb girl wrapping a another nervous blushing one in wires and charges
>>10910436Here's some ideas of my own.>Scientist Girl that's technically not a bomb but still made of extremely volatile materials>Demolitionist Bomb Girl that works construction or mining>Sleepy Bomb Girl with a faulty timer that ticks down while she's awake but ticks up while she sleeps, or vice versa>Confetti Clown Bombgirl
>>10910487>Sleepy Bomb Girl with a faulty timer that ticks down while she's awake but ticks up while she sleeps, or vice versaHow delightful. I can imagine her innocently sleeping, unaware of the panic she's causing. When she finally hits zero, the explosion is barely enough to wake her.
>>10910796I feel like that'd be super cute with like, an alarm-clock styled timer with some colorful wires sticking into her boobs or ass.
>>10911630I want a happy ending for her. It's okay to blow up, you don't have tone scared.
>>10911638I think a happy ending would've been her not blowing up...
>>10902964It's so weird that considering what happend to this character, there's literally no fan sequence of her growing and exploding.Oh well, it is what it is.
>>10911638Next best thing.
What are people's thoughts on cursed panties that give the wearer a major upgrade to their booty...and also a lit fuse?
>>10912434Peak.
0GGHDG
>>10911901There is one sequence.https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/69388761Although the only thing doing any exploding here is her shirt.
(Included only the expansion parts, link has the rest)
>>10914616*And this one which features a maid outfit.https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/69906926**Which also explodes.
Is it just me or do dark elf gals make excellent bombs?
>>10917935Some girl: "Wow! Can I just say I love your ashen complexion!"Drow who knows damn well she's comprised of 99.99% pure gunpowder: "Hah hah, yeah... Ash..."
>>10920025you see this lady at the beach, apparently unaware her fuse is about to ignite, wyd
>>10920203Duck and cover
>>10912434Dumb, but also kind of hot, so I guess I have no real say in the matter>>10921929Okay, this one's kind of cute
>>10897200If Bronze Bombshell deals damage to me, since it's now my creature, does that mean I can redirect that damage to a planeswalker I control?
>>10923849No, sadly. It didn't work that way before and it doesn't now, which makes me sad because the mental image of a useless planeswalker giving you the ol' GET DOWN, MR PRESIDENT! is funny. The planeswalker redirect rule was removed and they instead errata'd basically all cards that could have been used to redirect to a planeswalker to instead be able to target them.Under the old rules, the player controlling the damage source and the player being dealt damage-to-be-redirected had to be opponents, since the intent of the redirect rule was to let you lightning bolt your opponent's 'walker, not to let players use their own 'walkers as sacrificial lambs for cards that were meant to deal self-damage as a drawback.And under the new rule, the card's oracle text will just say "target player or planeswalker" or "any target"I'd post more art but there's none of b>>10923177this is kinda cute, it's subtle and clever.
>>10924574>>10924572Don't forget Lady Nagant.
>>10928441god fuck why is this piece so fucking hot
>>10931629I love seeing familiar characters as bombs.
I’m not gonna actually judge anyone, but this is the goofiest fetish Ive ever seen here. straight out of a looney tunes.
>>10937473I mean, I did literally get the fetish due to a Tom and Jerry episode, so you're not wrong.
>>10937473Goofy is good. Fetishes shouldn't be all serious business. Humans are silly creatures, we shouldn't be ashamed of it.
Probably intended as an "expand and consume the world" sense but...
>>10939505>>10939507>>10939508What's the story here? Mombot company with aggressive planned obsolescence?
>>10939960>"Thank you for purchasing you new mombot!">Credit card: declines>Mombot starts ticking>"Ohhh, you really should have made that last payment honey..."
>>10892559I'm not trying to shame but can someone explain to me the appeal of this? It kinda just seems like women with fuses on them, what about it turns you on?
>>10940724>>10895023I explained it here, but: Anticipation and danger are the big ones. The whole 'oh god, she's gonna blow!' aspect.
>>10944731cute design, i wonder what her deal is
>>10949726Why does Pauline make such a good bomb?
>>10950448Well for one thing, she's got all that DONK going for her.
>>10893781
>>10961192
>>10908079A bunch of the images ITT are of OCs and so are naturally similar, others are probably from commissions. I assume you do not follow or pay attention to the artists, because several of the characters explicitly belong to or are mainly drawn by particular artists. You might also be getting confused because some of the popular elements of the fetish (or at least those on display ITT) are similar, e.g. the tail fuse idea. Head fuses are also common.The brown bomb girl OC with the long dress and cartoonish styling for example has very obviously been commissioned a number of times but does not appear owned by an actual artist. The owner may or may not be a user by the name of "dusk">>10892559>>10892565>>10892566>>10893431>>10894025>>10932711This character, Cherry, belongs to Gigardrawz.>>10892609>>10892973>>10894377 (not drawn by him)>>10908346>>10909848>>10919410>>10922326>>10923561>>10945367>>10959755Characters by Brehwardt, do not remember their names.>>10893818>>10894872>>10896614>>10896617>>10896625>>10946656>>10947052>>10947055>>10916389Drawn by woot. I am mainly just pointing this one out, woot is not really a bomb girl fan and draws BBW and hyper content in general. He makes random stuff at will and tends not to "keep" his characters>>10898584
>>10892559I have a distinct memory of a Looney Tunes bit where Bugs or someone else create a decoy. It's like a straw person with a bomb for a head, or the whole body is made of dynamite. For some reason I think it is Elmer Fudd who thinks it is a woman and acts shy, then realizes it is a bomb. Is this a fake memory?
>>10965196Don't remember that, but there was a wartime Private Snafu short in which Snafu falls for a dummy with bombs in place of the bust ("B-b-b-b-booby traps!")
some stuff of my bombgirl ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>10970419
>>10970420
>>10970424
>>10970419Very nice!
>>10971206Thank you! I've been meaning to draw her more often honestly. Probably with her exploding or something
>>10964731Seething lmao!Don't 'blow up' over this >:3
>>10892560>>10892561I thought this was a sequence and when she "explodes" she transforms into a black babe.>>10912434I love that! I hope the fuse comes out of her spine and not out of the fabric of her panties. Also I'd not think of them as cursed, I like to imagine there's a rapid transformation instead of an explosion, or maybe they explode magic over everyone around them so it's less dark and more playful.>>10894874>>10895587>>10897200I guess I didn't realize the appeal of this fetish too, it's too dark for me. I think it might be a good concept for transformation though
>>10974926It doesn't "do it" for me, but I can understand the appeal thanks to the kind anons ITT explaining things. As for it being dark, a lot of stuff gets dark once you run through the ramifications. Bodily autonomy, the sanctity of the "self", rewriting personalities, etc. It's more in your face if the girl "explodes", but I've come to accept that this is no more or less fucked up than things like turning someone into a fuckable plant, or the shapechange/flattening guys, or many other things.I guess it's a good thing there is no horny genie out there giving random people the power to make their impossible fetish real.
>>10973992How's answering a question seething? You can go to the pages of the guys who own the OCs, except for the unnamed toony OC
>>10974948That's not how transformations work in my mind, I think you're overcomplicating it: Magic solves everything; even very drastic mind control and transformations can be good/wholesome if done right, it all depends on the application/situation; for example I'm into dumb/silly tfs not because of the humiliation/pain/death (I strongly dislike that, and I hate all toilet/feces/uglification tfs, although I like tfs that make women uglier in return for being sexified somehow, ultimately she must be more appealing with the ugliness as added kink/taboo about it that adds to the appeal) but because I just love these tfs and I imagine them as terrifying, intense, invasive, yet exciting, extremely pleasurable, even heavenly, to experience, something that every horny woman would genuinely dream of experiencing if she knew what it would do to her. What's real f*cked up is that I seem to be the only person who's into bizarre/silly/"humiliating" tfs but imagine them as wholesome as that; when I browse the dumb, humiliating tfs thread it seems everyone there wants to degrade women, and when it's not about women it's to degrade in general. (I put the most extreme example of tfs as being the worst case of what could be.) In short, I think the bad things in transformation either could be solved (e.g. consensual non-con) or can be good, not because I have a sick agenda against women/others but because they could be done well.
>>10975142obligatory booby trap joke here.
