Shall we make a chika thread? Also i heard there was a complete nude filter of the ova but i cant find it anywhere.
>>2726264All I've seen was a short loop gif where Chika is fishing for the soap and her (now bare) tits are swinging back and forth. Didn't think to save it because I'm a window licking retard.
>>2726264there are edits that add nudity but there is no uncensored version
>>2727805Nice
>>2726264Is it true that Chika-chan is gay or at least bi? She really seemed ready to go at it with Kaguya-san during the OVA.
>>2726264>Shall we make a chika thread?Looks like you already did
>>2739938
>>2740195People pair her with Hayasaka and the actual show never has her attracted to men, she’s just really devoted to her friendship with Kaguya
>>2750429they also hint at her being into Shirogane when she's asked to describe her dream guy
Sw8xgt
>>2726264>Shall we make a chika thread?If you insist
>>2763004>>2763005Yikes AI? or never seen a vagina before?
>>2726316>>2726315>>2726314Real or edit?
>>2774642Edit dumbass
>>2776217
>>2740195She's engaged to some random piano player guy in the manga. It's just yurifags being autistic faggots as always.
how big are chika's boobs anyway?
>>2726314jesus christ imagine milking those
Chika Butt!
>>2800222
>>2791852
>>2726315If only the door could be removed too...
>>2813512>>2813511>>2742214>>2742213Anybody got the source of these 3D Chika models?
>>2726315>>2726316link to the sauce? theres no pixels here
>>2819168Found them on the boorus.
>>2740195she explicitly says she's straight after Hayasaka kisses her
>>2797998she has a 34 inch chest, hard to say cupsize without also knowing her underbust measurement though. I'd guess a D cup though.
I do not care for the Kaguya-sama IP but I came buckets to the OVA scenes on gelbooru.
I hate chika but also wants to fuck herI like kaguya but don't want to fuck herwhat a dilemma
>>2827672Nice one.
>>2727806
>>2822426
>>2726264Good thread
>>2726314Ohhh yes yes yes
>All this AI shitfor what purpose
>>2852187541 days and barely half full, this thread has been dead for months so it has no defence against AI
>>2832352death upon thee you fucking AI cuck
>>2832352>AII hope you stub your fucking toe
>>2858179>>2858334Upvoted!
>>2858179>>2858334AI is only bad when you notice it or someone tells youotherwise it's just art - theres good and bad, and just like human art 80% of it is bad but that doesn't mean the other 20% isn't good
>>2858471No. It's always shit no matter what it looks like. I refuse to fap to slop produced by some algorithm. Kill yourself
>>2858707ok, and when noone tells you it's AI, it's perfectly acceptable? you can't tell the difference between high quality generative art and manual art anymore, and whatever slim gap there is is only getting smaller.i laugh at people like you, because if social media was around in full force in the 1990s, you retards would have been saying the same shit about digital art.
>>2858776>ok, and when noone tells you it's AI, it's perfectly acceptable?What part of it's always shit don't you understand? I can tell just fine when someone used AI to make something because I'm not retarded. AI is far from getting to that point and I know all about LoRAs and ControlNet and it's still very easy to tell.>you retards would have been saying the same shit about digital art.Stop comparing AI to traditional tools. I don't remember photoshop drawing things by itself by using stolen art from the internet. Also entering prompts is not a skill and you will never be a real artist.
>>2858794ah, i see, my mistakeyou have abaolutely no idea what you're talking about outside a few buzzwords, I should have noticed earlier.
>>2858776>you can't tell the difference between high quality generative art and manual art anymoreMaybe you can't because you fried your sense of quality looking at so much AI, I sure can tell the difference. Even without the mangled fingers and other nonsensical anatomy that used to be the norm.What you say might be true for fully clothed pics. I don't know, I don't look at those. But for anything at least semi-worthy of /e/ and beyond, AI usage is still completely obvious.It has gotten better, as you say, but I've still not seen a single AI pic that was worth looking at, let alone keeping.
>>2858806I accept your concession
>>2858776you seem to be missing the point that people complain about it BECAUSE they can easily tell, how else do you think they even find out
nice on-topic thread
