>>2810252Previous threads:https://rentry.org/marniecchivehttps://rentry.org/marniecchivehttps://rentry.org/marniecchive
>>2814328>>2814327Uohh, I'm scared stiff
There's a special place in hell for artists who put uncensored art behind a paywall.
>>2816859sexy
>>2817636I get the frustration. The artists probably don’t like doing it either. They spend a ton of time practicing their craft and likely want to make it their full time occupation, or already have. They gotta make ends meet so getting people to pay for their stuff is necessary.
>>2820694Please keep AI stuff in the containment thread.
Cumming in Marnie's butt!
>>2820711I didn't see any rules against AI art. Where is that stated?
>>2820920It's common sense here.
>>2820920No rules against AI, that guy just likes to be an annoying entitled fag about it.But you should at least keep it high quality, pics full of obvious flaws are kinda worthless.
>>2821512damn, I can count the pixels.
>>2820953i appreciate when people point out which images are AI
>>2820953there are indeed explicit rules about it>- Western art. Due to frequent quality issues and lawsuit-happy western artists, western art or fanart is not allowed, with very few exceptions.not all ai art is western, but you can tell when it is, so that's directand it CERTAINLY has the quality issues, so that's also implicit with the spirit of the rule
>>2821675Hard disagree, since the AI model is based entirely on Anime stylings. But that's ok, you're allowed your opinion. Sadly there is no merit to it, and thus nobody cares. We can post what we like within the Stated and factual rules.
>>2821679doesn't matter what the style is, someone that doesn't have an eye for quality thought it was of meritit is clearly not, which is why it was identified and called out immediatelyyou can post off topic material in any thread you choose and it may not wind up being deleted just because it may not be worth the time for users to report it and for moderation to decide on the reports to delete itboards like this are so small in traffic that they typically rely on self moderation, the users should know better what belongs and what does notbut this is still factually low quality, low effort, and on a board focused on quality art, you'll find more disdain for it than praisebe as obstinate about it as you want though, just when people point out that it's crap, you might have to accept that you're a minority for liking it and maybe you're out of place
I'd rather have low quality AI art over this boring discussion filling the thread. Post Marnie, or stfu.
>>2820711Agreed. AI slop ruins the vibe in these threads.
>>2822629CUTE!!
>>2821512
>>2817636
>>2827213how do you get poses like this?
>>2827237What do you mean? Are you thinking that's AI art? lol
>>2827241Oh, is it not? My mistake
>>2831414>>2831413Cute tits.
>>2836169marnie pubes...
>>2842467that's a big marnie.
>>2841325
>>2810252Why is Marnie so popular?
>>2850248cause people like her.
>>2850260Inconceivable.
>>2850260Wow. I learned something new today.
>>2853564>>2852603keep AI in its containment thread please.
>>2853566Shut up
>>2856742nice
>>2854358
