Previous Thread: >>3087259/edg/ is the home of 1girl posting. Here, we share AI-generated pics of sexy anime girls and discuss latest advancements in 1girl-related technology.Remember to keep it /e/, as per board rules. If unsure about what you can or cannot post here, consult the sticky thread.> FAQ (check here first)https://rentry.org/edg_faq> Local UIsForge Classic (easiest and simplest for SDXL): https://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classicForge Neo (supports newer tech like Flux and WAN): https://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classic/tree/neoComfyUI (node based UI, most extensible with custom nodes): https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI>Online Image GenFree no account: https://frosting.ai/ | https://perchance.org/Free Account Required: CivitAI, Tensor.art, SeaArt.ai, pixAIPaid Only: NovelAI>Catbox:4chanX Catbox/NAI prompt userscript: https://rentry.org/hdgcb> Resources and guidesUseful links: https://rentry.org/sdg-linkTags: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/tag_groupsUpscalers: https://openmodeldb.infoWAN Video Gens: https://github.com/Wan-Video/Wan2.2>Useful Extensions/Custom NodesADetailerTag AutocompleteStealth PNG InfoInfinite Image BrowsingLama cleanerRegional PrompterControlNetDynamic Prompts> LoRAsLoRa training: https://rentry.org/59xed3LoRA Collections:https://rentry.org/illustrious_loras_n_stuffhttps://rentry.org/trashcollectshttps://rentry.org/zp7g6https://rentry.org/hdglorarepo> /edg/ logoOP: https://files.catbox.moe/uc2ntj.png | Anchor: https://files.catbox.moe/bx1lo2.png (more color schemes in the FAQ Rentry)> Related generals>>>/b/degen>>>/aco/sdg>>>/d/ddg>>>/g/sdg>>>/h/hdg>>>/trash/sdg>>>/u/udg>>>/vt/vtai>>>/wsg/aicg
Request Anchor
Current Highlights Here:>>3085001>>3085002>>3086107>>3086108
Thread theme:Hanami
>>3087700Cheers
peekaboo
What's with the weird trend of not linking the next thread? How are all the other users supposed to know where the new one is!
>>3087733Damn bro four highlights this time. God damn
>>3087731I guess in the end the state of the thread doesn't actually matter to you. It's more about your ego and being able to dictate the highlights and thread theme. What a shame, but it is what it is
>>3087759for all intents and purposes, patreon spam is unironically higher quality than what edg was before.it's cold and impersonal, but it's certainly higher quality.
>>3087759Thread theme and baker are two different people. Also I'm pretty sure original baker is waiting things out and these threads are being made by someone else entirely.
>>3087734>Hanamiwho
>>3087779https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanami
>>3087776Two of those highlights are clearly made by IA and unless the baker of this thread is a different person who also can't figure out anti-aliasing, it's him.>Also I'm pretty sure original baker is waiting things outHe won't give up that easily. And if he does, I'll be there to post the moment he reappears to hijack again.
>>3087780ok i was thinking it was a specific part of the kimono thing
>>3087781you cant be this rent free dude
>>3087793Hey I haven't seen you for a bit. I look forward to seeing you defend him all thread. Good luck anon
>>3087781If you have a problem with someone, ignore them. If you have a problem with the thread, make your own, if you have a problem with the board, go elsewhere. In all of this, the problem is you.I will not engage with you again.
>>3087795>I will not engage with you again.I give it one thread
So what was the justification for spamming the thread again? From where I'm standing it just seems to function like a creativity DDOS, drowning out novel contributors with all the old Patreon slop.
I hope that our resident spammer had enjoyed spending yet another mother's day with a mom who hates him and regrets having given birth to him.But hey, keep spamming your feet and anuses. That will get you so much love, right?
>>3087806>So what was the justification for spamming the thread again?Mental illness
>>3087735Thanks a LOT
>>3087795> If you have a problem with the thread, make your ownOh and just one clarification: the IA schizo does not own this thread. This thread is one among many he has hijacked that existed long before his appearance in them. He's a parasite who won't make his own thread (because no one would participate in his circlejerk) and hijacks successful ones to turn them into his own curated general of what he personally wants to see. He ought to go make his own personal thread in which you and the other few sycophants mind broken into defending him can jerk each other off for as long as you want. Until then cry and moan all you want
I don't think that the spammer is looking forward for Father's day either.But whatever, keep spamming and keep being an asshole.
>>3087810I mean, I get that, but it's just that so many of them are from Patreon. Is that not indirect advertising? Goes pretty hard against the spirit of the thread of sharing creative self genned art.
>>3087819There's no justification, the guy is an autist with free time and motivation to be an annoyance in general in hopes of getting the attention he doesn't get IRL. /edg/ just happened to be an easy target because is in general a dead thread on a dead board.
>in hopes of getting the attention he doesn't get IRLI notice this is consistently your line of attack. Are you projecting, anon?
can you post something new?
Only if you post more dogshit clown gens, clown anon
>>3087785hey spammer, what is this girl's name?>>3087794also this one>>3087818lastly, is this some sort of meme catgirl outfit, like the cat underwear? it shows up in a couple other images you spam with
Putting these girls to war was Neo Zeon's biggest fuck-up. Should have had them cosplay
>>3087862the puru's tales are quite sad. they need a kaleido-like spin of.
>>3087734
>>3087867I see that couple of edg threads got manually archived. You ever goty banned for spamming?
>>3087873I think an image at >>3086442 got deleted but that's it.
>>3087268
>>3087731catbox?
>>3087901nice
>>3087614I do not mind smooth pussies, and I don't mind hairy pussies, and I don't mind pubic stubble pussies. I don't mind hags with smooth pussies or lolis with bush.Same way I don't mind if someone decides to put some tits into a loli or flat a hag if that's what floats their boats. Personally I prefer characters on model but at the same time I don't mind if the character is "off model" willingly. Some people loves to make characters with humunguos tits and I can respect that if its their fetish.What I find unsettling of the patreon sea art thing is how every girl seems to have "the same body" the small characters are given tits but the big breasted characters aren't as big as they usually are either. So they all end with this average breast size or at most adult characters are slightly bigger than the lolis with tits but not much different.And all have the same exact pussy regardless of the character, and all of them seem to have the same skin tone too.The uncanny part is not them being smooth, but the whole "samey" body package regardless of the character that is being portrayed.Here people posts smooth hags all the time and I don't find it an issue at all because all of them have different styles and shapes and proportions, some are more chubby some more skinny, some have more labia some more.But that patreon stuff feels like the same image with a different head.
>>3087809I used to think he deserved some sort of punishment. Now I believe his live is probably punishment enough.
>>3087942>>3087809>it's all one personHave you guys considered using a 7-day pill organiser box? You'd be less likely to forget your meds
>>3087924Cute fox girl. Catbox?
>>3087943Some guy insisting so much that there are multiple spammers only convinces me more there is only one.Now, this is 4chan, and of course I can see in the early days of spamming some people joining the spammer for the giggles. That allways happenned and probably happenned.But after all this time and with this level of dedication, it can't be that anymore.
>>3087732Requesting nude edit.
>>3087863All we have to do is simply generate our own, and do what those Neo Zeon losers couldn't
>>3087947
>>3087945>I feel this way>this seems unlikely to me>therefore it must be true
>>3087863The last couple of iterations were amusing in its own way but already felt almost like a parody spinoff.I know is not a popular opinion but I'd like to get back to Seed or 00 vibes
there is an old internet fallacy. assuming large scale behaviour must originate from a single mastermind because that story feels cleaner and more satisfying. people want to reduce the chaos into one villain because it makes events more coherent. it's tribal thinking.
>>3087948bananager would like sone of that
>>3087952>or 00 vibesThis but they need to let the world building to fully grow. 00's really stopped caring about it's own after one of the world leaders said "Seven... Gundams..." and from then on world building basically stopped.
>>3087957
>>3087942I used to think that sick people suffered of autism.Now I believe that sick fucks have autism and every person they interact with are the ones who really suffer.
I'm having an issue when I try to gen full h scenes in anima. With lewd 1girl standing or 2girls it doesn't seem to have this problem, but when you try to do sex intercourse at high res anima kind of loses its mind and draws abominations.With anima hires scale doesn't seem to work very well so I try to gen directly at big resolution instead and that works fine most part of the time. but compositions with two characters or more interacting seems to drive it mad. So those I make them with highres instead since even if anima struggles is better than the abominations.Anyone has a clue about what may be causing this?
>>3087962>full h scenesWrong board to ask that question.Plus, I'm not going to answer questions or help anyone for as long the spam issue is still going on. Sorry.
Elpomf ple
>>3087962Animation is still a thing only a few anons swing at even here. Mre so with the limited crew at the moment. You can try other places like /adt/ or /vtai/
more slavegirls >>3085497
>>3087966Sorry, I didn't mean animation I meant simply /h/ images. Anima seems to struggle to draw characters fucking at high res specially group sex, while it draws them fine at lower res with highres fix.But I would like to gen directly ad high res because the finishing with using highres fix is not that good and the gen is slower too.I know h has its own threads, but honestly even with the spammer around this is still heaven compared with those.
>>3087962are you on preview 3? p3 completely nuked multi character stability lol it's been overtrained at higher latent resolution and now it starts hallucinating limbs the second two people touch each other.use preview 2 instead and gen at 1536x896 OR 1344x1024, those are the native anima aspect buckets that I discovered by testing thousands of gens. anatomy holds together better at that res. people who stay under 1mp are cargo culting outdated advice from months ago desu.also never hires fix intercourse scenes above 0.15 denoise because anima starts averaging the skeletons together. if you absolutely have to hires, use latent nearest exact with 1.75 upscale and euler a 25 steps or it desyncs the vae and you get nightmare fuel.
>>3087970Oh, so its a problem with the model, good to know at least what was happenning.
>>3087970>and you get nightmare fueloh boy...
>>3087972yep lol almost any issue with preview 3 can be solved by reverting to p2. devs never explain the actual latent behaviour in detail. when you use these models seriously for work you have to figure it out yourself by testing thousands of gens and noticing patterns. you see which aspect ratios preserve anatomy better while some (even lower res) cause duplicate limbs or face drift. that's why pro genners end up with specific "magic" resolutions. it's science built out of trial and error, and then that info gets handed down to the hobbyist user like people on here.
I'm trying to generate an "age progression" of a single female character. child, teenage, adult from left to right. Preferably with same hairstyle and clothes. Can't get anima r3 to do it. Is it just prompt issue or should I try with different model?
>>3087971nice
>>3087975should be ez with natural language
>>3087962The trick to 2girl on anima3 is native language prompting. You can try dropping a target image into https://picsart.com/image-to-prompt/ and just copy/paste the entire SD prompt into anima. Should get you close enough that some simple character name and detail tags sprinkled in would get you there.
>>3087975did nobody fucking listen when i said p2 fixes basically every p3 problem lolswitch to p2 and do a horizontal triptych at 1792 by 768. thats one of my stable anima canvas ratios for character sheets/concepts. also keep the hairstyle and clothes EARLY in the prompt before the age stuff or the latent locks onto the aging first and rewrites the design. people don't realise prompt order matters way more in anima than other models because of how the clip layers were merged during training.also you're probs prompting too hard. don't say "child, teenager, adult" because anima interprets that as 3 seperate characters half the time. you should be explaining progression instead like "same girl at different ages" or "timeline growth" because the tokenizer is basically like Drax, it takes everything literally.
>>3087930here's the raw https://litter.catbox.moe/bm62jjcoqjwmgvle.png
Does anyone have the KwgSubmadohomu lora? I swear it was a thing but I can't find it.
>>3087987>>3087930that said I almost missed your post, you should reply to the original imagepost instead
>>3087970>>3087981same guy who embarrassed himself shitting on anima3 last thread? >>3086843
Hello bros, I hope yesterday you all had enjoyed a nice Mother's Day at home.Value your mothers, guys.
>>3087994yeah obviously I'm the same guy because apparently nobody else here is willing to say it lolpreview 2 is objectively better because:>it has way more stable anatomy above 1.5mp>expressions actually obey the prompt instead of getting smoothed out by p3 latent averaging>LoRAs trained on p2 and p1 dont randomly overbake skin texture>p2 still has the old contrast response before they washed it out with the p3 dataset merge>character identity holds together across batches because the clip layers weren't overcompressed yet>p3 has hidden pony contamination in the color space and that's why everything gets weirdly pastel after 20 steps ALTHOUGH you can counteract this somewhat with correct prompting>the p2 tokenizer aligns better with artist style because it was trained before the devs introduced synthetic caption reinforcement for smaller artists with low post countsI'm honestly tired of explaining this every thread because people act like newer automatically means better when that's literally never been true in AI art history. like I said before, hopefully they can course correction before the final release so all you plebs have access to your precious community "resources" that you can't train yourselves.
>>3087995before it's too late
>>3087995Are you trying to poke the spammer?
>>3087996Not liking the claims vs proof ratio here
>>3087999The proof is literally on my hard drives dude lol I've tested thousands of gens across different samplers, vaes, latent upscalers, clip skip values, all cross referenced over months.I'm not about to dump client workflow data onto a public thread just because redditfags want "proof". I train custom LoRAs for people professionally and half this stuff is basically trade secret territory at this point. you should be grateful for what I've already shared for fuck's sakes.and honestly even if I posted the charts and comparisons most people here wouldn't know what they were looking at anyway. I have been thinking about putting my docs behind a paywall but I want to wait for the final anima version to drop first.
>>3087998Bro, the spammer is not the center of my universe. I come here to post my gens, learn new ways to generate better pics and have fun.That's it.
>this enrages and infuriates (((some people)))
>>3087947cute, box please?>>3087971very good stuff. box as well?
>>3088002i dont think anyone is asking for charts or contract leaks here but like, maybe just three side by side images or something?. since you already have everything you need, doing some random 1girls to show off the worst offenses shouldn't take too much of your time
>>3088001I've seen what she is hiding there! Too lewd!
>>3087987thanks
Gotta figure out the styles thing. As nice as it looks, it is not what I would prefer.
honey come take a look the dog is behaving weird
>*sips*
>>3088007https://files.catbox.moe/o234py.png
>>3088029Nice. Workflow please?
Do we actually know what the spammer wants? Like does he just not like the thread and just wants us to stop, or is there something specific he is against? Did he set any terms to negotiate?
>>3087732Requesting steampunk stuff that doesn't rely on gears everywhere to sell the steampunk concept
>>3088033He explained he was doing it for attention (basedrage, smooches, etc). There is nothing to negotiate about. even if there was, it would be foolish to indulge such an individual.
>>3088033he wants the highlights guy to stophe might also have grudges against other regular ritual posters, like the lame pink cat poster, but i'm not sure about that
>>3088035Damn ok. Spammer if you're reading this I hope you find what it is you really need, but I doubt you'll find it here.
>>3088038>he might also have grudges against other regular ritual posters, like the lame pink cat poster,I think thats because people in these threads is kind towards the pink guy, mostly cause he is a regular. And since has some sort weird obsession with the "quality" of the thread it seems it makes him mad people being kind to someone that posts what he considers bad gen.The other day he lost his mind and even complained some dude made the pink anon an anima lora and insisted the pink anon was someway missussing that gitt or some shit like that.In other words is something like "you can't like this guy because he posts bad gens!" type of grudge.
>>3088033>Do we actually know what the spammer wants?He has said infinite times that he hates the Highlights guy, hates the idea of an official thread baker, hates the idea of named or popular posters, hates the idea of other people genning characters he dislikes, hates the idea of other people using models and checkpoints he hates, and hates the idea of his fetishes not being popular or accepted among us.in other wors, he's just an autistic asshole shitting all over the place until everyone accept him as the thread's owner and everyone give him what he wants. Which is something that will never happen.
>>3088038Hello spammer. You really can't fool anyone.
>>3088044>In other words is something like "you can't like this guy because he posts bad gens!" type of grudge.More like "You can't like this guy because I hate him and I want him gone" type of childish tantrum.
>>3088049that's smooth as hell
>>3088047>hates the idea of named or popular posters,You are right about the rest, but you got this point the oposite way, he wants to be able to identify regular posters so he can someway punish them when they post something he heats
>>3088049this is quite nice
>>3087732requesting a highres colored version of this image: https://files.catbox.moe/5k9l6q.png
>>3088050That's the one part I find easy to understand. I mean let's be honest, PK is a shitter. He's been doing this for like three years now, still hasn't bought a GPU, still hasn't set up collab or other GPU rental to get access to proper tools, hasn't even learnt to use the tools that online services provide. Just raw prompting in base res, the same thing over and over.What I don't get the is the rest of it. People want highlights, they've been here for as long as I remember. Sure the current anon is technically deficient, same as above. But nobody else is willing to do highlights consistently. And I don't see how spamming the thread is supposed to make things better, if anything it seems to have hit the higher quality posters foremost and most already left.
>>3088054He hates popular posters because he thinks that they are stealing the spotlight from him. For example, every time PK is given a gift like Buzz or a new model, the spammer has a meltdown because a person he hates is receiving nice things while he never receives anything from anyone.
>>3088057>PK is a shitter. He's been doing this for like three years now, still hasn't bought a GPU, still hasn't set up collab or other GPU rental to get access to proper tools,Hello spammer. You are really stupid, you know.
Uh oh /edg/ you've really done it now. When the spammer wakes up and sees this, he's gonna FREAK.
>>3088060Hush nonny
>>3088060Nobody cares about that retard. If he goes onanother of his retarded flooding sprees, we can simply go elsewhere and leave him all alone posting his retarded fetish pics.All what he has accomplished is push everyone away and get sure he will never get what he wants or have a place among us. So yeah, he better get used to the idea of always being alone and nobody ever wanting him around.
Requesting an uncensored version of this
>>3088059guess it is a bad time for criticism
>>3088004>learn new ways to generate better picsreally? could've fooled me
Shut up and go back to spamming.
>>3088070https://litter.catbox.moe/4faqz2.pngIt's always a bad day for criticism here
>>3088070No matter how smart you might think you are, you simply can't ever disguise who you are.
>>3088093You always crack me up with how many times you say this to random people that don't agree with you
>>3088087>>3088093kekIt would be ironic if the spam achieved the opposite of what he declared, and allowed any criticism to be ad-hominem'd as just the spammer being malicious.
How do i prevent her (or any girl) to try to schlick with both hands at the same time baka
>>3088111Try describing the other hand.
>>3088122even something simple like "hand at side" should help
>>3088129thanks
>>3088019Somewhat better.Also, why did I immeditealy gravitate to goth?
>>3088133Now that is truly an /edg/ gen right there!
>>3088098You always crack me up when you come crawling back to the thread, seething about bait from several months ago *smooch*
>>3088140I guess the smooch is finally off cooldown after the humiliation. Glad to have you back as your best self anon!
>>3088004You are doing fine, dont worry. That's the best approach
>>3088098please do not sabotage my argument
Hey when do you plan on making more gens and comic strips of the "troll" btw? That display of your obsession was amusing, although I think IA Schizo making the OP pic a wall of spam takes the cake.
>>3088057>People want highlightsSince when? Why are you just saying that as if it's a given?
>>3088133>>3088136Tried a gold version.
To be fair, there is one other time that you were funny--it was probably when you went to cry on /h/, got made fun of, then never posted there again. I still don't understand why you don't just stick to your refugee thread... it's the ideal place for you after all>>3088170Because he's IA Schizo's greatest ally and even when crashing out can't resist attaching an identity to his posts. Leddit personified into a single anon.
Actually smooch anon, I just thought of a great idea. Why don't you post your gens in /hdg/? It's an IA schizo thread and isn't doing so hot compared to /hgg/, so your help would probably be much appreciated in astroturfing over there. I'll warn you though it's gotten so bad he's not even doing highlights anymore :(
>>3088170>Since when?People wants them since the spammer began a crusade against them. Is not that people liked them but didn't hate them either. They were just kind of there you could check them or ignore them entirely. Almost no one paid much attenttion beyond "hey, that one is mine" kind of reaction.But since spammer seems adamant into killing them that made people wanting them just to piss off the spammer. If that's the thing he wants the most is the thing people won't let him to get. Even if they don't care much about the hightlights itself
>>3088183Oh now that's some entertaining head canon!
I would also be happy if i could remove those stupid pipes off any pool prompt
you anons are reading too much into it, the retard doing that is doing it in multiple unrelated threads, there is nothing outside of sharty ass behavior, aka online hobos
>>3088049Nice.
what's more embarrassing is that he hasn't automated it. downtime is cringe
>>3088191yeah happens in every ai thread at some point>>>/g/108801613
>>3088170I'm assuming people choose to stay in the thread because they like what's in it. And highlights have been a part of /edg/ almost since the very start.Admittedly it's becoming clear now some people prefer to stay in threads they do not like.
Reminder that there is an userscript to remove all the noise from the threads. Just install tampermonkey/violentmonkey and paste it there as a new script:https://rentry.co/faagxp7rBookmark it, it will be updated as needed
0girl
>>3088203
>>3088203Oh civitjeet bro updated it. Let's see what he changed
>>3088203you need to stop sharing this here and only post it on the discord
>>3088198it's not just ai threads, it's generalized to a few generals I know of, unrelated to aiI don't know why it became this bad lately
>>3088204/edg/ environment diffusion general.
>>3088209what you are seeing here is the result of oil crisis unemployment in the US
Uh oh seems like this script will impact the posts of smooch anon. Sad!
>>3088212that doesn't even make sense but i guess it made you feel smart saying it
>>3088214it's obvious when you think about it
Actual spammer here. Not Patreonbro, the other one. Was gone all day, but I'm just getting caught up on all the headcanon you guys posted today! It is funny as hell. Also...>>3088044PK Anon, you are very cute when you samefag.
>>30882094chan is not as popular as it used to be that's the reason. At some point was really big, and being really big means lot of people causing trouble, like serious problems. So it had a team with the sole purpose to deal with threats.But 4chan is not really that popular anymore, there is lot less traffic which mean the threats are much lower.The people left struggles even dealing with small troublemakers because all those in charge of dealing with threats left long ago.
More headcanon! You are spoiling me, boys.
Actually the spammer is able to get away with it because the last remaining 4chan janitor died in 2023 defending the servers during the Great /pol/ Uprising. Since then, moderation duties have been performed by a single mod with a Pentium 4 running in a closet somewhere in Pakistan.The admins want to intervene, but every time they try, the spammer reroutes his packets through a Dreamcast devkit.I also heard Boxxy foresaw all of this in a private IRC log in 2009 but nobody listened.
>>3088218was Gerard Butler in that one?
>>3088199Wrong assumption. People stay because they want to post ecchi pictures. Nobody ever agreed on highlights or on any of the other shit.
I mean the pink creature is obviously not very smart and is horrible at genning, but so are most of the thread's regulars to be fair.
>>3088224If you want to see high-quality gens by people who know what they're doing and train their own models, go to /degen/. It really puts /edg/ to shame. Unfortunately, they're also all pedophiles.
>>3088224I'm not her for the quality of the gens, but the creativity of the gens.The pink anon or that guy that makes that cute goat girl or the guy that post goblin girls are appreciated because they are creative. It doesn't matter if the generation is made with X model or if its more or less melty, the important thing is that they either put them in ecchi situations or funny situations or give some sort of context to their pictures that make them interesting.If I wan't to see boring ass completely nude girls there is a world out there of both ai and not ai generated images.What I like about here and want to see is original characters, characters in funny situations, creative clothing and headcanons in the shape of images, because THAT's FUN.I'm not here to jerk to the quality of the images but having fun creating, sharing and watching other people's having fun too.
>>3088226>pink anon>creativeSpamming the same exact character in the same exact pose wearing a slightly different outfite until he runs out of free good boy points of civitai is creative now?
>>3088223I like the highlights, it was fun.
>>3088227Giving context to the image is creative, yes.Have you been in any of the ecchi threads ever? There is one thread about toilets, a thread about pubic hair in official manga, things like that.People comes to this board to have fun with ecchi as a culture, as a concept, if all people wanted was to see pictures they would just go to the boorus, would not be partaking in threads here.This is an /ecchi/ thread first and a /ai/ thread second, not the other way around. The ecchi factor is what rules here, And ecchi is not just "muh nudes" if you can't understand that... well, then I pity you because you are losing so much fun.
>>3088226>that guy that makes that cute goat girl or the guy that post goblin girlsWhich one of those guys are you? I'm starting to get an eye for samefagging. I'm guessing you're the goblin guy?
>>3088199That's not a good assumption. Maybe there are some people who like the ecchi ai art and not the highlights. It's not like they could choose one and not the other if the two are forced together.
>>3088231Highlights are easily filterable. If you're too stupid to not use one of many tools available to you to do it, you deserve your suffering.
I guess IA Schizo is waiting for the standard one hour before starting the thread, to look not obsessed. He must be sweating bullets in anticipation. We should see a thread in the next few minutes
>>3088232filtering from a user end does not remove it from the thread or someone trying to force it into "thread culture."
>>3088232Yeah, what >>3088234 said.
>>3088234Yes. It does not. It removes it from your sight. Are you complaining that people on the internet do not agree with you?
>>3088233I know you're going to make it yourself though.
>>3088238Why are you ignoring the part where he mentions how it poisons thread culture?
>>3088238The complaint is that someone is intentionally encouraging a low quality thread by hijacking it.
>>3088238>>3088241What if someone doesn't want a popularity contest taking over all the ways anons post? Especially when the guy who set himself up as the judge without anyone else's approval has observably really bad taste in art and editing?Filtering and ignoring doesn't do anything to solve this problem.
brothers, just stop interacting, don't give (You)s.Single arrow if you must quote
>>3088244Does nothing except out you as angry.
>>3088234Don’t bother. They don’t have the brainpower for this conversation. They think it’s just a visual element you can filter out, instead of understanding the social dynamics and incentive structure it creates. To put it in SD terms: the batch size exceeds their VRAM.
>>3088246It reminds me of the corpo responses to stop killing games. They just give canned responses and ignore how they don't make sense, hoping that people will get bored and stop caring about the truth.
https://litter.catbox.moe/3ixh49.PNGPatreon "bro" here. Just got back and am surprised IA Schizo hasn't baked a new thread yet. Also wanted to say that the last post that was mine was >>3088213. Just food for thought, although I'm sure the drones will inevitably say I've been samefagging the whole time
>>3088244You realise that a (You) and a single arrow with the user's comment # are essentially the same thing when processed by anyone with above-goldfish intelligence, right?Holy fuck, you can't write this shit.
>>3088249don't worry about him, we trained him wrong as a joke
>>3088243Do you want to see the posts of those idiots, even if there's no one encouraging them?>>3088240This is exactly the point I am talking about. Is he complaining that people are stupid on the internet?>>3088241Do you really, with all your heart, think people care enough about this to change their posts? Why isn't anyone else posting IA? That's an auto include.
>>3088248Sorry, dude, I gave you the nickname Patreonbro. Should we just call you the Patreon spammer? People don't really call me anything because they think we're the same person.
>>3088251>And highlights have been a part of /edg/ almost since the very start.Also this is revisionism. Just because you only arrived here after the thread was hijacked doesn't mean it was always like this
>>3088251>Do you want to see the posts of those idiots, even if there's no one encouraging them?I don't care if I see the posts or not. I don't want the posts to change the character of the general.
>watch him again deliberately misunderstand and imply that filtering will fix the problem
>>3088253I did not say the quoted text, anon. I don't care about history or your precious AI culture.>>3088254What's the character of the general, anon? If no one posts, there is no general.
>>3088252Nah it's cool. It doesn't really make a difference what I'm called anyways.
I'm glad my brain is smooth enough all this dumb shit is sliding right off, and my only concern is "if an image is only lewd through a gluteal crease, is that lewd enough to post on ecchi or am I going to look like a weirdo posting SFW"
>>3088256>I did not say the quoted text, anon. I don't care about history or your precious AI culture.Sorry I meant to respond to the post that quoted that, not yours. Misclick
>>3088256>What's the character of the general, anon? If no one posts, there is no general.See: >>3088243>What if someone doesn't want a popularity contest taking over all the ways anons post? Especially when the guy who set himself up as the judge without anyone else's approval has observably really bad taste in art and editing?I don't want that to influence the general.
>>3088254I wonder if it might be more effective to post our own highlights instead of spamming? It would be more of a direct challenge to IA Schizo. He puts a very official-sounding filename on his, and they're allowed to stand as the only highlights on every thread. It would also help thread culture because it would enforce the idea that highlights can only ever be subjective.
>>3088260And it does not. Again, ia anon will include any post with ia, and yet people do not post ia. There is no drive to be in the highlights. You are imagining a scenario, then getting angry about it.
>>3088262>And it does not. Again, ia anon will include any post with ia, and yet people do not post ia. There is no drive to be in the highlights. You are imagining a scenario, then getting angry about it.Lmao I explicitly remember several anons admitting months ago they change what they gen to appeal to the schizo's tastes. As long as he is here the posting will continue.
>>3088261>why is someone taking a big, gigantic shit right on top of the thread?>you know what should be done about it? Let's just take another, gigantic shit right on top of it. That'll show'em.
>>3088263>I explicitly remember several anons admitting months ago they change what they gen to appeal to the schizo's tastes.Anon, just read this fucking thread. Anons will say all kinds of things. Lol, don't let what people say get into your head.
The crazy thing to me is that whether you're on OP's side or not, whether you think highlights are bad or not... There has been a hell of a lot of criticism and derision directed at the highlights in the last few weeks, amidst the spam. And yet, OP persists in posting them. That's what gets me, the ego of it. The personality that doesn't check itself, like, "Hang on, maybe nobody gives a shit about these, maybe I should step back?"Because correct me if I'm wrong, there are two camps here: people who hate the highlights, and people who are indifferent to them. Nobody else is advocating for highlights.
>>3088261>bro, but if you don't like X.... why don't you just even more X yourself??Woah. Brilliant. You fucking idiot.
>>3088262It does. There's no way around this. Sure this is a vague topic that you can't get hard proof on, but if you were a regular here for more than a month you'd know exactly what's going on.
>>3088266>lot of criticism and derision directed at the highlights in the last few weeks>egoi wonder who could be behind that post
>>3088267As an alternative to spam. Spam is hundreds of images. Additional highlights are two images. It's a surgical attack on IA directly, rather than a carpet bomb on everyone. And if you diversify the highlights selection, you decrease elitism, and you undermine IA's authority. But it's ok, you weren't thinking big picture. You fucking idiot.
>>3088266This has been going on for years, the only difference is that every time before it got called samefagging because it wasn't obviously several people talking about it at the same time.
https://litter.catbox.moe/0pegh9.pngIt's quite simple. The IA Schizo stops with his highlights and I disappear with him. Keep in mind the only good thread in the last few weeks is one that had no highlights in it that I did not touch.https://archive.palanq.win/e/thread/3080350For reference>>3088269Unironically not me but keep at it with the failing narrative that everyone who disagrees with you is me.
>>3088270I'm not the spammer, moron, so as an "alternative" it's meaningless. I can't shut off the spam just like I can't shut off the highlights. Both types of shitposting are technically within the rules so we're at their mercy even though they both make everything worse.
>>3088268I've been here for years anon. I saw the highlights start showing up, the kill yourself anon just give up and move on, etc. You are freaking yourself out.
>>3088271>This has been going on for yearsand months could go by without anyone complaining. and when it happened it was obvious it was again the same "his ban expired again" anon. it is only after thing have sort of settled in the/h/ threads that the spammer has moved here trying to derail and control this general as well.
>>3088274There you go, imagining it was just one person and nobody else ever minded.
>>3088275See: >>3088276This is the problem. Nobody is willing to talk about it or even acknowledge it. Now that the spammer has finally forced a conversation everyone is still stubborn about it.
>>3088272>and I disappear with himAfter all you have done here and elsewhere you have no credibility to support that claim.
this is an unreal amount of autism over anime women.
>>3088276Again, you need to stop freaking out and read. Where do I imply I think it's just one person?
>>3088278I have no clue who you think I am. This is the only place I've ever done this and you're confusing me with someone else. Either way you'll see for yourself. Keep up with the highlights and this keeps up, or stop and I stop. Simple as
>>3088277the same logic also applies to you
>>3088279>anons seethe because some idiot without credentials is lording over them>anons seethe because some idiot without standing is using force to enshittify the thread in responseUmm, where are these anime women
>>3088279I think it's just some unloved middle schoolers farming attention desu, probably doesn't care about the subject so much as the disruption
>>3088280Because you prefer to be dismissive rather than having a conversation.>>3088282No it doesn't, I'm not calling you a samefag.
>>3088281Disingenuous as always.>>3088279Agreed.
Please, just stop engaging with trolls.
>>3088286>Disingenuous as always.This is the most staightforward and blatant I've ever been about this topic. I stopped using this thread awhile after the highlighter appeared and decided I wasn't interested in letting him control the thread anymore. Especially seeing /h/ basically get rid of him. You can call me all the names you want and throw all the insults you want and yet it does not matter. There is simply one thing I want and I'm just as motivated as IA Schizo to achieve it.
>>3088285Anon, this response doesn't even make sense.>Where do I imply I think it's just one person?>Because you prefer to be dismissive rather than having a conversation.
>>3088289Whatever, I thought you said why instead of where. Either way, the point is to converse about the issue itself.
>>3088281>Simple asits no longer that simple now that you try to force the change. i'll rather see you dance like a monkey thread after thread instead of ever giving you what you want
>>3088291>i'll rather see you dance like a monkey thread after thread instead of ever giving you what you wantEnjoy the show
>>3088288>I stopped using this threadAnd that was the correct answer if this place bothered you so much.
>>3088290There have been more posts complaining about this fiction than there have been shitposts because of the highlights. There is no issue, dude.
>>3088291Why are you even so invested in this? Are you the highlighter? Or are you just a contrarian?
>>3088273The suggestion was aimed at the spammer, who is actively posting in the thread right now, not you. You inserted yourself and started screeching against a position nobody made.My point was simple: if someone is already going to attack IA’s highlights, then posting alternative highlights is way less destructive than flooding the thread with hundreds of spam images. One approach affects everyone indiscriminately and degrades the thread itself. The other specifically undermines IA’s perceived authority by demonstrating that the highlights are subjective and contestable instead of official canon.You’re also pretending those are equivalent when they obviously aren’t. Two extra highlight images challenging OP’s "official" status is not the same thing as carpet bombing the thread with spam.And "I can’t stop either" has nothing to do with the discussion. Nobody said you could. The point was about which approach does less damage to the thread while still undermining OP’s authority.You fucking idiot.
>>3088294There is an issue. The highlights warp the thread around some idiot's ego. The fact that he doesn't have good taste for art and fucks up editing only aggravates the issue further. As does the fact that nobody voted him in or anything like that, he's just doing it whether others want him to or not.
>i'm doing this because he's lording over you>so i'll lord over you instead
>>3088296I don't want highlights. Creating an extra set of highlights will only make things worse, not better. It's a moronic solution that completely misunderstands the problem. The people you should be selling this idea to is those who are in favor of highlights, not their literal inverse.
>>3088298>>so i'll lord over you insteadI have no interest in ever making it clear who I am, what I post, or making my own highlights. I don't understand how that is lording over you. And as the other anons explained, what he is doing is no different than what I am doing. I don't even know why you defend him so hard.
>>3088295>>3088298
>>3088300I think he's just a contrarian like I implied earlier.
>>3088300>>3088301>>3088302nigger samefag
>>3088295this thead is very chill then you came with your white knight complex while complaining over nothing so you can call me and other anons that way. also the other anon is right as giving you anything will make you feel entilted to demand even more dumb things giving how big your ego is
>>3088299I like the highlights. Why do you get to decide what I get to enjoy?
>>3088300>I have no interest in ever making it clear who I amCoward.
>>3088299Okay, you keep arguing from some imaginary zero highlights baseline that does not currently exist. OP is already posting highlights. The spammer is already attacking them. We are discussing damage control and incentive structure inside the situation that already exists, not your ideal world where both magically stop. I'm not saying that the extra highlights should be a permanent feature, either. Just an alternative method to destabilising OP's grip on the thread.Again, I’m directing this at the spammer. I’m floating it as an alternative tactic because it would take less effort and cause less collateral damage than spamming every thread with hundreds of images. You're getting very worked up over a message that was not even directed at you in the first place.
>>3088305I don't believe you. You might have liked the previous highlights, but the current ones are clearly some guy randomly picking images and fucking them up in ms paint to add extra insult.
>>3088308Now you're a liar
>>3088303Ohh he's fallen back on his programming..>>3088304>white knight complexNTA you're responding to but I am patreonbro. White knight implies I think there is a moral or righteous cause to what I am doing. I'm not concerned with such notions>>3088306Sorry but I am not interested in your avatarfaggotry on an anonymous imageboard. "Patreonbro" is simply a means to an end
>>3088307Honestly I've at this point adapted to the spam so I'm content with the spammer continuing what he's doing. Obviously it's annoying when I just genned some definitely ecchi image I want to post, but for the most part I can just gen for other generals while the spam is here, and post the ecchi one later.
>>3088266Highlights are just for faggots looking for extra recognition or validation, it's not necessary but being completely assblasted about it is lolcow-worthy, Might as well milk it and aggravate the faggot(s) some more, anons can always make another thread ffs. At least until the sun burns out or servers shit the bed, either way there's no real accomplishment to be had or inconvenience to anons.
>>3088309>>3088306>>3088303samefag
I like the highlights too, spamtranny replying to xerself doesn't get a vote in this.
>>3088310>I'm not concerned with such notionsthe ego on this one is off the scale. also you keeping yourself as a non-identifiable anon is one of the reasons no one trusts you or want to give in to your demands
>>3088310>White knight implies I think there is a moral or righteous cause to what I am doing. I'm not concerned with such notions>Sorry but I am not interested in your avatarfaggotry on an anonymous imageboard.Dude are you serious.
The ESL stench is off-the-scale.
>>3088315He's trolling, he's not really that conceited
>>3088318New to 4chan?
>>3088315I literally explained I do not care if you think what I'm doing is somehow ethically or morally wrong. It's a retarded imageboard. I'll just do what I want and you can call it whatever you wish. Seems like the defense force is out in full force now and with that I will just say the one thread without highlights in it was not touched, exactly as I said it would.
>What would Moot do ?
>>3088324stand back and laugh, probably
>>3088324Moot would probably find it laughable some tranny wants to make sure everybody is identifiable so "you can trust them"
>>3088322What about your friend? Do you speak for him when you say that threads without highlights will not be touched?
>>3088327I don't speak for anyone except for myself
>>3088328Are you behind the Ben pics?
>>3088329No
>>3088314I do not care about them particulary, Not hate them, not like them, I mean its just two fucking collages, But I don't think a dude that posts two images because he wants to should stop posting two images because another dude will spam 280 if it doesn't stop doing it.Also ff he stops doing it then the dude that spams 280 images will make the same again and again with everything he doesn't like.The spammer is the only real trouble here we can't ignore, two images you can ignore, 12 threads hoarding the board with the same images not
>>3088299>I don't want highlights.You don't want a lot of things and still cannot understand that it's not our problem.
>>3088331this
>>3088331>>3088312>>3088047
>>3088331>Also ff he stops doing it then the dude that spams 280 images will make the same again and again with everything he doesn't like.Exactly.>>3088322>I'll just do what I wantDouble so.
>>3088322>I'll just do what I wantAnd same goes for us. But again, feel free to keep wasting your time by attacking a message board if that makes you feel important and powerful.Tards like you always need to find a validation source no matter the cost.
>>3088328more of a reason to not give in. what if we do and the other spammer goes "i dont like this either so I will just spam till its gone" and starts it all again? so the answer is no
>>3088335>Double so.Uhh ESL bro? Then it's your choice as much as it is mine to ruin the thread when the solution is right in front of you. Just never pretend again that you or IA (I don't know who you are, but I wouldn't be surprised if he's one of you) want what's best for the thread.>>3088336>makes you feel important and powerful>always need to find a validation source no matter the costOhh back at it again with that projection I see. Keep it up bro. One more attack on my character and you'll really upset me I think
>>3088337We will keep doing what we want the way as we want as well. If the spammer or any other autist has a problem with the way we have fun, he can go screw himself because we are not gonna change shit.
>>3088338>want what's best for the thread.and there you go with the white knighting
Spamtranny just wants what's best for the thread! they're doing it for (you)
>>3088338>One more attack on my character and you'll really upset me I thinkNobody really cares.
>>3088340>and there you go with the white knightingReading comprehension? IA Schizo is the only one who's ever made an argument that what he's doing is in the best interest of the thread. I can understand that you wouldn't know, since you seem like a newfag all things considered
>>3088338>when the solution is right in front of youYour solution is not a solution.
>>3088332That's the cool thing, some guy thinks the same thing and is putting in a fuckton of effort into enforcing it. He says the morality of the situation is irrelevant, but I can assure you that he is acting morally. Tyranny and corruption deserve to be cast down.
There are a couple of other housekeeping issues we need to address, besides highlights. The whole OP text needs to be updated.>/wsg/aicg is defunct, I haven't seen a general there for ages. >we have a link for /degen/ but nothing for /ydg/. It's giving "homophobic pedophile" vibes.>the sdg-link "useful" link cuts off at SDXL, as in the first base model by Stability AI in July '23, it doesn't say anything about Noob or Illustrious, or Anima
>>3088338>the solution is right in front of you.You mean banning you for life? Yes.
>>3088346I swear, you sound like Christian Chandler. Probably look like him as well.
>>3088349do it yourself?
>>3088349if OP could just implement these few things, to start with, it would show good faith and that he cares about the thread a minimum
>>3088352Seethe all you want. Enjoy your spammed up threads, retard.
>>3088349Indeed but that will have to wait a bit.>/wsg/aicg is defunct, I haven't seen a general there for ages.F
>>3088343>Reading comprehension?more like you prposefully misunderdstanding the meaning but then again you have been a very disingenuos all the time
>>3088354Can replace the aicg link but with what? /adt/?
>>3088357>more like you prposefully misunderdstanding the meaning but then again you have been a very disingenuos all the timeSlow down there bud. Also I notice you and the other dude are now pushing the "disingenuous" angle simultaneously. Are you guys all parrots in a feedback loop?
>>3088353Do it myself? Hahahahahahahahahah.Dude.We have spent the last 3 hours since we hit image limit, arguing about OP's grip on the thread. I actually baked a thread that made some of those changes, and AI Schizo replied to my new thread with a nervous, "Anon?" and an image of IA, and then he posted his highlights, and he anxiously let everyone know that he was not the baker and that's why there were discrepancies between the OP pic and highlights, and then he went back to posting the same old OP text.If I'm bringing it up, I am bringing it to everyone's attention, so that we can collectively make the changes going forward.
Spamtranny is obviously just pretending to be retarded as bait. Morality, thread quality, highlights, etc, are all actually irrelevant, but he pretends that they aren't so he can get what he really want's, attention.
>>3088360thats a very good way to describe you and your many character flaws. its funny that you think you are entilted into forcing any change at all
>>3088364>No argumentK. At least you slowed down instead of spazzing out a response with a billion typos this time--it's a step up.
>>3088363This.
>>3088363>want's
>>3088363yeah pretty much that
>>3088361I dare you to explain the "lore" behind this post to your mother.
>>3088363can't tell if bait or low iq
>>3088369I already explained it to my mom when it happened. She helped me to summarise it just now.
>>3088363accurate.
>>3088361I don't care who bakes the threads as long as you follow the rules: no baking a new thread until the old one is on auto sage. No spamming the board with competing threads all pretending to be the "official" thread.
>>3088361>I actually baked a thread that made some of those changesAnd you made it without commenting about it in the previous thread? That's not how changes to the OP are made.
The amount of free time you lot have to be discussing this so enthusiastically.Holy shit the new post counter in this tab just keeps multiplying, I don't even have the patience to read through this wall now?Touch grass...
>>3088361no, we're talking about highlights and spam, neither of those two care about the op
>esl samefagging constantly who's totally not ia schizo>spammer is ironically the most proficient person in englishkek
>>3088354>if the spammer could stop flooding the threads with repugnant pics, it would show good faith and that he cares about the thread a minimum
>mfw I realize the anons in this thread are genuinely retarded and that "retard" is not just a thing we say to people who disagree with us but an actual condition that the majority of this general are afflicted with, and I've been arguing with doorknobs for brains
>>3088363>pretendingYeah, right. 'Pretending'
>>3088377It's clowns fighting clowns all the way down and at the bottom is clowns with the downs.
>>3088377>yum yum spammer cum tasty yum yum
>>3088361and you made that thread before the image limit even with op having posted that he was working on it so your intent is now clearly to have a petty attack on the baker. you just made a good example as of why we have a baker in the first place
They will always ignore the very inconvenient truth that I did exactly as I said I would for this thread:https://archive.palanq.win/e/thread/3080350Funny how that works. And I love the userscript vibe coding clown who's an actual tripfag now. This seems like a loop so see you guys next thread I suppose>>3088383ESL-kun... you might be one of the most entertaining after the smooch anon.
>>3088374Yeah, that's true I agree. I should have made it clear. My point was really to highlight that OP seems reluctant to relinquish his authorship of the thread, going by his reaction to someone else baking one. And so, it's not very helpful to tell me to implement changes myself, when this one guy has a grip on the thread, and therefore the OP text. It is OP that we need to get through to, collectively.
>>3088384>They will always ignore the very inconvenient truth that I did exactly as I said I would for this threadYou have no standing to back up that claim.
>>3088384>ESL-kun... you might be one of the most entertaining after the smooch anon.not an argument
>spamtranny critically weak to smooches
>>3088388He could never get over that fateful evening when his creepy uncle was left alone with him, smooch smooch LICK LICK
>>3088389he does act like he was molested by a family member...
>highlighter is a nonceEw. But not unexpected.
>>3088383Hm, no, I was trying something new in the face of growing discontent with OP. All I did was expose OP's territoriality and main character syndrome. I disregarded OP's percentage progress bar post because it effectively marks the upcoming thread as his project before the image limit. It's not functionally necessary, we know a new thread is coming. It's social signalling. "Stand by. The official continuation is coming. Don’t interfere." It also means that if I post first, it looks like I sniped him. That's pre-emptive delegitimization.
>>3088392You should snipe him more often. Making threads isn't a right.
>>3088392I don't know of any other generals that do that progress bar thing. I think most of them rotate OPs, because nobody is as possessive as our OP
>>3088393He's done it in the past, but he picks deepfried slop for the OP and acts like a dipshit when people tell him to fuck off. As we are seeing now.>inb4 "I just choose OP images in line with the quality of the thread :^)"
>>3088386what are you even talking about. that thread has no patreon spam and the ones preceding/succeeding it do. what kind of "standing" are you asking for exactly
>>3088396Isn't your inb4 true though? Well, not the thread specifically, but the usual OPs?
>>3088397see>>3088035
>>3088383not sure how you can frame someone simply baking a new thread as a petty attack on the usual OP, unless you are that OP and you felt personally hurt by it.
>>3088399that's not what he said at all. you're just making shit up
>>3088035>>3088399what's the highlighter doing it for though?
>just making shit upDevilish :^)
>>3088390that explains so much about his sick taste for ugly fetishesboth his brain and asshole were destroyed by his uncles dick
>>30883961/10 bait
He just keeps posting. He can't stop.
>>3088406OK, so these comments are funny if you read them as autobiographical
>>3088406The posts and the replies are all what keeps him distracted from his shitty life.Why else he would have spent nearly a month spamming a place to pretend he can force others to give him all what he wants?
>>3088392at lesst you admit some things but doing what you did is the gateway for having multiple anons trying to get the op
>>3088396Guys, categorise comments before you decide to reply. Take this one, for example.This is either very bad troll bait, or it's IA Schizo.Why would you take either of those seriously? No need to reply.
>>3088410>This is either very bad troll bait, or it's IA Schizowhat's the difference
>>3088410How do you propose we categorize anything? For example, your post seems to be of the same quality as the one you're attacking. Should we treat you as a bad troll or a schizo engaging in a conspiracy?
>Everyone that likes /edg/ is IA>Everyone that hates /edg/ is spamtrannyIt's all becoming clear to me...
>>3088384>This seems like a loop so see you guys next thread I supposeSorry bud but you don't get to force things on a anonymous community. The one keeping you "in the loop" is you yourself.
And the spammer is still trying to tell everyone what they can say and how they are supposed to say it.Pathetic.
>>3088409Huh? That phrasing is the problem. The OP is not something that anyone needs to "get".The thread hitting image limit is an inevitability. Somebody has to bake a new one. That does not require ownership or a designated baker. Any anon who is there at the time can do it. It's supposed to be anonymous and interchangeable like everything else on 4chan. If you want to be a Discord mod, start a Discord server.
>>3088414>things on a anonymous communityhello esl ia schizo. the word "anonymous" starts with a vowel phonetic so the indefinite article to use is "an" instead of "a". anyways can you bake the next thread already?
>>3088412This is so meta. Nice job, anon
>>3088417nah he's right about the "getting the op" thing, it's a sad sight to behold when a bunch of retards are fighting over a general's op and spamming up the board with redundant threadsoh wait, we're already doing that anyway
>>3088418>>3088418>>3088418Baker is dead, or bored, or I don't know, but there isn't a point waiting on a dead thread with no image slots so new bread
>>3088419Cute ad hominem, try again.
>>3088425that's not an ad hominem, he just insulted you, he'd need to actually base an argument on the insult for it to become an ad hominem
>>3088427anon he's retarded and even misunderstood the other anon's use of the loop term
>>3088427Another ad hominem, cute.
>>3088431inigo montoya would like to have a word with you
>>3088427>>3088429>yum yum spammer cum tasty yum yumit smells to cum sock-puppet in here
>>3088423>Baker is deadI was waiting for things to calm down a bit more. Tho I must say that you should have removed the /aicg/ link but I undestand that this is a weird time to actually change things in the OP.
>>3088435>I was waiting for things to calm down a bit moreunfortunately for you, you don't control when a new thread gets baked
>>3088434go make the highlights already so the spam puts us out of our misery
>>3088190maybe put pool ladder in negatives? i haven't tried this myself though
>>3088068https://files.catbox.moe/mz1lsk.png
