were their brand ever been considered "high class"
>>18107984My diva-esque girl loves my wool CK trench coat (thrift store, $10)
>>18107984Both are somewhat status symbols (meaning you just aren't poor), but not high class, no.
I like Tommy's shirts. Is it high class? In third world it's considered something between (upper) middle class and (lower) high class.Don't know shit about Calvin.
>>18107984no, at best they were mall-core
>>18107984calvin klein underwear yes.
high class brands are the ones you don't know the names of that cost more than you can afford
ITT: Hipsters
>>18107984Yeah, back in the 50s maybe. It was a novel thing shilled by celebrities. There's no such thing as "high class" brands anyway because actual richfags don't wear a lot of brand name clothing. They pay for materials and tailoring, not logos.
