[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fa/ - Fashion

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: wp-1599749945591.jpg (102 KB, 1080x1080)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
Were the late 1800's the worst era of fashion for women in the west?
It's no wonder why movies and shows set in this time period always use ahistorical clothing -- Who's going to take any woman seriously when she's dressed like picrel?
>>
File: IMG_1025.png (1.25 MB, 938x931)
1.25 MB
1.25 MB PNG
>>18167577
Cope + you’re gay
>>
Someone post that busty victorian woman pic.
>>
>>18167577
>makes their bust and hips look huge and waist looks small
and this is supposed to be ugly somehow??
>>
>>18167577
no it was fine
>>
nobody talks about the 1800s revival moment in the 1970s
>>
>>18167577
it was the best one
>>
>>18170894
Doesn't Edwardian mean 1910s
>>
>>18173054
It means 1901-1910
>>
>>18170894
post more
>>
>>18167914
Bottom left and bottom right - was it normal for skirts to be that short back then?
>>
>>18170894
>>18174746
jesus
>>
>>18177173
Next GF will be dressed in this.
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hhhmmmm
>>
>>18167577
>>18167914
>>18170894
>>18177204
>>18177207
>>18177212
>>18177216
I will never understand how so many people think wearing a dress = well dressed or peak fashion. Women’s fashion was mediocre at best until they started wearing pants, overalls, etc. in the early 20th century. Dresses are plain, boring and shapeless bags. No fun at all fashion-wise, and absolutely lazy and uncreative on the wearers part.
>>
>>18177220
>>
File: The Swan Princess.jpg (70 KB, 736x736)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>
File: 7239119138449378606_2.webm (2.83 MB, 576x1024)
2.83 MB
2.83 MB WEBM
>>
File: NYPICHPDPICT000009212598.jpg (1.33 MB, 2667x4001)
1.33 MB
1.33 MB JPG
>>
>>
>>18177220
The hats in >>18167914 are a lot bolder and show a lot more personality than anything you'd see today. The rest of the outfits are somewhat bland, but nothing you wont still see today in any trendy city
>>
>>18177220
Wearing a dress is peak rebellion for a female in the current ‘there is no such thing a biological sex’ woke NPC era.
It’s refreshing seeing a women dress feminine without looking like a whore.
>>
File: 7263243474147740971_2.webm (2.64 MB, 576x1024)
2.64 MB
2.64 MB WEBM
>>18177721
Absolutely this. That's why i cherish it on women.
It's also a middle finger to the attempt to build the one world order(unifying gender, 2 trade center -> one trade center).
>>
Women don't exist anymore, there's only thots:
alt-thot
e-thot
trad-thot
pinup-thot
eco-thot
pol-thot
biker-thot
They're all the same, cosplaying as something else. All of them claiming "they're not like the other girls"
>>
>>18174722
Yeah, young girls wore shorter skirts, and when they became more sexually developed, they would wear longer skirts. Those girls are both teenagers.
>>
>>18177748
They do.
>>
>>18177725
So that's what happened to erin anderson? She made it sisters! From man to tradwife!
>>
>>18174722
These are likely girls in their teens, hence the shorter skirts and looser hairstyles so at this age it was normal to wear shorter skirts no matter the occasion.
Shorter skirts were also fine for work and for exercising (both of which were completely normal for women no matter how much revisionism is done to tell everyone that women did nothing but stay at home and get beaten by their husbands before the sufferagettes and then the 70s women's liberation movement)
>>
>>18167577
>taking women seriously
imma stop you there



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.