Do you dress better then labor kid from 1912?
kids*
>>18190225*THAN
do you dress better than the kids at orphanages during the great depression?
even the jews in concentration camps were better dressed than most of this boardand they look better fed than the shit i see in /thinspo/grim
>>18190253Well yeah, because that's all they had. Suits and trench coats were their casual street wear because they didn't have 20 different kinds of clothing. For the negrified consoomers in 2024 who are used to wearing t-shirts, sweatpants/shorts and hoodies, wearing a regular button up shirt, dark wash jeans, and a denim jacket is the definition of "dressing up". What was considered to be casual a few decades back is today's formal.
This won't make suits normal either, drop your fetish already.
Number 1 legal horse betting company.But at what cost, Tom?
>>18190300who said anything about suits?literally any photo of 1950s children MOGS zoomers with their cheap plastic shoes and their cheap made in bangladesh clothes today.
1950s teenagerbetter version of the tall haircutjacket costs more than zoomers entire wardrobesfit is well composedpants fit properlyno zoomers meet this standard
>jacket costs more than zoomers entire wardrobeswhoops i thought i posted one with a leather jacket.
wayyyyyyyy more masculine than the gay/effeminate shit kids wear today.
>>18190225Yes
no plastic shoesno hip hugger pantstees aren't paper thintheir belts aren't cheap corrected grain glued together bullshitpants fit bettershirts aren't gay and slim
>>18190642what's are those things in the buttonholes? they look like those flip tops on glass bottles.
>>18190739that's what they look like to me too.
>>18190739oh yeah its all coming back to me now. that's exactly what they are. wearing those was a micro trend in the 50s then had a little revival in the 80s as well.
