Where do I get good high-waisted pants for men?Pic relatedI don't want to spend more than 60 per pair
>>18289850>good pants>I don't want to spend more than 60 per pairfigure out your life and then post again
>>18289853Fine, 80 faggot
>>18289850I heard from some trendy kid that carhartt women’s jeans are really good for baggy, trendy high waisted pants for me, which is I assume what you’re after. However I feel obligated to warn you that slim-baggy is a pattern which repeats itself and we are about to head back into low waisted slimmer pants being trendy in the next couple of years. Baggy and high waisted has been trendy for 8 years so the trend cycle is about to be due
>>18289861For men*
>>18289855still no. double it and youre in the ballpark
>>18289861this is true. idk about low rise but pro-skaters are already starting to switch back to slimmer pants. which is where most mainstream fashion trends seem to originate from for some reason.
>>18289867>>18289861look i just want high-waisted trousers for men
>>18289866ok. DOne. Recommend me shit now
>>18289889Berg & Berg, Natalino, Suit Supply, Poszetka, Casatlantic, Scavini, Rubato, SEH Kelly, Spier & Mackay
>>18289850Got this one from Zara at sale for 20€. It’s not groundbreaking quality but at least 50% wool that’s good enough at that price and drapes very nice
>>18289853>>18289855>>18289866>4chuds bargaining prices of imaginary long shorts
>>18289916Link it
>>18289939It’s from January collection don’t think it’s still available but here is the article numbers anyway Bought it complete with the suit a fave of mine
haggar anyone who spend more than 100 for a pair of pants is retard
>>18290099Im not even going to address what a retard you are. Why are you here?
>>18289889i was going to make the exact same recs as the other guy.berg & berg does 50% sales pretty frequently which put them in your price range great buy when on sale imo.
Bronson/Non-Stock. I highly recommend their corduroys. Just got a black pair, myself. They're actual high-rise, plenty of crotch space, $44 from their site.
>>18289853You can find excellent used stuff (often like new) for 15 bucks if you don’t live in a shithole country. And yes, the US are includer among the shithole countries.
>>18290330well i live in america so the sifting isnt worth the time investment. i saw someone selling 'vintage' express on ebay the other day though. that was pretty interesting
>>18289850from what I hear on /fa/, "everyone" is wearing those kinds of pants, so why is it hard for you to find
>>18289850>I don't want to spend more than 60 per pairstop being poor>>18289855stop being poor
>>18289913are these woke companies? i won't give them a penny
>>18290128Just because it's expensive doesn't make it better. No pants are worth over 100 dollars, unless they're made with some rare fabric. If you pay over a 100 dollars for a pair of basic bitch pleated pants, then you are a chump who got ripped off.
>>18290229seconding they're kino if you have a short enough inseam for their sizing.
>>18290551ok name a brand selling high rise 4 pleat pants in long or extra long staple 100% cotton for 100 bucks then.
OP hereI just went to ASOS :)
>>18290551stop being retarded right now. its giving me a headache
idk if you are married to pleats but if not i'd just get dickies, ben davis or redkap if you want to not spend alot. the dickies "skateboarding" version of original 874s are made much better and they're like $35. most of the dickies skateboarding stuff is overpriced crap but the dickies skateboarding original 874s are way better and worth the extra $15.
>>18290505Suit Supply is woke indeed, but check the rest for yourselfif there's a black model, just don't buyCasatlantic doesn't count since they're Moroccan and are allowed to be brown
>>18290128>Why are you here?To insult faggots like you, pants aren't something that have nasa technology, at least this one, faggots like you pay a lot of money to buy overpriced gadged and shit. I am paying only the pants you are paying the brand, like almost every nigger in this word, your monkey brain doesn't see the product but only the price and how much shine it is, that's why you are an incompetent stupid nigger monkey
>>18290841it costs more than 100 bucks to make a decent pair of pants without using outsourced child slave labor and have enough profit margin to stay in business. more like 150 on average. the types of brands i buy don't have any branding, you wouldn't know their names, they don't advertise only word of mouth, and they have 1/10th the mark up and low overhead. when you buy fast fashion from the mall most of your money is going to huge advertising budgets, corporate overhead costs, industry standard 2.5x retail markup sometimes double, etc. the brands i buy stuff from have an ig page ran by the owner and they don't even hire models.
>>18290841another way to put it is the clothes you buy raw materials cost 2-10% of what you're paying.the labor is also skimped out on by using slaves and children in the cheapest countries possible. china vietnam and even india have too high of a minimum wage and too high of human rights standards now that's why your clothes say made in bangladesh. shipping is cheap because they often abuse de minimis exemptions and other legal loopholes in other countries to make their taxpayers pay for it. its normal for 80% to go to merchant markups, marketing and the brand's overhead.meanwhile, the stuff i buy the cost of raw materials is usually more around 25% and labor's the greatest expense by % because its done in the first world often by well paid skilled craftsmen (i search brands i buy from on linkedin and facebook to see if they use illegals/cheap immigrant labor or not)on garments i can look at and tell where they bought the textile it'll often be "i can make this $150 garment for $75" that's pretty fair for having someone else sew it, shipped, all the design work they put in etc.
>>18290854t. knower
>>18290841>how much shine it isthere it is. esl opinion discarded
>>18290505Kill yourself, man. Or research it yourself.>Puhweeze tell me if I think a company is my fwend or not Jesus Christ you can't even figure out your own brainworms, you gotta have some else wag you around?
>>18290841you don't know what you're talking about anon. Look at a Sears catalogue from 100 years ago and adjust the prices for inflation. You might learn something
>>18290854NTA but custom clothing is really useful for this sort of thing. Luxire, Spier&Mackay, and Propercloth will let you pick the fabric, the dimensions, change the style, etc and you can get a pair of trousers made with the fabric you want and the dimensions you want for $100-200 dollars. If you want a pair of trousers to fit perfectly you often have to have them tailored, even if you buy from a good brand so you have to budget an additional $30-50 for anything you buy off the rack which makes the economics of custom work even more favorable
>>18291533when you want simple stuff without crazy fabrics or details that's the way to go. i tend to go rtw on most of my trousers but mtm/bespoke on my shirts because i have goofy long arms and a short torso.
>>18289850Pic unrelated you mean. This is a low waist trouser pattern that has been extended. Look at how short the zip fly is. That's improper
>>18289913Suit supply is low waist af
>>18291529>Look at a Sears catalogue from 100 years ago and adjust the prices for inflation.ok4.85$=63.45$5.75=75.239.45=123.6312.95=169.43 >>18289913>Berg & Bergavg. price 325$>Natalinoavg. price 400/500$>Suit Supplyavg. price 170$>Poszetkaavg. price 250$> Scaviniavg. price 300/400$>Rubatoavg. price 400$and so onThey don't pretend to be for daily use like in the 50s, all this new brands are fashion™ (peak consumism for people who pretend to be contrarian) it's elite wardrobe where you can't touch or do anything and act like a woman with their ladybags or dress since you can damage your 500$ pants, thanks but i like my testosterone.
>>18291882>Suit Supply>avg. price 170$So literally the same price as the example from Sears you posted?Other anons already answered for you: Propercloth and Luxire. Spier& Mackay works too at that price point. Land End Traditional cut are high rise and cost around $70. Jack Donnelly costs around $120, same for Orvis, Berle and Duckhead. Bronson makes great repro style chinos for about $50-80. Are you looking for actual answers or just to complain?
>>18289850The local thrift store.Vinted.Grailed.Poshmark.Ebay.
>>18291882berg & berg does 50% sales frequently everyone pays more like 150 for them.>They don't pretend to be for daily use like in the 50s, all this new brands are fashion™the fast fashion prices you are used to paying were never the norm until the 1990's. learn about zara's brand history if you want to know why clothes are so cheap now.men paid roughly the same prices for quality menswear back then as they did today. pic related. cpi inflation calculator is a low ball estimate of inflation realistically its probably around double.
>>18291882same goes for shoes and boots btw men paid like 200-600 for a pair of boots during the great depression going off the super low ball official government inflation numbers. not very different from what the boot thread spergs pay today if you ignore overpriced pnwmemes (they used to cost a lot less)
J Crew Classic chino
>>18291882>ok>4.85$=63.45$>5.75=75.23>9.45=123.63>12.95=169.43yes now realize that was fairly low end
>>18293220Not high rise in the slightest. Measure them, you'll get 11-11.5 at a 36 inch waist
Milsurp m1951 pants are really good for the price, depending on the site you use you can get a pair in really good condition for under $30. You'll have to deal with bdu sizing which is ass, but if you aren't inbetween sizes I'd reccomend em
>>18290634>>18289946>>18289916as a totally broke dude who needs clothes for work thanks for this tips lmao
>>18289850Uniqlo
(I'm >>18290229)>>182905895'5", my pair's an XS. They're too long by 1"-2" and there's a bit over 2" of extra fabric folded into the hem. Unless you're really lanky, they should be fine once altered.
>>18290330>>18290339Stores like Goodwill in the US are a scam and waste of time going into. They have staff that sort through donations and luck out anything decent that they sell at inflated prices online. The rest is just crap that they use to stock the stores with to fill out inventory. They throw most of it away after a certain time period. They also don't wash donations.
>>18295424>They also don't wash donations.why ever would they be expected to? that would be extremely tedious.
https://www.gap.com/browse/product.do?pid=5004670223132&vid=1&tid=gpns000044#pdp-page-contentI have these in black and brown. I love how they fit.No, I'm not advertising, just saying. For $80 they're not worth, but it is 40% off.
>>18295477How are wide pants like that, do they not look weird when walking outside? I rarely ever see people with these kind of wide pants
>>18295424>He doesn't have a St. Vincent's
>>18295477>63% recycled polyester
>>18295477>polyester trash
i love how there's this demographic of anons who are so resistant to getting a job at mcdonalds that they berg over how its unreasonable a pair of pants would ever cost $100-150 but can't name a normal ass pair of pants that aren't gay fitting or made of plastic for cheaper. and how they go around thread to thread seething about how some people would be willing to pay for something nicer than shit-tier.
>>18295424my goodwill washes everything with the most disgusting and aggressively strong smelling detergent ever and it takes over 10 washes or a year airing out to go away.good thing they only sell 2 year old uniqlo clothes for 150% what they costed when they were new, a 3 minute drive away from a uniqlo retail location.
>>18296160>how its unreasonable a pair of pants would ever cost $100-150I think part of the issue is there's a common notion that you need an absolute shit ton of clothes to be vaguely fashionable. So anons look and see a pair of $150-200 trousers that are well made and will last years, but they don't want to save a little to buy them and really want four or five pair of trousers instead for diversity, so they look around for $50 trousers that they can buy now, then another pair in a week, etc. The fact that the $50 trousers won't last and probably don't look as good aren't primary considerations, they can buy more shit, number go up so its better.I fully admit I buy way more than I need but I at least try and buy shit that lasts. If you're hell bent on focusing on quantity,do yourself a favor and learn how to shop second hand. You can at least buy better constructed clothes cheaper and have a bigger wardrobe, and often the second hand clothes will still last longer than the new polyshit items you'll get at many stores.
