>Your budget>Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot>Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz>Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone>Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet>Wrist size or desired watch sizeprevious thread: >>18294567
I have no use for it but I want it
>>18296374Can the pushers be pushed underwater?
>>18295254>>18296161>>18296163You simply have bad taste. Probably brainwashed by chud's metal bracelet style. Leather straps look actually much better when their edges don't touch the case. Classic vintage elegance. But you're too retarded to understand this.
Rolex on my wristPfeizer in my armIsrael in my heart
Thanks to the anon in the last thread for answering my question about sub-$300 dress watches.This thing is absolutely stunning.
The 1960s were the civilizational peak of the west. Nothing comes even close in term of aesthetics. Nothing. Everything just looked kino back then: watches, cars, fashion, every day objects. Even the fucking fridges looked nice. These days everything has to look "utilitarian" in the most retarded way. Like, have you seen the Moser the turkish retard keep spamming in every threads? It has air vents on the side. There's a Calatrava released 2 or 3 years ago with a dial that mimicks carbon fiber. That's what modern design is all about. You want to look cool? Dress like young Alain Delon.You want a timeless watch? Get a Datejust or a Tank. It's that simple.
>>18296390how loud is it, and do they have one without date?
>>18296389now order it so that it spells RIP
>>18296405That's not Alain Delon.
>>18296405Stop being a fucking clown, you dumb obnoxious cockroach.
>>18296372>curved spokes wheelskino
>>18296419what a great post, totally not making this board a septic shithole
>>18296390Glad u like anon. It's a fine watch that gets some love even in an unholy and bitter place like this.>>18296408There are a lot of variations. But I think the only one you can find without date is an awful open heart one.
>>18296386All but the rolex looks shit. Oddly enough the rolex has the smallest gaps.
Bought a bunch of parts and built my own Milsub clone microshitter.
>>18296450You should buy a bunch of parts and build yourself a camera
>>18296379yes
>>18296425You are a septic shithole.
>>18296433I bet you also suck dozens of cocks every week to refill your personality bar.
cheap russian whore
>>18296478The dial is great. The bezel could be improved.
>>18296483Yes would like to find a more subtle bezel but dont want to order from russia now because postal services will fuck with it likely
How do you call a fren with a Rolex?>BrolexHow do you call a Patek Philippe with a brown dial?>Patel PhilippeHow do you call a big black guy named Garry with an Octo Finissimo?>BVLLGARRY
Based or is this a zombie chink made piece of shit?MovementValjoux 7750 TOP, 48 hours power reserveFunctionshour, minute, small second, date and weekday on special position (German or English selectable)Chronograph: 12-hour counter, 30-minute counter, 60-seconds counterCaseIce-hardened stainless steel, case back screwed, crown screwed into case according to the "DAMASKO System" with crown protection waterproof 10bar / 100meters, low pressure resistant, functional reliabilty testet and certified at negative pressure and acceleration according to military standard sapphire crystal, flatBlackAll stainless steel components provided with DAMEST CoatingDialdial matte black, hour markers and triangle at 12 o’clock coated with special long-lasting luminous paint, also parts of the hands, second stop hand painted matte black, parts of the hand coated with special blue colorDimensions and weightdiameter: 40.00mm, overall height: 13.80mm, lug width: 20.00mm, lug to lug: 48,6mm, weight without strap: 90.00g
>there's no snow at the top of mount fujiWhoretadello wtf did you do?
>>18296471Real men don't settle for blown-out gaping pussy/bussy.
>>18296500Gaps too big
I want a gmt for travel, would like to keep it around $1000, currently between the christopher ward C63 and the seiko alpinist gmt version. What should I get?
>>18296526The CW symbol is so fucking ugly I dont understand how people wear them
>>18296528This
>>18296469lol are we back in 3rd grade?
>>18296526that fucking logo, if it just said WARD in some good font it would be million times better
>>18296526With such a tight budget you'd be better off buying a premium quartz GMT. Look at something from Grand Seiko or Citizen.But if you want a microshitter I'd look at something from Yema or Lorier or Glycine
>>18296526first time ever I have to vote for the seiko here
I am increasingly convinced that 36mm Rolex watches look great on leather straps, even better than on an Oyster or Jubilee strap. Please convince me that I am wrong.
>>18296540>But if you want a microshitter I'd look at something from Yema or Lorier or GlycineThis is the correct answer. Seiko will always be disappointing. If you can find a Glycine Airman No.1 Purist, you’ll have the original GMT watch.
>worst Rolex>worst Omega>worst JLC>worst Cartier>worst Patek>worst Vacheron>worst AP >worst Casio>worst Seiko (including Grand Seiko)>worst watch ever madeGO
When AP, PP, VC and Breguet were young and well-established, Rolex was a microshitter.So please, stop calling microbrands 'microshitters'.
>>18296560>>worst RolexDatejust 41>>worst OmegaSeamaster 300M>>worst JLCAll these stupid iterations of the Polaris (chronograph, traveler, etc)>>worst CartierBallon Bleu>>worst PatekCubitus obviously>>worst VacheronOverseas, such an ugly watch (especially when they add stupid complications like tourbillon or whatever) >>worst AP the disgusting reedition of a vintage watch they've released a few months ago, it's fucking gigantic and has an automatic movement - beyond retarded>>worst Casioall of them>>worst Seiko (including Grand Seiko)all of them>>worst watch ever madeDatejust 41, I'll never forgive Rolex for this
>>18296426Decent, decent. I have an online friend who knows many details about the weekdaters. He probably knows the difference between an 1964 6218-8970 and an 6218-8971 if he sees them for a sec.
>>18296568Actually agree with all of those…huh, weird.
>>18296560>>worst RolexExplorer I>>worst Omegale ebin moonwatch, one of the most retarded watches ever made>>worst JLCAny round JLC looks like garbage>>worst CartierMost people will say "any steel Cartier", but they have low IQ. The worst Cartier is that one with the caged dial.>>worst PatekThe one with the kike face on it. Imagine caring for this fucking joke of a brand.>>worst VacheronOverseas, and it's still orders of magnitude better than the omega shitmaster.>>worst APThose fucking shitters they make today that resemble Hublot and Richard Mille. Vomit-inducing trash.>>worst CasioThere isn't a bad Casio.>>worst Seiko (including Grand Seiko)All of them are rubbish.>>worst watch ever madeHublot, Richard Mille and all that dogshit is the lowest horology has ever gotten.
>>18296560>>worst Rolex
>>18296573Kill yourself you literal nigger.
>>18296575Those roman numerals are absolutely atrocious.
>>18296561Buy an ad, Marc.
>>18296570The 8971 has less text and no star, is a bit cleaner.
>>18296577Yes, they are.
>>18296572>worst Rolex>Explorer IFucking kek, this one is the best
>>18296584Even the Sky Dweller is better than that average normie poorfag piece of trash.>b-but le fat adipose reddit numerals bro xD
>>18296573How about Wimbledon?
>ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
>>18296572>Hublot, Richard Mille and all that dogshit is the lowest horology has ever gotten.This is the most R*ddit, uncontroversial, unoriginal take you can have.It's also wrong.
Hand-winding, no date > automatic with date > dogshit > quartz
>>18296594Liking Rolex is also reddit. Claiming steel Cartier is bad is also reddit and uncontroversial.You think this is a competition to see who shoots the biggest? Lmfao, grow up retard.
>>18296597automatic, no date > Hand-winding, no date > automatic with date > dogshit > quartz
>>18296597>>18296602Quartz > Automatic > Automatic, date > dogshit > Hand-winding
>>18296597>>18296602>date is............. LE BAD!
>>18296450Dogshit. Get a real watch.
>>18296612>he has a Mc Donald watch
>>18296612Is that meant to be advice for the owner of the box full of trash in your pic?
>>18296612Absolutely DESTROYED
>>18296601Last time I checked R*ddit was full of Omega and GSfags seething at Rolex' waitlists, and the Cartier Tank Solarbeat was insanely popular. That's not really my point though.Why do you hate Hublot and RM? Is it because that fat fuck Nico Leonard told you they're bad?
>>18296626Nick who?Dude, they just fucking suck. Look at them.
Bros I want a mudmaster AAAAAAAAA
The RM 005 is fucking cool and I'm tired of pretending it's not.
>>18296644I like Protrek.
>>18296652Looks like a child drew it.
>>18296652Franck Muller walked so Richard Mille could fly.
shitters
poolex
>>18296670>>18296685hello Tourettes anon
>>18296689PHUCKER
puke
Bittourettecel
its like a watch themed bathroom stall
a huge dump of excrements
nasty poopoo shitters
>thought I had 7k in my rolex fund, is only 6kit's literally overBut regardless, say I had a choice to cop (Implying I will have the choice), what would I prefer to cop?>Sub Date Black bezel>Sub Date Green bezel>GMT2 Full black on oyster>GMT2 Batman on oyster>GMT2 Pepsi on oysterno Jubilee homo shitpick one and only one
>>18296770bonus/wildcard choice since TTs are more easily gotten (ALLEGEDLY): TT Bluesey
>>18296770None of them costs 7k.
>>18296770Gmt2 black bezel
>>18296770>>18296774Kys you nasty turkroach.
>>18296776you don't say>>18296777the trips have spoken>>18296778I'm not whoretadello, I told him to get a Rolex ages ago however
>>18296560>worst RolexYachtmaster II I guess, any of the "oversized" Rolex looks terrible anyway, that one is just the most obvious example.>worst OmegaIf we stay current and avoid a lotof the really weird stuff Omega made in the quartz era (movements that suck to set, modules that age horribly and can't be fixed, weird digital Speedmasters) then I guess the Olympic Chronometer because how the fuck is a three-hander with a basic painted dial costs HOW MUCH?>worst JLCEither any of the Reverso chronos (huge, ugly square proportions, bulky) or the women's versions of the Polaris that are stone-set and have no water resistance>worst CartierRoadster automatic and nothing else in my post comes even close.>worst PatekThe quartz versions of the Nautilus. None of them should cost more than 600 to produce at most.>worst VacheronDon't know orcare enoough to know much about their catalog so I guess the Overseas? I don't like the way it looks but it's probably a fine enough watch.>worst APSame as VC, I really don't care so one of the butt-ugly Marvel ROs.>worst CasioI dunno one of ther really basic three-handers that's meant to be thrown away because the battery change will cost more than the watch did.>worst Seiko (including Grand Seiko)If we're staying modern, maybe some of the sporty GS, these look like they belong in the mall. Seiko had some real weird stinkers in their history though, like Omega.>worst watch ever madeCartier Roadster, automatic.If you've handled it, if you've tried to wind or set its smooth conical crown and saw how fat it looks inperson, you know.
>>18296780Remember that once he gets a rolex, if you will also have a rolex, you will be the same as him.
>>18296781The Yatchmaster II is a masterpiece, you're too dumb and limited to "get" it.
>>18296782putting on a rolie is like taking the shahada, a new beginning, cleansed of your sinsliterally rolie wearers and non rolie wearsthis is the divide
Any brands other than projects watches the sell more atypical watches?
>>18296789>>18296789Anyone who wears a vintage VC, a vintage AP, a vintage moonphase PP, a gold rectangular Cartier or even a titanium G-square mogs the rollie wearer to death. Simple facts.
>>18296782No lie, I actually like my own Moser a little less after he started spamming his entry level one.(Though, I prefer the pre-Meylan company before they went all-in on meme watches)
>>18296781>Roadster automatic and nothing else in my post comes even close.I often forget this exists. This is indeed horrendous but to me it doesn't even come close to the Reverso Squadra Chronograph.The 2000s were rough.
>>18296794to the 0.1% boomers that know what those watches are sureto dab on normies, rolex is the apexa gshock won't mog anything>>18296788>yatchmaster
>>18296798I think the Reverso Squadra was worse because it was a perversion of an otherwise perfect design. They should have known better. The Roadster was a completely new design that just didn’t work.
>>18296802>a gshock won't mog anythingWrong. Strong, durable manly watches mog those gay and useless Rolex bezels like it's nothing.Gold and titanium G-Shocks. Audemars Piguet Royal Oaks. Panerai Luminor if you're a big wrist hairy chad.
>>18296809lil bro thinks he's Lex Steele on set with those big ass watchesI just realized that the new black gmt is actually black grey, I thought it was only reflections for a sec
>>18296815Looks like something a 56 years old dude would wear in his garden while pouring water on the flowers.
>>18296818>t. has never seen a watch IRL
>>18296821Come back once you have that Rolex so we can make fun of your little wrist and your poor-quality dirty sneakers just like the turkroach.
>>18296815>I just realized that the new black gmt is actually black greyIn person, it is a lot more subtle. In most lighting conditions it just looks all-black.
>>18296794You can enjoy both
>>18296834Sell them (they both suck) and get an Historiques Americaine.
>>18296824>make fun of your little wrist7,5" checking in here, actually I am the one calling out wristlets here, not you, wrong again>and your poor-quality dirty sneakerskek
>>18296770Always GMT Coke
What does /wt/ think about Carl F. Bucherer?
>>18296865Isn't that a watch dealer who started making watches? The movement on that thing looked pretty legit though.
>>18296865Very good-looking chronographs.
>>18296869>>18296871>Isn't that a watch dealer who started making watches?Yes, they now belong to Rolex.>Very good-looking chronographs.>The movement on that thing looked pretty legit though.I've always wanted to own a World timer. This one has a very clean design, this is what a Patek should look like. I'll have to look into the brand, you can get a WT for 7k.
>>18296875>Yes, they now belong to Rolex.kek you're right I've never thought of that
>>18296372 Guys, I recently got a fake watch and the craftmanship is so ridiculously good that I see zero point in getting originals (unless it's some shit like a $150k tourbillon). What do?
>>18296644Get this instead (I love it and wear it every day)
>>18296913Are you in a military or a skinny virgin pretending to be a big tough man? Somehow i think the latter is more probable.
>>18296922Yes and I'm not a skinny fag or a fat fuck, the watch is pretty comfortable (if use rolled up sleeves).
>>18296967Nice. Are the sensors any good?
Imagine being in your 40's and posting on 4chan, trying to flex you pension investments to an audience of teenager saving for a casio.
>>18296967poorfaggot
>>18297006That's basically all of our avatarfags
>>18296834Nothing to stop you from enjoying those or a G-Shock as well
>>18296913fugg I just might.The dimensions put me off a bit though -- the GG-1000 you posted is 55mm across which is just huge.Still might anyway.
>>18296372>Your budget150 USD>Watch type00's era steel curved design, or from previous eras i suppose>MovementDigital>Desired featuresDate if possible>Preferred strap optionSteel or leatherI want something like i had when i was a kid before niggers stole my backpack with the watch in it, it was something similar to a Nike D-Line but the shields in front of the screen could lift/move and reveal the date, also had gimmicky visual cues that looked like a car's digital stereo receiver.
tfw no g shock gf
>>18296862>does not exist in current iterations (yet)no I am NOT buying a vintage rolex shitter for new prices, fuck vintagefagscolamariner>>18296967>>18296913>>18296644>wearing analog gshocksngmi
>>18296560Explorer 2Cause it's an ugly pos that shouldn't bare the Explorer name
>>18297084True love is shock resist.
>>18296560>worst RolexThe pieces that are oversized versions of existing models (41mm DJ, 40mm, DD, 39mm Explorer)>worst OmegaThe Constellation. They've been beating it to death for 40 years but won't let it die.>worst JLCThe Polaris range. Doesn't know what it wants to be.>worst CartierThe Ballon Bleu, such a dated-looking mess>worst Patekthe 5520 Alarm Travel Time>worst VacheronEasily the Overseethe. It's never been anything other than a cope watch.>worst AP AP's such a fucking mess right now, the only good piece they have is the 15510ST>worst CasioCasios are disposable. Best/worst doesn't really apply.>worst Seiko (including Grand Seiko)You'll have to show me a good Seiko for frame of reference.>worst watch ever madeThe Royal Oak for what it did to the direction of the industry.
any suggestions for a nice simple watch for the office? nothing too fancy, just want to look a bit more professional. preferably under $500.
>>18297176>Started the trend for huge watches>Started the trend for watches with integrated bracelets>Sport watch with nautical inspiration, but it's not waterproof>Sport watch, but it's very delicate and not shock resistant>Huge bezel with screws>The watch is huge despite only having two hands and a date window>It's uncomfortable>Aesthetics over utility>Destroyed the most creative and fun watchmaker in the holy trinity
>>1829723635mm Tissot PRX.
>>18297236Casio
5 digit with SELOr current 36 Explorer?
>>182972855 digit all the way. It's not even close.
>>18297287The movement and bracelet tho.But ya the 5 digit is nearly perfect visually...
>>18297289I've owned both and went back to the old-style Explorer.Like you say, with the looks it's no contest but>the movementit's a simple 3-hand no date. It's still chronometer certified. You want the extra power reserve? It takes no time to re-set if it winds down. It's still a 50 hour power reserve anyway. the old school movements are arguably better and more robust. Rolexes were designed to be bulletproof in those days, as opposed to today, when they are designed to be serviced only by Rolex.>the braceletagain, the shitty, rattly, hollow bracelet sounds bad on paper, but it's also incredibly comfortable and it's still durable. Old Jubilees wear out, old Oysters really don't. Plus, a 114270 will be at most 20 years old, which is not enough time for the bracelet to wear out unless it's had the shit kicked out of it.
Good to know king.Interesting to see someone actually go back to the 5 digit (which is far more attractive)
>>18297289>The movementyou mean the cal 32xx that has an innate flaw vs the 31xx that were basically tried and tested for years and bombproof?
>>18297057Such a based collection.
>>18296984Pretty much accurate, so yes
>>18297066It looks big but the rubber straps fits pretty good on average wrists
>>18297236Casio or Timex or even an Orient, you don't need more than that
>>18297401indonesia is a toilet
>>18297089>>18297007I guess I'm just poor
>>18297285What a disgusting shitter. It serves no purpose. It's not even clear if it's meant to be a steel casual urban watch or a nostalgic tool for explorers. Whatever the case is for you, it looks like dogshit.
>>18297412Acceptance is the first step toward healing.
>>18296557>>18296544>>18296540>>18296528fine if I suck it up and increase the budget to below 5k, is the black bay 58 the best answer? The regular gmt and the pro look so thick
>>18297406Sure it is, so what is your point? I mean about those watches
>>18297418What do you mean?
>>18297426that ad is in indonesian. did you know that they wipe with their bare left hand? which wrist do you suppose the watch goes on?
>>18297428Ohh... that ad, I was just looking a casio model that fits a simple design. That's all.Don't be a retard, don't make fake assumptions I'm not a pajeet.
Go to the gym.
>>18296774I tried a bluesy on the other day and was honestly blown away. You have to experience them in person to get it.
>>18297436What kind of fake is that? They make 36mm fakes now?
>>18296770No date sub
>>18296834Fuck off avatarfag. we've seen your "collection" 100 times already
>>18297473Whoretadello still assblasted about being btfo'd I see
>>18297478Can you go one hour without mentioning that guy?
>>18296572>Hublot, Richard Mille and all that dogshit is the lowest horology has ever gotten.Forgot Jacob & Co. Just gaudy shit.
>>18297490There's something for everyone. And if most who can are willing to pay the 300K for said watches then so be it. Some people are willing to pay 20K for swiss made in china watches.
SWISS MADE IN CHINA
It doesn't matter that a 300$ watch has better finishing.It doesn't matter that 95% of my swiss watch is made in china.It doesn't matter that I paid 11000$It doesn't matter that my high end watch shares the same movement as an entry level Tissot.It doesn't matter that it got 40 hours of power reserve.It doesn't matter that it's stainless steele.It doesn't matter that no human hands touched the watch.It doesn't matter that it loses 10 seconds per day.
I really want this watch but put it on one of their bracelets and use it as a sports watch
I like my Seiko
I have a dream and it's called ANGELUS.
whoretadello
poorfaggots
>>18297440Probably one of the new Quaranta or Due, which are awfulPress-down casebacks, no WR, no more hacking, known warranty queens.
>>18297554WATER PROOFBased
>>18297621In less words...a garbage
>>18297621Is it really that hard to make a proper small panerai with like 100-200m water resistance? It makes no sense.
Why do some some watch guys consider Seiko shit-tier? Looks like a pretty accomplished brand if you ask me.>has been making timepieces since the 1890s>released the world's first quartz watch, almost deep-sixed the entire Swiss industry>best known for the Seiko 5, the gold standard for affordable automatics>provides movements for l*terally hundreds of watch brands>gateway drug for so many collectors/enthusiasts>pioneered Zaratsu polishing, an intricate and time-consuming process derived from traditional swordmaking techniques that no h'wite boi brand can replicate
>>18297686They're just really ugly, wonky and badly made. You know how Longines or TAG Heuer are often called "mall watches"? Well Seiko is basically a gas station brand.As for Grand Seiko, they're just an upgrade of a really shitty product. The proportions and design are still ugly as fuck.>ZaratsuAh yes, the ancient art of swordmaking using German machines.(it's a well established fact "Zaratsu" is derived from the German manufacturer "Sallaz")
>>18297686Seiko is a classic example of a brand that had a lot of things going right at a lot of different price points, they made something for everyone, they had technical and manufacturing breakthroughs that revolutionized the industry, but in later years they started cutting corners and raising prices while offering little to no improvement on the priducts and it killed what they had going.The seiko 5s are actually a good example, the modern seiko 5s are reissues of really popular classic budget friendly watches that are double or even triple the cost they originally were and I think the only thing they have that the old ones don't is handwinding and hacking seconds. They still won't be even give you sapphire crystals, it's more important to save a couple bucks per watch.
Oh wow, a new Moonswatch
>>18297716I actually thought the script said "Sneedmaster"
>>18297716Ok the "earthphase" looks kinda neat,It's probably a useless day/night indicator or something like that but it looks kinda cool.
What is /wt/'s opinion on rep luxury watches?
>>18297787If you use them as a backup for your real watches, fine. But if you want to try to pretend you have something you don't it's cringe.
>>18297787>autistic, expensive reps and admitting they're fakecringe>shitty 20 dollar day-date fakes and claiming they're genuinebased
hello
>>18297796RQLEK JUSTDATE bought fro a guy in a trench coat with an unidentifiable accent near your local tourist trap is SOVL
I got a double and single penis soikos. Surprisingly king seiko has better case and dial.
>>18297798Any watch with any kind of coating is cringe.
>>18297821how can you tell if both of them have 2 lifetimes of wear on them at this point
How careful are you with your arm movement? I always accidentally bump my watch on something hard. In my case, scratches are inevitable within the first few days of use.
>>18297236iced out gold Rolex day date replica
>>18297665If I made watches I will put screw down crown (and it's caseback too), that will be easy
Is this true?
>>18297918Yep.
>>18297918lol noPeople who think like this don't understand the dynamics of trends and marketing.With price increase and control over their production, Rolex is moving towards the high-end luxury segment (10k+).Tudor on the other hand is becoming the obvious choice for anyone with a 3 to 5k budget who want a good sports watch. Basically what Rolex used to be before the 2010s.Tudor is doing future classics for the younger generation (Y and Z).In 20 years nobody will think of Tudor as "poorman Rolex". It will just be Tudor. tl;dr:Tudor = VolkswagenRolex = Audi
>>18297949This kind of cope can only come from a Tooter owner who realized that he could have kept saving up a bought the Rolex he actually wanted.
>>18297963I have a Rolex actually.btw as a Rolex owner it's in your best interest Tudor becomes huge and successful. This means your Rolex will only gain in value.
>>18297907You say that but the newer Radiomir Quaranta with screw-down crowns also have bad WR lel
>>18297965What happens if Rolex and Tudor don’t make a single watch that you like?They’re all just so dull.
>>18297966Wow...they suck. The ASSembly is ass made, right?
>>18297972Buy something else?
>>18297972Then anything you buy will be an obvious cope for the Rolex you actually like but won't admit to liking because how could you possibly prefer any watch to a Rolex?
>>18297979> Mass appeal can only mean one thing : being the lowest common denominator.> Rolex is, this fact is undeniable, the best known maison today. It is the watch every uneducated consumer aspires to. Understanding this is what begins to separate one from the plebe.> Rolex, to put it in a way one of its owners would understand, is thinking Olive Garden is fine dining. After all, it is more expensive than Burger King and you may even need to place a reservation beforehand. It is exclusivity in the hands of millions, an elusive presence you will find everywhere. It is everything but exceptionnal, special, it is the status symbol of those who need it. And a man with status does not need a symbol for he has his status and that alone speaks for itself. > This simple, logical truth will anger the simple mind. "Cope!" he will scream, believing you are jealous of him who owns one of the most common and mundane pieces one could imagine. He is to be dismissed. "You are bitter!" he will cry, unable to even imagine he may not have been correct in his decision to adhere to the glib norm of the unaware. He is to be dismissed.> Would you give the time of day to a supposed cinéphile who believes himself legitimate after watching a C. Nolan film and "getting it"? To the man who thinks himself a connaisseur of the letters and routinely uses the term " kafkaesque" because he has once read The Metamorphosis (only after skipping the foreword, naturally) ?> These are lower still than the ignorant masses simply for believing themselves higher. They are to be ignored.> Rolex is Ronald McDonald in a three piece suit. He tells you that you are lucky : the McRib is available today. The common man believes he is getting an exceptionnal treat. The discerning man may enjoy the sandwich for what it is but will not be fooled into thinking it fine dining.
>seething at Rolex out of nowhere
>>18297980>the glib norm of the unawareThis is a shit pastaDare I say, a glib facsimilie :^)
>>18297798There's no reason at all in the world for a minimalist 3 hand watch to be over 38mm diameter. I could maybe understand if the dial was really intricate or depicted a scene or something, but it's a cheap looking sunburst shitter dial. It's not even thin. Like, unironically, why does this watch exist? What does it do better than watches in the same price range or even half of its price?The dial is a cool color. That's it, that's the entire list of things appealing about this watch.
>>18297980The pasta that, to this day, no one has been able to debunk.
>>18297918like the other guy said, tudor is becoming what rolex used to be in their prime. Love rolex, but I’ll buy a 5k bb 58 gmt over a 17k gmt master every day, I think the tudor might look better even.
>that will be 1 million eurobucks please
>>18298037>brought to you by the same people that made a one-of-one clock to celebrate Stern winning a regatta across Lake Geneva where the hardest part is affording the entrence feeEvery day that passes, I respect Patek less and less.
>>18298047Gotta say, though, pointing out how the Cubitus haters are just seething poorfags who will never own a PP anyway was based.
I love this kind of watches
>>18297887Same here. That's why my daily is a G-Shock and my 'dress watch' is also a G-Shock.
>>18297821Based, i have a single penis quartz as well.
>>18297856They are in very good condition for being 50 years old, i thought i would have to change the crystal, but simple cleaning and greasing will suffice.
>>18297787Only if you accept yourself that you're a nigger.
>>18297787no one will know
>>18298140Depends on what you’re wearing and what you do for a living. If you’re a bus driver wearing a solid gold Rolex is not believable, but an engineer wearing a Datejust is reasonable.
People talk and talk about Rolex, but they are not able to explain in words what they feel about Rolex.Rolex is like the old Mercedes Benz of the 80s and 90s (Bruno Sacco), when Mercedes made really reliable cars. It was the more conservative option when you have money and want to buy a quality car. Sober design, yes, somewhat boring, it retains its value and lasts a lifetime. And when you stop to look at it more closely you discover that its designs are great in their own way. A somewhat utilitarian luxury, it is not real luxury like a Bentley (AP) or a Rolls (PP), but it has surprising things like an S class.
>>18298164That's still one of the most beautiful limousines ever made.
>>18296372What does this image actually say?The asymmetric one has some stuff I do not understand. It’s clearly something bad but what the fuck is it saying?
>>18298164It's a nice car. I used to get molested in one of those, before moving out from Greece.
>>18298105I prefer the double penis myself, as it allows me to imagine two big tiddies futa frotting every time I check my watch.
>>18298181It basically tries to attribute to asymmetry the benefits of a more powerful mainspring thanks to a larger barrel.
>>18298181Movement on the right is 15% bigger but has 90% more power reserve.
>>18298186Kek
>>18298037Is that paul mckartney?
>>18297987Bro, why do you save text files of posts people made roasting your watches and spam them as replies to random watches?
New Tudor Pelagos FXD GMTFucking faux patina ruins it.
>>18298235>Fucking faux patina ruins it.What's the alternative, oh great watch critic?
>>18298239C3 or BGW9. The bright, long lasting lume formulas that Superluminova makes. The fauxtina is not very bright or long lasting, making it nothing but shittier for a sports watch.
Left or right strap? I have small wrists and I like tank watches so it's probably my only affordable choice.
>>18298239... Not using faux patina?
>>18298261Get the bracelet. You can get a much better quality leather strap for relatively cheap. Then you can swap them out for different looks.
>>18298235>fxdWhy do they do this? Why fuck up an okay design by giving it the worst possible option for lugs?
>>18298249Provide a render, or at least a pic with colors or representation.
>>18298278Google doesn’t work for you?
>>18297787>What is /wt/'s opinion on rep luxury watches?Depends on which ones, a lot are indistinguishable from the original and you'd be a retard if you bought the original for 10-100x the price. Much better than shit mall brands and homages and other cheap watches.
Heeee
>>18298230I just know it by heart.
>>18298232Tight watch, player.
>>18298082oi thats a right shitta that
>>18298270Because the first version didn't sell and they need to use up the cases.
What watch do I wear to signal to all of the chuds at the polls that I'm voting for the woman and there's nothing they can do to stop me?
>>18298342But why do that though? It's like weird psychopath behavior.
>>18298386Rolex
>>18298386Tissot, Moser, or Christopher Ward.
>>18298386nomosshinola
>>18298386Casio f91w
>>18296372Titanium watch+bracelet in the 2-5K range. Suggest.
>>18298386Unironically, casio f91w or everything that hodinkee makes/sells/suggest/recommends
>>18298386The one that says that you're a triple vaxxed cattle
>>18297236https://www.casio.com/us/watches/casio/product.A1100G-5/
What do you think?
i want something with a leather strap that's neither too outdoorsy nor too dressy. just something to wear to the office, preferably mechanical, that won't make me look like a complete poorfag or a richfag with no sense (ie. a mall brand)should i get a used Tank or something
>>18298843If they made this watch but smaller I probably would buy it for work. They made a kind of similar weekender field-ish watch that's 37mm that's kinda cool but the case shape isn't as nice and it doesn't have a bracelet and it has mineral crystal.
Remember when watches were good?
I'm not white. I'm brown. The reason I buy watches, the reason I developed an interest in them at all is because I've always seen them as a "white people" thing and when I wear a watch I feel just a little bit more white than if I had a naked wrist.
>>18298739So this then >>18296389
>>18298865When was that?
