>>18361987
overhyped. basically trying way too hard to rip off balenciaga with the dirty, muddy, distressed jeans they keep putting out

overpriced garbage

>>18361987
plebeian

>>18361987
>that'll be $700 for some jeans goy
No thanks, I'll stick to my Wranglers

>>18361987
Like many things scandi, absolute garbage.

Good quality basics. Who wears the high fashion shit anyways?

>>18361987
they have good sweatshirts imo

no clue i'll never pay that much for anything so basic

>>18365104
Overpriced but definitely not garbage.
If they halved their prices they'd be one of the best looking and most exciting brands on the market. Right now they're stuck in this limbo of having high fashion prices with a stagnant minimal aesthetic that's not luxury enough to justify them. Still looks great though.

>here are some ugly ass barrel jeans with retarded shit literally painted on it (????)
>$800 please
>every cent gets donated to our "astroturf all online communities" charity fund :)
these scandi niggers wish they were margiela

every single scandinavian brand is the same

>>18368979
>definitely not garbage
>aware why they're garbage "right now"
acne has always been garbage with gaslight, marketing campaign tax mark up. "high fashion" no different from Zara, Uniqlo, or most tiktok startups that did basic research into chinese manufacturers BTW.

>>18361987
$700 for made in china plastic jeans is robbery