Gen Z started the slim fit hate because they are ugly and obeseIf you are fit, then slim fit will look 10,000 times better on youAnd even if you are not, you still look like a slob in baggy pants
>>18367053Idk how to break it to you but in current year only gay men still dress this way and you know I’m right
>>18367055Yeah on skibidi fr fr
>>18367053Why does this BOY not tuck his shirt in? I want to see that genital bulge
>>18367053>Men look GREAT in skin-tight clothing!No, they look like faggots. It's unprofessional and compromising.Men don't compromise.
>>18367053Another really great woke thread about retarded shit that has been out of fashion the minute after every NPC started wearing itBTW that pic is AI generated. Try posting actual humans next time.
Why are you guys all so retarded? > Millenials: slim fit is best> Zoomers: noo as loose and baggy as possible is best> Coping gym bros and lards: nooo athletic fit is best You are all just coping with the fact that clothes suck now. What is wrong with traditional classic and straight leg with a mid or high rise? They objectively look the best. The problem is you can rarely buy them off the rack at Nordstrom so you pretend like they don’t exist.
>>18367290>It's unprofessional and compromisingWrong
>>18367053Ew.. he is so ugly, why did you post this.?
>>18367053I prefer slim fit over whatever it is zoom zooms are doing but in your picture it's a bit too much where it just becomes dated and cringe. It's important to distinguish between slim fit and skinny fit.
>>18367053No man will ever look better (let alone 10,000 times better) when wearing skinny jeans. A man's legs should look like tree stumps in pants, almost uniformly thick. Not taper hard like chicken drumsticks. That's a really feminine look, especially if you are fit with thick thighs. And for that you need at least straight fit. Slim fit (actual slim fit where the legs gradually expand down the knees up to the hem, not skinny fit) is also acceptable as long as the leg opening is decently wide, like at least 7 inches.
>>18367485If there's one single complaint I have about jeans, it's the "5-pocket" style that DOMINATES them. It's too small and pointless.I'm not fat. I'm very tall and decently athletic (focusing on my legs), so when I wear my "classic fit" and even "relaxed fit" jeans with their DAMNED 5-POCKET set up, I can't even put my hand in there, or my keys or whatever. It's genuinely aggravating.I want SIDE pockets. Give me pockets I can ACTUALLY USE.
>>18367485Damn whose uncle is that? Is he on his way to his programming job, or an anime convention?Does he have to mow grass later?
>>18367515Maybe try carpenter jeans. Their pockets are kind of side-ish.
>>18367515Do you mean CARGO PANTS you absolute fucking retard? How have you never heard of cargo pants?
>>18367576I do own those, yes. I was simply commenting on the 5-pocket style so commonly posted so others might feel some sympathy to their dislike for tight jeans.>>18367583I exclusively wore those in elementary school and middle school (late 90s) yes. When I am actually wearing work-related clothing, I have some canvas pants I use, not jeans. I'm simply approaching 40 and I remember how much I disliked 5-pocket style jeans.
>>18367515How the fuck. I am a fat fuck and I only have a levis 501, and even that has pockets so deep it’s like I am scratching my balls when I wanna take out my phone. What are you putting in your pockets, a nintendo seitch?
>>183675935 pocket style jeans are the best imo. I don't know why people even like side pockets on pants. Everything you put in them will slip out when you sit down, especially phone and wallet. They are also much easier to pickpocket than front pockets. The only thing side pockets are good for is using as hand warmers.Your problem with front 5 pocket setup is probably due to your height. But in general I think they are much more functional and secure than side pockets. It's also why I don't like wearing chinos. The pockets are completely useless in modern times.
>>18367598This is me next to other people for some scale (and, as mentioned, I love my cargos/carpenter's). Maybe it's my buttocks being large, maybe it's because I wear a belt and keep my pants raised next to my waist, and yes, I'm 6'2" and taller with shoes, but small pockets have always infuriated me. Too small, it pinched my thighs, it crumpled my groin.I'm happy if you like your 5-pocket, but I do recommend at least giving side-pockets a try next time you're out shopping; you might like them more.
>>18367603Same anon and it's precisely why I like wearing my chinos, corduroy and other pants. The pockets are large enough to actually use, nothing ever falls out, and it's wildly more comfortable, for me.Then again, I guess it's just because I'm a big guy.
>>18367290>t. Sex not haver
>>18367053>slim fit pants>skinny pants>tapered pantsstop this shit for the love of all that is sacred, it looks tacky on women and fucking disgusting and gay on men
>>18367639Baggy pants make you look like a triple faggot, and straight pants make you look like a plumberDont even get me started on baggy suit pants, looking like a fucking 1950s detective
>>18367053im going to be honest with you OP its millennials that started the slim fit hate (despite championing skinny jeans 10-15 years ago) because theyre old and fat now and cant fit into those clothes anymore and are too bitter to cope in a healthier way about itt. zoomer
>>18367644>baggy suit pants, looking like a fucking 1950s detectiveAnd how is that a bad thing you fucking aging millennial retard? Imagine thinking looking like a woman in your gay little tight jeans that show off your plump curves is better than normal, roomy men's pants.
>>18367657>posting a woman when the discussion is about mens slim jeansAre you actually retarded?
>>18367662That's the point, retard. Your skinny and slim fit jeans were originally meant for women to show off their ass and thighs. You are a literal faggot if you think skinny jeans look better on men than regular/straight/relaxed fit jeans.
>>18367671Then why not post a picture of a man looking like a woman in skinny jeans you retard? That’s clearly a woman so obviously it looks like a woman.>You are a literal faggot if you think skinny jeans look better on men than regular/straight/relaxed fit jeans.You realize you’re the only one in this thread who has mentioned skinny jeans, right? The OP even said “slim” in his post. Stupid ESL.
>>18367053no, it's because they are highly insecure and want to hide away under a security blanket. the millennial security blanket is a baseball cap and sunglasses at the same time
>>18367676>Then why not post a picture of a man looking like a woman in skinny jeansI don't need to. OP already has. The guy in his pic looks like a little bitch on his way to a gay bar.> you’re the only one in this thread who has mentioned skinny jeansBecause OP posted an image of skinny jeans, probably because most people these days use slim and skinny interchangeably.
>>18367685>I don't need to. OP already has. The guy in his pic looks like a little bitch on his way to a gay bar.He looks fine. Post your fit. I guarantee you’re a fattie. I’ll wait.Tytwr
>>18367690No straight man thinks he looks fine. And I have never been fat my entire life. I'm pretty thin. In fact, I'm the kind of guy who can pull off skinny jeans the most because they wouldn't look like women's pants on my scrawny legs. But I would never wear them because they're gay.
>>18367644>Baggy pants make you look like a triple faggot, and straight pants make you look like a plumberretard take if not bait, straight/baggy has been the norm for literally all of history
>>18367290Facts. >>18367303Amazon sells straight fit jeans and pants. That's what I prefer too.>>18367328Those guys are married and doing 69's WITH EACH OTHER every night. >>18367548Have fun with low test since you want every gay guy to stare at your ass.>>18367728Yes. From Shaolin community, monks, Kung Fu, Middle East, and many others. Baggy and loose was always normal dress code for everyone for many centuries since it doesn't tempt others to look at someone's curves or bulge.
>>18367758Nigga you wear amazon jeans get the fuck outta here go back to your fat wife with fibromaglia
>>18368043Not him, but you talk like a nigger. Worse, a zoomer wigger. Nothing you say will ever be worth anything.
yeah lemme dess like some zesty retard nigger in france. LMAO no thanks.
>>18367303millenials were 12-13 when jncos were popular and in late teens/early 20s when ultra slim fit jeans and even the emo trend of wearing skin women's jeggings was popular. they wore all manner of pants styles.
>>18368054Would rather be a wigger than go on the fashion board and complain about guys dressing well, and not like divorced dads
>>18368074Hilarious how you seethe at everything that's traditionally masculine and think dressing like an effeminate faggot is "effay". This is what happens when your culture gets pussified. Just start wearing stockings and a little tutu and get it over with.
>>18368043Amazon carries levis, lee, izod, Wrangler, Calvin Klein, and many more. You seem like a very young ignorant child.
>>18367303Millennials liked both slim and baggy.
>>18367303It’s all so tiresome.
>>18367583They’re also called carpenter pants, as in the vast majority of European languages, you rude burger dumbfuck.
>>18367053Roast me
>>18368126>and baggyyeah, sure, the early ones in the first half of the 2000s
