The three options I've narrowed down, whatever gets most votes after a few hours i'll pull the triggerLacoste L2966 210Giorgio Armani AR7125 5026Persol PO3092V 9066
they look the same lmao, armani looks bigger tho, so avoid these
>>18370575roudness of the persols look niceset imo, lacoste 2nd
Why can't white men take their smallest of decisions by themselves? Why do they need consensus from their online fellow retards to do even the smallest purchase?They are all too big for your face retard. Kill yourself
>>18370575>>18370578thispersol is the way
>>18370575Try aviators
>>18370575persol is the only serious brand you posted and i own 3 pair and absolutely love them
They all look a bit too big IMO?If I had to choose I would go persol
>>18370575something else > armani >> lacoste >>>> persol
What an ugly fag. Get contacts or LASIK and a better fucking haircut, christ.
>>18370575No offence, but they all look retarded. Not that your face helps.The biggest problem is how the glasses rise above your eyebrows. That messes up the division of your face. Something with narrower glasses would look better.Also, a (rounder) rectangular shape would match your chin better. Circular and elliptic shapes are better for people with angular chins.Out of the three models, the Persol ones look best, but comparing them to other models I've seen recently, I'd still rate them somewhere around 3/10.
>>18370742I'm just at the mall buddy Minimal effort>>18370589thank you>>18370577lmaootherwise seems like persol is winning here, thanks friends
>I want to be be Patrick Bateman but the Store doesnt have Oliver Peoples' framesEither go for something like Pic related or aviator style just with a straighter bottom
They're all too big for your face.
>>18370707So he can look like a d-bag try hard.
I need to get glasses too, which kind would fit me best?
>>18371356Tried fixing the picture but it's stuck sideways for some reason