[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Let's say that someone is just starting and they have great genetics for muscle and strength. Like they progress much faster than others. How many inches can they add to their baseline arm measurement in a year? What about in total? Would 1.5 inches in a year and 4 inches in a decade be unrealistic if someone has good genetics for lifting?
>>
>>74229144
Sorry man I failed calculus.
Does he eat beans?
>>
>>74229144
Dependent on too many factors
Are they lean? Are they fatceps? How tall are they? Are they bulking?
I'd say the average male can get 16" arms pretty easily granted they have solid genetics and they actually train triceps as a priority
>>
>>74229144
Not a single vein or separation in that picture
That person will go down to 14.5" arms after they cut a layer of fat off them
>>
>>74229169
What about 2 guys who are 6' tall on a bulk
>Man A: 18" fatceps
>Man B: 16.5" lean arm
As their baseline because their genetics are solid for muscle building
>>
>>74229144
I have 16.2 inch arms cold/flaccid, 16.8 inch with tumescence.

I added about an inch to my arms with 16 weeks of focused arm training, most of it is just inflammation tho.

T. Average genetics, 200mg Test-E, 180cm, 87kg bodyweight.
>>
>>74229144
18 inches is around the upper limit naturally, 17 inches shredded (sub 12% bodyfat). This is with really good arm genetics + excellent
and consistent training for 5+ years.

Now the average joe can probably only achieve 16 inches while still being lean.
>>
>>74229475
>18 inches is around the upper limit naturally
Need a source for that.
>>
>>74229531
Nta but it's rare to get 18 inches naturally while under 15% bf let alone 12%.
Most guys who can achieve it will be tall.
>t. 6'3 18in 16% bf
>>
>>74229144
>it's 16 inchest
it's not, tape is folded :D it's 14 maybe, i have 14 almost and they are bigger (and leaner, wtf is this pulp lol)>>74229306
>inflammation tho
water bro, so sorry for ur loss of valls due to injection of *** oils, how do u cope with castration? did u get ur gyno yet?
>pic covers tits
yes u did, man that's rough
>>
>>74229599
shut it ranjeet
you have tiny arms
no need to attack others, just work on yourself
>>
>>74229832
>ranjeet
how raicis of u :D
> you have tiny arms
not enormous, but they are getting there, i have seen increased measurements every week and that means basically every 2 sets of curls xD
>but it takes u half an hour with warmup and other stuff
yea
>>74229832
>no need to attack others
it's just u bot, so no animals were hurt during writing that post xD
>>
File: 1715220602770267.jpg (120 KB, 1200x675)
120 KB
120 KB JPG
>>74229921
>>74229832
>>74229599



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.