>me after turning every active discussion on the board into a steroid thread
>>74617659okay but literally everyone is on steroids though and fitness/aesthetics aren't even discussable without drawing the difference.
>>74617795natty moment
>>74617840Nobody is natty anymore. It’s a shame.> while reports of AAS use among gym attendees ranged from 3.5% to 80% (27)(The 3% was a Curves fitness center by the way) > bodybuilders, with rates ranging from 33.3% to 79.5% You are all bodybuilders by the definition they usedhttps://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Fulltext/2021/08000/Anabolic_Androgenic_Steroid_Use_in_Sports,_Health,.26.aspx#> men who regularly attend the gym, they found that within this group, 30.4 percent said they used steroids.https://www.inverse.com/article/55955-anabolic-steroid-survey-misuse
>>74617659Based>>74617990>men who regularly attend the gym, they found that within this group, 30.4seems pretty consistent with what I see in the gym, I don't really see the issue here since it's pretty easy to tell when someone is on steroids
>>74617990Based on how I look as a life natty and comparing to the physiques of people in the gym I think it's massively bullshit. Its stupidly easy to spot people who roid after you've lifted for a couple of years
>>74618037k dude, glad you shared your amateur opinion, I'm sure the research scientists with a 4-8 specialty education in this matter are simply mistaken because your bro-spirit instincts disagree.
>>74618132I only ever say things which are correct and you can shove your soience up your dickhole nerd
>>74618132So 1/3 of serious gym goers are on steroids and you're assblasted for some reason?
>>74618132TRUSTT LE SCIENCE
>>74617990Even Patty?
