Just when I thought we had witnessed the limits of female promiscuity with skin tight see through booty shorts and sports bras, girls have come up with a new way to be degeneratenow they pull the sides of their thongs up so their strings are clearly visible against the backdrop of their bare hips. Today a group of barely legal white girls were doing this right in front of me and I absolutely could not take it. These are 17-19 year old girls. STILL GROWING. LITTLE KIDS.Why are women allowed to dress like its a strip club? When will this end?
>>75356108Cum
>17-19>KidsThat's the age of peak fertility.Really weird to call someone most capable of becoming a mother a child.Even stranger when you then fetishize women past peak fertility instead of before.Sounds like you just want to be able to fuck women without the commitment or self restraint.Who's the pervert now?
>>75356198Frontal lobe is still developing until 24.
>>75356203>SHE WAS ONLY 23 YEARS, 11 MONTHS AND 29 DAYS OLD YOU PEDO
Your lust is frankly disgusting.Sex and sexuality is for reproducing.>>75356203last time I checked that wasn't a part of the female reproductive organ.Be a respectable man that can be trusted with someone who is still developing and maybe you can have children.Fun fact when children are born they are younger than 24.
>>75356203If she old enough to reason, she in season
>>75356108>These are 17-19 year old girls. STILL GROWING. LITTLE KIDS.they are adults and are at the peak of their attractivenessyou are being extremely gay
>>75356108>tattoosRuined
>>75356203Well it doesn't take brains to have sex
>>75356203so we shouldn’t let women vote, drive, or work until they are 24? i agree
>>75356315Based.
>>75356315Women can still do those things, but that doesn’t stop older men with fully developed frontal lobes from taking advantage through manipulation of younger girls. Any guy dating a girl under 24 is a pedophile who wouldn’t be able to handle a woman his age
>>75356203Good then she won't be smart enough not to fall for my bullshit
>>75356357>older men with fully developed frontal lobes from taking advantage through manipulation of younger girls.Haven't you just described why they shouldn't be able to vote
>>75356357so sex is manipulation but political brainwashing isnt?eat a dick you kike
>>75356357man bait used to be believable
>>75356370>>75356368Manipulating a girl for sex is far worse than a girl being manipulated by political campaigns. One causes trauma and one is harmless.
>>75356357>be me, 22 at the time>start dating 16 to cutie>take her virginity etc>ffw 14 years, married and kidNow listen: https://vocaroo.com/1lsLCYEsw4AUCope seethe dilate etc
>>75356357>a pedophile who wouldn’t be able to handle a woman his ageWhy aren’t these mutually exclusive and why should I even want to handle a woman my age, why should a relationship with a woman that needs to be handled even desirable
>>75356381this has to be the worst bait ive ever seen
>>75356381one causes (((((trauma))))) and the other causes irreperable damage to society and ruins the lives of millions of people
>>75356357Women actually develop faster than men, iirc their brains finish development at 24 while men finish at 26, hence the 25 average.
>>75356388>implying a girl above AoC in developed countries gets "trauma" from getting fucked by an older man she WANTED to fuck
>>75356381Trauma is harmless while politics actually hurt people you’re fucked in the head
>>75356384And you think a 21 year old wants your old wrinkly ass? No, she wants a cute and young 21 year old boy. The only reason young girls end up messing with older men is because they get manipulated into it. 90% of couples have a 1-3 year age gap.
>>75356405Thats literally not your problem
>>75356396theres a reason I typed trauma in a bunch of paranthesis, because thats exactly what I meantdid I need to explicitly say in additional paranthesis that its sarcasm and that its not real for you to get it?
>>75356405>I'm manipooooolating aaahhhhh
>>75356411Fair enough
>>7535638314 years and only one kid? 4 or more is the reich standard.Still respectable to be bold enough to ignore everyone else's delusion and tenacious enough to stay committed.>>75356405Plato advises that there ought to be a 10 year age gap with a 30 year old man and 20 year old woman.Aristotle advised that the ideal age for getting married was a 37 year old man with an 18 year old woman.You might be on the side of normative ethics but no one respected for their wisdom is on your side.
>>75356420Oh forgot to mention that Mary, mother of Christ, was 12 years old when the creator of the universe got her pregnant.
>>75356108is the exposed thong coming back into style? I remember chicks would do this when I was in highschool (02-07) and it was hot as fuckwe used to snap the thongs, it was a thing and nobody got punishedgood times
>>75356315Same with men
>>75356427That isn't trueScripture has zero mention of Joseph's or Mary's ageScholarly deduction says that best guess they were both young adults with Joseph maybe been a year or few older than MaryThe whole "Mary was 12 and Joseph was 50-60" rhetoric was started by Jews and pushed by Muslims trying to deflect the fact that Mohammed fucked many kids (age specifically mentioned) as explicitly stated in their own writings
>>75356108I saw a 12 yo with her mom do the same thing, she had her bikini strings showing above her sweatpants and in college I saw a girl showing her thong above her pants, straight whale tailing it for everyone to see her purple laced underwear.
>>75356420To be fair aristotle and platos statements are just as normative and irrelevant even if by a different logical goal. The age of consent is whatever a girl and her father agree to, or whatever she wants it to be when she emancipates yourself. Whatever problems you imagine arising out of the freedom stance on things, government has proven itself to make things far worse with the clintons trafficking children out of haiti for blood libel and a pizza place across the street from the white house with tunnels for trafficking children.
>>75356575>>75356515Whatever, I know personally that a 14 year old friend of mine really likes the book Lolita.She's hardly alone.Read into that as much as you want.
>>75356357You don't even know what a lobe does.Saying one develops the until 24 just sounds like it's a definitive marker for something, but it's not.Quit infantilizing young women 18-23, you aren't their fucking nanny and they don't need a fucking nanny.Prohibiting men from paying young women sexual attention is a mating strategy among modern "career women" who fell for the feminist meme and didn't reproduce when their nature was trying to tell them to because of social pressure from older women who wanted to horde single males attention.
>>75356586>I know personallyno you dont
>>75356203That is the dumbest feminist talking point yet. Wait till your brain is wired completely and unable to change to new stimuli (such as living with a lover) and then wonder why things just aren’t working out.
>>75356524This lmao little girls are all dressing like sluts these days, I saw so many preteens in string bikinis this summer, it’s a new world. I once saw this little girls birthday party at a park and it was like roller derby themed or something and all these legit elementary school girls had fishnets and shiny fabric hot pants and tube tops on they looked like 9 year old prostitutes and their mothers were overjoyed.
>>75356427Correct and has been long taught to anyone who went to seminary to become a priest/pastor or any bible college. They only recently started to try and hide this fact because zoomers and millennials apparently can’t worship a god who called a 12 yo “blessed among women”.
>>75356515Cope. Also who said Joseph was that old? He was likely 16-25. Unless you’re a retarded catholic who thinks Mary was his second wife. Spoiler alert, God may have tapped her first, but Joseph bent her in two every night after she healed. James is the half brother of Jesus.
>>75356694In the 1850s, the age of consent in the United States varied by state, ranging from 7 to 12 years old: Delaware: The age of consent was 7 years old. Most states: The age of consent was 10 to 12 years oldIt was in 1920 that the age of consent was raised to 18 by none other than childless feminists.What you're describing is how people normally act despite delusional roasties take it upon themselves to tell everyone else how to live.
>>75356724what are you possibly rambling about
>>75356771Correcting you on your misunderstanding about the nature of Mary. God’s ethereal penis impregnated her without breaking her hymen at age 12. After Jesus broke her hymen when he was born and she healed from the birth tearing, Joseph clapped those cheeks giving Jesus half brothers and sisters. The most notable half brother being the author of the book of James.
>>75356728yeah it was totally feminism that caused the age of consent to go up, not the advent of modern medicine or the infant mortality rate plummeting for the first time in recorded history. dumb pedo faggot
>>75356922and it definitely wasnt because of the industrial revolution where men went to work instead of breeding their wives/daughters for 15 farmhands.i hate women probably more than you do but you’re retarded >>75356728
>>75356108I would impregnate her right there and then
>>75356930No it wasn’t. It lies squarely with the Temperance and Suffrage feminist movements.
>>75356203For men. Women stop developing mentally at 14.
>>75356944>muh prohibition they were protestants you dumb faggot. you’re the same faggot in every one of these closet pedo threads about bitching about how the age of consent used to be 7, like you were somehow robbed of a child bride. its sad as fuck bro lmao
>>75356922the fuck does that have to do with anything? You just want to throw that word around because it makes you feel tough. But actually you're just a danger to yourself and others, more than a literal pedophile. After all, pedos can realize they're fucked and take their meds and get therapy and be monitored... but you think you're god's gift to the world.>>75356944this is 4chan you can just say jews
>>75356968>child attracted person angry at the word pedokek
I’ve been waiting my entire fucking life for whale tales and low rise genes to finally make a comeback
>>75356108huh in Europe 14-16 year olds do it and it's hot and also legal
>>75356357Bad bait. 18 year olds are hot
>>75356965It was lead by women you historically illiterate faggot. They were the same left over old hags and used the church to morally blackmail the nation. They are the same movement.
>>75356996protestant women.
>>75356357>if a man dates a girl under 24 he's taking advantage of her>if the government puts a girl that just turned 18 into 10$K+ in debt for college it's called 'helping' These are the people that vote for Kamala ladies and gentlemen
>>75356922What do those have to do with anything, even the infant mortality argument wouldn’t explain it as a law, just as a custom
>>75356968The jews aren’t the only people who ever caused problems pietists contributed their fair share of bullshit to our world
>>75357001Left over women who hated being under mens thumbs while also being unmarried. Subversion is the playbook of jews and cat women, and they are intertwined as the other anon pointed out. The temperance movement’s major male proponent was a (((newspaper owner))) who sensationalized their “plight”. The movement was “Christian” out of convenience to twist the morality to their whims. It was a prop to be discarded once they held better ground. And it was discarded easily for cigarettes and bra burning.
>>75357015because it eliminates any real logical and legitimate reason for marrying a 7 year old, and it just leaves the obvious reason is that you’re just a pedo attracted to literal children. >>75357029and any of that mean anything as to why you want to have sex with kids?
>>75357057Because there is no moral reason for it other than the government being henpecked to use force against men who want a wife that will actually be a wife.
>>75357081>theres no moral reason against marrying childrenshitskin
>>75356904>God’s ethereal penis impregnated her without breaking her hymen at age 12.a very gross and wrong personal interpretation of MaryShe was not 12, and God did not have sex with herMary is explicitly referred to as a woman, placing her at 18 at the youngest or just slightly older around 20Even then there is zero direct sources that give us the age of Mary or Joseph, the best guess being they were both young adults in some generic sense as it truly bares no importance>Joseph clapped those cheeks giving Jesus half brothers and sisters. The most notable half brother being the author of the book of James.There is zero significance in mentioning James or the possibility of Jesus having siblings at allIt does not matter in the slightestJesus is STILL the Son of God whether He had brothers or sisters or notMary is STILL the Blessed Eternal Virgin and Mother of God whether her and Joseph had sex and had other kidsThe only reason the sibling argument or Mary's age is ever mentioned regarding Mary is to spread anti-Catholic and anti-Mary rhetoric
>>75356108I would wring the sweat out of that thong directly into my mouth
>>75357088Redneck actually. My great grandma was 14 my great grandpa was 27. My grandparents were both 17. My mom was 24 and my dad was 25. Guess who got divorced? Guess who was the most madly in love? And because my Great grandma and grandmother were so young I got to know both of then really well and hear all the stories and learn my family history. Better roots, better times.
>>75357081Not to mention the government trafficks children and they would arguably safer married
>>75357102She is not the eternal virgin because she got bent over ever my night by Joseph after Jesus was born. She is also with the dead in the cloud of witnesses and can’t hear you to answer prayers. She has no power. Lastly, when the bible says “The spirit of the Lord overshadowed her” it is the same overshadow that is used when David overshadowed Bathsheba. It is sexual in nature. God entered her womb and fertilized an egg. That is sex.
>>75357118They absolutely would be safer married. People act like reversing AoC is going to have girls lined up in brothels when in fact that is exactly what we encourage right now. And even if they aren’t trafficked, the “free” girls are bombarded with OF and porn as being the greatest career path in their youth and to avoid falling in love and having children at any cost.
rules do not apply to women. If they did that'd mean women would have responsibility for their actions. As we all know women have less responsibility than children.
>>75357132Who would I listen to regarding this?The Church that has existed for over 2000 years that Christ made, or your personal secular view that's influenced by everything being about sex>She is also with the deadGod is the God of the living, not the deadEveryone in Heaven is more alive than us>can't hear you to answer prayersChurch says otherwise and Revelations 6 and 7, plus it was a tradition started by the early Christians that knew much more about the faith than you or me, so I put my trust in them>“The spirit of the Lord overshadowed her” it is the same overshadow that is used when David overshadowed Bathsheba. It is sexual in nature. God entered her womb and fertilized an egg. That is sex.God overshadowing something is a spirtual sense of superiority and awe, like how one might say you are "in someone's shadow"The word "overshadow" is never mentioned with the story of David and Bathsheba, it explicitly states that they had sex, with the original Greek saying he "laid" with herYou are bastardizing Mary and God and His Church
>>75357174You can’t argue with a catholic. My theory is their ceremonial boy rape at catechism just blocks all ability to reason thereafter.
>>75356203it's not
>>75357184Yeah it is actually 25 when the main wiring is finished with little plasticity remaining. DHA might be a mitigating factor in this, but the average person is cut off at 25.
>>75357183>I'm wrong so I'm going to say more anti-Catholic rhetoric!I accept your surrender, and I hope one day you accept that God and the Saints and Mary are bigger than your current view of them
>>75357194No I’m not wrong. You are the one who is bending scripture to your whims. But catholic’s don’t actually care about scripture. They care what the pope says and follow his edits rather than the word of God as written. That’s why you worship so many gods in the form of those graven images you claim are saints.
There’s deceptively little cunny posting itt
>>75357205>I'm so right that I'm going to just say more baseless anti-Catholic rhetoric!!!I accept your surrender>But catholic’s don’t actually care about scripture.We put it together, you're welcome :)Crazy to think you can use the Bible to "debunk" the Church when they compiled it and decided what was canon>They care what the pope says and follow his edits rather than the word of God as writtenThe Pope has never edited Scripture>That’s why you worship so many gods in the form of those graven images you claim are saints.Your view/practice of worship is very low and watered down compared to Catholic worship, that's why you think veneration and intercession (which is prayer) is worship and idolatry or paganism or whatever, because you have no clue what real worship is
>>75357205KJV bible is the only one and true word of God my friend and I hope you are reading for there. Also you can become a saint aswell, all of disciples of Jesus Christs are saints, see John 8:31-32. In order though for this to happen you have to obey to God's word and go according to his will, that means getting baptized. John 3:5, Acts 2:38, Tidus 3:5. Praise the Lord
>>75357242My sinner friend, you are following man-made directions written by people who write fiction and have their religious entertainers preach babylonian myths of Rome in this instance,your pastor. God's word is written in the bible(KJV) and only you can read the word of God and understand it and you don't need 'theologians' to tell you what is right and wrong because God's word is clear but in order for this to happen you have to believe in our Lord's words in spirit and in truth.John 4:24. So stop listening to man-made doctorines and open your Bible today and be born again. Amen
>>75356728But they didn't dress like sluts.
>>75357102Jews are considered women after 13 - bat mitzvah.Jewish scholars also say it is okay to fuck a girl as long as she is younger than 3 because the hymen grows back.
>>75356108>now they pull the sides of their thongs up so their strings are clearly visible against the backdrop of their bare hipsWomen have been doing this for decades. Why does it bother you? You some kind of faggot or something?
>>75356515>>75357102>>75357174>>75357194>>75357242very based brother in christ. amen
>>75356108>19>LITTLE KIDFuck right off.
>>75357277unfortunately. Although I did just look up 19th century nude paintings and the tits are perky like a 13 year olds so someone must have known what's good.
>>75356357I'm 32 and fucking a petite 19 yo black girl, shits cash. Cry about it here is your (you)
>>75356357>Any guy dating a girl under 24 is a pedophile who wouldn’t be able to handle a woman his ageWell if they literally can't handle an older woman, it's good they go after younger women they're a better match for, right? What's the issue? Seems to me like everyone benefits.
>>75357848Sure as shit sounds like a win-win to me.The older woman will most likely want a REAL man anyways so let one of those handle her.Im not really a REAL man so I cant really handle an older woman so Ill just go for the younger cutie.
>>75357252Most of the OT is jewish lies though.All you need is Proverbs and New Testament. A lot of the Apocrypha is worth reading though.
>>75357888Based trips of logic and self understanding
>>75356203I know this is bait, but for those of you who ever meet a tranny who says this, realize that the average life expectancy of human ancestors is 25-30 years old, and the frontal lobe in particular evolved to prolong development as long as possible in order to maximize intelligence. It only ended at 25 because, until recent human history, 70% of humans died off by then, buffering the selective pressure for delayed developed.Essentially, the actual argument is reversed and nature estimated that you should've already fulfilled your biological mission and bred children by the time your brain has fully developed, i.e. before 25. As morbid as it sounds, as soon as one is physically developed enough to safely give birth, they're old enough to have sex. This is universal across all mammals.
>>75356198Lmfao, not only kids but>Little kidsThis nigger is unironically putting 18 year old women with tits and fanny hair and a preferred alcoholic drink into the same category as prepubescent children. What a nonce
>>75356224When do women ever use reason, though?
>>75357936Average life expectancy of our ancestors was absolutely not 25-30. If you survived childhood you'd likely live to your 60s-70s.But you're right about the fertility part. Also, I don't understand why the brain "still developing" would somehow preclude reproduction. If one is biologically capable of reproduction then why would the state of the brain matter so long as the parenting instincts are there? Why do they assume that the development between 18-24 is somehow development that makes one a better parent? Maybe all of the hardwired, basic skills for survival and reproduction are already well developed by mid-teens and it's only ancillary stuff that gets refined in our 20s. It's just cope for slags who are salty about older men preferring nubile younger women
>>75356108This thread was made by a towl head
>>75356357>actual reddit spacingThis has to be b8
>>75356108Open thread, save pic, close thread
>>75356975>low rise genes to finally make a comebackManlets have always been here though?
>>75357961Wrong. Abortion has lead to medicine that saved us from diarrhea. We barely ever touched 40.
>>75357242Catholics suck shit out of the priests ass and call it communion. I went to bed and you stayed up and stewed in your anger. An anger you only get when you know your world view is wrong but you have to justify it or have an identity crisis. Keep losing.
>>75356203Maybe for you, you nutrient deficient retard
>>75357252>>75357268King James onlyism has to be the dumbest "Christian" doctrine besides Christian zionism. I can't believe there's people retarded enough to believe it.
>>75357229middle > right > left
>>75357252>>75357268>KJV supremacist >doesnt know that the KJV bible is full of translational errors and wasnt authorized by the Church to be written>doesnt bring up how the KJV removed books they dont like because it supports Catholic doctrine like purgatory and intercession >calls Catholic doctrine man-made and pointless when all of it is based in Scripture and the traditions of the early Christians who built the Church>open your Bible today and be born againCatholics are the reason you have the Bible, to try and say the Bible debunks Catholicism is truly low IQ>>75358508>more anti-Catholic rhetoric and angerIm sorry but I trust the Church Fathers more than you or your facebook pastor I accept your concession
>>75356405Not necessarily, I’m 26 and my gf is 21
>>75358947My favorite scripture is>The Lord came unto Mary, crying UH-OH! Mary tummy EROTIC!
>>75358947Catholics have fought the bible, what the fuck are you talking about? They wanted to keep it in latin so the common people couldn’t read it for themselves and see the Catholic church was making shit up to fleece everyone of all their time and money. No different from any emperor who declared themselves God. Catholicism is a false religion and a blight for the last 2000 years.
>>75358987actually the Catholic church commissioned it's own vernacular translations and most common people couldn't read anyway so it was a moot point. what you're repeating are very common lies perpetuated by American pastors who want to protect their own power. this isn't even controversial. you could literally just google it and see that I'm right but if you want to follow jack chick and pastor cletus into hell instead it's your choice.
>>75359018You can’t rewrite history. And the alterations you made to the bible invalidate your church. You are sons of the devil no different from the jews who killed Jesus.
>>75356203In females it stops at around 16. Seriously, look it up.
>>75356108Its the world we live in man. You struggle with it because of media brainwashing that portrays women as anything other than whores. Those girls are living their truth.
>>75356108>>75356198
>>75356203
>>75356357I know this is bait, but you're gay gor even typing it out
>>75356357>Women can still do those things,but why would we let them if they are not mentally prepared?
>>75358947>Catholics are the reason you have the BibleNext they'll try>Phillistines are the reason Israel had the arc of the covenant>Babylonians are the reason the jews had Jerusalem
>>75356405>muh manipulation If you are in your fucking 20s and some old wrinkly fuck convinces you to be in a relationship with him then you deserve your status as object.
I don't know why everyone is obsessed with younger women, my cousin married his baby sitter, she's like 8 years older than him and they have like 3 kids now, I've never seen a happier couple.
>>75358947>to try and say the Bible debunks Catholicism is truly low IQcatholics don't even read the bible, they claim to be experts, cite James 2, get btfo by James 2:10, drop any basis of the bible and start appealing to catholic history or some random papist theologian>Im sorry but I trust the Church Fathers more than you or your facebook pastorlol, it's the blind leading the blind
>>75358474>Abortion has lead to medicine that saved us from diarrhea.
>>75356108>now they pull the sides of their thongs up so their strings are clearly visible against the backdrop of their bare hips.This was a trend in the 00s
>>75358987The Catholic Church issued dozens of translations of the Bible to be used for the public, hiring many scholarly translaters and scribes to make new translationsThe reason it was in Latin originally was because that was the local dialect, not because it was some secret language no one understood, everyone knew LatinThis is common Church history, but you'll never actually read any of itThe only translations they fought against were ones that went against the Church and werent authorized>>75359457Sorry, but the Bible you use to try and slander the Church was compiled by the Church in 382 AD (with all the books, even the ones you dont like)>Phillistines are the reason Israel had the arc of the covenant>Babylonians are the reason the jews had JerusalemYou made up something no one says to get mad about it
>>75359607>Catholic church lies after the fact to save faceThe church only wanted all the gold and enslave all mankind. An informed congregation is a free congregation. Catholic’s burn in hell asking why Mary hasn’t reached down to save them.
>>75358474>Wrong. Abortion has lead to medicine that saved us from diarrhea.i knew a cholera pandemic in the early 1800's lead to the idea that it could be treated by keeping the patient hydrated but i didn't realise it wasn't until the 1990 when they started adding sugar to the salt rehydration solution
>>75356515>muh holy book literally written by a bunch of Jews to control the populace>tfw LARP'ers congregate on /fit/
>>75359607It's the same erroneous logic, God's word has and will remain preserved regardless of Philistine, Assyrian, Babylonian, Roman, Catholic or Muslim governmental control. >(even the ones you don't like)Papist insistence on the apocrypha despite not ever reading the bible is strange, but then again, if your religion is entirely based on organizationally approved traditions and orders from popes, what does it matter if you mix in the apocrypha? It's not like catholics give any mind to God's word, otherwise they'd be able to understand basic reproofs from the bible, like the following. >1 Timothy 2:5: For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;No need for a pope, to pray to the saints (including Mary). Our Lord is the only mediator. >1 Corinthians 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?If you're a man, don't have long hair. These two basic teachings are clear, but catholics just ignore them, they follow tradition or convenience, and make God's word to no effect.Not to even mention the matter of alcohol, calling priests "father", graven images and idols, I could argue these also and post evidence from the bible, yet with catholics it always falls to the same lame platitudes, reliance on secular history, dead and burning philosophers and theologians, "Sorry, but I trust the church fathers more than you". Fortunately, the papist church being a farce, this recent trend of online catholicism will die off, numbers will dwindle, you'll eventually fall away, and I hope after that, when a soul winner with a bible eventually comes to your door, you'll have a right heart to actually listen to and consider the matter.
>>75359777Checked Godly digits of truth and conviction.
>>75359777all this shit has been addressed by countless saints and theologians over the last few centuries
>>75359874Lol catholic is crying and saging because he got btfo.
>>75360163i did no such thing, also i wasn't btfo you never even said anything to me, i'm not the same guy you were talking to.
>>75359777checked nice>God's word has and will remain preserved regardless of Philistine, Assyrian, Babylonian, Roman, Catholic or Muslim governmental control.Not necessarily but I see what you meanThe only reason you have the Bible, what is canonized and deemed authentic, is because of the councils done by the Catholic ChurchThere were hundreds of texts known to us today (gnostic) and unknown that the Church had to comb through in order to determine if it is truly the Word of GodThe Church is the reason you are reading the Gospels of Mark, Luke, John, and Matthew, and not the Gospels of Judas, Thomas, or Bartholomew, because the Church made the decision to say they are not God's Word>if your religion is entirely based on organizationally approved traditionsEarly Christian practices were all based in organizationally approved traditions, even the NT writers were influenced by oral traditions>what does it matter if you mix in the apocrypha?Because they are canon texts and belong in the Bible>It's not like catholics give any mind to God's word, otherwise they'd be able to understand basic reproofs from the bibleAgain, they compiled the Bible, thats hard for you to grasp>No need for a pope, to pray to the saints (including Mary).Early Christians prayed to the Saints and Mary, even long before the Catholic Church was physicaly established in RomeThe Pope is a leader, nothing more, you'd be an idiot to not have some kind of leadership in your church to guide people, especially one that is over a billion people >Our Lord is the only mediatorCorrect, the Church says thisYou are confusing intercessors with a mediatorMary and the Saints help pray WITH us to Christ, offering their own prayers to strengthen ours, they are not saving us and they cannot save us, only God can>1 Corinthians 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?>If you're a man, don't have long hair.Jesus has long hair
>>75356108SEX
>>75359777>>75360374To continue>1 Corinthians 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?>If you're a man, don't have long hair.Paul is writing a letter to the Corinthians about church conduct which they are notoriously not good atFor the ancient times, a man having long hair like a woman's is a sign of depravity and sexuality (Corinthian church had a lot of sexual happenings), so for Paul to say for men to not have long hair you need to look at the cultural signficance of it at the time and who he wrote it too, it is nothing more than if someone today said that you need to wear a suit to church>Not to even mention the matter of alcohol, calling priests "father", graven images and idols,Let me guess, grape juice communion?Priests are called "father" because they assumed a parental role of authority when they lead their parish, like the father of a household, they are the father of their parishHow are they graven images or idols when all of them are made for God? No Catholic worships the statues or icons or anything, the reason YOU would think its worship is because your understanding of worship is very weak and watered down>yet with catholics it always falls to the same lame platitudesScripture, the smartest theologians in human history, and writings and traditions that are traced back to when Christ walked the earth are "lame platitudes?">this recent trend of online catholicism will die off, numbers will dwindle, you'll eventually fall awayThe Catholic Church is growing in number lol>when a soul winner with a bible eventually comes to your door, Ill be sure to sit down and explain that he doesnt have the full picture and is lacking crucial details and truths of the faithALSO I forgot>No need for a popeMatthew 16:19
>>75356357Found the jew
>>75359604And it needs to be brought back.
I can't believe I clicked on this thread and there's only one (1) picture of this gardening whoore.
>>75356108>These are 17-19 year oldWell so are you if you can't remember every single teen girl doing this.
>>75360374>Gospels of Judas, Thomas, or BartholomewThis is because they were proven to be fabricated by Gnostics and pseudopigrapha and hence cannot be genuine back when they began circulating by the church fathers. For example, Judas in particular is accepted to have hung himself shortly after betraying Jesus and hence could not have written any gospels.>Early Christian practices were all based in organizationally approved traditionsAnd the old testament was written down and necessarily part of the tradition as without it, you have no basis to evaluate any of the claims regarding Jesus' status as Messiah. Moreover, this further implies that much of the Apocrypha cannot be part of the tradition as it blatantly contradicts the old testament on premise such as with the Gnostic psuedopigrapha.>NT writers were influenced by oral traditionsYou need proof of this. The best is that the teachings of Jesus were initially passed orally. However, even in the first century, the historian Josephus verifies the belief that Jesus was the Messiah by the Christian groups in Jerusalem prior to the first Jewish war. Accepting the standard historical timeline of writings, they were established as the canon within anatolia by the end of the first century AD with some of the church fathers from the region, especially those alive who claimed to have been taught by the apostles, just a few decades later traveling to denounce these other works as the pseudopigrapha they were while attesting that the books they had were actually written by the authors claimed.
>>75360590I think she has a whole youtube channel where she baits with these thumbnails but never actually posts herself naked anywhere else.
>>75360627based. fleece the simps for everything you can
>>75360374>Early Christians prayed to the Saints and Mary, even long before the Catholic ChurchThere is evidence dating to no earlier than the end of the 2nd century that SOME groups were doing so. However, the term the "Catholic Church" (Catholic mean complete or made whole in the language at the time) was a name existing much earlier as used by Ignatius in a letter to the Church at Smyrna, dating to around 110 AD, to refer to the Church or as it was most commonly called "The Assembly of God" to use the more literal translation of what Paul called it.https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0109.htmIt would most honest to question the narrative that early Christian prayed to "the Saints" (a term Paul explicitly used to refer to ALL members of the churches he wrote to) or Mary was even practiced outside a small group of people who may have been declared heretics by the early church fathers in the east as they commonly set out to call out many western groups and were not following the doctrines that they had received from the apostles and that were not in communion with them as heretics as they commonly did. Meanwhile, this became adopted as the members of those groups were the ones who happened to play ball with the Roman state and were then supported by the Roman state and eventually declared as an official religion of the empire. >The Pope is a leader, nothing moreThis is accurate and correct. Some could argue based on the doctrines that have been commonly taught by popes like "give me money and suddenly your dead relatives won't be in hell anymore or can get out of purgatory sooner" are evidence that he cannot even be a legitimate bishop.
>>75357888Wonderful digits. Don’t let your dreams be memes
>>75359777>Not to even mention the matter of alcoholThere is nothing against alcohol in general. Just drunkenness from excessive drinking. When you consider the history of how alcohol was typically used especially when into the early modern period, beer, wine, etc. was used as a way to preserve grains and fruit in the form of beverage. Moreover, due to the lack of knowledge of yeast and its varieties, these beverages generally were not nearly as strong as they are today since the yeast would often be not formidable enough to survive relatively low alcohol levels. Laborers used to drink beer as part of breakfast during the seasons where they needed to work and people would even give it to children as it was seen as nutritive. In some cases, people would prefer to water as the water was generally not potable in some regions. You wouldn't get drunk because it would be like drinking a modern light beer. You would have to be a glutton to really get drunk. The problems with drunkenness that eventually came in the late 19th and early 20th centuries were a result of the potency of alcoholic beverages increasing due to the refinement in the knowledge of yeast cultures while the people drinking were just inheriting the habits of people who lived at a time where a beer or ale they would have for breakfast was 1-2% alcohol, not 5-10%.To top it off, Jesus drank wine and even turned water into strong wine for guests at a wedding in John. There was an acceptable use for it and an unacceptable use for it. What is prohibited are substances that have no other purpose but to be taken as hallucinogens and will induce forms of drunkenness with even the smallest doses. You can have a glass of wine of cup of beer occasionally with dinner. You can't however chug a 12-pack of beer to get drunk.
>>75357193no
name is Vicky Aisha>this is her nowits so over
>>75362341No anon. It just began.
>>75362341>tattoosnever began
>>75361436Yes
>>75356223Lust is necessary because men wouldn't care about relationships if they were sexually sober enough to weigh the pros and cons. Kinda like how male spiders and praying mantis will reproduce even though they will be eaten. There's no benefit other than continuing genetic legacy, but if the urge to reproduce wasn't strong they would die out.
>>75356357>Any guy dating a girl under 24 is a pedophile who wouldn’t be able to handle a woman his ageTrue I want a wife not a pet
>>75356223>Sex and sexuality is for reproducing.>implying "solely" for reproductionEven the Bible disagrees with you
>>75356357>Any guy dating a girl under 24 is a pedophile who wouldn’t be able to handle a woman his ageWhy do I need to handle anyone? This statement just admits women are annoying as fuck to be around and need to be treated as animals to be tamed.
>>75356357These statements are always funny because when you actually read them, men are creepy for dating someone younger than them, but they shouldn't be banned from dating. Because normally women think creepy men shouldn't date anyone, but these men are fine if hey just date someone older. Women literally admit the only problem with these men is they date younger. But they aren't creepy enough not to date whatsoever as long as they date older women. Basically admitting it's just jealousy that the men they think they're entitled to they can't have and they're mad at them but they're no longer mad if they date older women
Whaletail whores aren't a new phenomenon. More like bringing back an old classic.God I hate women so much bros
>"people" taking the lowest hanging bait. Disrespectfrul perforamansu
>>75356108haha imagine her booba being out when she's outside
>>75358303Must’ve been hammered last night can’t believe this thread is still up. The point still stands
>>75356357>she was 23 you sick fuck!
>>75356203Doesn't seem to help much desu
>>75356108Everyone's arguing about gay shit but I can't get enough of these tan lines
Why do 16-18 year old girls all want to get pregnant, then hate children only to want them again in their early 30s?
>>75356108>>75356223>Why are women allowed to dress like its a strip club? When will this end?Because it's a gym, you are supposed to be naked. Gym = Greek 'gumnós' = naked. The nakedness is supposed to be public to set comparative examples of bodily excellence to every member of the polis, and to erotically charge you to transform yourself to also become an erotic being, in a circular exchange of heightening erotic energy. Any clothes are a comprise to prudery.
>>75362341>vein
>>75364338https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/conversations/?p=443Only men were training naked in ancient Greece.
>>75356108>Just when I thought we had witnessed the limits of female promiscuity with skin tight see through booty shorts and sports bras, girls have come up with a new way to be degenerate>>now they pull the sides of their thongs up so their strings are clearly visible against the backdrop of their bare hips. Today a group of barely legal white girls were doing this right in front of me and I absolutely could not take it. These are 17-19 year old girls. STILL GROWING. LITTLE KIDS.>>Why are women allowed to dress like its a strip club? When will this end?You sound so fucking gay it's not even funny. >17-19>little kidAmericano mind rot
>>75356357Roast beef lover detected.
>>75358987>Catholicism is a false religionlike all others
