What is the largest animal could you beat in a fight?I could probably kill a medium-sized dog, but an eagle would probably slit my throat.
Wait a minute. Pitbulls are like a medium sized dog but they're probably the most dangerous dog. I don't think it will be any more difficult to kill a Great Dane than a pitbull. It's all because as we go down the list these animals get more and more difficult to kill but this medium dog versus large dog business, I'm not too sure about that.
>>75612161Was thiking the same. I could take on a dog the size of a pitbull, but not an actual pit bull. Them fuckers are evil.
>>75612161borzoi and rottweilers maul pitbulls like it's a chew toy
>>75612144give me a wooden stick and some time and i could kill an elephant
>>75612144>Humans conquered the world with ingenuity and inventions>AKSHUALLY YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW OUR ARBITRARY BAREFISTED RULESETNerds
>>75612187Stop what you’re doing.
>>75612144I won against a medium sized hog. You just kind of lay on it for a few until it gives up. I also defeated various kinds of goats and sheep in wrestling duels.
What kind of nigga thinks he can beat up an elephant? Lmao
>>75612226Everybody get on the floor
>>75612187Borzoi are sight hounds retard. And rottweilers regularly get BTFOd by pitbulls half their size.I know we like to larp online like it's fantasy monster fights and you found a new meta, but pits are literally bred for cage dog fights. There's a reason they're so hated and so often featured in news articles for attacking and killing other dogs and children. They are bred to be killing machines.
>>75612161Same, I could take on some mid size dogs, but not all of them. Eagles, wolves, kangaroos, I'd have a chance, and I think most everybody would, but it's just a chance, mostly because in the wild they don't attack you all out, they're careful-ish, and you might take some damage.
>>75612231>I won against a medium sized hog. You just kind of lay on it for a few until it gives up.I also defeated various kinds of goats and sheep in wrestling duels.Was this for work or pleasure?
>>75612280>rottweilers regularly get BTFOd by pitbulls half their sizeDoubt. I have a 100lb rot and a 70lb pit. They are the most loving dogs around but when playing the rot will just grab the pit by the neck and pin him like it's nothing. Weight classes exist for a reason.
>>75612144I wouldn't fight a rat personally.
>>75612579Honestly thinking this too. And so many people rated themselves highly about thinking they could take a cat in a fight? Their claws and teeth are razor sharp and their bacteria can infect you and that alone could kill you in bad cases. Cats are extremely agile, vicious, and unpredictable when scared/pissed off/feral or all of the above. I love cats, but all one would have to do is lunge at your face and get the eyes and it's over for you.
>>75612592The list isn't, "I'll fight this and be okay". It's, "I'll fight this and win".Yes, the wolf could maul me pretty badly and I'll probably need hospitalisation to not die. But if I don't give it my throat, I'll kill it faster than it kills me. I will win.
>>75612195A good rock in hand would heem most of those jabronie ass animals
>>75612161You can hit it in the head as hard as an Alaskan malamute or Turkish wolf dog and it won't do fucking shit because it's head I'd shaped like a fucking predator not a deer.
>>75612686The greatest samurai of all time could 100% is a stick/staff and wreck a tiger or something, spear seems more irl.
>>75612696Like idk dude I'm hitting a 100lb fighting dog in the head in my fist 110% I think it stays conscious and angry by wicked divine spirit alone.
>>75612681You think you'll live long enough to kill the wolf if you willingly give it your throat?
>>75612709That's the point, dumbass. When you fight canines, you give them your left hand, and use your right to fuck them up. Your left hand will be badly mauled and you will require hospitalisation. But you will kill the pooch first.
>>75612681You are foolishly. Why would it go for your hand? It wants to kill you. You will lose.
>>75612144>elephant higher than grizzlyso there are people who think they cant beat a grizzly, but an elephant should be doable?
I think an article said that we are the best throwers in the animal kingdom, if you could drop the unarmed rule you could probably crack the skull of anything with a rock.
>>75613651LOL what a silly little dude. Elephants are such cool animals.
>>75613829Well if there was no unarmed rule then we could simply just have a gun and auto win for the most part, although even with a gun I'm not sure I'd be winning against a grizzly
>>75612144By "beat" do they mean Kill, or force into Retreat.Theoretically, a peak human could kill a chimpanzee with technique.But animals like lions aren't interested in fights to the death; they prefer easy prey, so they may just stop caring if you make yourself appear like too much trouble.
>>75612144> 28% of Americans couldnt kill a ratGrim.
>>75612144>more people think that they can beat a chimp than a kangarooholy fucking shitive seen both and theres just no chance that someone that can beat a chimp would lose to a kangaroo. kangaroos are actually crazy easy to wrestle (i wrestled one when i was 17) as long as you grab it first
>>75615494>large male chimpnot even a large chimp, i would rather fight an alpha red kangaroo over even a adolescent chimp just because im fairly certain that i can choke it out without any scratches but the chimp has a chance of ripping my fingers off
>>75612592you grab it and smash it, you are x10-20 times larger imagine being afraid of a fucking house cat
>>75615494fkn kek roos don't get to three meters in height
>>75615518>fingersit'll rip your arms straight out of their sockets and beat you with them. it'll get hold of your jaw and rip your face off. they're fucking insanely strong and insanely savage. not you anon, but doubting anons need to look up videos of them hunting in packs.
>>75612144Imagine thinking you couldn't take a house cat.
>>75615543i was talking about an adolescent one ripping my fingers off, i know an adult can rip arms off but surely a child chimp cant? and apologies for >>75615518 being unreadable, i didnt sleep enough last night
>>75612144>rat, house cat, gooseObviously I'd fuck em up. >medium/large dog, eagleI'd win, but I'd probably be injured. The dog/eagle would bite/claw me first, but once I had it in my hands I could crush it to death. >King cobraI could easily kill it, but if it bit me, I'd probably die from venom afterward. >KangarooMaaaybe. Only if I got the drop on it. If it struck me first, I'm dead. >CrocodileSame deal as kangaroo, but only if it's a small one. Otherwise, no. >the restNo chance in hell.
>>75615448Geese being super mean and aggressive is over-memed. Like yes, they can be aggressive, but people forget it's still a 15 lb bird with fragile bones, and no talons in this case to boot.
>>75612242People just have this image of elephants being these docile creatures. Like yeah, they don't go looking for fights, but it's not just gonna let you try to crush it's skull (and you couldn't do it unarmed anyway).
>>75612592can confirm. my cat in feral state is fucking teriffic and hes only like 15lbs
>>75612144> It is reported that less than 50% of Brits could defeat a goose in unarmed combat
>>75612144>Eagle Just walk inside a building like bro just stop being outside lmao
>>75612144In an environment with concrete or a lot of rocks anything I could pick up and swing.
>>75612144Manatee. Punch him right in his stupid fat fucking face.
